首页 500强 活动 榜单 商业 科技 领导力 专题 品牌中心
杂志订阅

特朗普希望在5月前重启美国经济,但他有权力这么做吗?

已经有一些州长表态,称5月1日结束停工为时过早,可见接下来白宫和各州领导人发生冲突在所难免。

文本设置
小号
默认
大号
Plus(0条)

如何既能控制住新冠病毒疫情,又可以保住经济呢?在美国上下为此而绞尽脑汁之时,总统特朗普于上上周宣布,希望在未来几天内实施“一项非常强劲的重启经济计划”,“甚至可能会在5月1日之前实施。”

此番“重启经济”宣言的背景是,绝大多数的州长都已经勒令大部分企业停工。但已经有一些州长表态称5月1日结束停工为时过早,可见接下来白宫和各州领导人发生冲突恐怕在所难免。

这也提出了美国总统究竟在哪些地方有权重启经济的问题。4月13日,特朗普声称其对各州何时能够重启经济有着“绝对的权力”。但在各个政治派别的法律学者均指出这毫无依据之后,他又收回了这一说法。

卡多佐法学院宪法学教授黛博拉·珀尔斯坦表示,“和大家一样,我也认为,特朗普拥有绝对权力的说法完全是无稽之谈。”

珀尔斯坦援引美国宪法第十修正案指出,大多数的权力,包括对贸易和公民自由的权力,都只属于各个州。虽然联邦政府握有对州际贸易的权力,但这种权力必须由国会来行使,而非由总统。

珀尔斯坦说,即便是港口、机场和州际公路等关键的联邦基础设施,总统也无权单方面开放或者关闭。或许是因为认识到这一点,在4月16日发布最新的重启经济指引前,特朗普据悉对各州州长说,“具体要怎么做你们自行决定。”

那么,特朗普有什么权力“重启”经济吗?他的确有,但那些权力大多是间接性的而不是直接性的,他倒可以利用它们来施加影响。例如,他可以通过发布联邦政府指引来向州长们施加政治压力,又或者直接通过电视媒体或推特来扩大影响力。

珀尔斯坦还指出,特朗普可以要求司法部起诉那些没有遵从他的要求重启经济的州,不过一旦到了联邦法庭,他会毫无胜算。她说,总统更有可能使用截留物资或者联邦资金的方式,来惩罚那些不服从要求的州。

然而,据珀尔斯坦说,如果没有得到国会法案的批准,截留用于高速公路或医疗服务的联邦资金是违法的。但她认为,特朗普可能还是会一意孤行。

珀尔斯坦说道:“想象一下,这位总统试图截留提供给纽约州的医疗保健资金的情况。那么做是不合法的,而且非常麻烦。但通常用来阻止这种情况发生的机制,目前基本上是无效的,比如司法部监察长和国会的传唤权。”她解释称,国会在休会,另外司法部总监察长的警告也曾被特朗普无视过。

总统还拥有军事权。虽然陆海空三军大体上不能用于执法,但他们可以在交通运输和其它的后勤事项上发挥重要作用。因此,对于那些违抗重启经济指令的州,特朗普有权决定给它们部署还是截留这些资源,其中包括海军医疗船和N95口罩等物质。

这一切意味着,未来几周,特朗普将无法行驶什么直接性的权力来强制全美各地的企业复工。不过,他还是可以动用这样或那样的软权力来施压各州州长就范。

“就看他有多强硬了。”珀尔斯坦说。(财富中文网)

译者:万志文

如何既能控制住新冠病毒疫情,又可以保住经济呢?在美国上下为此而绞尽脑汁之时,总统特朗普于上上周宣布,希望在未来几天内实施“一项非常强劲的重启经济计划”,“甚至可能会在5月1日之前实施。”

此番“重启经济”宣言的背景是,绝大多数的州长都已经勒令大部分企业停工。但已经有一些州长表态称5月1日结束停工为时过早,可见接下来白宫和各州领导人发生冲突恐怕在所难免。

这也提出了美国总统究竟在哪些地方有权重启经济的问题。4月13日,特朗普声称其对各州何时能够重启经济有着“绝对的权力”。但在各个政治派别的法律学者均指出这毫无依据之后,他又收回了这一说法。

卡多佐法学院宪法学教授黛博拉·珀尔斯坦表示,“和大家一样,我也认为,特朗普拥有绝对权力的说法完全是无稽之谈。”

珀尔斯坦援引美国宪法第十修正案指出,大多数的权力,包括对贸易和公民自由的权力,都只属于各个州。虽然联邦政府握有对州际贸易的权力,但这种权力必须由国会来行使,而非由总统。

珀尔斯坦说,即便是港口、机场和州际公路等关键的联邦基础设施,总统也无权单方面开放或者关闭。或许是因为认识到这一点,在4月16日发布最新的重启经济指引前,特朗普据悉对各州州长说,“具体要怎么做你们自行决定。”

那么,特朗普有什么权力“重启”经济吗?他的确有,但那些权力大多是间接性的而不是直接性的,他倒可以利用它们来施加影响。例如,他可以通过发布联邦政府指引来向州长们施加政治压力,又或者直接通过电视媒体或推特来扩大影响力。

珀尔斯坦还指出,特朗普可以要求司法部起诉那些没有遵从他的要求重启经济的州,不过一旦到了联邦法庭,他会毫无胜算。她说,总统更有可能使用截留物资或者联邦资金的方式,来惩罚那些不服从要求的州。

然而,据珀尔斯坦说,如果没有得到国会法案的批准,截留用于高速公路或医疗服务的联邦资金是违法的。但她认为,特朗普可能还是会一意孤行。

珀尔斯坦说道:“想象一下,这位总统试图截留提供给纽约州的医疗保健资金的情况。那么做是不合法的,而且非常麻烦。但通常用来阻止这种情况发生的机制,目前基本上是无效的,比如司法部监察长和国会的传唤权。”她解释称,国会在休会,另外司法部总监察长的警告也曾被特朗普无视过。

总统还拥有军事权。虽然陆海空三军大体上不能用于执法,但他们可以在交通运输和其它的后勤事项上发挥重要作用。因此,对于那些违抗重启经济指令的州,特朗普有权决定给它们部署还是截留这些资源,其中包括海军医疗船和N95口罩等物质。

这一切意味着,未来几周,特朗普将无法行驶什么直接性的权力来强制全美各地的企业复工。不过,他还是可以动用这样或那样的软权力来施压各州州长就范。

“就看他有多强硬了。”珀尔斯坦说。(财富中文网)

译者:万志文

As the U.S. wrestles with how to contain the coronavirus while also saving the economy, President Trump declared last week he wants to implement “a very powerful reopening plan” in coming days—"maybe even before the date of May 1."

The call for "reopening" is a response to governors in a large majority of states who have ordered most businesses to close. But already some governors have suggested May 1 is too soon to end their shutdowns, raising the specter of a collision between the White House and state leaders.

It also raises the question of what spaces in the country the President can or can't open. On April 13, Trump declared he had "total authority" over when the states can restart their economies—a claim he has since walked back after legal scholars across the political spectrum claimed it had no basis.

"I share the view of pretty much everyone that the total authority claim is total nonsense," said Deborah Pearlstein a professor of constitutional law at Cardozo Law School.

Pearlstein cited the Tenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which reserves most powers—including over commerce and civil liberties—to the states. And while the federal government has power over interstate commerce, that power must be exercised by Congress not the President.

Even for key federal infrastructure such as ports, airports and Interstate highways, the President does not have the power to unilaterally open or close them, says Pearlstein. On April 16, perhaps acknowledging this reality, Trump reportedly told the country's governors "You're going to call your own," prior to issuing updated guidelines.

So does Trump have any power to "reopen" the economy? It turns out he does, but they are mostly indirect ones he can use to exert influence rather explicit legal ones. For instance, he can exert political pressure on governors through federal guidelines or, more informally, through his bully pulpit on TV and Twitter.

Pearlstein also notes that he could ask the Justice Department to sue states that don't heed his demands they reopen, but that he would certainly lose in federal court. She says it's more likely that the President would withhold equipment or federal funds from states that don't comply.

But in the absence of an act of Congress, withholding funds for highways or health services would be illegal, Perlstein says, but adds that Trump may nonetheless attempt such tactics.

"One can imagine this President trying to withhold health care funds to the state of NY. That would be illegal and very troubling but the mechanisms that usually exist to prevent that, such as Inspectors General or Congressional subpoena power are substantially disabled," Pearlstein says, explaining that Congress is out of session and that Trump has previously failed to heed Inspectors General.

There is also the President's power over the military. While the armed services largely can't be used for law enforcement, the military can play an important role in transportation and other logistics. As such, the President could deploy or withhold such resources—including Navy hospital ships or delivery of N95 masks—from states whose governors defy his request to reopen.

All of this means that, in coming weeks, the President will be able to exercise little direct authority to compel the country's businesses to reopen. But he could nonetheless use considerable soft power to pressure states to do his bidding.

"It depends how much hardball he wants to play," says Perlstein.

财富中文网所刊载内容之知识产权为财富媒体知识产权有限公司及/或相关权利人专属所有或持有。未经许可,禁止进行转载、摘编、复制及建立镜像等任何使用。
0条Plus
精彩评论
评论

撰写或查看更多评论

请打开财富Plus APP

前往打开