美国大选季已经正式拉开帷幕,目前美国总统唐纳德·特朗普和前副总统乔·拜登展开了第一周的角逐。
如果没有爆发疫情,我们可能会看到特朗普马不停蹄地前往关键州出席竞选集会。我们会听到人们排队进场,等着听总统先生花几个小时即兴讲述“政治迫害”和“瞌睡虫乔”的故事。当然,他那些更离谱的言论肯定会被媒体争相报道。
拜登也会在全国巡回演讲,召开潜在选民集会,他将展现出亲民的魅力,同时还会不时表现出精心设计的(或者一时冲动下的)强硬态度(比如对特朗普说:“听着,胖子”)。
选举会成为未来六个月媒体报道的重头戏。CNN的字幕条会变得非常夸张。竞选辩论会打破收视率。然后美国选民在11月份前往投票。
但很显然,今年竞选的情况与以往不同。由于在可以预见的未来,大部分州将继续采取社会疏离措施,因此这两位候选人无法进行巡回演讲。
美国目前每天的新冠肺炎死亡病例接近2,000人,现在举行公开竞选活动似乎并不明智,而且每位候选人现在都必须把对自己的定位调整为准战时指挥官。目前美国新增失业人数1,600万人,许多人不得不担心眼前的生计问题:如何支付租金和养家糊口。人们显然没有心思花时间参与总统大选。
从大众媒体的报道中可以看出美国政治上的混乱:《纽约时报》用了一个戏谑的标题“我们终究还要进行选举”。一篇评论文章中已经提到了最糟糕的情况:“美国今年不举行大选,就是在践踏宪法的尊严。”本周末,米歇尔·奥巴马发起了扩大缺席投票的新倡议。
那么,今年大选当前的战况到底如何?本文回答了几个热点问题。
今年是否会举行大选?
原定于11月3日星期二举行的总统大选绝对不会取消或推迟。这是联邦法律规定的日期,即使现任总统唐纳德·特朗普也没有权力修改。修改大选日期,必须由国会通过法律,而这样的法律在民主党把持的众议院内通过的概率微乎其微。
美国历史上从来没有取消或推迟过总统大选。1916年和1944年,即使在世界大战期间,美国也举行了大选。西班牙流感发生在伍德罗·威尔逊总统任期内,但当时依旧举行了国会选举。许多地方在投票开始前五天才取消隔离,而且投票率非常低,仅有约40%(1914年中期选举投票率为50%)。
近几年来,迈阿密和新奥尔良的飓风曾经导致市长选举推迟了数周。2001年9月11日纽约市市长初选日发生恐怖袭击,选举被迫推迟两周举行。
而且即使修改了大选日期,美国宪法第二十条修正案规定“总统和副总统的任期必须在1月20日正午结束。”即使不举行选举,总统特朗普和副总统迈克·彭斯也必须搬出白宫。
谁来代替他们呢?
这是个好问题,不过答案有些复杂。
正常情况下,众议院议长南希·佩洛西将成为总统。但如果不重新选举,她的任期和其他众议员的任期一样,将在2021年1月3日到期。约三分之一参议员的任期也即将届满。
排在美国总统继任顺序下一位的是参议院临时议长,目前由查克·格拉斯利(爱荷华州共和党人)担任。
而事情发展到这里开始变得有趣。
23位共和党参议员的任期将在今年届满,而民主党只有12位。这意味着如果不进行选举,民主党将夺得参议院的控制权,并且可以提名临时议长,之后这位临时议长将继任总统。除非个别州修改法规,允许州长提名临时人选接任空出的参议院席位,而这也会改变参议院的平衡。
简而言之,局面将很快陷入混乱。而且可能会出现很长时间的延搁,因为各州修改法规要接受法院的司法审查,并且每个州的情况各不相同。
所以,取消大选会造成极大的混乱。但在隔离期间如何参加投票?
这个问题很难回答。
理想的结果是社会疏离措施发挥作用,并且可以进行全国性检测,使大选能够像往常一样,在11月份正常举行。
但这也不太可能发生。
这时候需要由总统选举团发挥作用。有关总统选举的法律规定“各州必须在11月第一个星期一之后的星期二指定总统和副总统选举人。”这给各州留出了很大的灵活空间:美国联邦法律中没有宪法条款要求选举团根据民众的投票结果进行投票。严格意义上来说,选举团甚至可以在各州民众不参与的情况下进行投票。理论上,一个州可以选择他们确定会按照党派路线投票的选举团成员。
但这只是理论上,实际上不太可能发生。从19世纪60年代以来,美国每个州都选择通过普选选出选举团成员,而且各州一直没有修改这方面的法律。
但也有人担心有些选区在选举时可能仍在执行严格的隔离措施,而有些选区可能允许选民外出投票:这种差异足以改变某些州的选举结果。
笔者听说过许多有关邮寄投票的观点……
目前来看,邮寄投票似乎是最可行的应急方案。
周末,米歇尔·奥巴马呼吁各州尊重选民的意愿,允许选民邮寄选票。
奥巴马在声明中表示:“我们在此次疫情危机之前就知道选民投票存在许多障碍,尤其是年轻人和有色群体。在当前的形势下,提倡邮寄投票,实行在线选民登记和提前投票是非常关键的措施,而且早就应该这样做。我们应该努力履行国家的承诺,让更多人享受到宝贵的民主,保护我们的邻居、朋友和爱人,让他们可以安全参加选举,为美国人的幸福生活奠定基础,这无关党派。”
但美国总统特朗普却反对这种做法。他在上周召开的新闻发布会上表示:“我认为邮寄投票很可怕;这是腐败。”有记者指出,总统先生在上个月佛罗里达州的选举中就是邮寄的选票,但他回答说自己之所以这样做是因为“得到了允许”。他说,选民不在本州境内和在境内时邮寄选票是有区别的。
特朗普说:“美国各地会有无数人坐在他们的卧室里填写选票。不,我认为既然参加投票,就要到投票点去,即使提前投票也不是最好的做法。”
但目前并没有证明美国选民欺诈的广泛证据,而且总统的选民欺诈委员会因为没有找到任何证据已经解散。News21对缺席选票欺诈的调查发现,2000年至2012年期间只出现491例涉嫌欺诈行为。
特朗普总统在这问题上的观点并没有得到共和党的支持。共和党议员非常赞同这种做法,比如佛罗里达州的罗恩·德桑蒂斯。邮寄投票通常被称为缺席投票,有31个州允许这种做法,在选举日不在本地的选民和身患残疾无法亲自投票的选民通常会采取这种方式。在多数州,选民必须符合一定的条件,才能收到缺席选票。
但目前科罗拉多、夏威夷、俄勒冈、华盛顿和犹他等五个州,允许所有选民邮寄投票,至少有21个州在个别选举中使用邮寄投票,大部分是地方性选举,比如学校董事会席位的选举等。
周日,弗吉尼亚州州长拉尔夫·诺瑟姆签署通过了一项法律,将选举日定为假期,在投票时允许不出示身份证明,并且从投票前45天开始,允许任何选民参加提前投票,无需说明理由。上周,纽约州州长科莫宣布,允许所有纽约州居民通过缺席选票进行初选投票。但他没有就总统大选做出决定。
而美国邮政局本身正面临着破产危机,甚至有人质疑它能否继续维持下去,支持选民邮寄投票。
初选?我以为你说乔·拜登是民主党提名候选人……
他只是推定民主党提名候选人。只有等到8月份召开民主党全国代表大会(Democratic National Convention),他才能获得正式提名。
许多州还没有进行投票。虽然伯尼·桑德斯宣布暂停竞选活动,但他并没有退出选举。这意味着选票上还会有他的名字。
桑德斯特别要求支持者投票给他,因为虽然他会建议党代表在民主党全国代表大会上支持乔·拜登,但他希望利用集体的力量,提出更激进的民主党议程。
然而桑德斯并不是初选还会继续下去的唯一原因。其他多位暂停竞选活动的民主党候选人也将出现在选票上。
由于对COVID-19的恐惧和没有确定的提名候选人,今年的投票率可能较低。上周二,在桑德斯退出选举之前,威斯康辛州包括邮寄选票在内的投票率非常低。有些选区的投票率较2016年下降了10个百分点。
两党是否会如期召开全国代表大会?
共和党宣布,将按原计划筹备大会,在8月份在北卡罗来纳州夏洛特召开。民主党将大会时间从7月推迟到八月末,并表示会议将在密尔沃基正常举行。
乔·拜登当选后,有没有抗击疫情的方案?
上周一上午,拜登在《纽约时报》发表了一篇评论文章,其中大致介绍了他对于COVID-19的一些想法。
他会继续执行社会疏离措施,同时卫生及公共服务部(Department of Health and Human Services)将继续进行大范围病毒检测,并在全国开展抗体研究。美国总统特朗普在上周召开的新闻发布会上表示,他并不认为大范围病毒检测是企业复工的必要条件。
拜登还表示,他会确保医护人员和抗疫一线的工作人员为疫情多次突然爆发做好准备。
拜登在此前公布的详细医疗保健计划中表示,他会支持医院的预算,保证医院针对未来的COVID-19疫情做好准备。(财富中文网)
翻译:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
美国大选季已经正式拉开帷幕,目前美国总统唐纳德·特朗普和前副总统乔·拜登展开了第一周的角逐。
如果没有爆发疫情,我们可能会看到特朗普马不停蹄地前往关键州出席竞选集会。我们会听到人们排队进场,等着听总统先生花几个小时即兴讲述“政治迫害”和“瞌睡虫乔”的故事。当然,他那些更离谱的言论肯定会被媒体争相报道。
拜登也会在全国巡回演讲,召开潜在选民集会,他将展现出亲民的魅力,同时还会不时表现出精心设计的(或者一时冲动下的)强硬态度(比如对特朗普说:“听着,胖子”)。
选举会成为未来六个月媒体报道的重头戏。CNN的字幕条会变得非常夸张。竞选辩论会打破收视率。然后美国选民在11月份前往投票。
但很显然,今年竞选的情况与以往不同。由于在可以预见的未来,大部分州将继续采取社会疏离措施,因此这两位候选人无法进行巡回演讲。
美国目前每天的新冠肺炎死亡病例接近2,000人,现在举行公开竞选活动似乎并不明智,而且每位候选人现在都必须把对自己的定位调整为准战时指挥官。目前美国新增失业人数1,600万人,许多人不得不担心眼前的生计问题:如何支付租金和养家糊口。人们显然没有心思花时间参与总统大选。
从大众媒体的报道中可以看出美国政治上的混乱:《纽约时报》用了一个戏谑的标题“我们终究还要进行选举”。一篇评论文章中已经提到了最糟糕的情况:“美国今年不举行大选,就是在践踏宪法的尊严。”本周末,米歇尔·奥巴马发起了扩大缺席投票的新倡议。
那么,今年大选当前的战况到底如何?本文回答了几个热点问题。
今年是否会举行大选?
原定于11月3日星期二举行的总统大选绝对不会取消或推迟。这是联邦法律规定的日期,即使现任总统唐纳德·特朗普也没有权力修改。修改大选日期,必须由国会通过法律,而这样的法律在民主党把持的众议院内通过的概率微乎其微。
美国历史上从来没有取消或推迟过总统大选。1916年和1944年,即使在世界大战期间,美国也举行了大选。西班牙流感发生在伍德罗·威尔逊总统任期内,但当时依旧举行了国会选举。许多地方在投票开始前五天才取消隔离,而且投票率非常低,仅有约40%(1914年中期选举投票率为50%)。
近几年来,迈阿密和新奥尔良的飓风曾经导致市长选举推迟了数周。2001年9月11日纽约市市长初选日发生恐怖袭击,选举被迫推迟两周举行。
而且即使修改了大选日期,美国宪法第二十条修正案规定“总统和副总统的任期必须在1月20日正午结束。”即使不举行选举,总统特朗普和副总统迈克·彭斯也必须搬出白宫。
谁来代替他们呢?
这是个好问题,不过答案有些复杂。
正常情况下,众议院议长南希·佩洛西将成为总统。但如果不重新选举,她的任期和其他众议员的任期一样,将在2021年1月3日到期。约三分之一参议员的任期也即将届满。
排在美国总统继任顺序下一位的是参议院临时议长,目前由查克·格拉斯利(爱荷华州共和党人)担任。
而事情发展到这里开始变得有趣。
23位共和党参议员的任期将在今年届满,而民主党只有12位。这意味着如果不进行选举,民主党将夺得参议院的控制权,并且可以提名临时议长,之后这位临时议长将继任总统。除非个别州修改法规,允许州长提名临时人选接任空出的参议院席位,而这也会改变参议院的平衡。
简而言之,局面将很快陷入混乱。而且可能会出现很长时间的延搁,因为各州修改法规要接受法院的司法审查,并且每个州的情况各不相同。
所以,取消大选会造成极大的混乱。但在隔离期间如何参加投票?
这个问题很难回答。
理想的结果是社会疏离措施发挥作用,并且可以进行全国性检测,使大选能够像往常一样,在11月份正常举行。
但这也不太可能发生。
这时候需要由总统选举团发挥作用。有关总统选举的法律规定“各州必须在11月第一个星期一之后的星期二指定总统和副总统选举人。”这给各州留出了很大的灵活空间:美国联邦法律中没有宪法条款要求选举团根据民众的投票结果进行投票。严格意义上来说,选举团甚至可以在各州民众不参与的情况下进行投票。理论上,一个州可以选择他们确定会按照党派路线投票的选举团成员。
但这只是理论上,实际上不太可能发生。从19世纪60年代以来,美国每个州都选择通过普选选出选举团成员,而且各州一直没有修改这方面的法律。
但也有人担心有些选区在选举时可能仍在执行严格的隔离措施,而有些选区可能允许选民外出投票:这种差异足以改变某些州的选举结果。
笔者听说过许多有关邮寄投票的观点……
目前来看,邮寄投票似乎是最可行的应急方案。
周末,米歇尔·奥巴马呼吁各州尊重选民的意愿,允许选民邮寄选票。
奥巴马在声明中表示:“我们在此次疫情危机之前就知道选民投票存在许多障碍,尤其是年轻人和有色群体。在当前的形势下,提倡邮寄投票,实行在线选民登记和提前投票是非常关键的措施,而且早就应该这样做。我们应该努力履行国家的承诺,让更多人享受到宝贵的民主,保护我们的邻居、朋友和爱人,让他们可以安全参加选举,为美国人的幸福生活奠定基础,这无关党派。”
但美国总统特朗普却反对这种做法。他在上周召开的新闻发布会上表示:“我认为邮寄投票很可怕;这是腐败。”有记者指出,总统先生在上个月佛罗里达州的选举中就是邮寄的选票,但他回答说自己之所以这样做是因为“得到了允许”。他说,选民不在本州境内和在境内时邮寄选票是有区别的。
特朗普说:“美国各地会有无数人坐在他们的卧室里填写选票。不,我认为既然参加投票,就要到投票点去,即使提前投票也不是最好的做法。”
但目前并没有证明美国选民欺诈的广泛证据,而且总统的选民欺诈委员会因为没有找到任何证据已经解散。News21对缺席选票欺诈的调查发现,2000年至2012年期间只出现491例涉嫌欺诈行为。
特朗普总统在这问题上的观点并没有得到共和党的支持。共和党议员非常赞同这种做法,比如佛罗里达州的罗恩·德桑蒂斯。邮寄投票通常被称为缺席投票,有31个州允许这种做法,在选举日不在本地的选民和身患残疾无法亲自投票的选民通常会采取这种方式。在多数州,选民必须符合一定的条件,才能收到缺席选票。
但目前科罗拉多、夏威夷、俄勒冈、华盛顿和犹他等五个州,允许所有选民邮寄投票,至少有21个州在个别选举中使用邮寄投票,大部分是地方性选举,比如学校董事会席位的选举等。
周日,弗吉尼亚州州长拉尔夫·诺瑟姆签署通过了一项法律,将选举日定为假期,在投票时允许不出示身份证明,并且从投票前45天开始,允许任何选民参加提前投票,无需说明理由。上周,纽约州州长科莫宣布,允许所有纽约州居民通过缺席选票进行初选投票。但他没有就总统大选做出决定。
而美国邮政局本身正面临着破产危机,甚至有人质疑它能否继续维持下去,支持选民邮寄投票。
初选?我以为你说乔·拜登是民主党提名候选人……
他只是推定民主党提名候选人。只有等到8月份召开民主党全国代表大会(Democratic National Convention),他才能获得正式提名。
许多州还没有进行投票。虽然伯尼·桑德斯宣布暂停竞选活动,但他并没有退出选举。这意味着选票上还会有他的名字。
桑德斯特别要求支持者投票给他,因为虽然他会建议党代表在民主党全国代表大会上支持乔·拜登,但他希望利用集体的力量,提出更激进的民主党议程。
然而桑德斯并不是初选还会继续下去的唯一原因。其他多位暂停竞选活动的民主党候选人也将出现在选票上。
由于对COVID-19的恐惧和没有确定的提名候选人,今年的投票率可能较低。上周二,在桑德斯退出选举之前,威斯康辛州包括邮寄选票在内的投票率非常低。有些选区的投票率较2016年下降了10个百分点。
两党是否会如期召开全国代表大会?
共和党宣布,将按原计划筹备大会,在8月份在北卡罗来纳州夏洛特召开。民主党将大会时间从7月推迟到八月末,并表示会议将在密尔沃基正常举行。
乔·拜登当选后,有没有抗击疫情的方案?
上周一上午,拜登在《纽约时报》发表了一篇评论文章,其中大致介绍了他对于COVID-19的一些想法。
他会继续执行社会疏离措施,同时卫生及公共服务部(Department of Health and Human Services)将继续进行大范围病毒检测,并在全国开展抗体研究。美国总统特朗普在上周召开的新闻发布会上表示,他并不认为大范围病毒检测是企业复工的必要条件。
拜登还表示,他会确保医护人员和抗疫一线的工作人员为疫情多次突然爆发做好准备。
拜登在此前公布的详细医疗保健计划中表示,他会支持医院的预算,保证医院针对未来的COVID-19疫情做好准备。(财富中文网)
翻译:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
The United States has officially galloped into general election season, and the first full week of the race between President Donald Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden is underway.
In a pre-COVID-19 world, we’d likely see Trump pick up the pace of his campaign rally appearances in key states across the country. We’d hear the stories about people lining up outside of various arenas in order to hear the President riff for hours about “witch hunts” and “sleepy Joe.” Surely some of his more outrageous lines would grab him massive amounts of earned media.
Biden would also tour the country, devoting himself to town hall meetings with potential voters where moments of relatable folksy charm would be juxtaposed with moments of calculated (or uncalculated) toughness (“look, fat”).
The election would be the main driver of news for the next six months. CNN’s graphics package would be over the top. The debates would likely break viewership records. Then the nation would head to the polls in November.
Clearly, that’s not how things are going to happen this time around. Both candidates are stuck in place, as social-distancing measures are enforced in most states for the foreseeable future.
With nearly 2,000 Americans dying of the COVID-19 virus each day, overt campaigning appears crass, and each candidate must now reposition themselves as a quasi-wartime chief. As 16 million Americans find themselves newly unemployed, many across the country have been forced to worry about immediate survival needs: how to pay rent and feed their families. The idea of devoting time to a presidential election feels impossible.
A quick look at mass media betrays the political confusion: “Somehow, There’s Still an Election,” reads a cheeky New York Times headline. “The Constitution will be in tatters if America holds no election this year,” reads an opinion piece, already presuming the worst. This weekend, Michelle Obama, meanwhile, introduced a new initiative to expand absentee voting.
So what’s going on with this election, anyway? We answer some burning questions.
Will the election even happen?
It is incredibly unlikely that the presidential election, slated for Tuesday, Nov. 3, will be canceled or even postponed. This date is set by federal law, and President Donald Trump has no power to move it. Congress would have to pass a law with a date change, and that seems highly improbable with a Democratically controlled House.
A presidential election has never before been canceled or postponed in the United States. Elections took place in 1916 and 1944, both during World Wars. The Spanish Flu occurred right in the middle of President Woodrow Wilson’s term, but Congressional elections still occurred. In many cases quarantines were lifted just five days before the polls opened, and turnout was incredibly low, at about 40% (it had been 50% during the 1914 midterms).
In recent years, hurricanes in Miami and New Orleans have led to the delay of mayoral elections by a few weeks. The attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, took place on the day of a New York City mayoral primary, which was subsequently delayed by two weeks.
Even if a date change does occur, the 20th amendment mandates that “the terms of the President and the Vice President shall end at noon on the 20th day of January.” Even if there were no election, President Trump and Vice President Mike Pence would be forced to vacate the White House.
Who would replace them?
That’s a good question with a complicated answer.
Under normal circumstances the Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, would become President. But without reelection, her term is set to expire on Jan. 3, 2021, along with every other member of the House. About one-third of Senators will see their terms expire.
The next in line for the presidency is the president pro tempore of the Senate, currently held by Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa).
This is where things get funky.
There are 23 seats held by Republicans that will expire this year, and only 12 held by Democrats. That means that without an election Democrats would gain control of the Senate and could nominate their own president pro tempore, a person who would then ascend to the presidency. Except…some states have rules in place that allow governors to name temporary fill-ins for empty Senate seats, so that could also change the balance of the Senate.
In short, it would get very messy very quickly, and there would likely be a long holdup as the changes are litigated in the courts and on a state-by-state basis.
Okay, so canceling the elections would be way too messy. But how will we vote if we’re sheltering in place?
That’s the million-dollar question.
The ideal outcome would be that social-distancing measures do their job and countrywide testing is available come November so the general election can take place as it would in any other year.
But that might not happen.
This is where the electoral college comes into play. The statute requiring a presidential election states that “the electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed, in each State, on the Tuesday next after the first Monday in November.” That leaves a lot of discretion to the states: There is no constitutional provision or federal law that requires the electoral college to vote based on how the population cast their votes. The electoral college could technically cast their votes without the state’s population even participating. Theoretically, a state could opt to pick electoral college members that they know would vote along party lines.
This, however, is very theoretical and unlikely. Every state in the country has opted to use a popular election to pick their electoral college since the 1860s, and states would have to change their own legislation to end that.
There are also fears that some districts may remain under strict shelter-in-place orders during the election while others are allowed to go out and vote: That could be enough to sway results in some states.
I’ve been hearing a lot about this vote-by-mail idea…
Voting by mail appears to be the most promising contingency plan right now.
Over the weekend, Michelle Obama advocated that states allow all voters who wish to send their ballots in by mail to do so.
“We know that barriers to voting existed before this crisis, especially for young people and communities of color,” Obama said in a statement. “Expanding access to vote-by-mail, online voter registration, and early voting are critical steps for this moment—and they’re long overdue. There is nothing partisan about striving to live up to the promise of our country; making the democracy we all cherish more accessible; and protecting our neighbors, friends, and loved ones as they participate in this cornerstone of American life.”
President Trump, meanwhile, has spoken out against the idea. “I think mail-in voting is horrible; it’s corrupt,” he said at a press conference last week. When a reporter pointed out that the President had voted by mail in the Florida election last month, he said he did it because he was “allowed to.” There is a difference between sending in a ballot while one is out of the state and sending one in while in the state, he said.
“And you get thousands and thousands of people sitting in somebody’s living room signing ballots all over the place. No…I think if you vote you should go, and even the concept of early voting is not the greatest thing,” Trump said.
There is no widespread evidence of voter fraud in the United States, and the President’s own commission on voter fraud disbanded without finding any evidence. A study of absentee ballot fraud by News21 found just 491 alleged instances between 2000 and 2012.
The President may not receive the support of his party on this issue. Republican governors like Florida’s Ron DeSantis rely heavily on it. Commonly called absentee voting and allowed by 31 states, voting by mail is often used by those who won’t be in town on Election Day or have a disability that would make it difficult for them to vote in person. In most states, a voter has to meet certain qualifications in order to receive an absentee ballot.
But there are currently five states—Colorado, Hawaii, Oregon, Washington, and Utah—that allow all voters to cast their vote by mail, and at least 21 other states use vote-by-mail in some races, mostly in more local elections like school board seats.
On Sunday, Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam signed legislation into effect that would make Election Day a holiday, allow for voting without an ID, and let anyone participate in early voting starting 45 days before the election without any stated reason. Last week, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo announced that all New York residents would be allowed to vote in the primary election by absentee ballot. He has not yet made a decision about the general election.
The Postal Service, however, is facing its own equity crisis, and some question whether it will even be able to stay afloat long enough to allow for a vote-by-mail.
Primary? I thought you said Joe Biden was the Democratic nominee…
Presumptive Democratic nominee. He won’t be the official nominee until the Democratic National Convention convenes in August.
Many states haven’t voted yet, and while Bernie Sanders has suspended his election, he has not dropped out. That means his name will still be on ballots.
Sanders has specifically asked his supporters to cast a vote in his favor, because although he will advise his delegates to vote on behalf of Joe Biden at the Democratic Convention, he explained last week that he wants to harness their collective power to advocate for a more progressive Democratic agenda.
Sanders, however, is not the sole reason primaries will continue. A number of other Democratic candidates who have suspended their races also remain on the ballot.
Still, turnout will likely be low owing to COVID-19 fears and a presumed nominee. In Wisconsin last Tuesday, before Sanders had even dropped out of the race, turnout, including mail-in ballots, was very low. Some districts reported 10-point drops from 2016.
Are the conventions still happening?
Republicans say they’re continuing to plan their convention as though it will happen in Charlotte, N.C., this August. Democrats have pushed their convention from July to late August but say things will otherwise be business as usual in Milwaukee.
Does Joe Biden have a plan to combat COVID-19 if he’s elected?
Biden wrote an opinion piece for the New York Times Monday morning which broadly outlined some of his thinking around COVID-19.
He would continue social distancing while the Department of Health and Human Services works on establishing widespread testing for the virus and its antibodies around the country. President Trump said during a press conference last week that he did not think widespread testing was necessary to “reopen” the country’s businesses.
Biden also said he would make sure health care and frontline workers were prepared for multiple flare-ups of the outbreak.
Biden previously released a more detailed health care plan, describing how he would bolster hospital budgets and make sure they are prepared for any future COVID-19 waves.