大企业的利益与迫在眉睫的“气候战争”能否并存?这是我们这个时代面临的一个核心问题,德国可能很快给出答案。
德国周日举行了联邦选举,选举结果表明德国政治格局发生了根本性的、或许是永久性的变化。新现实尚未引起关注,但现在德国的权力平衡掌握在左翼环保主义者和右翼资本主义维护者手中。德国的政局现在取决于双方能否达成合作。
巨变
中右翼的基督教民主党(CDU)和中左翼的社会民主党(SPD)一直是德国的主流政党或者全民党。现在他们依旧是德国最大的两个政党,但他们获得的选票比例却远远低于历史得票率。
基督教民主党及其合作党派巴伐利亚基督教社会联盟(CSU)组成的全国联盟,在此次选举中得票率只有24%,是该阵营二战以来表现最差的一次。社会民主党得票率接近26%,成为德国联邦议院的第一大党,但远低于其在2002年成为议院第一大党时38.5%的得票率。
绿党以接近15%的得票率位居第三,得票率创历史新高,但依旧令人失望,因为绿党在今年早些时候的民调支持率接近25%。右倾自由派政党自由民主党(FDP)得票率约11.5%,排在第四位,是该政党十多年来表现最好的一次。
有未来眼光的人会发现一个有趣的现象:首次投票者主要把票投给了自由民主党(23%)和绿党(22%),社会民主党和基督教民主党/基督教社会联盟的得票率分别为15%和10%,极右翼政党另类选择党(AfD)和极左翼政党左翼党(Die Linke)得票率只有个位数。这意味着在可以预见的未来,德国政局将是一场四方角逐,边缘党派将不会参与其中。
首先是眼下的德国新执政联盟的组建。
理论上,社会民主党和基督教民主党/基督教社会联盟可以再组建一个“大联合政府”,即将离任的总理安吉拉·默克尔所领导的四届政府,有三届都采用了这种形式,但双方都已经排除了这种可能性。与此同时,左翼党在周日表现糟糕,其得票率没有达到德国比例代表制规定的5%的门槛,这意味着德国不会出现由社会民主党领导的“红-红-绿”左翼联合政府。
这代表下一届政府很有可能是由绿党和自由民主党参与组建的三方联合政府。这两个政府现在将左右德国的政府领导人人选——他们将决定社会民主党的奥拉夫·绍尔茨还是基督教民主党的阿明·拉谢特将成为德国下一任总理。自由民主党党魁克里斯蒂安·林德纳在周日晚上投票结束之后表示,他要做的第一件事是与绿党商讨接下来的动作。绿党党魁之一、总理候选人安娜莱娜·贝尔博克认同他的观点。
新协议
德国的三方联合政府(各州政府一直是这种格局,但联邦政府自上世纪50年代以来从未出现过三方联合政府)都有与每个政党的颜色相对应的绰号:黑色代表基督教民主党/基督教社会联盟,红色代表社会民主党,绿色代表绿党,黄色代表自由民主党。如果绿党和自由民主党决定支持社会民主党,他们将组成“红黄绿”(红绿灯的颜色)联合政府。如果他们选择支持保守派,他们将组成“黑黄绿”(牙买加国旗的颜色)联合政府。
无论绿党还是自由民主党都不是单一议题政党,但他们在核心问题上都会坚持自己的立场。绿党的核心理念是紧急应对气候危机,而自由派则旗帜鲜明地提出对企业和富人加税。
气候变化科学在德国没有争议,因为德国两个月前才刚刚遭遇了毁灭性的洪水,因此绿党和自由民主党(以及其他所有大型政党)都同意政府需要在这方面加大力度。这两个政党都希望加快德国的数字化建设速度。
问题是必要投资的资金从何而来?绿党希望德国政府能够带头放宽借款限制,而自由民主党更愿意相信市场,并且希望扩大而是不放弃德国“债务刹车”机制。在欧洲舞台上,绿党希望建立财政联盟;但自由派却反对这种做法。
因此,在决定组建红黄绿联合政府或者黑黄绿联合政府之前,这两个政党首先必须确定两党之间能否建立起合作的桥梁。两党以前曾经进行过尝试,但未能成功。但失败的经验可能让双方这一次更有可能达成合作。
2017年,默克尔曾尝试组建黑黄绿联合政府。基督教民主党、绿党和自由民主党进行了数月谈判,但林德纳突然退出,原因是各方在环境和移民政策上存在分歧。他表示,绿党严重亲移民的立场会令当时飞速崛起的极右翼政党另类选择党得利。最终,基督教民主党/基督教社会联盟和社会民主党组建了大联合政府,但这个结果都不符合双方的预期。
这件事导致林德纳的信誉受损,如果他希望为自由民主党树立“权力党”的形象,而不是一个固执己见的政党,如果他希望获得梦寐以求的财政部长的职位,这一次他必须做出更多妥协。绿党已经表示,只要政府能真正开始应对气候变化,他们会愿意在其他方面做出妥协。
现在全世界可能都在关注绍尔茨和拉谢特的总理宝座之争(在各方达成协议之前,默克尔将继续担任总理),但各方目前在幕后的角力可能对未来更有指导意义。(财富中文网)
翻译:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
大企业的利益与迫在眉睫的“气候战争”能否并存?这是我们这个时代面临的一个核心问题,德国可能很快给出答案。
德国周日举行了联邦选举,选举结果表明德国政治格局发生了根本性的、或许是永久性的变化。新现实尚未引起关注,但现在德国的权力平衡掌握在左翼环保主义者和右翼资本主义维护者手中。德国的政局现在取决于双方能否达成合作。
巨变
中右翼的基督教民主党(CDU)和中左翼的社会民主党(SPD)一直是德国的主流政党或者全民党。现在他们依旧是德国最大的两个政党,但他们获得的选票比例却远远低于历史得票率。
基督教民主党及其合作党派巴伐利亚基督教社会联盟(CSU)组成的全国联盟,在此次选举中得票率只有24%,是该阵营二战以来表现最差的一次。社会民主党得票率接近26%,成为德国联邦议院的第一大党,但远低于其在2002年成为议院第一大党时38.5%的得票率。
绿党以接近15%的得票率位居第三,得票率创历史新高,但依旧令人失望,因为绿党在今年早些时候的民调支持率接近25%。右倾自由派政党自由民主党(FDP)得票率约11.5%,排在第四位,是该政党十多年来表现最好的一次。
有未来眼光的人会发现一个有趣的现象:首次投票者主要把票投给了自由民主党(23%)和绿党(22%),社会民主党和基督教民主党/基督教社会联盟的得票率分别为15%和10%,极右翼政党另类选择党(AfD)和极左翼政党左翼党(Die Linke)得票率只有个位数。这意味着在可以预见的未来,德国政局将是一场四方角逐,边缘党派将不会参与其中。
首先是眼下的德国新执政联盟的组建。
理论上,社会民主党和基督教民主党/基督教社会联盟可以再组建一个“大联合政府”,即将离任的总理安吉拉·默克尔所领导的四届政府,有三届都采用了这种形式,但双方都已经排除了这种可能性。与此同时,左翼党在周日表现糟糕,其得票率没有达到德国比例代表制规定的5%的门槛,这意味着德国不会出现由社会民主党领导的“红-红-绿”左翼联合政府。
这代表下一届政府很有可能是由绿党和自由民主党参与组建的三方联合政府。这两个政府现在将左右德国的政府领导人人选——他们将决定社会民主党的奥拉夫·绍尔茨还是基督教民主党的阿明·拉谢特将成为德国下一任总理。自由民主党党魁克里斯蒂安·林德纳在周日晚上投票结束之后表示,他要做的第一件事是与绿党商讨接下来的动作。绿党党魁之一、总理候选人安娜莱娜·贝尔博克认同他的观点。
新协议
德国的三方联合政府(各州政府一直是这种格局,但联邦政府自上世纪50年代以来从未出现过三方联合政府)都有与每个政党的颜色相对应的绰号:黑色代表基督教民主党/基督教社会联盟,红色代表社会民主党,绿色代表绿党,黄色代表自由民主党。如果绿党和自由民主党决定支持社会民主党,他们将组成“红黄绿”(红绿灯的颜色)联合政府。如果他们选择支持保守派,他们将组成“黑黄绿”(牙买加国旗的颜色)联合政府。
无论绿党还是自由民主党都不是单一议题政党,但他们在核心问题上都会坚持自己的立场。绿党的核心理念是紧急应对气候危机,而自由派则旗帜鲜明地提出对企业和富人加税。
气候变化科学在德国没有争议,因为德国两个月前才刚刚遭遇了毁灭性的洪水,因此绿党和自由民主党(以及其他所有大型政党)都同意政府需要在这方面加大力度。这两个政党都希望加快德国的数字化建设速度。
问题是必要投资的资金从何而来?绿党希望德国政府能够带头放宽借款限制,而自由民主党更愿意相信市场,并且希望扩大而是不放弃德国“债务刹车”机制。在欧洲舞台上,绿党希望建立财政联盟;但自由派却反对这种做法。
因此,在决定组建红黄绿联合政府或者黑黄绿联合政府之前,这两个政党首先必须确定两党之间能否建立起合作的桥梁。两党以前曾经进行过尝试,但未能成功。但失败的经验可能让双方这一次更有可能达成合作。
2017年,默克尔曾尝试组建黑黄绿联合政府。基督教民主党、绿党和自由民主党进行了数月谈判,但林德纳突然退出,原因是各方在环境和移民政策上存在分歧。他表示,绿党严重亲移民的立场会令当时飞速崛起的极右翼政党另类选择党得利。最终,基督教民主党/基督教社会联盟和社会民主党组建了大联合政府,但这个结果都不符合双方的预期。
这件事导致林德纳的信誉受损,如果他希望为自由民主党树立“权力党”的形象,而不是一个固执己见的政党,如果他希望获得梦寐以求的财政部长的职位,这一次他必须做出更多妥协。绿党已经表示,只要政府能真正开始应对气候变化,他们会愿意在其他方面做出妥协。
现在全世界可能都在关注绍尔茨和拉谢特的总理宝座之争(在各方达成协议之前,默克尔将继续担任总理),但各方目前在幕后的角力可能对未来更有指导意义。(财富中文网)
翻译:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
Can big-business interests co-exist with an urgent climate fightback? That's one of the core questions of our time—and Germany may soon provide the answer.
The country held federal elections on Sunday, and the results suggest a radical and perhaps permanent realignment of the German political landscape. The new reality isn't in sharp focus yet, but the balance of power seems to now rest in the hands of left-wing environmentalists and right-wing defenders of capitalism. Everything now depends on their ability to cooperate—or not.
All change
The center-right Christian Democrats (CDU) and the center-left Social Democrats (SPD) have traditionally held the status of Volksparteien, or people's parties. For now, they remain the biggest beasts on the scene, but with significantly lower shares of the vote than they have traditionally won.
The CDU and its Bavarian partner party, the Christian Social Union (CSU)—the two operate in tandem on the national stage—got their worst postwar result, with 24% of the vote between them. The SPD emerged from the election with a share of nearly 26%, making it the biggest party in the Bundestag, but that's a far cry from the 38.5% it won in 2002, the last time it came out on top.
The Greens came in third, with nearly 15% of the vote—a historically large share of the vote, albeit disappointing for a party that was polling around 25% earlier this year. The right-leaning, liberal Free Democrats (FDP) won fourth place with around 11.5% of the vote; its best performance in over a decade.
Future-gazers will be intrigued to note that first-time voters opted overwhelmingly for the FDP (23%) and Greens (22%), with the SPD and CDU/CSU trailing behind with 15% and 10% respectively, and the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) and far-left Left party (Die Linke) scoring single digits. This suggests that, for the foreseeable future, German politics will be a four-way tussle in which the fringes will not be involved.
That future begins now, with the formation of Germany's next governing coalition.
The SPD and CDU/CSU could theoretically form another "grand coalition," like those that have comprised three of outgoing Chancellor Angela Merkel's four governments, but both sides have all but ruled that out. Meanwhile, Die Linke's poor showing on Sunday—it just failed to reach the 5% threshold under Germany's proportional representation system—means there will be no "red-red-green" leftist coalition with the SPD at the helm.
That means the next government will almost certainly be a three-way coalition featuring both the Greens and the FDP. Those two parties are now Germany's joint kingmakers—they will effectively get to decide whether the SPD's Olaf Scholz or the CDU's Armin Laschet get to be the next chancellor. As FDP leader Christian Lindner said after the polls closed on Sunday evening, the first thing he is going to do is talk to the Greens about what to do next. Annalena Baerbock, the Greens' co-leader and candidate for chancellor, agreed.
New deal
In Germany, three-way coalitions (a longstanding reality in states, but not on the federal level since the 1950s) have nicknames corresponding to the parties' colors—black for the CDU/CSU, red for the SPD, green for the Greens, yellow for the FDP. If the Greens and FDP decide to support the Social Democrats, this would be known as a "traffic-light" coalition. If they opt to prop up the conservatives, that would be "Jamaica" (a flag reference.)
Neither the Greens nor the FDP are exactly single-issue parties, but both have core stances on which they are unlikely to compromise. For the Greens, it's all about urgently combating the climate crisis, while the liberals have drawn a line in the sand regarding tax hikes for corporations and the rich.
With the science of climate change not being up for debate in Germany—a country that got hit by catastrophic flooding less than two months ago—both the Greens and FDP (and indeed all the other big parties) agree that more needs to be done on that front. They also both want to speed up Germany's digitalization.
The question is, how to pay for all the necessary investment? The Greens would want the German government to take the lead with a relaxation of borrowing limits, while the FDP would rather trust the markets and wants to expand, not ditch, the German "debt brake." On the European stage, the Greens want fiscal union; the liberals most certainly do not.
So, before they decide whether to back a traffic-light or Jamaica configuration, these two parties must first figure out if they can build a bridge between themselves. They have tried this before, unsuccessfully. However, that experience could actually make a deal more likely this time round.
In 2017, Merkel tried to organize a Jamaica coalition. The CDU, Greens and FPD spent months in talks before Lindner abruptly walked out, citing differences over environmental and migration policy—he said the Greens' heavily pro-immigration stance would play into the hands of the far-right AfD, which was surging at the time. As a result, the CDU/CSU and SPD ended up forming another grand coalition, which neither side wanted.
The experience battered Lindner's reputation and, if he wants the FDP to be seen as a party of power rather than obstinacy—and if he wants to get the finance-minister post that he so covets—he needs to be more compromising this time. The Greens have already indicated that, as long as the climate fightback begins in earnest, they are willing to compromise on other points.
The world's eyes may be on the contest between Scholz and Laschet for the post of chancellor—a role that Merkel will continue to play until a deal is sealed—but what happens behind the scenes now could prove more instructive.