在新冠病毒疫情爆发后不久,人们开始为住宅和办公室购买便携式空气净化器。理由?该设备可以将病毒(可在室内漂浮多达3小时)从空气中过滤掉,从而降低患病风险。
但空气净化器真的好用吗?答案是肯定的,按照美国环保局的说法,在一定程度上是有用的。
空气净化器的效力取决于它们捕捉空气中颗粒物以及它们相对于过滤空间的过滤能力。它与其他技术同时使用时会发挥更大的效力,例如增强室内通风,在中央暖气和空调系统中使用高端过滤器,以及遵守社交疏离政策等。
在购买空气净化器之前不妨了解以下信息。
谁需要便携式空气净化器?
空气净化器相对于其他一些解决方案(例如改善通风,只需打开几扇窗户)来说较为昂贵。人们应该将其看作是一种额外的预防措施,或将其作为其他解决方案无法实施时的最后手段。
例如,高楼的窗户通常是不能打开的;也有可能你在家中陪伴着一名感染了新冠病毒的家庭成员,或者那些经常前往家庭之外高风险地带的人。例如,担心暴露于学生中的教师们可能会希望给其家人增添额外的保护措施。专家们甚至建议将空气净化器纳入学校更广泛的重启计划。
现有的空气净化技术有哪些?
空气净化器并非生来就是一模一样的,我们首先要看其过滤原理。
最广泛使用的空气净化技术是人们众所周知的机械过滤。简而言之,就是指空气净化器将空气送入能够捕捉悬浮颗粒物的实体过滤器,基本上与通过筛网过滤水中杂质的方式一样。
第二种方法是越来越流行的电离技术。该技术将电解质释放至悬浮物中,从而让其附着在物体表面而不是悬浮在空气中。然而,一些研究发现,电离式净化器的效率没有其他净化器高。环保局曾警告说,一些电离式净化器会产生臭氧,而且其浓度可能会威胁人类肺部健康。得益于技术的改善以及来自于监管方的压力,零臭氧排放电离式净化器也已面世,而且加州空气资源委员会已针对臭氧排放浓度低于安全标准的空气净化器列出了一个清单。
最后,还有多种非传统空气净化技术。其中一些遭到了广泛的审查,例如Molekule使用的PECO专属过滤技术。但由于空气净化器仅受制于有限的监管方监管,因此请务必谨慎对待实验性技术。
哪种过滤器能够捕捉冠状病毒?
要想确保空气净化器能够过滤冠状病毒,最简单的办法是购买带有高效空气过滤器(HEPA)的机械式空气净化器,它对0.3微米以上悬浮物的捕捉率达到了99.97%。医院通常使用这种过滤级别的净化器,而且业界普遍认为它能够有效地过滤掉空气中的冠状病毒。
冠状病毒的大小仅有0.1微米,比HEPA标称的可捕捉颗粒物的尺寸要小。然而,要悬浮在空气中,病毒需要一个载体,通常是水滴,而水滴的尺寸则要大得多,因此可以被过滤器俘获。
令人感到疑惑的是,一些空气净化器可能宣传自己有“HEPA类型”的过滤器,这一点具有误导性,因为这些过滤器的效果可能与真正的HEPA过滤器有差距。
包括电离式和静电式空气净化器在内的其他设备在清洁空气时无需使用过滤器。事情倒是简单了,但这种无过滤器净化器的效果可谓是千差万别,而且有关其捕捉冠状病毒效力的研究着实非常有限。因此总的来说,机械式HEPA过滤器是最安全的选择。
但有一个值得注意的例外:实验室测试显示,Molekule的专属PECO技术在捕捉悬浮颗粒物时的效力比HEPA更高,而且是直接摧毁并非是捕捉。然而,Molekule的设备在市场上的价格亦位于顶端(见下图)。
你的空气净化器是否足够大?
空气净化器的衡量指标称之为洁净空气量(CADR)。这个标准反映了净化器捕捉污染物的效能,但要理解这个数字并不容易。
大多数空气净化器有三个CADR标准,分别针对花粉、灰尘和烟雾,其过滤效率略有不同。按照家用电器制造商协会的推荐,所购买空气净化器的烟雾过滤CADR至少应该是房间空间的三分之二。
例如,如果房间大小为12英尺X 10英尺,或120立方英尺,那么所购买空气净化器的烟雾 CADR至少应该是80。
如果对此特别在意的话,你可以购买适用于更大房间的空气净化器,这也就意味着房间中的空气过滤频率将高于其必要频率。此外,对于那些层高高于8英尺的房间来说,协会称应该购买适用于更大房间的空气净化器(不过该组织并未说明如何调整相关指标。)
然而,这种做法并不适用于所有空气净化器:戴森和Molekule都已提交了按照CADR标准制定的自家设备指标。但它们也都就每个型号所适用的房间大小进行了建议。
独立式空气净化器基本上都是针对单个房间使用,因此,如果你需要对多个房间的空气进行过滤,那么你可能得购买多台净化器。
哪款空气净化器最好?
有几个型号的空气净化器在知名评论人士心目中一直名列前茅,不过人们还是得根据价格、房间大小和设计等因素来自行判断。
Coway AP-1512HH Mighty空气净化器是Tom’s Guide与《纽约时报》Wirecutter专栏的首选,亦得到了Cnet的高度评价。此外,Blueair Blue Pure 411和Honeywell HPA 300在上述三个榜单中也一直都处于靠前的位置。
好的空气净化器价格几何?
空气净化器的价格千差万别,这取决于其过滤能力和所使用的技术。
最贵的空气净化器包括799美元的Molekule;在低端,备受推崇的Blueair 411的价格仅为119美元。
我们还应注意:空气净化器的总价格不仅包括购入价格,同时还包括更换滤网的成本和频率,以及设备的耗电量。这一点对于电离式净化器来说是一个明显的优势,它没有需要更换的滤网。然而,其初始成本要高于机械式净化器,而且你还得清洁收集颗粒物的金属板,但有用户说这一体验并不愉快。
可以从哪里了解有关空气净化器的详情?
空气净化器评测领域一个非常有用的工具便是AHAM编录的室内空气净化器名录。该名录包含各类空气净化器的CADR和表现数据,业已经过独立实验室测试验证。
您也可以在空气净化器包装或营销材料上寻找AHAM的“Verifide”标识。该标识表明净化器制造商有关过滤能力以及其他细节的标称值都已得到了独立验证。(财富中文网)
译者:Feb
在新冠病毒疫情爆发后不久,人们开始为住宅和办公室购买便携式空气净化器。理由?该设备可以将病毒(可在室内漂浮多达3小时)从空气中过滤掉,从而降低患病风险。
但空气净化器真的好用吗?答案是肯定的,按照美国环保局的说法,在一定程度上是有用的。
空气净化器的效力取决于它们捕捉空气中颗粒物以及它们相对于过滤空间的过滤能力。它与其他技术同时使用时会发挥更大的效力,例如增强室内通风,在中央暖气和空调系统中使用高端过滤器,以及遵守社交疏离政策等。
在购买空气净化器之前不妨了解以下信息。
谁需要便携式空气净化器?
空气净化器相对于其他一些解决方案(例如改善通风,只需打开几扇窗户)来说较为昂贵。人们应该将其看作是一种额外的预防措施,或将其作为其他解决方案无法实施时的最后手段。
例如,高楼的窗户通常是不能打开的;也有可能你在家中陪伴着一名感染了新冠病毒的家庭成员,或者那些经常前往家庭之外高风险地带的人。例如,担心暴露于学生中的教师们可能会希望给其家人增添额外的保护措施。专家们甚至建议将空气净化器纳入学校更广泛的重启计划。
现有的空气净化技术有哪些?
空气净化器并非生来就是一模一样的,我们首先要看其过滤原理。
最广泛使用的空气净化技术是人们众所周知的机械过滤。简而言之,就是指空气净化器将空气送入能够捕捉悬浮颗粒物的实体过滤器,基本上与通过筛网过滤水中杂质的方式一样。
第二种方法是越来越流行的电离技术。该技术将电解质释放至悬浮物中,从而让其附着在物体表面而不是悬浮在空气中。然而,一些研究发现,电离式净化器的效率没有其他净化器高。环保局曾警告说,一些电离式净化器会产生臭氧,而且其浓度可能会威胁人类肺部健康。得益于技术的改善以及来自于监管方的压力,零臭氧排放电离式净化器也已面世,而且加州空气资源委员会已针对臭氧排放浓度低于安全标准的空气净化器列出了一个清单。
最后,还有多种非传统空气净化技术。其中一些遭到了广泛的审查,例如Molekule使用的PECO专属过滤技术。但由于空气净化器仅受制于有限的监管方监管,因此请务必谨慎对待实验性技术。
哪种过滤器能够捕捉冠状病毒?
要想确保空气净化器能够过滤冠状病毒,最简单的办法是购买带有高效空气过滤器(HEPA)的机械式空气净化器,它对0.3微米以上悬浮物的捕捉率达到了99.97%。医院通常使用这种过滤级别的净化器,而且业界普遍认为它能够有效地过滤掉空气中的冠状病毒。
冠状病毒的大小仅有0.1微米,比HEPA标称的可捕捉颗粒物的尺寸要小。然而,要悬浮在空气中,病毒需要一个载体,通常是水滴,而水滴的尺寸则要大得多,因此可以被过滤器俘获。
令人感到疑惑的是,一些空气净化器可能宣传自己有“HEPA类型”的过滤器,这一点具有误导性,因为这些过滤器的效果可能与真正的HEPA过滤器有差距。
包括电离式和静电式空气净化器在内的其他设备在清洁空气时无需使用过滤器。事情倒是简单了,但这种无过滤器净化器的效果可谓是千差万别,而且有关其捕捉冠状病毒效力的研究着实非常有限。因此总的来说,机械式HEPA过滤器是最安全的选择。
但有一个值得注意的例外:实验室测试显示,Molekule的专属PECO技术在捕捉悬浮颗粒物时的效力比HEPA更高,而且是直接摧毁并非是捕捉。然而,Molekule的设备在市场上的价格亦位于顶端(见下图)。
你的空气净化器是否足够大?
空气净化器的衡量指标称之为洁净空气量(CADR)。这个标准反映了净化器捕捉污染物的效能,但要理解这个数字并不容易。
大多数空气净化器有三个CADR标准,分别针对花粉、灰尘和烟雾,其过滤效率略有不同。按照家用电器制造商协会的推荐,所购买空气净化器的烟雾过滤CADR至少应该是房间空间的三分之二。
例如,如果房间大小为12英尺X 10英尺,或120立方英尺,那么所购买空气净化器的烟雾 CADR至少应该是80。
如果对此特别在意的话,你可以购买适用于更大房间的空气净化器,这也就意味着房间中的空气过滤频率将高于其必要频率。此外,对于那些层高高于8英尺的房间来说,协会称应该购买适用于更大房间的空气净化器(不过该组织并未说明如何调整相关指标。)
然而,这种做法并不适用于所有空气净化器:戴森和Molekule都已提交了按照CADR标准制定的自家设备指标。但它们也都就每个型号所适用的房间大小进行了建议。
独立式空气净化器基本上都是针对单个房间使用,因此,如果你需要对多个房间的空气进行过滤,那么你可能得购买多台净化器。
哪款空气净化器最好?
有几个型号的空气净化器在知名评论人士心目中一直名列前茅,不过人们还是得根据价格、房间大小和设计等因素来自行判断。
Coway AP-1512HH Mighty空气净化器是Tom’s Guide与《纽约时报》Wirecutter专栏的首选,亦得到了Cnet的高度评价。此外,Blueair Blue Pure 411和Honeywell HPA 300在上述三个榜单中也一直都处于靠前的位置。
好的空气净化器价格几何?
空气净化器的价格千差万别,这取决于其过滤能力和所使用的技术。
最贵的空气净化器包括799美元的Molekule;在低端,备受推崇的Blueair 411的价格仅为119美元。
我们还应注意:空气净化器的总价格不仅包括购入价格,同时还包括更换滤网的成本和频率,以及设备的耗电量。这一点对于电离式净化器来说是一个明显的优势,它没有需要更换的滤网。然而,其初始成本要高于机械式净化器,而且你还得清洁收集颗粒物的金属板,但有用户说这一体验并不愉快。
可以从哪里了解有关空气净化器的详情?
空气净化器评测领域一个非常有用的工具便是AHAM编录的室内空气净化器名录。该名录包含各类空气净化器的CADR和表现数据,业已经过独立实验室测试验证。
您也可以在空气净化器包装或营销材料上寻找AHAM的“Verifide”标识。该标识表明净化器制造商有关过滤能力以及其他细节的标称值都已得到了独立验证。(财富中文网)
译者:Feb
Soon after the coronavirus pandemic hit, people started snatching up portable air purifiers for their homes and offices. Their thinking? The devices will scrub the air of the virus (it can float for up to three hours indoors), reducing their risk of falling sick.
But do air purifiers actually work? The answer is yes—to a point, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
The effectiveness of air purifiers depends on how well they catch air particles and their size in relation to the space they must filter. And it helps to use the devices in concert with other techniques such as increasing ventilation indoors, using high-end filters in central heating and air conditioning systems, and adhering to social distancing.
Here's what you need to know before buying an air purifier.
Who needs a portable air purifier?
Air purifiers are expensive relative to some other solutions—improved ventilation, for instance, can be as simple as opening a few windows. You should think of them as an extra precaution, or as a last resort when other options are unavailable.
For instance, windows in high-rise buildings often can’t be opened. Or maybe you’re at home with a coronavirus-infected family member, or with people who are regularly in risky situations outside of the home. For example, teachers worried about exposure from their students may want the extra protection for their families. Experts have even recommended air purifiers as part of schools’ broader reopening plans.
What types of air-purifying technologies are available?
Air purifiers aren't created equal. The first thing to look at is how a purifier filters the air.
The most widely used air purifier technology is what’s known as mechanical filtration. This simply means a purifier pushes air through a physical filter that catches airborne particles, in essentially the same way a sieve removes particles when you pour water through it.
A second, increasingly widespread method involves ionization. This technology adds an electric charge to particles, which makes them stick to surfaces instead of floating airborne. However, some research has found ionizing purifiers are less effective than other options. And the EPA has warned that some ionizing devices generate ozone at levels that may be damaging to human lungs. Thanks to better technology and pressure from regulators, ionizing filters that don’t generate ozone are now available, and the California Air Resources Board has created a list of those that emit only safe levels of ozone.
Finally, there are a number of unconventional air purifying technologies available. Some of these, such as the proprietary PECO filtration technology used by Molekule, are widely vetted. But since air purifier claims are subject to limited regulatory oversight, approach experimental technology with caution.
Which filters catch the coronavirus?
The easiest way to ensure your air purifier can filter coronavirus is to buy a mechanical purifier that uses a HEPA filter, which capture 99.97% of particles that are 0.3 microns or larger. This is the filter grade commonly used by hospitals, and is widely considered effective for removing coronavirus from the air.
The size of the coronavirus is only around 0.1 microns, or smaller than what a HEPA filter is rated to reliably catch. But to get airborne, the virus requires a carrier, usually water droplets, which are much larger and therefore can be captured.
Adding to the confusion, some purifiers may be advertised as having "HEPA type" filters, which could be misleading, since these may not be as effective as a true HEPA filters.
Other devices, including ionizing and electrostatic purifiers, clean the air without using filters. That can save hassle, but the effectiveness of filterless purifiers varies widely, and research on their effect on the coronavirus specifically is still limited. So in general, a mechanical HEPA filter is the safest bet.
There is one notable exception: Laboratory tests show Molekule's proprietary PECO technology catches particulates more effectively than HEPA, and destroys them instead of just trapping them. But Molekule's devices are among the most expensive on the market (see below).
Is your purifier big enough?
Air filters are rated on a metric known as Clean Air Delivery Rate, or CADR. This rating reflects how well a purifier removes contaminants, though understanding the number is difficult.
Most purifiers have three CADR ratings, for pollen, dust, and tobacco smoke, which are filtered at slightly different rates. The Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) recommends buying a filter with a tobacco smoke CADR of at least two-thirds of the volume of the room in which you'll use the device.
For example, if you’re buying a purifier for a room that’s 12 feet by 10 feet, or 120 cubic feet, you’d want a purifier with a tobacco smoke CADR of at least 80.
If you want to be especially cautious, you can buy a purifier rated for a larger room, which will simply mean your air is being filtered even more often than necessary. Also, for rooms with ceilings higher than eight feet, AHAM says you’ll want a purifier rated for a larger room (though the group doesn’t specify how to adjust your measurement).
This doesn’t apply to all purifiers, though: Neither Dyson nor Molekule have submitted their devices for measurement under the CADR standard. But they offer their own recommendations for the room size each model can protect.
Freestanding air purifiers are largely intended to work for single rooms, so if you want protection in more than one part of your house, you may need multiple purifiers.
Which air purifiers are best?
A few air purifier models are consistently highly ranked by reputable reviewers, though you’ll have to make your own judgment when balancing factors like price, room size, and design.
The Coway AP-1512HH Mighty purifier was the top pick from both Tom’s Guide and the New York Times’ Wirecutter, and was also highly rated by Cnet. The Blueair Blue Pure 411 and the Honeywell HPA 300 also placed consistently high in all three rankings.
How much does an effective air purifier cost?
Air purifier prices can vary a great deal depending on their filtering capacity and the technology they rely on.
Among the most expensive air purifiers is the $799 Molekule. On the other end of the spectrum, the highly-rated Blueair 411 purifier costs just $119.
Also worth considering: An air purifier's total price includes not only the sticker price, but also the cost and frequency of replacement filters, and the electrical cost of running the device. That’s one clear advantage for ionizing purifiers, which don’t have a filter that needs replacing. But they do generally cost more up front than mechanical filters, and you have to clean the metal plates that collect particulates, which some users say is unpleasant.
Where to find more information about air purifiers?
One very useful tool for evaluating air purifiers is this directory of room air cleaners maintained by AHAM. The directory includes room size (CADR) and performance data for a wide variety of purifiers, verified by independent lab tests.
You can also look for AHAM’s “Verifide” mark on a purifier's packaging or marketing materials. This indicates that the manufacturer’s claims about filtration power and other details have been independently verified.