摩根士丹利(Morgan Stanley)的前亚洲区主席斯蒂芬•罗奇表示,美国国内储蓄率下降和“被浪费的全球领导力”,导致美元面临压力。他预测广义美元指数将下跌35%,并且美元在全球储备货币中的主导地位会遭遇巨大挑战。
罗奇说:“美元的替代品有很多。”罗奇现在是耶鲁大学的高级研究员和讲师,被认为是亚洲事务和货币领域的权威。他说,欧盟通过7,500亿欧元新冠疫情复苏基金和泛欧主权债券,会推动欧元升值。
他还表示,如果中国“继续坚持改革道路”,人民币将成为美元的一个替代品。而“美元无可替代”的观点,正在经受新冠疫情的考验。
近期,罗奇在“东方世界聚光灯”(Eastworld Spotlight)栏目中,与《财富》杂志的钱科雷进行了对话。他讨论了美元的替代品、中美关系的未来走向以及乔•拜登当选后会如何对待中国。因篇幅和清晰度关系,本文对访谈内容进行了编辑。
《财富》:近一个月来,您一直警告美元处境危急。能跟我们分享一下您对美元前景的预测吗?您为什么感到担忧?
斯蒂芬•罗奇:美元从2011年以来一直保持强势;通胀调整后的广义美元指数上涨了接近30%。未来两年,美元走势会大幅回调。我预计通胀调整后的广义美元指数将下跌35%,原因有两个。
第一,美国的宏观经济失衡会达到前所未有的程度。国内储蓄率大幅下降,会导致创纪录的经常帐赤字。在疫情爆发之初,美国的国内储蓄率已经处在极低的水平,仅占国民收入的1.4%。在巨大的预算赤字影响下,美国将出现负储蓄率,达到–5%至–10%。
我预测美元贬值的第二个原因是美国的一系列作为,包括去全球化、脱钩、贸易摩擦、贸易保护主义等等,浪费了其全球领导力。与其他国家相比,美国应对新冠疫情的表现之差令人难以置信,而且美国还有一场有关种族问题的“情绪宣泄”正在上演。
所以,从这两个角度来说,美元贬值35%绝非没有先例。在20世纪70年代,美元曾经出现过一次类似幅度的贬值,80年代中期有过两次,而在本世纪初美元贬值了30%。我们即将迎来一次姗姗来迟的美元大幅贬值。美元将贬值35%,迎来暴跌。
会不会出现美元的替代品?
美元的替代品有很多,目前全世界最受冷落[和被低估]的主要货币是欧元。但[欧元]最近持续走强,如果欧洲的政治领袖们能团结一致,通过7,500亿欧元“欧盟下一代”复兴计划,同时支持发行泛欧主权债券,欧元就会继续大幅升值。[编者注:采访时间在7月21日之前,当时欧盟领导人尚未初步通过该复兴计划。]
我认为,以广义的贸易加权汇率计算,人民币也会继续走强。过去15年,人民币升值50%,如果中国继续坚持改革道路,[人民币仍有升值空间]。我不想推荐一些另类的替代品,但你还是要认真对待比特币等加密货币和黄金等贵金属。
所以,在我看来,那种以为美元不可替代的想法,将在此次新冠疫情期间经受考验。
人民币要作为一种储备货币扮演更重要的角色,中国还需要在哪些方面进行改革?
有三件事确实非常关键:国有企业改革;资本市场改革;第三,中国需要增加对退休基金和医疗基础设施的投资。
特朗普政府似乎下定决心,要阻止中国获得西方国家的尖端技术,并且一直在说服美国的其他盟友联起手来,将中国赶出全球科技生态系统。美国能否成功抑制甚至阻止中国的创新步伐?
我认为[美国的所作所为]不可能阻止中国,但肯定会产生一些负面影响。特朗普政府针对华为及其供应商的种种作为,值得关注。
美国政府认为中国是威胁,因此应该阻止中国取得美国在二战之后长期享有的技术主导地位。我认为,科技战才是双方可能爆发的“冷战2.0”的核心。
鉴于美国经济目前的混乱形势,中美之间的贸易协议是否已经成为过去式,还是说它对于市场的表现依旧有着重要影响?
中美间的贸易摩擦刚刚平息,便爆发了新冠疫情,而且从很大程度上来看,新冠疫情已经成为主要议题。投资者认为,中美第一阶段的贸易协定没有取得多少实质成果,而两国达成第二阶段贸易协定的概率极低。由于前副总统拜登在竞选民调中遥遥领先,因此投资者在预测市场前景时,需要考虑到中美关系得以恢复,或出现贸易谈判达成新框架的可能性。
当下的市场已经受够了这种贸易摩擦,这与共和党和特朗普政府的策略并不相符。特朗普政府希望通过对中国的打压来分散美国民众的注意力,进而让美国国民忽略他们处理新冠疫情的糟糕表现。
如果拜登当选,您认为美国对待中国的态度会有大的转变吗?
如果拜登当选,美国政府的政策会更容易预测。过去两年半,许多棘手的问题已经被摆在了台面上,你不可能直接把它们抛在一边。但拜登会采取截然不同的方式,通过妥协寻找共同点,而不是利用所谓的“交易的艺术”中的策略,像特朗普政府一样惩罚和欺凌一个所谓的经济对手。
我认为,如果拜登当选,他在技术转让、创新政策、知识产权和网络等结构性问题上会很强硬。但我想拜登采用的谈判过程将更容易理解,他的目标和战术会更加透明。(财富中文网)
本文摘自“东方世界聚光灯”栏目。该栏目邀请来自亚洲的高管、专家、创业者和投资者,畅谈商业、技术和金融等问题。
翻译:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
摩根士丹利(Morgan Stanley)的前亚洲区主席斯蒂芬•罗奇表示,美国国内储蓄率下降和“被浪费的全球领导力”,导致美元面临压力。他预测广义美元指数将下跌35%,并且美元在全球储备货币中的主导地位会遭遇巨大挑战。
罗奇说:“美元的替代品有很多。”罗奇现在是耶鲁大学的高级研究员和讲师,被认为是亚洲事务和货币领域的权威。他说,欧盟通过7,500亿欧元新冠疫情复苏基金和泛欧主权债券,会推动欧元升值。
他还表示,如果中国“继续坚持改革道路”,人民币将成为美元的一个替代品。而“美元无可替代”的观点,正在经受新冠疫情的考验。
近期,罗奇在“东方世界聚光灯”(Eastworld Spotlight)栏目中,与《财富》杂志的钱科雷进行了对话。他讨论了美元的替代品、中美关系的未来走向以及乔•拜登当选后会如何对待中国。因篇幅和清晰度关系,本文对访谈内容进行了编辑。
《财富》:近一个月来,您一直警告美元处境危急。能跟我们分享一下您对美元前景的预测吗?您为什么感到担忧?
斯蒂芬•罗奇:美元从2011年以来一直保持强势;通胀调整后的广义美元指数上涨了接近30%。未来两年,美元走势会大幅回调。我预计通胀调整后的广义美元指数将下跌35%,原因有两个。
第一,美国的宏观经济失衡会达到前所未有的程度。国内储蓄率大幅下降,会导致创纪录的经常帐赤字。在疫情爆发之初,美国的国内储蓄率已经处在极低的水平,仅占国民收入的1.4%。在巨大的预算赤字影响下,美国将出现负储蓄率,达到–5%至–10%。
我预测美元贬值的第二个原因是美国的一系列作为,包括去全球化、脱钩、贸易摩擦、贸易保护主义等等,浪费了其全球领导力。与其他国家相比,美国应对新冠疫情的表现之差令人难以置信,而且美国还有一场有关种族问题的“情绪宣泄”正在上演。
所以,从这两个角度来说,美元贬值35%绝非没有先例。在20世纪70年代,美元曾经出现过一次类似幅度的贬值,80年代中期有过两次,而在本世纪初美元贬值了30%。我们即将迎来一次姗姗来迟的美元大幅贬值。美元将贬值35%,迎来暴跌。
会不会出现美元的替代品?
美元的替代品有很多,目前全世界最受冷落[和被低估]的主要货币是欧元。但[欧元]最近持续走强,如果欧洲的政治领袖们能团结一致,通过7,500亿欧元“欧盟下一代”复兴计划,同时支持发行泛欧主权债券,欧元就会继续大幅升值。[编者注:采访时间在7月21日之前,当时欧盟领导人尚未初步通过该复兴计划。]
我认为,以广义的贸易加权汇率计算,人民币也会继续走强。过去15年,人民币升值50%,如果中国继续坚持改革道路,[人民币仍有升值空间]。我不想推荐一些另类的替代品,但你还是要认真对待比特币等加密货币和黄金等贵金属。
所以,在我看来,那种以为美元不可替代的想法,将在此次新冠疫情期间经受考验。
人民币要作为一种储备货币扮演更重要的角色,中国还需要在哪些方面进行改革?
有三件事确实非常关键:国有企业改革;资本市场改革;第三,中国需要增加对退休基金和医疗基础设施的投资。
特朗普政府似乎下定决心,要阻止中国获得西方国家的尖端技术,并且一直在说服美国的其他盟友联起手来,将中国赶出全球科技生态系统。美国能否成功抑制甚至阻止中国的创新步伐?
我认为[美国的所作所为]不可能阻止中国,但肯定会产生一些负面影响。特朗普政府针对华为及其供应商的种种作为,值得关注。
美国政府认为中国是威胁,因此应该阻止中国取得美国在二战之后长期享有的技术主导地位。我认为,科技战才是双方可能爆发的“冷战2.0”的核心。
鉴于美国经济目前的混乱形势,中美之间的贸易协议是否已经成为过去式,还是说它对于市场的表现依旧有着重要影响?
中美间的贸易摩擦刚刚平息,便爆发了新冠疫情,而且从很大程度上来看,新冠疫情已经成为主要议题。投资者认为,中美第一阶段的贸易协定没有取得多少实质成果,而两国达成第二阶段贸易协定的概率极低。由于前副总统拜登在竞选民调中遥遥领先,因此投资者在预测市场前景时,需要考虑到中美关系得以恢复,或出现贸易谈判达成新框架的可能性。
当下的市场已经受够了这种贸易摩擦,这与共和党和特朗普政府的策略并不相符。特朗普政府希望通过对中国的打压来分散美国民众的注意力,进而让美国国民忽略他们处理新冠疫情的糟糕表现。
如果拜登当选,您认为美国对待中国的态度会有大的转变吗?
如果拜登当选,美国政府的政策会更容易预测。过去两年半,许多棘手的问题已经被摆在了台面上,你不可能直接把它们抛在一边。但拜登会采取截然不同的方式,通过妥协寻找共同点,而不是利用所谓的“交易的艺术”中的策略,像特朗普政府一样惩罚和欺凌一个所谓的经济对手。
我认为,如果拜登当选,他在技术转让、创新政策、知识产权和网络等结构性问题上会很强硬。但我想拜登采用的谈判过程将更容易理解,他的目标和战术会更加透明。(财富中文网)
本文摘自“东方世界聚光灯”栏目。该栏目邀请来自亚洲的高管、专家、创业者和投资者,畅谈商业、技术和金融等问题。
翻译:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
The decline in domestic saving in the U.S. and its “squandered global leadership” have put the U.S. dollar under pressure, says former Morgan Stanley Asia chairman Stephen Roach. He predicts the broad dollar index will drop by 35% and foresees legitimate challenges to the greenback’s status as the world’s dominant reserve currency.
“There are plenty of alternatives,” said Roach, who's now a senior fellow and lecturer at Yale University and considered a top authority on Asia and currency matters. The passing of the European Union’s 750 billion euro coronavirus recovery fund and a sovereign pan-European bond could boost the euro, he says.
The Chinese yuan could be another U.S. dollar alternative if China “stays the course on reforms,” said Roach. The idea of there being “no alternative to the dollar” is being tested by the ongoing pandemic, he said.
In an Eastworld Spotlight conversation with Fortune’s Clay Chandler this week, Roach discussed U.S. dollar alternatives, the future of U.S.-China relations, and how a President Joe Biden would treat Beijing. The conversation below has been edited for length and clarity.
Fortune: You’ve been warning for nearly a month that the dollar is in danger. Talk to us about the outlook and the sources of your concerns.
Stephen Roach: The dollar has had a strong run since 2011; a broad dollar index up close to 30% in inflation-adjusted terms. Over the next couple of years, I think the dollar is going to undergo a sharp correction to the downside. I look for the broad dollar index to decline by 35% on an inflation-adjusted basis for two sets of reasons.
One, the U.S. macro imbalances are going to be building as never before. A sharp decline in domestic savings that will trigger a record current account deficit. We entered the pandemic with a very low domestic savings rate, 1.4% of national income. And courtesy of these gigantic budget deficits, we’re going to see a negative savings rate to the tune of –5% to –10%.
The second set of reasons behind the dollar call is that America has squandered its global leadership in so many ways—de-globalization, decoupling, a trade war, trade protectionism. We’ve had an unbelievably abysmal performance in addressing the coronavirus relative to other nations, and we have a racial catharsis going on in the United States.
So from both standpoints…the dollar headed down 35% is not unprecedented. We had a comparable decline in the 1970s, a comparable decline for a couple of years in the mid-’80s, and about a 30% decline in the early 2000s. We’re going to have another one, it’s long overdue. It’s 35%—it’s a sharp decline.
Are we going to have an alternative to the U.S. dollar?
There are plenty of alternatives, [and] the most unloved [and undervalued] major currency in the world right now is the euro. [The euro has] been moving up recently, and if European political leaders can get their act together and pass this package that funds a 750 billion euro Next Generation EU recovery plan, and endorses the issuance of a sovereign pan-European bond to go along with it, the euro will continue to move up sharply. [Editor’s note: The interview was conducted before EU leaders preliminarily passed the recovery fund on July 21.]
I think the Chinese renminbi can also continue to move up on a broad trade-weighted basis. It’s up about 50% over the last 15 years, [and there’s more to go] if China stays the course on reform. I’m not recommending…exotic alternatives, but you have to look seriously at cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and precious metals like gold.
So I think the idea that there’s no alternative to the dollar is really going to be tested during this COVID crisis.
What are the additional reforms needed for China to play a bigger role as a reserve currency?
Three things in particular that are really critical: state-owned enterprise reform. Capital market reforms. And thirdly, [China’s] social safety net is still needs to be done to invest in retirement and in health care infrastructure.
The Trump administration seems determined to prevent China from getting a hold of cutting-edge Western technologies and has reached out to other U.S. allies to join the effort to keep China out of the global techno ecosystem. Can the U.S. succeed in slowing the pace of innovation in China or even shut it down?
I don’t think [the effort] could shut it down, but it certainly can have an adverse impact. The Trump administration’s move on Huawei and its suppliers is something to be [taken] very seriously.
The U.S. has a view that China is a threat and should be contained from achieving the type of technological dominance that America has long enjoyed post–World War II. And I think this technology battle is really at the heart of what could well be a “Cold War 2.0.”
Given all the other turmoil in the U.S. economy right now, is the focus on the U.S.-China trade deal a thing of the past, or is it still something that’s important to how markets perform?
COVID-19 has taken over where the trade issues have left off [and] has clearly taken the upper hand to a large extent. Investors have pretty much come to the view that phase 1 didn’t really accomplish much and that the likelihood of a phase 2 is very low. And with Vice President Biden leading so soundly in the polls, the prospects of a new reset or a new framework to negotiate these trade issues is something that investors will have to take into consideration in shaping their market outlook.
The markets are done with the trade war for the time being, and this is very much at odds with Republicans’ and the Trump administration’s strategy to fixate on China to deflect attention away from their pathetically horrible performance in dealing with the coronavirus.
In the case of a Biden victory, do you see a significant reset on how the U.S. deals with China?
There will be greater predictability to do policy. There are a lot of tough issues that have been put on the table in the last two and a half years that are not going to be yanked off the table. You are going to see a very different approach, one that really focuses much more on finding common ground through compromise, rather than utilizing the so-called Art of the Deal strategy to punish and bully a supposed economic adversary as the Trump administration has done.
On the structural issues of technology transfer, innovation policy, intellectual property rights, and cyber, I think if [Biden] is elected, he will be very tough on those issues. But I think it’ll be a process that will be easier to understand, [and] more transparent in its objectives and its tactics.
This story is part of Eastworld Spotlight, a series of conversations on matters of business, tech, and finance with executives, experts, entrepreneurs, and investors in Asia.