1月,必然会被载入史册。
2021年伊始,股市在经历了不凡的2020年之后高调开局(股市于2020年3月份暴跌超过30%,随后一路恢复,在12月底创下新高)。然而,就在进入1月数周之后,所谓的“Reddit股票”(那些被在线信息平台Reddit的散户炒起来的股票)着实让股市狂野了一把:诸如GameStop等股票的涨幅达到了三位数,而基准指数则出现了大幅下跌。
大盘抛售的部分原因可能在于,轧空GameStop这类股票的对冲基金被迫通过筹集现金来轧平头寸。然而,不管背后的罪魁祸首是谁,这一轮波动导致标普500在本月一度出现了1.1%的跌幅。
虽然这场华尔街大戏已随着游戏驿站累计暴跌超80%的现状而接近尾声。但历史告诉我们,1月份的抛售对于今年余下的时间来说不是个好兆头。
美国银行技术研究策略师史蒂夫•萨特梅尔指出:“我们不禁想起了华尔街的一句老话:‘全年股市看1月’”。他在周二的报告中写道:在1928年,“如果1月形势不好,[标普500]往往也会走弱,而且这一时期1月出现上涨的年份仅占45.7%,平均回报率为-0.97%……这一时期剩余月份出现增长的年份占到了60%,平均回报率为2.89%。”(详见美国银行的图表)
此外,让我们来看看股市在新总统上任首年的历史表现如何:“如果新总统上任第一年1月出现下滑,那么这一时期出现增长的年份仅占22.2%,平均回报率为-6.92%……而且2月-12月亦出现增长的年份占到了22.2%,平均回报率为-3.14%”,萨特梅尔写道。
那好消息呢?美国银行的萨特梅尔表示,1月晴雨表在最近几年的“可靠性一直在降低”。LPL Financial的分析师在周一写道,事实上,自21世纪00年代初开始,在过去1月股市下滑的9个年份中,有8个年份的股市出现了上涨,平均回报率为11.5%。
近些年的1月晴雨表并不怎么准确,近些年1月回报的负增长也并不代表熊市。
到目前为止,股市在2月迎来了开门红。周二,标普500上涨了1.4%,而道琼斯收涨近1.6%。确实,Ally的贝尔认为,“很明显,市场正在应对那些[投机]股票的行动,而且目前人们对此的解读似乎是‘不错,这些投机型交易正在减少,而自然的市场力量正在回归。’”
她说,就1月晴雨表而言,“回顾历史并不是坏事,但这里存在着大量能够从根本上推动股市上涨的各类因素。”
确实,瑞士联合银行称,他们并不认为“标普500出现的温和抛售就意味着经济和企业利润前景出现了根本性的转变。”瑞士联合银行全球财富管理首席信息官索利塔•马瑟利与瑞士联合银行美国股票业务负责人大卫•勒夫科维茨在周一的纪要中写道。“在经历了最近的抛售之后,美国股票的风险/回报看起来多了一点吸引力。”他们认为疫苗的推出、强劲的企业利润以及持续的美联储和预算开支支持最终会推高股价。
然而,我们在过去几周看到,这可能是一个跌宕起伏的旅程。Ally的贝尔说:“最终,我们可能依然会继续看到股市在短期内(未来一两个月内)会呈现出忽高忽低的状态,但我期待今年后半年股市回报会有所回升。”(财富中文网)
译者:冯丰
审校:夏林
1月,必然会被载入史册。
2021年伊始,股市在经历了不凡的2020年之后高调开局(股市于2020年3月份暴跌超过30%,随后一路恢复,在12月底创下新高)。然而,就在进入1月数周之后,所谓的“Reddit股票”(那些被在线信息平台Reddit的散户炒起来的股票)着实让股市狂野了一把:诸如GameStop等股票的涨幅达到了三位数,而基准指数则出现了大幅下跌。
大盘抛售的部分原因可能在于,轧空GameStop这类股票的对冲基金被迫通过筹集现金来轧平头寸。然而,不管背后的罪魁祸首是谁,这一轮波动导致标普500在本月一度出现了1.1%的跌幅。
虽然这场华尔街大戏已随着游戏驿站累计暴跌超80%的现状而接近尾声。但历史告诉我们,1月份的抛售对于今年余下的时间来说不是个好兆头。
美国银行技术研究策略师史蒂夫•萨特梅尔指出:“我们不禁想起了华尔街的一句老话:‘全年股市看1月’”。他在周二的报告中写道:在1928年,“如果1月形势不好,[标普500]往往也会走弱,而且这一时期1月出现上涨的年份仅占45.7%,平均回报率为-0.97%……这一时期剩余月份出现增长的年份占到了60%,平均回报率为2.89%。”(详见美国银行的图表)
此外,让我们来看看股市在新总统上任首年的历史表现如何:“如果新总统上任第一年1月出现下滑,那么这一时期出现增长的年份仅占22.2%,平均回报率为-6.92%……而且2月-12月亦出现增长的年份占到了22.2%,平均回报率为-3.14%”,萨特梅尔写道。
那好消息呢?美国银行的萨特梅尔表示,1月晴雨表在最近几年的“可靠性一直在降低”。LPL Financial的分析师在周一写道,事实上,自21世纪00年代初开始,在过去1月股市下滑的9个年份中,有8个年份的股市出现了上涨,平均回报率为11.5%。
近些年的1月晴雨表并不怎么准确,近些年1月回报的负增长也并不代表熊市。
到目前为止,股市在2月迎来了开门红。周二,标普500上涨了1.4%,而道琼斯收涨近1.6%。确实,Ally的贝尔认为,“很明显,市场正在应对那些[投机]股票的行动,而且目前人们对此的解读似乎是‘不错,这些投机型交易正在减少,而自然的市场力量正在回归。’”
她说,就1月晴雨表而言,“回顾历史并不是坏事,但这里存在着大量能够从根本上推动股市上涨的各类因素。”
确实,瑞士联合银行称,他们并不认为“标普500出现的温和抛售就意味着经济和企业利润前景出现了根本性的转变。”瑞士联合银行全球财富管理首席信息官索利塔•马瑟利与瑞士联合银行美国股票业务负责人大卫•勒夫科维茨在周一的纪要中写道。“在经历了最近的抛售之后,美国股票的风险/回报看起来多了一点吸引力。”他们认为疫苗的推出、强劲的企业利润以及持续的美联储和预算开支支持最终会推高股价。
然而,我们在过去几周看到,这可能是一个跌宕起伏的旅程。Ally的贝尔说:“最终,我们可能依然会继续看到股市在短期内(未来一两个月内)会呈现出忽高忽低的状态,但我期待今年后半年股市回报会有所回升。”(财富中文网)
译者:冯丰
审校:夏林
January was certainly a month for the history books.
Markets started 2021 on a high note on the back of a sensational year (after stocks plunged over 30% in March they recovered to new highs by December). But just a few weeks into January, so-called "Reddit stocks," those pumped up by retail traders on online message board Reddit, took the markets on a wild ride: Names like GameStop soared triple digits, while benchmark indexes slumped.
Part of that broader selloff may have been due to hedge funds who were short (squeezing?)names like GameStop being forced to raise cash and cover their positions. But whatever the culprit, the bout of volatility sunk the S&P 500 1.1% lower for the month.
And according to history, the January selloff doesn't bode well for the rest of the year.
"The old Wall Street adage of 'as goes January, so goes the year' comes to mind," notes Bank of America technical research strategist Stephen Suttmeier. Going back to 1928, "When January is down, the [S&P 500] tends to be weaker and the year is up only 45.7% of the time with an average return of -0.97% ... and the rest of the year is up 60% of the time with an average return of 2.89%," he wrote in a Tuesday report (see BofA's chart).
Add to that how stocks historically perform during the first year of a new presidency: "When January is down in a Presidential Cycle Year 1, the year is up only 22.2% of the time with an average return of -6.92% ... and February-December is also up 22.2% of the time with an average return of -3.14%," Suttmeier wrote.
But the good news? That January barometer has "become less reliable in recent years," BofA's Suttmeier notes. In fact, since the early 2000s, stocks have been up eight out of the past nine times stocks were lower in January, with an average return of 11.5%, analysts at LPL Financial wrote Monday (see chart).
So far markets have seen a boost to kick off February. The S&P 500 rose 1.4% while the Dow closed up nearly 1.6% on Tuesday. Indeed, Ally's Bell suggests "Clearly the market is reacting to the action in those [speculative] stocks overall, and it seems like right now, the read-through is that, 'Okay, these speculative trades are winding down and the natural market forces are returning'," she suggests to Fortune.
In terms of that January barometer, "It’s good to look at history, but there are a lot of different things fundamentally that can drive the market higher," she says.
Indeed, strategists at UBS note they "don’t think the modest selloff in the S&P 500 is indicative of a fundamental shift in the outlook for the economy and corporate profits," Solita Marcelli, CIO of Americas at UBS Global Wealth Management and David Lefkowitz, head of Americas equities, wrote in a Monday note. "After the recent sell-off, the risk/reward for US equities is looking a bit more appealing." They believe stocks will ultimately trade higher due to the vaccine rollout, strong corporate profits, and continued Fed and fiscal spending support.
But as the past few weeks have shown us, it may be a bumpy ride. "Ultimately, we could still continue to see choppiness here in the near term for the next month or two," Ally's Bell says. "But I look forward to the latter part of the year to drive market returns."