为方便理解,问题略有删减。
问题:我是一个很有条理的人,而且我喜欢进行策划。当我与同事分享理念时,我有时候会花大量的时间去汇总非常详尽的邮件和文件,然而我通常得不到我同事的回复。
有时候我得到的是一个字的回复,因此我还得去猜测他们说的是我哪一部分的工作,或者他们这么回复有什么用意。最糟糕的情形在于,当我得到一个较短的回复,可能只有一个句子,我就得回过头来重新做很多工作。
我工作很卖力,而且我觉得人们并不关心我花了多少时间才准备好这些材料。我哪个地方做的不对?他们恨我吗?
——阿里克斯
尊敬的阿里克斯,
你的同事可能并不是因为恨你才忽视你的邮件或简短回复,很有可能只是他们处理工作和邮件的方式不同罢了。你向别人发送了很多信息,并期待他人能够给你长篇大论、面面俱到的回复。有时候,别人在看你邮件时,并没预料到邮件中会有这么多文件。
如果你希望与对方交流自己的理念和详尽的反馈,或者与合作方沟通,一开始就发送一封事无巨细的邮件并非是最好的方式。在如何表达自身理念的问题上,如果你从更广泛的角度思考一下,而不是仅把目光放在邮件回复上,你就有机会打开新的思路,从而更加有效地与同事共事。
在我看来,如果你决定听从建议专栏的忠告,请务必做到的事情就是,弄清楚自己的个性对自身沟通偏好的影响。要记住,要以更加包容的态度对待他人的沟通偏好。通常,人们会认为其他人的处事方法会和自己一样,但事实在于,我们可能会通过不同的方式来获得结论。喜欢向他人征求意见的人会把话说开;喜欢独立工作的人通常喜欢自己先琢磨一阵子。
发现自身最突出的个性特征对于更好地了解如何与他人沟通至关重要。据我所知,有很多人极其信赖其Myers-Briggs评估,后者主要专注于评估一个人是属于内向还是外向型性格。在发掘个人特长以及团队寻求最佳方式进行合作的对话方面,CliftonStrengths评估表尤为实用。
但我个人认为,最有效的莫过于Enneagram。该框架不仅仅包括静态的个性类型,同时还对人们在顺境和逆境中的反应进行了详细的描述。例如,在第七种类型中,我属于非常外向的人。当我在最佳状态时,我可以成为某个项目的优秀推销人,对于各种可能性感到十分振奋,能够迅速地与他人建立联系,并异常积极地响应其他人的请求。当我心情不佳时,我便变得难以接受其他人的理念。我可以专注地想出一大堆新的理念,以防某一理念无法奏效。我喜欢与他人开门见山地谈论事情,而且如果我变得心情不佳的时候,我有可能会忽略某些人高谈阔论的邮件,因为我会非常专注于我自身的工作。
不管你选择哪种工具,不管是Enneagram、Myers-Briggs、CliftonStrengths或其他工具,它都提供了一个更好地了解自身个性的通用框架,以及有关你与其他人共事的具体洞见。在通过口头或书面来传达信息时要特别注意;自己是喜欢独立完成任务还是通过团队合作;自己是否会依靠直觉来做决策,还是先搜集数据。多少了解一下自己的行事风格以及它对工作的影响,对自己十分有益;了解其他的个性以及自己会对这些个性做出什么样的反应,则是属于下一个层面的问题。
尽管有时候,将自己的性格通过测试来定性听起来有点冷酷,但我发现对自身性格有着更清楚的认识会更有助于与别人沟通,有利于别人了解如何与自己共事。当然,测试给你打上的标签并不能代表你的全部,但如果你以包容的心态来看待它们,你会对自我或你认识的某人有新的发现。我还注意到,测试有助于我发现和纠正一些不好的习惯。
你所面临的更深层次挑战——想想你的沟通方式是否会与其他人发生冲突——比以前任何时候都更具有现实关联性,因为受冠状病毒疫情影响,现在越来越多的人都在远程工作。即便是在同一个屋檐下,我们也很难去揣摩某一个人的行事风格。由于人们如今都依靠电子邮件和其他线上沟通方式,因此,现在对于你以及所有人来说正是一个好时候,可以询问他人如何以一种最有效的方式来为他们提供信息。
你可以问同事和合作方以下问题,来了解他们的沟通方式:
如果有人想向你询问某事,最好是通过哪种方式?
在与你打交道时,哪种方式最不实用?
关于某个项目,你会在哪些重要时间点跟进?
我能通过哪种有效的方式来告知你最新的进展?
如果我没有收到你的回复,你希望我如何跟进?
无论你希望在什么时候重新建立工作关系中的默契,这类问题都可以为你带来新的洞见。除了你获得的数据之外,你也在告诉你的同事,你十分在意与他们的合作方式,与此同时既不增添他们的负担,也不会为其带来额外的工作。
我发现在启动一个新项目,与新同事共事或确认如何开展合作时(一对一会面,年度回顾,询问新项目的进展),弄清楚沟通和工作方式尤为有益。你无需一次问完所有问题或一次性与共事的所有人沟通这件事,只需选择那些最适合你和自身地位的问题即可。
进一步来讲,你可以使用利兹•弗斯里恩和莫里•威斯特•达菲创建的《与本人合作指南》工作表。二者是《请勿见怪:正视工作情绪的潜在力量》一书的作者。这篇指南讲述了人们希望以什么样的方式接受反馈,以及他人在与自己打交道时最应关注的事情。
在与同事打交道之前,先自己花点时间回答这些问题,这样,你便可以告诉他人该如何与自己打交道。更多地介绍自己一贯的工作方式有助于让他人更好地了解如何与自己共事。你可能也会注意到,你一直在期待其他人去做自己通常会做的事情。
祝关系融洽,
珍(财富中文网)
译者:冯丰
审校:夏林
为方便理解,问题略有删减。
问题:我是一个很有条理的人,而且我喜欢进行策划。当我与同事分享理念时,我有时候会花大量的时间去汇总非常详尽的邮件和文件,然而我通常得不到我同事的回复。
有时候我得到的是一个字的回复,因此我还得去猜测他们说的是我哪一部分的工作,或者他们这么回复有什么用意。最糟糕的情形在于,当我得到一个较短的回复,可能只有一个句子,我就得回过头来重新做很多工作。
我工作很卖力,而且我觉得人们并不关心我花了多少时间才准备好这些材料。我哪个地方做的不对?他们恨我吗?
——阿里克斯
尊敬的阿里克斯,
你的同事可能并不是因为恨你才忽视你的邮件或简短回复,很有可能只是他们处理工作和邮件的方式不同罢了。你向别人发送了很多信息,并期待他人能够给你长篇大论、面面俱到的回复。有时候,别人在看你邮件时,并没预料到邮件中会有这么多文件。
如果你希望与对方交流自己的理念和详尽的反馈,或者与合作方沟通,一开始就发送一封事无巨细的邮件并非是最好的方式。在如何表达自身理念的问题上,如果你从更广泛的角度思考一下,而不是仅把目光放在邮件回复上,你就有机会打开新的思路,从而更加有效地与同事共事。
在我看来,如果你决定听从建议专栏的忠告,请务必做到的事情就是,弄清楚自己的个性对自身沟通偏好的影响。要记住,要以更加包容的态度对待他人的沟通偏好。通常,人们会认为其他人的处事方法会和自己一样,但事实在于,我们可能会通过不同的方式来获得结论。喜欢向他人征求意见的人会把话说开;喜欢独立工作的人通常喜欢自己先琢磨一阵子。
发现自身最突出的个性特征对于更好地了解如何与他人沟通至关重要。据我所知,有很多人极其信赖其Myers-Briggs评估,后者主要专注于评估一个人是属于内向还是外向型性格。在发掘个人特长以及团队寻求最佳方式进行合作的对话方面,CliftonStrengths评估表尤为实用。
但我个人认为,最有效的莫过于Enneagram。该框架不仅仅包括静态的个性类型,同时还对人们在顺境和逆境中的反应进行了详细的描述。例如,在第七种类型中,我属于非常外向的人。当我在最佳状态时,我可以成为某个项目的优秀推销人,对于各种可能性感到十分振奋,能够迅速地与他人建立联系,并异常积极地响应其他人的请求。当我心情不佳时,我便变得难以接受其他人的理念。我可以专注地想出一大堆新的理念,以防某一理念无法奏效。我喜欢与他人开门见山地谈论事情,而且如果我变得心情不佳的时候,我有可能会忽略某些人高谈阔论的邮件,因为我会非常专注于我自身的工作。
不管你选择哪种工具,不管是Enneagram、Myers-Briggs、CliftonStrengths或其他工具,它都提供了一个更好地了解自身个性的通用框架,以及有关你与其他人共事的具体洞见。在通过口头或书面来传达信息时要特别注意;自己是喜欢独立完成任务还是通过团队合作;自己是否会依靠直觉来做决策,还是先搜集数据。多少了解一下自己的行事风格以及它对工作的影响,对自己十分有益;了解其他的个性以及自己会对这些个性做出什么样的反应,则是属于下一个层面的问题。
尽管有时候,将自己的性格通过测试来定性听起来有点冷酷,但我发现对自身性格有着更清楚的认识会更有助于与别人沟通,有利于别人了解如何与自己共事。当然,测试给你打上的标签并不能代表你的全部,但如果你以包容的心态来看待它们,你会对自我或你认识的某人有新的发现。我还注意到,测试有助于我发现和纠正一些不好的习惯。
你所面临的更深层次挑战——想想你的沟通方式是否会与其他人发生冲突——比以前任何时候都更具有现实关联性,因为受冠状病毒疫情影响,现在越来越多的人都在远程工作。即便是在同一个屋檐下,我们也很难去揣摩某一个人的行事风格。由于人们如今都依靠电子邮件和其他线上沟通方式,因此,现在对于你以及所有人来说正是一个好时候,可以询问他人如何以一种最有效的方式来为他们提供信息。
你可以问同事和合作方以下问题,来了解他们的沟通方式:
如果有人想向你询问某事,最好是通过哪种方式?
在与你打交道时,哪种方式最不实用?
关于某个项目,你会在哪些重要时间点跟进?
我能通过哪种有效的方式来告知你最新的进展?
如果我没有收到你的回复,你希望我如何跟进?
无论你希望在什么时候重新建立工作关系中的默契,这类问题都可以为你带来新的洞见。除了你获得的数据之外,你也在告诉你的同事,你十分在意与他们的合作方式,与此同时既不增添他们的负担,也不会为其带来额外的工作。
我发现在启动一个新项目,与新同事共事或确认如何开展合作时(一对一会面,年度回顾,询问新项目的进展),弄清楚沟通和工作方式尤为有益。你无需一次问完所有问题或一次性与共事的所有人沟通这件事,只需选择那些最适合你和自身地位的问题即可。
进一步来讲,你可以使用利兹•弗斯里恩和莫里•威斯特•达菲创建的《与本人合作指南》工作表。二者是《请勿见怪:正视工作情绪的潜在力量》一书的作者。这篇指南讲述了人们希望以什么样的方式接受反馈,以及他人在与自己打交道时最应关注的事情。
在与同事打交道之前,先自己花点时间回答这些问题,这样,你便可以告诉他人该如何与自己打交道。更多地介绍自己一贯的工作方式有助于让他人更好地了解如何与自己共事。你可能也会注意到,你一直在期待其他人去做自己通常会做的事情。
祝关系融洽,
珍(财富中文网)
译者:冯丰
审校:夏林
The question has been lightly edited and condensed for clarity.
Q: I’m organized, and I like to plan. When I want to share ideas with people I work with, I sometimes put together very thorough emails and documents that take a lot of work, but often, I get no response from my coworkers.
Sometimes I get a one-word response, and I have to guess what part of my work they’re responding to or what they mean. The worst is when I get a short, maybe one-sentence reply that means I have to go back and redo a bunch of my work.
I work hard, and I feel like people don’t even care about how much time I am spending preparing everything. What am I doing wrong? Do they hate me?
—Alex
Dear Alex,
Your coworkers are probably not ignoring your emails or giving short responses because they hate you. , they have a different approach to work and email than you do. You’re sending lots of information and expecting people to give you long and thoughtful responses. Sometimes, you send detailed plans without telling people the documents are coming.
If you’re looking for a conversation about your ideas, detailed feedback, or collaborators who want to build something with you, starting with a massively detailed email isn’t the best way to get there. If you think more broadly about how you can convey your ideas, instead of focusing only on getting a response by email, that shift in perspective is going to open up new ways for you to work more effectively with your colleagues.
My No. 1 please-if-you-do-one-thing-from-this-advice-column-do-this-one-thing is for you to identify how your personality informs how you like to communicate. Be mindful about how you can be more open to other people’s communication preferences. It’s quite common for people to assume that others will naturally approach things the same way they do, but in reality, we can have very different ways of reaching our conclusions. People who like to bounce ideas off other people like to talk things out. People who like to work independently often prefer to sit with something for a while.
Being able to identify some of your strongest personality traits is critical to better understanding how to communicate with others. I know loads of people who swear by their Myers-Briggs assessment, which has a big focus on whether you’re introverted or extroverted. The CliftonStrengths assessment is particularly useful for reframing conversations around what people are best at and for teams seeking the best ways to work together.
Personally, I have found the Enneagram to be most helpful. The framework goes beyond static personality types to include nuanced insights on how people respond when they’re doing well versus when they’re more stressed. For example, as a Type Seven, I’m very extroverted. When I’m at my best, I can be a great hype person for a project—excited about possibilities, quick to make connections, and super responsive to other people. When I’m stressed, I have a harder time being present for other people’s ideas. I can get focused on brainstorming lots of new ideas in case one thing doesn’t work. I love talking things out with people, and if I’m stressed, I’m likely to skip over someone’s big idea email because I’m so focused on my own output.
Whichever tool you choose—whether it’s Enneagram, Myers-Briggs, CliftonStrengths, or something else—it will give you a general framework for better understanding your personality, with specific insights that will be relevant to how you work with people. Pay special attention to whether you tend to process information verbally or through writing; whether you prefer to work through things on your own or in groups; and whether you prefer to collect data before making a decision or do things more intuitively. Having some insight into your style and how it impacts your work is helpful; being able to recognize other personality styles and how they might intersect with yours is the next level.
While it can sometimes be a harsh dose of reality to see aspects of your personality boiled down in an archetype or quiz, I’ve found that having a better awareness of what my style is makes it easier to talk to people about how to work with me. None of the archetypes or styles are going to be 100% true to you. If you approach them with an open mind, you’ll almost certainly recognize something in yourself or someone you know, and that’s useful. I’ve also noticed that it’s easier for me to identify and correct patterns when I’m slipping into behaviors I’d like to change.
The deeper challenge that you’re facing—thinking about how your communication style fits with other people’s—is one that’s more relevant than ever, now that more people are working remotely as a result of the coronavirus. It’s hard enough to guess what people’s approach is when you work in the same place. Now that you’re relying on email and other online communications more than ever, it’s a good time for you, and for all of us, to check in with people about how you can best get them information in a way that’s useful.
You can use the confusion about what work even looks like while more people are working remotely as an opportunity to check in. You might find that you have more time for one-on-one conversations. Or you may find yourself suddenly on Zoom calls with groups of people. Here are some questions aimed at giving you insight into how people communicate that you can ask your colleagues and collaborators:
What’s the best way for someone to approach you with an ask?
What’s the least useful way for people to approach you?
When are the key times you like to check in on a project?
How can I share updates with you in a way that’s helpful?
If I don’t hear back from you, how would you like for me to follow up?
Anytime you’re looking to reset the chemistry in a work relationship, questions like this can give you new insight. Beyond the data you’ll get, you’ll also show your colleagues that you care about how you can work with them in ways that don’t burden them or make extra work for them.
I find checking in on communication and working styles is especially helpful when kicking off a new project, working with new people, or during check-ins about how you can work together (one-on-one meetings, annual reviews, debriefs about how a project went). You don’t have to ask all of these questions at once or reach out to everyone you work with simultaneously. Simply choose the questions that most apply to you and your situation.
To dig deeper, you can use this Guide to Working With Me worksheet, created by Liz Fosslien and Mollie West Duffy, the authors of No Hard Feelings: The Secret Power of Embracing Emotions at Work. Their guide touches on how you like to receive feedback and the most important things to know when communicating with you.
Spend some time answering the questions for yourself before you go to your colleagues, so that you’re able to talk to people about what works for you. Having more language around your default way of working will help you give people a better idea of how to work with you. You might also notice that you’ve been expecting other people to do what you would naturally do.
Sending you good vibes,
Jen