首页 500强 活动 榜单 商业 科技 领导力 专题 品牌中心
杂志订阅

美国邮政局陷入困境,救助为何如此困难

NICOLE GOODKIND
2020-05-06

尽管邮政局在新冠疫情危机之前便已出现了不可持续的亏损,但邮件量自疫情发生之后便出现了难以扭转的急剧下滑。

文本设置
小号
默认
大号
Plus(0条)

美国邮政局异常明确地宣布:如果没有国会的资助,公司的资金很有可能在今年9月前耗尽。

为了维持经营,邮政局的支持者要求国会提供250亿美元的直接援助,重建基础设施所需的250亿美元设施现代化拨款,以及140亿美元的债务豁免。由三名共和党(均由特朗普任命)和两名民主党组成的州长邮政局管理委员会在本月早些时候全票通过了这一请求。

在理想情况下,上述资金应该足够邮政局在乔·拜登成为总统候选人之前维持其运营。他曾说过自己打算通过立法工作来支持邮政局,并保持其国有性质。

拜登在致其支持者的一封信中写道:“美国邮政局是美国生活的重要组成部分。然而,在特朗普当选美国总统之后,我们的邮政局受到了攻击。特朗普呼吁撤销针对邮政工人的保护,并对邮局进行私有化……特朗普有关邮政局私有化的谋划来的可谓真不是时候。”他还指出,“因此我们需要立即采取行动,保护邮政局。”

尽管邮政局到目前为止并未被纳入任何刺激方案,但国会议员、来自密苏里州的伊曼纽尔·克里夫依然满怀希望地认为,邮政局在下一轮资助中将多少获得些资金。4月底,他与122名国会同事一道,给众议院领导写了一封信,要求对邮政局进行救助。

他向《财富》透露:“如果邮政局私有化,美国农村地区将受到重创。这意味着,对于本来就认为自己并未受到重视的美国农村地区来说,私有化等于发出了一个再明显不过的信号:你们的这个想法没错,美国国会对你们并不关心,而且你们也会因此陷入困境。因为私有化之后,他们收不到邮件,拿不到药,连对外沟通的机会都没了。”

在4月早些时候向国会议员的汇报中,邮政部长梅根•布雷南介绍了问题的全貌。尽管邮政局在新冠疫情危机之前便已出现了不可持续的亏损,但邮件量自疫情发生之后便出现了难以扭转的急剧下滑。

布雷南指出,邮件量在美国疫情出现后的第一个月下滑了5.3%。到了4月,降幅增至30%。她预测这一情况只会越来越糟糕:在第三季度末和第四季度末,降幅将达到50%和57%。将于10月1日结束的2020财年,邮政局预计将迎来130亿美元的营收亏损,完全拜新冠疫情所赐。在疫情发生之前,美国邮政局年亏损达到了近90亿美元。

在新冠疫情引发的商业实体关闭期间,邮政局员工被政府定性为关键岗位。工会官员称,有1800多名邮政员工已确诊感染病毒,或疑似感染,超过30名员工因此而丧生。

佛蒙特州参议员、前总统候选人伯尼•桑德斯上周与邮政工会领导人举行了一场虚拟市政会。他说,“此时此刻,美国邮政局正面临着极其严峻的挑战。”

但总统在4月底签署的最新国会救助方案并未给邮政局提供任何帮助,特朗普特意称美国邮政局是“一个笑话”。

全美邮政邮件处理者联盟总裁保尔•霍格罗吉安说:“在我看来,邮政局到目前为止被整了三次半。”

如果得不到额外的资助,美国邮政局除了大幅裁员和削减某些服务之外没有其他办法来维持经营。邮政局目前拥有64万名员工,其中很多都是退伍军人和有色人种。

宪法规定邮政局必须以统一的价格对美国所有公民提供同等服务。该公司是邮件服务唯一的综合提供商,而且是邮递行业的低成本支柱,有助于压低私营邮递服务的费率。政策研究所最近的分析显示,如果没有美国邮政,超过7000万美国民众将不得不为邮递服务支付高昂的费用。

霍格罗吉安解释说,如果邮政局暂停部分或所有邮递服务,“那么美国农村地区将被排除在外,或被迫支付高昂的价格。”他说,处方药、社保和养老金都无法直接交送给他们,他还强调,40%的美国人依然通过美国邮递服务支付和获取账单。

政府运营附属委员会主席共和党盖瑞•科诺利表示:“因此,联邦快递和UPS将择优挑选它们希望参与的市场,而且如果市场无利可图或太偏僻、成本太高,他们也可以放弃。”

科诺利称:“这样做对于邮政局来说并不是什么好事。邮政服务对于美国的千家万户和所有企业来说至关重要,因为他们依靠日常的邮政快递来获取其处方药、食品、医疗设备、供应物资等。就在我们说话之际,人们正在通过邮递预定口罩、医疗物资和处方药,而且我们甚至通过邮寄选票增加了其负担。”

美国邮递员联合会弗雷德里克•罗兰多称,拯救邮政局的唯一方式在于加入即将到来的总统选举,并为拜登投票。罗兰多称,他将全部精力放在了保持邮政局存活的短期举措上,但即便是潜在的救助金也无法解决长远问题。

美国邮政局目前是美国最受信赖的政府机构,其在民主党和共和党中的支持率几乎相同,都达到了90%。虽然该机构由联邦政府负责运营,但它在过去30多年的时间中从未获得过纳税人的资助,而且外界认为其享有独立财务。

然而,该机构自2006年小布什政府颁布的一项法律出台之后一直在迅速地亏钱,该法律要求企业为退休雇员提前支付员工未来75年的医疗保险。这意味着邮政局必须为还未出生的员工支付今后的医疗保险。这一负担大概占到了该机构亏损额的80-90%。

邮政局支持者将其称之为“横征暴敛”,他们认为预先支付计划是在逼迫邮政局私营化。他们还称,就算没有这笔刺激经费,纳税人也将被迫为退休福利买单。

霍格罗吉安称:“2006年的说辞是,邮政局必须立即支付,因为‘我们无法确定邮政局在20年后依然健在,届时,这笔费用将由纳税人承担。不过,如果我们不给公司注资,这种情况现在就会发生。’”

科诺利称,尽管500亿美元加140亿美元的债务豁免可能看起来过多,但也得看怎么对比,尤其是国会最近通过的2.2万亿美元刺激法案。他说:“虽然索要的金额是不少,但也得看是什么情形。”

科诺利说:“不妨看看航空业。该行业在过去5年中为了实现利润最大化一直在蒙骗客户,它们在过去5年中获得了创纪录的利润率。但这些利润被用来干什么了呢?它们共计耗费了420亿美元来回购股票,对生产活动毫无帮助。然后当疫情来临时,他们毕恭毕敬地向政府索要500亿美元的救助金。因此,如果政府能给航空公司拿这笔钱,而且确实也拿了,那么我们当然也可以为美国邮政局做类似的事情。”

最初,国会两党均有意为邮政局提供救助金,然而,《华盛顿邮报》的报道称,特朗普和财政部长史蒂芬•姆努钦横插一脚,并威胁称,如果法案中最终存在同意向邮政局直接拨款130亿美元的条款,则会否决整个法案。后来,国会仅允许财政部提供100亿美元的贷款,而且还附加了相应的条件。

科诺利称,财政部的贷款通常是为了夺走邮政局的自治权,并让其向私有化迈进。他说:“我们非常担心财政部会提出不合理要求,而我们会拒绝。姆努钦[和总统]有自己的小算盘。需要记住的是,作为保守派共和党,他们并不喜欢邮政局,因为它的规模太大,属于准政府机构,而且有工会。”

特朗普政府对邮政局的私营化表示支持,而霍格罗吉安称,他对“政客们试图使用这一危机来实现其政治目的,而不是代表美国民众制定好政策的可耻行为”感到不安。2018年财政部任务组撰写的一篇报告建议将邮政局的部分业务出售给私营领域。

克里夫说,特朗普政府尝试将邮政局作为“长期政治野心”的“封地”,此举“臭不可闻。”

长期以来,总统一直是邮政局的反对者。他并不支持将邮寄选票计划作为应对新冠疫情危机的方式,他强词夺理地称此举会导致选民造假的增加,他还认为邮政局应向杰夫•贝佐斯和亚马逊收取更多的邮费。据称,这位总统还亲自敦促邮政大臣应双倍征收亚马逊的邮费。

然而克里夫认为,探讨将美国邮政救助纳入第四轮刺激法案还是有希望的。他说:“这取决于我们通过刺激法案的迫切程度,还取决于是否还有其他事项安排。我们几乎每天都会见面探讨这件事情。如今的局面是,那些希望获得农村选票的议员们将不得不认真思考如何对此进行投票。”

科诺利依然认为协商是可行的。他说:“我们在《冠状病毒援助、救济和经济安全法案》中非常成功地灌注了白宫、姆努钦部长和参议院多数党领袖米奇·迈克康奈尔不愿接受的事物。”例如,民主党能够通过协商为州和当地政府争取1500亿美元的援助,同时能够争取4亿美元的费用帮助选举委员会,并支持邮寄选票。

委员会正在就第四轮刺激法案进行协商。

科诺利说:“你知道,我们的国会和政府并不团结。在美国要完成一项事情需要懂得取舍。共和党和白宫将被迫为邮政提供援助,而且他们将不得不因为国家的原因而暂时搁置其政治目的。”(财富中文网)

译者:冯丰

审校:夏林

美国邮政局异常明确地宣布:如果没有国会的资助,公司的资金很有可能在今年9月前耗尽。

为了维持经营,邮政局的支持者要求国会提供250亿美元的直接援助,重建基础设施所需的250亿美元设施现代化拨款,以及140亿美元的债务豁免。由三名共和党(均由特朗普任命)和两名民主党组成的州长邮政局管理委员会在本月早些时候全票通过了这一请求。

在理想情况下,上述资金应该足够邮政局在乔·拜登成为总统候选人之前维持其运营。他曾说过自己打算通过立法工作来支持邮政局,并保持其国有性质。

拜登在致其支持者的一封信中写道:“美国邮政局是美国生活的重要组成部分。然而,在特朗普当选美国总统之后,我们的邮政局受到了攻击。特朗普呼吁撤销针对邮政工人的保护,并对邮局进行私有化……特朗普有关邮政局私有化的谋划来的可谓真不是时候。”他还指出,“因此我们需要立即采取行动,保护邮政局。”

尽管邮政局到目前为止并未被纳入任何刺激方案,但国会议员、来自密苏里州的伊曼纽尔·克里夫依然满怀希望地认为,邮政局在下一轮资助中将多少获得些资金。4月底,他与122名国会同事一道,给众议院领导写了一封信,要求对邮政局进行救助。

他向《财富》透露:“如果邮政局私有化,美国农村地区将受到重创。这意味着,对于本来就认为自己并未受到重视的美国农村地区来说,私有化等于发出了一个再明显不过的信号:你们的这个想法没错,美国国会对你们并不关心,而且你们也会因此陷入困境。因为私有化之后,他们收不到邮件,拿不到药,连对外沟通的机会都没了。”

在4月早些时候向国会议员的汇报中,邮政部长梅根•布雷南介绍了问题的全貌。尽管邮政局在新冠疫情危机之前便已出现了不可持续的亏损,但邮件量自疫情发生之后便出现了难以扭转的急剧下滑。

布雷南指出,邮件量在美国疫情出现后的第一个月下滑了5.3%。到了4月,降幅增至30%。她预测这一情况只会越来越糟糕:在第三季度末和第四季度末,降幅将达到50%和57%。将于10月1日结束的2020财年,邮政局预计将迎来130亿美元的营收亏损,完全拜新冠疫情所赐。在疫情发生之前,美国邮政局年亏损达到了近90亿美元。

在新冠疫情引发的商业实体关闭期间,邮政局员工被政府定性为关键岗位。工会官员称,有1800多名邮政员工已确诊感染病毒,或疑似感染,超过30名员工因此而丧生。

佛蒙特州参议员、前总统候选人伯尼•桑德斯上周与邮政工会领导人举行了一场虚拟市政会。他说,“此时此刻,美国邮政局正面临着极其严峻的挑战。”

但总统在4月底签署的最新国会救助方案并未给邮政局提供任何帮助,特朗普特意称美国邮政局是“一个笑话”。

全美邮政邮件处理者联盟总裁保尔•霍格罗吉安说:“在我看来,邮政局到目前为止被整了三次半。”

如果得不到额外的资助,美国邮政局除了大幅裁员和削减某些服务之外没有其他办法来维持经营。邮政局目前拥有64万名员工,其中很多都是退伍军人和有色人种。

宪法规定邮政局必须以统一的价格对美国所有公民提供同等服务。该公司是邮件服务唯一的综合提供商,而且是邮递行业的低成本支柱,有助于压低私营邮递服务的费率。政策研究所最近的分析显示,如果没有美国邮政,超过7000万美国民众将不得不为邮递服务支付高昂的费用。

霍格罗吉安解释说,如果邮政局暂停部分或所有邮递服务,“那么美国农村地区将被排除在外,或被迫支付高昂的价格。”他说,处方药、社保和养老金都无法直接交送给他们,他还强调,40%的美国人依然通过美国邮递服务支付和获取账单。

政府运营附属委员会主席共和党盖瑞•科诺利表示:“因此,联邦快递和UPS将择优挑选它们希望参与的市场,而且如果市场无利可图或太偏僻、成本太高,他们也可以放弃。”

科诺利称:“这样做对于邮政局来说并不是什么好事。邮政服务对于美国的千家万户和所有企业来说至关重要,因为他们依靠日常的邮政快递来获取其处方药、食品、医疗设备、供应物资等。就在我们说话之际,人们正在通过邮递预定口罩、医疗物资和处方药,而且我们甚至通过邮寄选票增加了其负担。”

美国邮递员联合会弗雷德里克•罗兰多称,拯救邮政局的唯一方式在于加入即将到来的总统选举,并为拜登投票。罗兰多称,他将全部精力放在了保持邮政局存活的短期举措上,但即便是潜在的救助金也无法解决长远问题。

美国邮政局目前是美国最受信赖的政府机构,其在民主党和共和党中的支持率几乎相同,都达到了90%。虽然该机构由联邦政府负责运营,但它在过去30多年的时间中从未获得过纳税人的资助,而且外界认为其享有独立财务。

然而,该机构自2006年小布什政府颁布的一项法律出台之后一直在迅速地亏钱,该法律要求企业为退休雇员提前支付员工未来75年的医疗保险。这意味着邮政局必须为还未出生的员工支付今后的医疗保险。这一负担大概占到了该机构亏损额的80-90%。

邮政局支持者将其称之为“横征暴敛”,他们认为预先支付计划是在逼迫邮政局私营化。他们还称,就算没有这笔刺激经费,纳税人也将被迫为退休福利买单。

霍格罗吉安称:“2006年的说辞是,邮政局必须立即支付,因为‘我们无法确定邮政局在20年后依然健在,届时,这笔费用将由纳税人承担。不过,如果我们不给公司注资,这种情况现在就会发生。’”

科诺利称,尽管500亿美元加140亿美元的债务豁免可能看起来过多,但也得看怎么对比,尤其是国会最近通过的2.2万亿美元刺激法案。他说:“虽然索要的金额是不少,但也得看是什么情形。”

科诺利说:“不妨看看航空业。该行业在过去5年中为了实现利润最大化一直在蒙骗客户,它们在过去5年中获得了创纪录的利润率。但这些利润被用来干什么了呢?它们共计耗费了420亿美元来回购股票,对生产活动毫无帮助。然后当疫情来临时,他们毕恭毕敬地向政府索要500亿美元的救助金。因此,如果政府能给航空公司拿这笔钱,而且确实也拿了,那么我们当然也可以为美国邮政局做类似的事情。”

最初,国会两党均有意为邮政局提供救助金,然而,《华盛顿邮报》的报道称,特朗普和财政部长史蒂芬•姆努钦横插一脚,并威胁称,如果法案中最终存在同意向邮政局直接拨款130亿美元的条款,则会否决整个法案。后来,国会仅允许财政部提供100亿美元的贷款,而且还附加了相应的条件。

科诺利称,财政部的贷款通常是为了夺走邮政局的自治权,并让其向私有化迈进。他说:“我们非常担心财政部会提出不合理要求,而我们会拒绝。姆努钦[和总统]有自己的小算盘。需要记住的是,作为保守派共和党,他们并不喜欢邮政局,因为它的规模太大,属于准政府机构,而且有工会。”

特朗普政府对邮政局的私营化表示支持,而霍格罗吉安称,他对“政客们试图使用这一危机来实现其政治目的,而不是代表美国民众制定好政策的可耻行为”感到不安。2018年财政部任务组撰写的一篇报告建议将邮政局的部分业务出售给私营领域。

克里夫说,特朗普政府尝试将邮政局作为“长期政治野心”的“封地”,此举“臭不可闻。”

长期以来,总统一直是邮政局的反对者。他并不支持将邮寄选票计划作为应对新冠疫情危机的方式,他强词夺理地称此举会导致选民造假的增加,他还认为邮政局应向杰夫•贝佐斯和亚马逊收取更多的邮费。据称,这位总统还亲自敦促邮政大臣应双倍征收亚马逊的邮费。

然而克里夫认为,探讨将美国邮政救助纳入第四轮刺激法案还是有希望的。他说:“这取决于我们通过刺激法案的迫切程度,还取决于是否还有其他事项安排。我们几乎每天都会见面探讨这件事情。如今的局面是,那些希望获得农村选票的议员们将不得不认真思考如何对此进行投票。”

科诺利依然认为协商是可行的。他说:“我们在《冠状病毒援助、救济和经济安全法案》中非常成功地灌注了白宫、姆努钦部长和参议院多数党领袖米奇·迈克康奈尔不愿接受的事物。”例如,民主党能够通过协商为州和当地政府争取1500亿美元的援助,同时能够争取4亿美元的费用帮助选举委员会,并支持邮寄选票。

委员会正在就第四轮刺激法案进行协商。

科诺利说:“你知道,我们的国会和政府并不团结。在美国要完成一项事情需要懂得取舍。共和党和白宫将被迫为邮政提供援助,而且他们将不得不因为国家的原因而暂时搁置其政治目的。”(财富中文网)

译者:冯丰

审校:夏林

The U.S. Postal Service has made it explicitly clear: Without a Hail Mary pass from Congress, it will likely run out of money before September of this year.

In order to stay afloat, advocates for the Postal Service are asking Congress for $25 billion in immediate assistance, a $25 billion modernization grant to overhaul infrastructure, and $14 billion in debt forgiveness. The Postal Service Board of Governors, which consists of three Republicans (all of whom were appointed by President Donald Trump) and two Democrats, unanimously approved of the ask earlier this month.

Ideally, that would be enough to sustain the Postal Service until the election of presidential candidate Joe Biden, who has said he plans to back legislation to support the post office and keep it public.

“The U.S. Postal Service is an important part of American life. But, with Donald Trump in the Oval Office, our post offices are under attack,” Biden wrote in a letter to his supporters last week. “Trump has called for rolling back protections for postal workers and privatizing the USPS…Trump’s plot to privatize the USPS couldn’t come at a worse time,” he continued. “So we need to take action now to protect the Postal Service.”

While the post office has not been included in any stimulus packages so far, Congressman Emanuel Cleaver of Missouri still remains hopeful that the Postal Service will get something in the next round of funding. He sent a letter—along with 122 of his congressional colleagues last week—to House leadership, demanding a bailout.

“If the Postal Service is privatized, rural America will be traumatized,” he tells Fortune. “It means that rural America, which already thinks it’s being ignored, will be given a clear and unambiguous sign that they’re right. That they’re not only ignored by the Congress of the United States but that they’re being placed in harm’s way. So not only do they not get mail, they don’t get medications, they don’t get the opportunity to communicate.”

In a briefing with members of Congress earlier this month, Postmaster General Megan Brennan outlined the full extent of the problem. While the Postal Service was losing money at an unsustainable pace before the COVID-19 crisis, it has seen an insuperable and precipitous drop in mail volume since.

There was a 5.3% decline in mail volume, said Brennan, during the first month of the pandemic in the United States. By April, it had grown to 30%. It will only get worse, she predicted: At the end of the third quarter, it will be a 50% drop, and at the end of quarter four, 57%. For this fiscal year, which ends Oct. 1, the Postal Service is predicting a revenue loss of $13 billion, the result exclusively of COVID-19. That’s on top of the nearly $9 billion the USPS had been losing annually before the pandemic.

Post office workers are considered essential during COVID-19 shutdowns. Over 1,800 postal workers have either tested positive or are presumed to be positive with the virus, and there have been over 30 deaths related to COVID-19, according to union officials.

Vermont senator and former presidential candidate Bernie Sanders held a virtual town hall last week with postal union leaders. “At this moment,” he said, the USPS “is facing very difficult challenges.”

But the latest congressional relief package, signed into law by the President on Friday, when he went out of his way to call the USPS “a joke,” provides no support for the Postal Service.

“As far as I’m concerned the Postal Service got screwed three and a half times now,” said Paul Hogrogian, president of the National Postal Mail Handlers Union.

If additional funding is not provided, the USPS would have no way forward without significantly reducing staff and cutting some services. The post office currently employs 640,000 staffers, many of whom are veterans and people of color.

The Postal Service is required by the constitution to serve everyone in the country equally and with uniform rates. They are the only universal provider of mail service and have been a low-cost anchor for the mailing industry, helping to keep private mail service rates down. A recent analysis by the Institute for Policy Studies found that, without the USPS, 70 million more Americans would have to pay hefty surcharges for deliveries.

If the Postal Service were to halt some or all of its deliveries, “rural America would be left out of the equation or be forced to pay exorbitant prices,” explained Hogrogian. Prescription drugs, Social Security, and pension checks would no longer be directly delivered to them, he said, noting that 40% of Americans still pay and receive bills through the U.S. mail.

“So FedEx and UPS get to cherry-pick what markets they want to play in, and if it’s unprofitable or too remote or too expensive, they get to not do it,” said Rep. Gerry Connolly, chairman of the Subcommittee on Government Operations.

“This isn’t just a nice thing to do for the Postal Service. This is essential to every household and every business in America that counts on daily delivery of their prescription drugs, foodstuffs, medical equipment, supplies,” said Connolly. “As we speak, people are ordering masks through the mail, medical supplies, and prescriptions, and we’re even adding to the burden by voting through mail.”

The only way to save the Postal Service, said Fredric Rolando, the president of the National Association of Letter Carriers, is to participate in the upcoming presidential election and vote for Biden. Rolando said he’s focused fully on short-term measures to keep the Postal Service alive, but even potential bailout money won’t provide long-term relief.

The USPS is currently the most trusted government agency in the country with a 90% approval rating divided almost equally among both Democrats and Republicans. While the agency is federally run, it has not received taxpayer funding for more than 30 years and is considered financially independent.

But the agency has been rapidly losing money since a 2006 law, passed with the support of the George W. Bush administration, required the agency to pre-fund employee retiree health benefits for 75 years in the future. That means the Postal Service must pay for the future health care of employees who have not even been born yet. The burden accounts for an estimated 80% to 90% of the agency’s losses.

Postal advocates believe that the pre-funding initiative, which they call “onerous” and “draconian,” was intended to force the Postal Service to privatize. They also say that without the stimulus money, taxpayers will be forced to pay for retiree benefits anyway.

“The line in 2006 was that the Postal Service has to pay upfront now because ‘we’re not sure if they’re going to be around in 20 years, and then the taxpayer will be stuck with the bill,’” said Hogrogian. “But that’s exactly what’s going to happen now if we’re not given this infusion.”

And while $50 billion plus debt forgiveness to the tune of another $14 billion may seem excessive, Connolly said perspective matters, especially in light of the $2.2 trillion stimulus bill recently passed by Congress. “It’s a big ask, but you have to put it into context,” he said.

“Think about the airline industry: Here’s an industry that gouged customers over the last five years to maximize profits, and they’ve had record profits over the last five years. And what did they do with those profits? They used $42 billion collectively to buy back stock. Not a productive activity,” said Connolly. “And then when the pandemic hit, they came hat-in-hand asking for $50 billion for a bailout. So if we can do that for the airline industry, and we did, then we can certainly do something comparable for the Postal Service.”

There was initial bipartisan interest in a bailout of the USPS by Congress, but according to reports by the Washington Post, Trump and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin stepped in and threatened to veto the entire bill if it included the final agreed upon $13 billion direct grant to the USPS. Instead, they allowed only an additional $10 billion loan from the Treasury, but that comes with strings attached.

Connolly said that the loans taken from the Treasury usually work to take autonomy away from the USPS and bring it closer to privatization. “We are very worried that Treasury will pull our arm, and we’re going to resist it,” he said. “Mnuchin [and the President have] an agenda. You’ve got to remember that they don’t like the Postal Service as conservative Republicans because it’s big, it’s quasi-governmental, and it’s unionized.”

The Trump administration is supportive of privatizing the post office, and Hogrogian said that he was upset by “the shamefulness of them trying to use this crisis to carry out their political agenda, rather than set good policy on behalf of the people of this country.” A 2018 report written by a Treasury Department task force recommended selling off parts of the USPS to the private sector.

The Trump administration’s attempts to use the Postal Service as a “fiefdom” for “long-term political ambitions,” said Cleaver, “gives off a bad odor.”

The President has long advocated against the Postal Service. He does not support vote-by-mail initiatives as a response to the COVID-19 crisis, which he falsely claims would lead to an increase in voter fraud, and he also believes that the USPS should charge Jeff Bezos and Amazon more money for mail services than they do. The President reportedly personally pushed the Postmaster General to double rates for Amazon deliveries.

Still, Cleaver thinks there is a way to negotiate a bailout into the fourth stimulus bill. “It depends on how desperate we are to get the stimulus through, and it also depends on what else is on the table,” he said. “We’ve been meeting almost daily discussing it. Now it’s reached a point where people who are interested in getting that rural vote are going to have to think deeply about how they’re going to vote on this.”

Connolly also thinks negotiation is possible. “We had great success in the CARES Act in injecting things that the White House and Secretary Mnuchin and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell did not want to accept,” he said. Democrats, for example, were able to negotiate $150 billion for state and local governments and $400 million to help electoral boards and support voting by mail.

Negotiations for stimulus bill four are currently in committee.

“You know, we have a divided Congress and a divided government, and to get things done there’s going to have to be give and take,” Connolly said. “Republicans and the White House are going to have to give postal relief, and they’re going to have to put their agenda aside for the sake of the country.”

财富中文网所刊载内容之知识产权为财富媒体知识产权有限公司及/或相关权利人专属所有或持有。未经许可,禁止进行转载、摘编、复制及建立镜像等任何使用。
0条Plus
精彩评论
评论

撰写或查看更多评论

请打开财富Plus APP

前往打开