“正在开发中的疫苗有接近200种。39种疫苗正在进行人体临床试验。9种疫苗进入三期临床试验。真的了不起。”在谈到新冠疫苗的研究进展时,赛斯•伯克利的赞叹之情溢于言表。但他很快指出,这些疫苗更多只是“里程标记”,还算不上里程碑。他说:“我们不知道这些疫苗能否研制成功。”我们还要经过很多次的试验,才可以确认这些公司的不懈努力,能否给我们应对此次新冠疫情带来真正安全、有效的手段。
没有人比伯克利更了解疫苗的作用,也没有人比他更清楚疫苗开发、审批和在全世界接种所面临的挑战。伯克利是一名医生兼流行病学专家,也是全球疫苗免疫联盟(GAVI)的负责人。过去20年,全球疫苗免疫联盟让近8亿儿童获得了对各种致命病原体的免疫力,拯救了无数人的生命。
伯克利自2011年开始担任全球疫苗免疫联盟的首席执行官。在此之前,他创立了国际艾滋病疫苗行动组织(International AIDS Vaccine Initiative)并担任负责人。这段经历让他学会了坚持不懈和控制自己的预期。毕竟,到现在为止,人类仍然没有找到艾滋病病毒疫苗,尽管全世界已经为此努力了四十多年。最近几年出现的严重急性呼吸道综合征(SARS)或中东呼吸综合征(MERS)这两种致命冠状病毒也没有疫苗,莱姆病、西尼罗河病毒、寨卡病毒甚至普通感冒同样没有疫苗。
伯克利表示,令人吃惊的是,大批公司纷纷投入到新冠疫苗的开发工作当中,这种情况是前所未有的。这代表广大药企愿意团结起来,为一项非常重要的共同事业而努力:保证疫苗诞生之后,可以同时投放到全世界。
这种合作方式要通过一项史无前例的计划才能够实现。全球疫苗免疫联盟与流行病防范创新联盟(CEPI)和世界卫生组织(World Health Organization)合作创建了2019冠状病毒病疫苗全球获取机制(COVAX机制),该计划将联合较发达国家的购买力,保障一批有效疫苗,同时协调全球资源,进行疫苗的生产、存放、分配,最终保证全球几十亿人可以安全、迅速地接种疫苗。
伯克利表示,到目前为止,已经有170多个国家参与了该机制,几乎每一家正在研制新冠疫苗的制药公司都参与其中。该机制的目标是投资12至15种最有希望的候选疫苗,然后帮助这些公司扩大生产规模。
伯克利说:“我们希望在2021年年底之前生产20亿支疫苗。这是前所未有的壮举。没错,我们会经历许多困难,而且肯定会有很多批评的声音,但疫情当前,全世界团结起来,并且制药行业正在发挥着主导作用……这是一件真正了不起的大事件。”在这种灾难性的病毒被制服之后的很长一段时间里,这种合作所产生的积极影响仍然将会持续存在。
制药行业一直口碑不佳。盖洛普(Gallup)的民意调查显示,制药业在美国民众当中的好感度排在倒数第二位,去年更是排名垫底。但新冠疫情为制药业提供了一次救赎的机会。许多有见识的观察家认为,制药业抓住了这次机会。比尔•盖茨在接受笔者采访时说:“制药行业对于疫情的反应和在疫苗方面所做的努力,让我们重新认识到他们的能力和对整个世界的帮助,这改变了它们在民众心目中那种自私自利和互相不配合的负面形象。”
或许面对疫情,最令人意想不到的是制药业对于合作的诚意。我们看到,过去在疫苗领域并不占主要地位的传统药企巨头阿斯利康(AstraZeneca),与备受尊敬的学术机构牛津大学(University of Oxford)合作,以加快一款候选疫苗从实验室到进入人体试验的过程。我们看到了互为竞争对手的赛诺菲(Sanofi)和葛兰素史克(GSK)携起手来,我们看到了大量的国际合作:例如德国制药公司BioNTech与药企巨头辉瑞(Pfizer)合作,正在纽约试验一款新型信使核糖核酸疫苗,同时与复星医药合作在上海试验另一款疫苗。
慈善家比尔•盖茨的比尔及梅琳达•盖茨基金会(Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation)正在与多家生物制药公司合作开发疫苗以及治疗新冠肺炎的药物。他表示,至少在规模方面,他正在见证一种史无前例的合作形式——不参与疫苗开发的公司愿意提供工厂以加快疫苗生产。
著名生物科技分析师、纽约Cantor Fitzgerald公司的医疗保健研究主管阿列西娅•杨也看到传统竞争对手正在相互合作,协助生产新冠肺炎治疗药物。她提到自己正在分析的一家公司再生元(Regeneron):“再生元最近与罗氏制药(Roche)合作,后者可以帮助增加抗体供应,这种合作是前所未有的。”她解释说:“正常情况下,无论是在肿瘤学还是其他领域,再生元与罗氏都是竞争对手。
“新冠疫苗和所有药物所面临的一个重要问题是生产速度和从中能够获得的收益。”这是因为,在疫情的背景下,“制药公司的任务不是生产一款供几万人或者100万人使用的药物。它们的产能或许要满足数亿人的需求。”而且这些工作还不能干扰公司的其他业务。阿列西娅•杨补充说:“这些公司都是制药公司,所以它们还要保证其他药品的供应。”
对于新冠疫苗,我们不知道究竟哪一款能够成功,或者是否会有足够多的疫苗和药物可以保护地球上的人类。我们看到了药企之间的这种奇妙的新合作方式,我们相信它们在过去三个季度的合作,或许将改变这个世界,或者拯救部分世界。问题是:它们能否坚持到疫情结束,并且延续这种共同使命感,解决全球没有得到满足的其他健康需求?
在今年夏天召开的《财富》头脑风暴健康大会上,百时美施贵宝(Bristol Myers Squibb)的首席执行官乔瓦尼•卡福里奥的一番话发人深省:“当前,各类药企相互协作盛况空前,这是我从未见过的……我们如何把过去六个月里得到的启发应用到癌症治疗领域?”或者,应用到登革热、糖尿病或其他各种流行病?
全球疫苗免疫联盟的赛斯•伯克利认为,这些问题的部分答案在于创建行之有效的机制,促进和培养公司、行业、非营利组织以及政府之间的协作。他表示,类似于COVAX机制这种国际模式,甚至可以作为解决气候变化的模板,使来自世界各地的人们能够打破惯性、政治和财务壁垒。
他问道:“整个世界作为一个共同体,如何实现这个目标?”在疫情时期,无论是政府还是公司领导人,所有人都需要共同面对挑战。携手应对疫情。(财富中文网)
贝莱德(BLACKROCK)、碧迪医疗(BD)、高露洁-棕榄(COLGATE- PALMOLIVE)、科迪华农业科技(CORTEVA AGRISCIENCE)、汉瑞祥(HENRY SCHEIN)、万事达卡(MASTERCARD)、默沙东(MERCK)、再生元、加拿大皇家银行(ROYAL BANK OF CANADA)、LINEAGE LOGISTICS、雅培(ABBOTT)、CENTENE、沃尔玛、培生(PEARSON)、美敦力(MEDTRONIC)、百威英博(AB INBEV)、宜家/斯堪斯卡合资公司(IKEA/SKANSKA)、瑞典钢铁公司(SSAB)、蒙德拉贡(MONDRAGON)、约旦阿赫里银行(JORDAN AHLI BANK)、FOOTPRINT、ONEUNITED BANK、美国银行、UPS、CHENMED、沃旭能源(ØRSTED)、牛尾(USHIO)、阿里巴巴(ALIBABA)、蔚来(NIO)、高通(QUALCOMM)、GRUPO ENERGÍA BOGOTÁ、NATURA、西麦斯(CEMEX)、微软(MICROSOFT)、AMD、ADOBE、谷歌(GOOGLE)、英伟达(NVIDIA)、PAYPAL、赛富时(SALESFORCE)、UDEMY、WILLIAMS-SONOMA、ZOOM、SAFARICOM、非洲银行(AFRICAN BANK),ZUTARI、RELIANCE JIO,印度血清研究所(SERUM INSTITUTE OF INDIA)、GRAB、东西种子公司(EAST- WEST SEED)、GREEN MONDAY、平安保险(PING AN INSURANCE)
译者:Biz
“正在开发中的疫苗有接近200种。39种疫苗正在进行人体临床试验。9种疫苗进入三期临床试验。真的了不起。”在谈到新冠疫苗的研究进展时,赛斯•伯克利的赞叹之情溢于言表。但他很快指出,这些疫苗更多只是“里程标记”,还算不上里程碑。他说:“我们不知道这些疫苗能否研制成功。”我们还要经过很多次的试验,才可以确认这些公司的不懈努力,能否给我们应对此次新冠疫情带来真正安全、有效的手段。
没有人比伯克利更了解疫苗的作用,也没有人比他更清楚疫苗开发、审批和在全世界接种所面临的挑战。伯克利是一名医生兼流行病学专家,也是全球疫苗免疫联盟(GAVI)的负责人。过去20年,全球疫苗免疫联盟让近8亿儿童获得了对各种致命病原体的免疫力,拯救了无数人的生命。
伯克利自2011年开始担任全球疫苗免疫联盟的首席执行官。在此之前,他创立了国际艾滋病疫苗行动组织(International AIDS Vaccine Initiative)并担任负责人。这段经历让他学会了坚持不懈和控制自己的预期。毕竟,到现在为止,人类仍然没有找到艾滋病病毒疫苗,尽管全世界已经为此努力了四十多年。最近几年出现的严重急性呼吸道综合征(SARS)或中东呼吸综合征(MERS)这两种致命冠状病毒也没有疫苗,莱姆病、西尼罗河病毒、寨卡病毒甚至普通感冒同样没有疫苗。
伯克利表示,令人吃惊的是,大批公司纷纷投入到新冠疫苗的开发工作当中,这种情况是前所未有的。这代表广大药企愿意团结起来,为一项非常重要的共同事业而努力:保证疫苗诞生之后,可以同时投放到全世界。
这种合作方式要通过一项史无前例的计划才能够实现。全球疫苗免疫联盟与流行病防范创新联盟(CEPI)和世界卫生组织(World Health Organization)合作创建了2019冠状病毒病疫苗全球获取机制(COVAX机制),该计划将联合较发达国家的购买力,保障一批有效疫苗,同时协调全球资源,进行疫苗的生产、存放、分配,最终保证全球几十亿人可以安全、迅速地接种疫苗。
伯克利表示,到目前为止,已经有170多个国家参与了该机制,几乎每一家正在研制新冠疫苗的制药公司都参与其中。该机制的目标是投资12至15种最有希望的候选疫苗,然后帮助这些公司扩大生产规模。
伯克利说:“我们希望在2021年年底之前生产20亿支疫苗。这是前所未有的壮举。没错,我们会经历许多困难,而且肯定会有很多批评的声音,但疫情当前,全世界团结起来,并且制药行业正在发挥着主导作用……这是一件真正了不起的大事件。”在这种灾难性的病毒被制服之后的很长一段时间里,这种合作所产生的积极影响仍然将会持续存在。
制药行业一直口碑不佳。盖洛普(Gallup)的民意调查显示,制药业在美国民众当中的好感度排在倒数第二位,去年更是排名垫底。但新冠疫情为制药业提供了一次救赎的机会。许多有见识的观察家认为,制药业抓住了这次机会。比尔•盖茨在接受笔者采访时说:“制药行业对于疫情的反应和在疫苗方面所做的努力,让我们重新认识到他们的能力和对整个世界的帮助,这改变了它们在民众心目中那种自私自利和互相不配合的负面形象。”
或许面对疫情,最令人意想不到的是制药业对于合作的诚意。我们看到,过去在疫苗领域并不占主要地位的传统药企巨头阿斯利康(AstraZeneca),与备受尊敬的学术机构牛津大学(University of Oxford)合作,以加快一款候选疫苗从实验室到进入人体试验的过程。我们看到了互为竞争对手的赛诺菲(Sanofi)和葛兰素史克(GSK)携起手来,我们看到了大量的国际合作:例如德国制药公司BioNTech与药企巨头辉瑞(Pfizer)合作,正在纽约试验一款新型信使核糖核酸疫苗,同时与复星医药合作在上海试验另一款疫苗。
慈善家比尔•盖茨的比尔及梅琳达•盖茨基金会(Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation)正在与多家生物制药公司合作开发疫苗以及治疗新冠肺炎的药物。他表示,至少在规模方面,他正在见证一种史无前例的合作形式——不参与疫苗开发的公司愿意提供工厂以加快疫苗生产。
著名生物科技分析师、纽约Cantor Fitzgerald公司的医疗保健研究主管阿列西娅•杨也看到传统竞争对手正在相互合作,协助生产新冠肺炎治疗药物。她提到自己正在分析的一家公司再生元(Regeneron):“再生元最近与罗氏制药(Roche)合作,后者可以帮助增加抗体供应,这种合作是前所未有的。”她解释说:“正常情况下,无论是在肿瘤学还是其他领域,再生元与罗氏都是竞争对手。
“新冠疫苗和所有药物所面临的一个重要问题是生产速度和从中能够获得的收益。”这是因为,在疫情的背景下,“制药公司的任务不是生产一款供几万人或者100万人使用的药物。它们的产能或许要满足数亿人的需求。”而且这些工作还不能干扰公司的其他业务。阿列西娅•杨补充说:“这些公司都是制药公司,所以它们还要保证其他药品的供应。”
对于新冠疫苗,我们不知道究竟哪一款能够成功,或者是否会有足够多的疫苗和药物可以保护地球上的人类。我们看到了药企之间的这种奇妙的新合作方式,我们相信它们在过去三个季度的合作,或许将改变这个世界,或者拯救部分世界。问题是:它们能否坚持到疫情结束,并且延续这种共同使命感,解决全球没有得到满足的其他健康需求?
在今年夏天召开的《财富》头脑风暴健康大会上,百时美施贵宝(Bristol Myers Squibb)的首席执行官乔瓦尼•卡福里奥的一番话发人深省:“当前,各类药企相互协作盛况空前,这是我从未见过的……我们如何把过去六个月里得到的启发应用到癌症治疗领域?”或者,应用到登革热、糖尿病或其他各种流行病?
全球疫苗免疫联盟的赛斯•伯克利认为,这些问题的部分答案在于创建行之有效的机制,促进和培养公司、行业、非营利组织以及政府之间的协作。他表示,类似于COVAX机制这种国际模式,甚至可以作为解决气候变化的模板,使来自世界各地的人们能够打破惯性、政治和财务壁垒。
他问道:“整个世界作为一个共同体,如何实现这个目标?”在疫情时期,无论是政府还是公司领导人,所有人都需要共同面对挑战。携手应对疫情。(财富中文网)
译者:Biz
“Nearly 200 in development. Thirty-nine in human clinical trials. Nine in Phase III trials. I mean, yes, that is something.” There is marvel in Seth Berkley’s voice as he relates the progress made so far in producing a possible vaccine against COVID-19. But then, he’s quick to point out that these numbers are more mile markers than milestones. “We don’t know whether any of those are going to make it through,” he says. There remains much testing to be done before we’ll know if any of these valiant efforts produces a safe and truly effective countermeasure to this pandemic.
There are few people on earth who better understand the power of vaccines—or who know more about the challenge of developing, vet- ting, and distributing them around the world—than Berkley. The physician and epidemiologist presides over GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance, which over the past 20 years has immunized nearly 800 million children against a host of deadly pathogens, saving millions of lives.
Before becoming GAVI’s CEO in 2011, Berkley found- ed and led the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative— which itself was a long lesson in both perseverance and keeping one’s expectations in check. There is, after all, no vaccine yet for HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, despite nearly four decades of global endeavor. Nor is there one for SARS or MERS, those two other deadly coronaviruses that have emerged in recent years—nor for Lyme disease, West Nile virus, Zika, or the common cold.
Yet in one striking way, the swarm of initiatives to develop vaccines against COVID is unique, says Berkley. That is in the readiness of pharmaceutical companies to stand together in one very important common cause: ensuring that when vaccines are ready, they are available to the whole world at the same time.
The way this is manifesting is through what is itself a first-of-its-kind enterprise. GAVI, along with CEPI (the Coalition for Epidemic Pre- paredness Innovations) and the World Health Organization, have formed what they have called the “COVAX Facility” - a plan that pools together the purchasing power of wealthier nations to secure a portfolio of viable vaccines and simultaneously coordinates worldwide efforts to manufacture, stockpile, distribute, and deliver them safely and speedily to billions of people.
So far, more than 170 countries have signed on to the compact—and virtually every pharma company working on a COVID vaccine is participating in the planning, Berkley says. The goal is to invest in a portfolio of 12 to 15 candidate vaccines, as the most promising ones evolve, and then help those companies scale up manufacturing.
“We’re trying to do 2 billion doses by end of 2021,” Berkley says. “Nothing like this has ever been done before. Yes, we’ll have some rough patches - I’m sure we’ll have lots of critics - but the idea
that, in a pandemic, the whole world is coming together, that industry is leading as part of this … that’s a really big deal.” And it’s a big deal that could have positive repercussions long after this catastrophic virus is corralled.
FOR A SECTOR that has long been at or near the bottom of public opinion ratings—the pharmaceutical industry is currently the second-most disliked business group in America, according to Gallup’s polling, up from its dead-last ranking last year—the COVID crisis has provided an opportunity for redemption. And many knowledgeable observers say the industry has grabbed it. “Their response to the pandemic and this great work that pharma people are doing has reminded many of their capacities and how they can be helpful to the world—as opposed to the industry being viewed as kind of selfish and uncooperative,” Bill Gates tells me in an interview
Perhaps the most unexpected aspect to that response has been the sector’s wholehearted embrace of collaboration. We’ve seen traditional pharma giant AstraZeneca, which in years past has not been a major player in vaccines, partner with a venerable academic institution (University of Oxford) to swiftly bring a vaccine candidate from lab to human trial. We’ve seen rivals snuggle up in pairs (Sanofi and GSK) and international collaborations galore: Germany’s BioNTech, for instance, is testing one novel messenger RNA vaccine with giant Pfizer, in New York, and a second with Fosun Pharma, in Shanghai.
Philanthropist Gates, whose Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is working with a large number of biopharma companies to develop vaccines as well as medicines to treat patients with COVID, says he’s now witnessing a form of cooperation that seems never to have happened before, at least at scale—and that’s having a company that did not invent a vaccine provide its factories so that production can be rapidly increased.
Alethia Young, a top biotech analyst and head of health care research at Cantor Fitzgerald, in New York, also sees traditional rivals coming together to help in manufacturing COVID therapeutics. She points to Regeneron, a company she covers as an analyst: “They did a collaboration recently with Roche, so that Roche could help them get more supply of their antibody—and that’s unprecedented,” she says. “Normally, when you look in the area of oncology or in other spaces, Regeneron and Roche are competitors.
“A big issue with vaccines and all of these medicines is the rate at which you can produce and how much you can make of them,” Young ex- plains. That’s because, in the math of the pandemic, “the task is not to make a medicine that’s available for a hundred thousand people or even a million people. You’re making a medicine that, over time, needs to be available to probably hundreds of mil- lions of people.” And all this without disrupting the rest of your business, she adds: “These companies are pharmaceutical companies, so they have a whole other set of medicines they’re trying to supply for other stuff.”
IN THE CASE of a COVID vaccine, we don’t know yet which, if any, of the shots on goal will score—or when there will be enough supply of vaccine and medicine to protect the planet. We have seen enough of this brave new approach among pharma companies, however, to think their collective action over the past three-quarters of a year might actually change the world, or save part of it. The question is: Can they not only keep it up through the end of this pandemic, but also extend their sense of shared purpose to other unmet needs in global health?
Giovanni Caforio, CEO of Bristol Myers Squibb, said it well at Fortune’s virtual Brainstorm Health conference this summer: “I have never seen the level of collaboration that’s going on today … so how do we take what we’ve learned in the last six months and apply it to cancer?” Or, for that matter, to dengue, diabetes, and myriad other plagues?
GAVI’s Seth Berkley believes part of the answer to such questions is creating mechanisms that facilitate and foster such collaboration across companies, indus- tries, nonprofit sectors, and governments. And an inter- national model such as the COVAX Facility, for example, might even offer a template for tackling climate change, he says—allowing far-flung parties to break through inertial, political, and financial barriers.
“How, as a world, do we come together to make stuff happen?” he asks. In our age of pandemic, that challenge belongs to every government and business leader.