首页 500强 活动 榜单 商业 科技 领导力 专题 品牌中心
杂志订阅

“美国版美团”的挑战:盛大IPO之后如何盈利

Danielle Abril
2020-12-18

DoorDash如今的估值约为500亿美元,比一些成名已久的大型公司还要高。

文本设置
小号
默认
大号
Plus(0条)

在斯坦福大学外的街边,一套被当作办公室的两卧室公寓塞满了20名年轻的技术人员。公寓内的家具都是便宜货,包括一张唇膏红的沙发、不匹配的桌子和折叠椅。

这家公司专注于为餐厅提供送餐服务,但仅为公寓周边的8家餐厅提供服务。公司的雇员,不管从事什么工作,都会在一天当中抽出一些时间去送餐,目的是为了了解如何改善这一业务,哪怕只是将订单送达时间缩短几秒钟。

送餐初创公司DoorDash首席执行官徐讯说:“公司所有人都会去送餐,与所担任的职务无关。”那个时候,这样做的目的就是想“努力让员工尽早地成为这方面的专家。”

7年后,DoorDash已经成为了美国送餐服务领域最大的服务商。上周,在新冠疫情引发的送餐热潮中,公司成了上市新贵。

在迎来了盛大的IPO之后,DoorDash如今的估值约为500亿美元,比一些成名已久的大型公司还要高,例如通用磨坊、卡夫亨氏以及福特。

然而,DoorDash必须证明其疫情期间的增长并非只是昙花一现。除了在最近的一个季度出现了短暂的盈利之外,公司多年来一直都在烧钱,2018年亏损了2.04亿美元,2019年亏损了6.67亿美元,今年前9个月亏损了1.49亿美元。

AB Bernstein分析师马克•施姆里克说:“投资者目前最大的疑问在于,当前的增长态势能持续多久。送餐已经成为日常生活的一部分,但其可持续性如何?”

周一,另一名分析师曾质疑投资者在公司IPO之后对于公司过于乐观,DoorDash的股价在盘中应声下跌12%,降至153美元。DoorDash重现了20年前互联网泡沫的那段时光,其股价在交易首日飙升了86%。

DoorDash提到了多个能够佐证其业务顺遂的迹象。在多个城市经营数年之后,公司能够在这些城市盈利,前提是刨掉某些成本。公司还提到已实现正现金流,初创企业通常会拿这个指标来展示自己所取得的进步,当然也得先扣除某些成本。这意味着按照这种情况来看,DoorDash在今年前9个月的进账要高于支出,这个业绩受到了疫情的加速,但并非源于疫情。

不管从哪种情况来看,DoorDash都面临着多重挑战,其中包括可能导致雇员成本提升的法规;使用其服务的小商家破产导致客户数量减少;以及与强大同行的竞争,包括UberEats、Just Eat和Takeaway.com旗下Grubhub。

最终,DoorDash并不希望仅仅止步于送餐服务:公司打算让自己成为几乎所有主流街区店面购物和送货的常用应用。

获得金主支持

DoorDash在早期奉行的理念是效率和节俭,大都是不得已罢了,一开始只有硅谷初创企业加速器Y Combinator向其提供了仅2万美元资金。多年来,DoorDash一直在对其业务进行完善,以降低成本。

徐讯说:“从第一天开始,我们像鹰一样一直紧盯着公司的盈利能力。我们一直在确保我们所打造的业务拥有通向盈利的路径。”

公司首席运营官克里斯托弗•佩妮说,DoorDash一开始的扩张可谓是郊区与城区并举,与此同时,传统的理念认为,送餐公司需要霸占人口密度高的大型城市,因为在那里,大量的客户都居住在离送餐公司不远的地方。然而,在Cheesecake Factory请DoorDash为其全美开设的餐厅提供服务之后,DoorDash高管双倍押注郊区业务,尽管有人担心公司难以在这些地区盈利。

佩妮说:“当时的情形是,‘我们很快就会将其弄清楚’。回过头来看,我们似乎做出了明智的决策,因为事实证明,DoorDash在郊区的效益与都市环境相差无几,或者更高。”

通过专注于郊区,DoorDash的服务延伸至更多的家庭,而这些家庭在每个订单中又购买了更多的食物。尽管司机的路途有所增加,但他们抵达目的地和停车的速度会更快。

投行D.A. Davidson分析师汤姆•怀特说:“展望未来,这是市场所有增长的动力源。”

郊区战略帮助钓来了硅谷风投公司红杉资本,后者于2014年领投了1730万美元的资金。公司吸引到的另一个人就是徐讯。

红杉资本的合伙人阿尔弗莱德•林一开始并没有看好DoorDash,因为这个领域此前曾被投资者认为是超级资本密集型行业。然而,阿尔弗莱德•林最终于2014年同意注资DoorDash,在此之前,林在红杉资本赞助的晚宴上与徐讯进行了交流。徐讯是华裔移民,他从小到大一直在餐厅刷盘子,他母亲也是这个餐厅的雇员。徐讯向林具体剖析了餐厅的业务,甚至连餐厅如何计算餐饮的送餐时间都进行了解释。然后,徐讯将餐厅的效率与DoorDash进行了对比,并从林那里拿到了这笔投资。

林说:“他可能是唯一一个向我解释其中数学问题的人。他的介绍改变了我的想法。”

公司的首席人力官萨拉•瓦格纳说,徐讯对于效率的痴迷最终汇聚成了Doordash的企业文化。其理念是专注于业务需要改善的领域,迫使雇员不停地寻找他们可以解决的问题。她说:“这种理念我还是头一次见到。”

一夜之间的转变

在经历了快速增长之后,DoorDash开始将目光瞄向了在2019年初 IPO。今年三月,在DoorDash信心满满地提交了IPO申请之后,一件超乎想象的事情发生了:新冠病毒开始在全球蔓延。

随着病毒的传播,餐厅因城市整体关停而举步维艰,其中的一些餐厅仅能够提供外卖和送餐。很多餐厅迅速与DoorDash这样的第三方送餐服务商签订了协议。

瓦格纳说:“数以万计的商户在短时间内发布的通告中了解到,它们必须从店内用餐转变为送餐和取餐模式。徐讯、管理团队和公司的数千名雇员耗费了数个夜晚、周末及其空余时间……将这些商户揽入平台。”

为了应对新冠病毒,DoorDash临时取消了新餐厅加入该服务的注册费用,并为店面数不超过5家的当地餐厅提供服务费五折优惠。公司还花费1.2亿美元为司机购买了口罩、手套和洗手液,并取消了对餐厅的收费,同时提供了无接触送餐选项。在选择这一服务后,司机会将餐食放在家门口,以避免与消费者近距离接触。

维克多和达娜•库克西夫妇是芝加哥烧烤餐厅Krazy Hog的店主,对他们来说,DoorDash就是救世主。Krazy Hog在疫情开始肆虐之后便关闭了门店。然而数周之后,在DoorDash的指引下,餐厅搬到了由第三方运营商所有的共享厨房,仅提供取餐和送餐服务。DoorDash还通过公司所搜集的数据,例如客户年龄分布和下单频率,来帮助餐厅吸引更多的客户。同时,DoorDash还将Krazy Hog的烧烤酱纳入了公司于今年早些时候推出的数字便利店。

达娜•库克西说:“当他们告诉我们这一切时……你知道那个无比兴奋的表情符号吗?我们就露出了这种表情。”她说自己当时兴奋到了极点。

维克多补充说:“在我看来,送餐服务已经发生了彻底的变化。”

但并非所有人都对DoorDash深信不疑。例如,Olive Garden与Yard House连锁店母公司Darden Restaurants对于第三方送餐服务的销售和质量普遍感到不满。Darden表示,公司依然认同首席执行官两年前有关送餐的声明:“在我们看来,有鉴于当前的操作方式,这并非是我们现如今希望参与的业务。”

一些餐厅起诉DoorDash在没有获得许可的情况下便将其列为服务对象。例如,芝加哥Burger Antics在2018年起诉DoorDash,称客户在经历了长时间等待之后收到了由司机送来的冰冷餐食。In-N-Out Burger在2015年也曾起诉过DoorDash。

DoorDash希望通过列出那些所谓的“非合作方”餐厅,向其证明自己的服务可以提升餐厅业务,从而将这些餐厅转变为客户。DoorDash称,公司在11月叫停了这类做法。

频遭审查

DoorDash也遭到过不少审查。

一些餐厅抱怨,像DoorDash这样的送餐服务收取的服务费过高,会削减餐厅的利润。分析师称,这笔费用为订单额的15-20%。这类抱怨吸引了广泛的注意力,以至于全美各大城市开始出台送餐服务费上限政策,而其中大多数上限在疫情开始后有所上调。

AB Bernstein的施姆里克说:“我们并不知道这些上限是永久性的还是临时的。是因为疫情的原因,还是说它将成为永久性的服务费限制规定?”

多个州的监管方已经将目标瞄准了DoorDash及其零工公司,监管方认为司机应被划分为雇员而不是得不到福利的独立承包商。加州在这件事上一马当先,出台了一部新法,要求公司将其司机重新划分为雇员。然而,在选民11月投票通过一个名为Proposition 22提案,允许零工工作者保持其独立承包商的身份,同时能够拿到一些额外福利,例如最低时薪和医疗保险。

这一主张得到了DoorDash的资助,徐讯对Prop 22提案的通过表示了赞赏,他说自己希望公司在这一方面发挥引领作用,为其他州的司机寻找类似的解决方案。徐讯最近在《商业内幕》的一篇专栏报道中写道:“我们要站在加州的肩膀上,在其他地方寻找创新的解决方案。”

尽管其他州依然在考虑这个方案,D.A. Davidson的怀特说:“司机的划分将依然是个难题。”DoorDash曾称,公司在其他地区实施Prop 22之后亦能存活,但到目前为止,公司的工作大多忙于计算假定的业绩和成本。任何由州和联邦监管者做出的不利决策都有可能推迟DoorDash在未来几年实现盈利的计划。

2019年,DoorDash收到了客户对一项小费政策的抗议,该政策似乎能够让DoorDash获取本应给司机的小费。迫于压力,DoorDash撤销了这项政策,公司称实施该政策的初衷是为了提升司机收入。

除了应对批评之外,DoorDash还必须应付竞争对手。公司的主要竞争对手UberEats给出了第三季度营收(14.5亿美元)增长125%的财务业绩。作为对比,DoorDash同一季度的营收为8.79亿美元,增幅达到了268%。

随着DoorDash向国际扩张(已在澳大利亚和加拿大设立业务),公司面临的竞争对手越来越多,包括英国的Just Eat和Deliveroo。UberEats还通过以26.5亿美元收购竞争对手Postmates,以及成为拉美百货送货初创企业Cornershop大股东,拓展了其业务覆盖范围。

随着DoorDash进军百货送货以及便利店等其他领域,竞争对手名单则变得越来越长。结果,公司可能会面临来自于百货专营巨头Instacart和塔吉特旗下Shipt的竞争,甚至是电商巨头亚马逊。

有利于DoorDash的一点在于,公司的服务已经吸引了超过1800万用户以及超过39万家商户。施姆里克说:“公司在今后丢失市场份额的可能性不大,但唯一的问题在于,DoorDash是否能渗透至上述其他领域,还是会拱手将这些市场份额让给他人。”

尽管面临着增长和不断增长的挑战,徐讯说自己的关注点依然是餐厅、用餐的人和业务,而IPO只不过是锦上添花罢了。

他说:“当我们创建这家公司时,我并没有想到要进行IPO。我想的是,‘除了我用自己的本田车运送鹰嘴豆之外,如何才能确保今晚有足够的猛冲者(公司为其送餐工作人员起的外号)前往送餐’,当时的情形有点让人难以置信。”(财富中文网)

澄清:本文对原文进行了更新,以提供更多有关DoorDash在疫情期间的开支详情。

译者:冯丰

审校:夏林

在斯坦福大学外的街边,一套被当作办公室的两卧室公寓塞满了20名年轻的技术人员。公寓内的家具都是便宜货,包括一张唇膏红的沙发、不匹配的桌子和折叠椅。

这家公司专注于为餐厅提供送餐服务,但仅为公寓周边的8家餐厅提供服务。公司的雇员,不管从事什么工作,都会在一天当中抽出一些时间去送餐,目的是为了了解如何改善这一业务,哪怕只是将订单送达时间缩短几秒钟。

送餐初创公司DoorDash首席执行官徐讯说:“公司所有人都会去送餐,与所担任的职务无关。”那个时候,这样做的目的就是想“努力让员工尽早地成为这方面的专家。”

7年后,DoorDash已经成为了美国送餐服务领域最大的服务商。上周,在新冠疫情引发的送餐热潮中,公司成了上市新贵。

在迎来了盛大的IPO之后,DoorDash如今的估值约为500亿美元,比一些成名已久的大型公司还要高,例如通用磨坊、卡夫亨氏以及福特。

然而,DoorDash必须证明其疫情期间的增长并非只是昙花一现。除了在最近的一个季度出现了短暂的盈利之外,公司多年来一直都在烧钱,2018年亏损了2.04亿美元,2019年亏损了6.67亿美元,今年前9个月亏损了1.49亿美元。

AB Bernstein分析师马克•施姆里克说:“投资者目前最大的疑问在于,当前的增长态势能持续多久。送餐已经成为日常生活的一部分,但其可持续性如何?”

周一,另一名分析师曾质疑投资者在公司IPO之后对于公司过于乐观,DoorDash的股价在盘中应声下跌12%,降至153美元。DoorDash重现了20年前互联网泡沫的那段时光,其股价在交易首日飙升了86%。

DoorDash提到了多个能够佐证其业务顺遂的迹象。在多个城市经营数年之后,公司能够在这些城市盈利,前提是刨掉某些成本。公司还提到已实现正现金流,初创企业通常会拿这个指标来展示自己所取得的进步,当然也得先扣除某些成本。这意味着按照这种情况来看,DoorDash在今年前9个月的进账要高于支出,这个业绩受到了疫情的加速,但并非源于疫情。

不管从哪种情况来看,DoorDash都面临着多重挑战,其中包括可能导致雇员成本提升的法规;使用其服务的小商家破产导致客户数量减少;以及与强大同行的竞争,包括UberEats、Just Eat和Takeaway.com旗下Grubhub。

最终,DoorDash并不希望仅仅止步于送餐服务:公司打算让自己成为几乎所有主流街区店面购物和送货的常用应用。

获得金主支持

DoorDash在早期奉行的理念是效率和节俭,大都是不得已罢了,一开始只有硅谷初创企业加速器Y Combinator向其提供了仅2万美元资金。多年来,DoorDash一直在对其业务进行完善,以降低成本。

徐讯说:“从第一天开始,我们像鹰一样一直紧盯着公司的盈利能力。我们一直在确保我们所打造的业务拥有通向盈利的路径。”

公司首席运营官克里斯托弗•佩妮说,DoorDash一开始的扩张可谓是郊区与城区并举,与此同时,传统的理念认为,送餐公司需要霸占人口密度高的大型城市,因为在那里,大量的客户都居住在离送餐公司不远的地方。然而,在Cheesecake Factory请DoorDash为其全美开设的餐厅提供服务之后,DoorDash高管双倍押注郊区业务,尽管有人担心公司难以在这些地区盈利。

佩妮说:“当时的情形是,‘我们很快就会将其弄清楚’。回过头来看,我们似乎做出了明智的决策,因为事实证明,DoorDash在郊区的效益与都市环境相差无几,或者更高。”

通过专注于郊区,DoorDash的服务延伸至更多的家庭,而这些家庭在每个订单中又购买了更多的食物。尽管司机的路途有所增加,但他们抵达目的地和停车的速度会更快。

投行D.A. Davidson分析师汤姆•怀特说:“展望未来,这是市场所有增长的动力源。”

郊区战略帮助钓来了硅谷风投公司红杉资本,后者于2014年领投了1730万美元的资金。公司吸引到的另一个人就是徐讯。

红杉资本的合伙人阿尔弗莱德•林一开始并没有看好DoorDash,因为这个领域此前曾被投资者认为是超级资本密集型行业。然而,阿尔弗莱德•林最终于2014年同意注资DoorDash,在此之前,林在红杉资本赞助的晚宴上与徐讯进行了交流。徐讯是华裔移民,他从小到大一直在餐厅刷盘子,他母亲也是这个餐厅的雇员。徐讯向林具体剖析了餐厅的业务,甚至连餐厅如何计算餐饮的送餐时间都进行了解释。然后,徐讯将餐厅的效率与DoorDash进行了对比,并从林那里拿到了这笔投资。

林说:“他可能是唯一一个向我解释其中数学问题的人。他的介绍改变了我的想法。”

公司的首席人力官萨拉•瓦格纳说,徐讯对于效率的痴迷最终汇聚成了Doordash的企业文化。其理念是专注于业务需要改善的领域,迫使雇员不停地寻找他们可以解决的问题。她说:“这种理念我还是头一次见到。”

一夜之间的转变

在经历了快速增长之后,DoorDash开始将目光瞄向了在2019年初 IPO。今年三月,在DoorDash信心满满地提交了IPO申请之后,一件超乎想象的事情发生了:新冠病毒开始在全球蔓延。

随着病毒的传播,餐厅因城市整体关停而举步维艰,其中的一些餐厅仅能够提供外卖和送餐。很多餐厅迅速与DoorDash这样的第三方送餐服务商签订了协议。

瓦格纳说:“数以万计的商户在短时间内发布的通告中了解到,它们必须从店内用餐转变为送餐和取餐模式。徐讯、管理团队和公司的数千名雇员耗费了数个夜晚、周末及其空余时间……将这些商户揽入平台。”

为了应对新冠病毒,DoorDash临时取消了新餐厅加入该服务的注册费用,并为店面数不超过5家的当地餐厅提供服务费五折优惠。公司还花费1.2亿美元为司机购买了口罩、手套和洗手液,并取消了对餐厅的收费,同时提供了无接触送餐选项。在选择这一服务后,司机会将餐食放在家门口,以避免与消费者近距离接触。

维克多和达娜•库克西夫妇是芝加哥烧烤餐厅Krazy Hog的店主,对他们来说,DoorDash就是救世主。Krazy Hog在疫情开始肆虐之后便关闭了门店。然而数周之后,在DoorDash的指引下,餐厅搬到了由第三方运营商所有的共享厨房,仅提供取餐和送餐服务。DoorDash还通过公司所搜集的数据,例如客户年龄分布和下单频率,来帮助餐厅吸引更多的客户。同时,DoorDash还将Krazy Hog的烧烤酱纳入了公司于今年早些时候推出的数字便利店。

达娜•库克西说:“当他们告诉我们这一切时……你知道那个无比兴奋的表情符号吗?我们就露出了这种表情。”她说自己当时兴奋到了极点。

维克多补充说:“在我看来,送餐服务已经发生了彻底的变化。”

但并非所有人都对DoorDash深信不疑。例如,Olive Garden与Yard House连锁店母公司Darden Restaurants对于第三方送餐服务的销售和质量普遍感到不满。Darden表示,公司依然认同首席执行官两年前有关送餐的声明:“在我们看来,有鉴于当前的操作方式,这并非是我们现如今希望参与的业务。”

一些餐厅起诉DoorDash在没有获得许可的情况下便将其列为服务对象。例如,芝加哥Burger Antics在2018年起诉DoorDash,称客户在经历了长时间等待之后收到了由司机送来的冰冷餐食。In-N-Out Burger在2015年也曾起诉过DoorDash。

DoorDash希望通过列出那些所谓的“非合作方”餐厅,向其证明自己的服务可以提升餐厅业务,从而将这些餐厅转变为客户。DoorDash称,公司在11月叫停了这类做法。

频遭审查

DoorDash也遭到过不少审查。

一些餐厅抱怨,像DoorDash这样的送餐服务收取的服务费过高,会削减餐厅的利润。分析师称,这笔费用为订单额的15-20%。这类抱怨吸引了广泛的注意力,以至于全美各大城市开始出台送餐服务费上限政策,而其中大多数上限在疫情开始后有所上调。

AB Bernstein的施姆里克说:“我们并不知道这些上限是永久性的还是临时的。是因为疫情的原因,还是说它将成为永久性的服务费限制规定?”

多个州的监管方已经将目标瞄准了DoorDash及其零工公司,监管方认为司机应被划分为雇员而不是得不到福利的独立承包商。加州在这件事上一马当先,出台了一部新法,要求公司将其司机重新划分为雇员。然而,在选民11月投票通过一个名为Proposition 22提案,允许零工工作者保持其独立承包商的身份,同时能够拿到一些额外福利,例如最低时薪和医疗保险。

这一主张得到了DoorDash的资助,徐讯对Prop 22提案的通过表示了赞赏,他说自己希望公司在这一方面发挥引领作用,为其他州的司机寻找类似的解决方案。徐讯最近在《商业内幕》的一篇专栏报道中写道:“我们要站在加州的肩膀上,在其他地方寻找创新的解决方案。”

尽管其他州依然在考虑这个方案,D.A. Davidson的怀特说:“司机的划分将依然是个难题。”DoorDash曾称,公司在其他地区实施Prop 22之后亦能存活,但到目前为止,公司的工作大多忙于计算假定的业绩和成本。任何由州和联邦监管者做出的不利决策都有可能推迟DoorDash在未来几年实现盈利的计划。

2019年,DoorDash收到了客户对一项小费政策的抗议,该政策似乎能够让DoorDash获取本应给司机的小费。迫于压力,DoorDash撤销了这项政策,公司称实施该政策的初衷是为了提升司机收入。

除了应对批评之外,DoorDash还必须应付竞争对手。公司的主要竞争对手UberEats给出了第三季度营收(14.5亿美元)增长125%的财务业绩。作为对比,DoorDash同一季度的营收为8.79亿美元,增幅达到了268%。

随着DoorDash向国际扩张(已在澳大利亚和加拿大设立业务),公司面临的竞争对手越来越多,包括英国的Just Eat和Deliveroo。UberEats还通过以26.5亿美元收购竞争对手Postmates,以及成为拉美百货送货初创企业Cornershop大股东,拓展了其业务覆盖范围。

随着DoorDash进军百货送货以及便利店等其他领域,竞争对手名单则变得越来越长。结果,公司可能会面临来自于百货专营巨头Instacart和塔吉特旗下Shipt的竞争,甚至是电商巨头亚马逊。

有利于DoorDash的一点在于,公司的服务已经吸引了超过1800万用户以及超过39万家商户。施姆里克说:“公司在今后丢失市场份额的可能性不大,但唯一的问题在于,DoorDash是否能渗透至上述其他领域,还是会拱手将这些市场份额让给他人。”

尽管面临着增长和不断增长的挑战,徐讯说自己的关注点依然是餐厅、用餐的人和业务,而IPO只不过是锦上添花罢了。

他说:“当我们创建这家公司时,我并没有想到要进行IPO。我想的是,‘除了我用自己的本田车运送鹰嘴豆之外,如何才能确保今晚有足够的猛冲者(公司为其送餐工作人员起的外号)前往送餐’,当时的情形有点让人难以置信。”(财富中文网)

澄清:本文对原文进行了更新,以提供更多有关DoorDash在疫情期间的开支详情。

译者:冯丰

审校:夏林

Down the street from Stanford University, 20 young techies crammed into a two-bedroom apartment that served as their office. Their furniture, bought on the cheap, included a lipstick-red couch, mismatched tables, and folding chairs.

The company was focused on providing food delivery for restaurants—in this case just eight in the neighborhood. Employees, no matter their job, spent part of their day shuttling food to front porches, in an effort to learn how to improve the business, even if it meant shaving only a few seconds off the time it took to get orders to their destinations.

“Everyone in the company did deliveries—it didn’t matter what you were,” said Tony Xu, CEO of the delivery upstart, DoorDash. Back then, it was about “trying to become an expert early on.”

Seven years later, DoorDash has become the biggest player in U.S. food delivery. And last week, amid a food delivery boom fueled by the coronavirus pandemic, it became a newly minted public company.

Following a blockbuster IPO, DoorDash is now valued at around $50 billion. That’s more than big established companies like General Mills, Kraft Heinz, and Ford.

Still, DoorDash must prove that its growth during the pandemic was no fluke. Other than a profitable blip in one recent quarter, it has hemorrhaged money for years, losing $204 million in 2018, $667 million in 2019, and, in the first nine months of this year, $149 million.

“The biggest questions investors have is how durable the current growth levels are,” said Mark Shmulik, an analyst at AB Bernstein. “Food delivery has become a part of normal life, but at what sustainable level?”

On Monday, DoorDash’s shares slid 12% to $153 in midday trading after another analyst questioned whether investors had been too optimistic following the company’s IPO. In a reprise of the dotcom boom days of 20 years ago, DoorDash’s shares had soared 86% on their first day of trading.

DoorDash points to a couple of signs that suggest its business is sound. After operating in certain cities for several years, it’s able to make a profit in them, excluding certain costs. The company also points to being cash flow positive, a metric often touted by startups to show progress that also excludes certain costs. It means that the company, in this case, over the first nine months of this year, had more cash coming in than going out, a result that was accelerated, but not created, by the pandemic.

Whatever the case, DoorDash faces a number of challenges. Those include regulation that could increase employee costs; the demise of mom-and-pop restaurants, which is reducing the number of merchants using its service; and competition with well-funded rivals including UberEats and Just Eat Takeaway.com–owned Grubhub.

At the end of the day, DoorDash wants to deliver more than just food: It wants to be the go-to app for shopping and delivery from nearly all Main Street stores.

Getting buy-in

DoorDash’s early days were driven by efficiency and frugality—mostly out of necessity. Starting with just $20,000 from Silicon Valley startup accelerator Y Combinator in 2013, DoorDash has spent years tinkering with its operations to lower costs.

“We watched profitability like a hawk from day one because we had to,” Xu said. “We always made sure we built a business that had a path to profitability.”

Initially, DoorDash expanded in urban markets in addition to suburban ones, said Christopher Payne, the company’s chief operating officer. At the time, the conventional wisdom was that delivery companies needed to dominate big, dense cities, where lots of customers live within short distances, to be successful. But after the Cheesecake Factory asked DoorDash to serve its restaurants nationwide, DoorDash executives doubled down on the suburbs despite concerns about making those areas profitable.

“We were like, ‘We’re just going to figure it out,’” Payne said. “In hindsight, it looks like we were brilliant because it turns out that DoorDash works as well or better in suburbs as it does in urban environments.”

By focusing on the suburbs, DoorDash reached more families, who in turn bought more food per order. Though drivers traveled farther, they often reached their destinations and parked faster.

“Fast-forward, and those are the markets all growth is coming from,” said Tom White, an analyst at investment bank D.A. Davidson.

The suburban strategy was partially what helped lure big Silicon Valley venture capital firm Sequoia Capital, which led a $17.3 million funding round in DoorDash in 2014. The other attraction was Xu.

After initially passing on DoorDash—the category was once viewed as too capital intensive by investors—Sequoia partner Alfred Lin was finally sold in 2014 after speaking with Xu at a Sequoia-sponsored networking dinner. Xu, a Chinese immigrant who grew up washing dishes in a restaurant that also employed his mother, dissected the restaurant’s operations for Lin, even going so far as to explain how the restaurant timed the delivery of its food. Xu then tied the efficiency of the restaurant to that of DoorDash, sealing the deal for Lin.

“He was probably the only person to talk to me about the math of it all,” Lin said. “It changed my mind.”

Xu’s obsession with efficiency eventually trickled down into what has become the culture at DoorDash, said Sarah Wagener, the company’s chief people officer. The idea is to focus on areas where the business needs improvement, forcing employees to constantly look for problems they can solve. “It’s not like anything I’ve seen,” she said.

An overnight shift

Following rapid growth, DoorDash began eyeing an initial public offering in early 2019. Then in March, after filing for an IPO confidentially, the unimaginable happened: The coronavirus became a global pandemic.

As the virus spread, restaurants grappled with citywide shutdowns, some of which limited them to takeout and delivery. Many restaurants quickly signed up with third-party delivery services like DoorDash.

“Thousands and thousands of merchants were realizing in a moment’s notice they had to switch from a dine-in to delivery and pickup-only model,” Wagener said. “Tony, the management team, and thousands of employees across the company spent nights, weekends, their spare time…onboarding merchants onto the platform.”

To respond to the coronavirus, DoorDash temporarily waived sign-up fees for new restaurants joining the service and cut commission fees in half for local restaurants with five or fewer locations. It also spent $120 million on masks, gloves, and hand sanitizer for drivers plus the waiver of the fees it charges restaurants, and built a no-contact delivery option, in which drivers leave food on the doorstep to avoid close contact with consumers.

For Krazy Hog, a Chicago-based barbecue restaurant, DoorDash became vital. Owned by husband-and-wife duo Victor and Dana Cooksey, Krazy Hog shut its doors after the pandemic hit. But just weeks later, with guidance from DoorDash, the restaurant moved into a shared kitchen owned by a third-party operator and set up for pickup and delivery alone. DoorDash also helped the restaurant lure more customers through the use of the data it collects, such as customer demographics and ordering frequency, and is working to include Krazy Hog’s barbecue sauce in DoorDash’s digital convenience store that debuted earlier this year.

“When they told us about all this…You know the little emoji with the brains being blown out? It was that,” Dana Cooksey said, suggesting she was mind-blown.

“I view the delivery totally different now,” Victor added.

But not everyone is sold on DoorDash. For one, Darden Restaurants, the parent of the Olive Garden and Yard House chains, has been unimpressed by the sales and quality of third-party delivery services generally. Darden said it still stands by a statement its CEO, Gene Lee, made two years ago about delivery: “We just don’t see this as something that we want to get involved in today with the current way it’s being executed.”

Some restaurants have sued DoorDash for allegedly adding their eateries to the service without permission. For example, Chicago-based Burger Antics filed a lawsuit against DoorDash in 2018, saying that customers claimed they had received cold food from drivers after long waits. And In-N-Out Burger sued DoorDash in 2015.

By listing what the company calls “non-partner” restaurants, DoorDash hoped to convert those restaurants into customers by proving that its service increased their business. DoorDash said it stopped the practice in November.

No stranger to scrutiny

DoorDash has had its share of scrutiny.

Some restaurants have complained that food-delivery services like DoorDash hurt profits by charging excessive commissions, which analysts say amount to 15% to 20% per order. The complaint has received so much traction that cities nationwide have started implementing caps on delivery commission, most of which have been added since the pandemic started.

“We don’t know how permanent or temporary these caps are,” said Shmulik of AB Bernstein. “Is this just the pandemic, or is this going to be a permanent thing that is going limit them?”

Several state regulators have also targeted DoorDash and its fellow gig companies, arguing that drivers should be classified as employees rather than independent contractors who get no benefits. California has taken the lead on the matter, enacting a new law that would have required companies to reclassify their drivers as employees. But that law was nullified after voters approved a November ballot initiative called Proposition 22 that lets gig workers remain independent contractors while receiving a few additional benefits like a minimum hourly wage and medical coverage.

Xu touted the passage of the proposition, which DoorDash helped fund, and said he hopes that the company leads the effort on finding similar solutions for drivers in other states. “We need to build upon what began in California to find innovative solutions elsewhere,” Xu recently wrote in an op-ed for Business Insider.

Though other states are still considering their options, “driver classification is certainly going to remain an issue,” said White of D.A. Davidson. DoorDash has said it can survive the adoption of Prop 22–like laws elsewhere, but so far the company has mostly been working through hypothetical outcomes and costs. Any adverse decision by state or federal regulators may delay DoorDash’s plans to become profitable in upcoming years.

In 2019, DoorDash faced a customer revolt over a tipping policy that appeared to allow DoorDash to pocket tips that were meant for drivers. Under pressure, DoorDash reversed that policy, which it said was initially implemented to increase driver earnings.

Beyond criticism, DoorDash must fend off rivals. The company’s main one, UberEats, reported a 125% gain in third-quarter revenue to $1.45 billion. By comparison, DoorDash had $879 million in revenue during the same period, a gain of 268%.

As it expands internationally—DoorDash currently operates in Australia and Canada—it faces growing competition including from the U.K.’s Just Eat and Deliveroo. UberEats has also extended its reach through a $2.65 billion acquisition of rival Postmates and by taking a majority stake in Latin American grocery-delivery startup Cornershop.

As DoorDash expands into other categories like grocery delivery and convenience, the list of rivals is growing. As a result, it could face competition from grocery-focused giants Instacart and Target-owned Shipt, and even e-commerce behemoth Amazon.

Working in DoorDash’s favor is that it has already attracted more than 18 million users to its service and more than 390,000 merchants. “It’s hard to see how they lose share moving forward,” said Shmulik. “The only question is, can they penetrate these other categories or do they leave the door open for others to gain that share?”

Despite the growth and mounting challenges, Xu said his focus remains on restaurants, diners, and operations. And the IPO, well, that’s the icing on the cake.

“When we started the company, I wasn’t thinking about an IPO; I was thinking about, ‘How I am going to make sure we have enough Dashers on the road tonight, in addition to me schlepping hummus from my Honda,’” he said, using the company’s terms for its delivery workers. “It’s a bit of an incredulous moment.”

Clarification: This article was updated from the original to provide more detail about DoorDash’s spending during the pandemic.

财富中文网所刊载内容之知识产权为财富媒体知识产权有限公司及/或相关权利人专属所有或持有。未经许可,禁止进行转载、摘编、复制及建立镜像等任何使用。
0条Plus
精彩评论
评论

撰写或查看更多评论

请打开财富Plus APP

前往打开