过去几十年间,查尔斯和他已故的弟弟大卫•科赫利用他们共同的财富和人脉关系,发挥着令人难以置信的政治影响力。他们豪掷数亿美元,重塑了美国的政治格局,推动共和党议程向他们支持的自由主义和自由市场靠拢,并催生了茶党运动。2014年,兄弟两人共同创立了强大的保守主义组织“繁荣美国人”(Americans for Prosperity)。
现年85岁的查尔斯•科赫在他的新书《相信人民:在一个自上而下的世界提出自下而上的解决方案》(Believe in People: Bottom-Up Solutions for a Top-Down World)中写道:“天哪,我们搞砸了!真是一团乱!”
科赫和弟弟深度介入了美国气候变化应对决策的制定。他们通过“繁荣美国人”组织,促使400多位国会成员承诺投票反对没有相应减税措施的气候变化法案。在加州,他们发挥影响力减弱了排放法规的约束力。1997至2018年间,他们共斥资145555197美元,资助了近100个抨击气候变化科学的组织。
2011年最高法院就联合公民诉联邦选举委员会案做出裁决后,科赫兄弟斥资近2亿美元支持声称不会通过任何新环境法规的共和党人参与竞选。
“茶党不是我们创立的。我们只是和他们一样担心政府支出不可持续。我们在这点上支持一些茶党团体。”11月13日科赫在给《华尔街日报》(Wall Street Journal)记者道格拉斯•贝尔金的电子邮件中写道,“但现在我觉得,从长远来看,茶党基本上失败了,因为我们现在选出的共和党政府是历史上政府开支最大的一届。”
他还祝贺了乔•拜登和贺锦丽(Kamala Harris)分别当选总统和副总统,并表示他愿意与新一届白宫政府合作,“设法携手打破阻碍人们前进的障碍”。他说,这些障碍包括了刑事司法和移民改革。
科赫还在邮件中写道:“与此同时,我希望我们都能够利用选举后的这段时间找到更好的前进道路。由于党派之争,我们对政治寄予了过高的期望,但对自身和彼此却期望过低。”
虽然科赫兄弟并不支持特朗普,但他们在2016年大选中投入了约7.5亿美元。2018年,他们承诺还会再投入4亿美元,用于支持保守派候选人。(财富中文网)
译者:钱功毅
过去几十年间,查尔斯和他已故的弟弟大卫•科赫利用他们共同的财富和人脉关系,发挥着令人难以置信的政治影响力。他们豪掷数亿美元,重塑了美国的政治格局,推动共和党议程向他们支持的自由主义和自由市场靠拢,并催生了茶党运动。2014年,兄弟两人共同创立了强大的保守主义组织“繁荣美国人”(Americans for Prosperity)。
现年85岁的查尔斯•科赫在他的新书《相信人民:在一个自上而下的世界提出自下而上的解决方案》(Believe in People: Bottom-Up Solutions for a Top-Down World)中写道:“天哪,我们搞砸了!真是一团乱!”
科赫和弟弟深度介入了美国气候变化应对决策的制定。他们通过“繁荣美国人”组织,促使400多位国会成员承诺投票反对没有相应减税措施的气候变化法案。在加州,他们发挥影响力减弱了排放法规的约束力。1997至2018年间,他们共斥资145555197美元,资助了近100个抨击气候变化科学的组织。
2011年最高法院就联合公民诉联邦选举委员会案做出裁决后,科赫兄弟斥资近2亿美元支持声称不会通过任何新环境法规的共和党人参与竞选。
“茶党不是我们创立的。我们只是和他们一样担心政府支出不可持续。我们在这点上支持一些茶党团体。”11月13日科赫在给《华尔街日报》(Wall Street Journal)记者道格拉斯•贝尔金的电子邮件中写道,“但现在我觉得,从长远来看,茶党基本上失败了,因为我们现在选出的共和党政府是历史上政府开支最大的一届。”
他还祝贺了乔•拜登和贺锦丽(Kamala Harris)分别当选总统和副总统,并表示他愿意与新一届白宫政府合作,“设法携手打破阻碍人们前进的障碍”。他说,这些障碍包括了刑事司法和移民改革。
科赫还在邮件中写道:“与此同时,我希望我们都能够利用选举后的这段时间找到更好的前进道路。由于党派之争,我们对政治寄予了过高的期望,但对自身和彼此却期望过低。”
虽然科赫兄弟并不支持特朗普,但他们在2016年大选中投入了约7.5亿美元。2018年,他们承诺还会再投入4亿美元,用于支持保守派候选人。(财富中文网)
译者:钱功毅
Charles and his late brother, David, used their collective wealth and connections to wield incredible political influence over the past few decades, donating hundreds of millions of dollars to reshape the American political landscape, push the Republican agenda towards their Libreterian, free-market bend, and give rise to the Tea Party movement. Together, the brothers founded the conservative powerhouse Americans for Prosperity in 2004.
“Boy, did we screw up!,” wrote Koch, now 85, in his new book, Believe in People: Bottom-Up Solutions for a Top-Down World. “What a mess!"
Koch and his brother were also largely involved in shaping the country’s response to climate change. Through Americans for Prosperity, they got over 400 members of Congress to sign a pledge to vote against climate change legislation that does not include equivalent tax cuts. In California, they were influential in rolling back emission regulations, and between 1997 and 2018 they spent $145,555,197 financing nearly 100 groups that attacked climate change science.
Following the 2011 Supreme Court Citizens United decision, the Kochs spent nearly $200 million to elect Republicans who said that they would not pass any new environmental regulations.
"We did not create the tea party. We shared their concern about unsustainable government spending, and we supported some tea-party groups on that issue," Koch wrote in an email to Wall Street Journal reporter Douglas Belkin on November 13. "But it seems to me the tea party was largely unsuccessful long-term, given that we're coming off a Republican administration with the largest government spending in history."
He also congratulated President-elect Joe Biden and vice president-elect Kamala Harris and said he’d like to collaborate with the new White House on "finding ways to work with them to break down the barriers holding people back." Those barriers, he said, include criminal justice and immigration reform.
"At the same time," Koch wrote in his email, "I hope we all use this post-election period to find a better way forward. Because of partisanship, we've come to expect too much of politics and too little of ourselves and one another."
Though the Kochs did not support Trump, they poured about $750 million into the 2016 election. In 2018, they pledged to spend another $400 million to back conservative candidates.