3月11日,美国总统乔·拜登正式签署了1.9万亿美元的新冠疫情纾困法案——该法案的资金规模之大、覆盖范围之广,以及其中一些略显激进的内容,都注定会载入史册。其中还涉及向有子女的家庭提供低保的具体形式。这项法案是拜登上台后的第一个重大政绩,而它出台的背景则是美国疫苗接种率提高、疫情大流行也似乎终于迎来了曙光。
当拜登正带领美国度过这场致命公共卫生危机的最后阶段,他自然会受到人们的交口称赞。但一波未平,一波又起——当疫情的危机得到缓解之后,他又难免会在其他一些重大问题上面临更多的挑战,其中最重要的一个便是移民问题。
上周,有消息称,美国边境地区又涌现了许多儿童移民,白宫新闻秘书珍·普萨基对此向记者回应道:“鉴于许多国会议员对移民问题、边境局势都有着深切的忧虑,现在将这项工作提上议程,不失为一个合适的时机。”
有人表示,拜登的确拟定了许多移民政策,但在落实过程中困难重重,仅仅是取消前总统唐纳德·特朗普的政策——这在移民权利倡导者看来是最起码的——都可能需要他付出一整个任期的努力。而民主党的长期目标一直是要对现有移民制度进行真正的改革,这将需要更长的时间。
“拜登政府触及的是政治改革中最复杂的环节之一。”美国国家移民法律中心(National Immigration Law Center)的执行主任玛丽莱娜·辛卡佩说——她也是拜登和桑德斯共同领导的一个移民专项工作组的联合主席。“我们原先已经为移民政策改革打好了许多基础,而特朗普政府推翻了一切,我认为拜登政府的目标正是要出台合适的法案,让移民们在美国更加安全、受到更加人道的对待。”
为解决移民问题,拜登制定了一项总体性的规划,正式名称是《2021年美国公民法案》(U.S. Citizenship Act of 2021)——该法案可谓多管齐下,旨在为无证件公民提供取得合法身份的途径,让家庭成员不再天各一方,加强对美国国土安全部(Department of Homeland Security)和边境巡逻队(Border Patrol)的监督,并有意加大对中美洲国家的援助力度,想要通过这一方式,从根源上解决移民的问题。
然而尽管民主党人在国会占多数,即便是拜登计划中那些备受欢迎的部分也可能遇到阻力。预计众议院将在本周通过关于“儿童入境暂缓遣返”计划(DACA)和农民绿卡身份的两项法案,但立法者表示,如果通过有望,则必须由参议院修订。
据《华盛顿邮报》(Washington Post)报道,一些民主党众议员表示,他们希望拜登在争取共和党人的支持时,能够采取更多强硬的措施——尽管他们也知道,这会引起党内进步派人士的强烈反对。但政府似乎愿意做出一些让步。一位和白宫有密切接触的移民权利倡导者告诉了《华盛顿邮报》一些有关拜登改革计划的消息:“他们并不拘泥于那个计划。他们愿意为无证件人士提供一切有可能的救济。”
对许多移民权利倡导者来说,“一切有可能的救济”或许还不够,他们希望看到新政府可以做出实质性的改变。他们正准备给拜登施压,希望政府能够进一步控制住疫情。
美国难民及移民教育与法律服务中心(RAICES)的诉讼事务主任曼诺吉·戈文达亚说:“我觉得我们已经向拜登做出了一些让步,积极配合他的政策,因为我们也不是不知道疫情的实际情况。但只要疫情下的封禁措施取消,社会再次‘回归常态’,我们就不会再浪费时间,会立即要求他对这一问题进行更彻底的改革。”
但是,尽管这些民权组织可能并不会那么咄咄逼人地喊话拜登,但他们也没有在移民问题上全然放过他。上个月,美国难民及移民教育与法律服务中心发表公告称,称该组织感到“既震惊又悲伤”,因为他们看到政府重新开放了卡里索斯普林斯的儿童移民收留中心,并要求他们立即关闭。此外,还有报道称,拜登准备在佛罗里达州霍姆斯特德市重新开放另一个“集中营”,而该中心还面临着性虐待指控——这也引起了民权人士的猛烈抨击。
圣安东尼奥市一名维护无人监护儿童权益的移民律师琳达·布兰德米勒说:“我对本届政府非常失望——这种强行将儿童交给政府照料的方式在财政上是不负责任的,在道德上是应该受到谴责的,而且也是违法的。”
让布兰德米勒等人担忧的还有煽动性的媒体报道——例如把移民的增加称为“危机”放在头版头条,而有关移民的右翼言论也可能会让拜登步入歧途。拜登想要左右逢源,和两党都搞好关系,避免左派把他和特朗普相提并论,右派又抨击他对移民问题处理不当。
戈文达亚说:“我们当然不会幻想自己的愿望——在边境地区去军事化和放弃强制遣返手段等可以在一夜之间实现。但令人担忧的是,散布‘难民危机’或‘移民涌入’的言论,或者用和特朗普一样的方式来解决问题,这些都很容易——因为除非我们能够把这些问题解释清楚,否则[他会认为]自己其实别无选择。”
尽管如此,在特朗普时代就积极为移民争取权益的人们虽然心怀忧虑,但依旧保持乐观。在拜登的“新官上任三把火”中,就废除了特朗普的一些移民政策:上任后,他就立即叫停了针对穆斯林的入境禁令,中止了美墨边界墙的建设,并指示国土安全部要加强对暂缓遣返的儿童移民的法律保护。此后的几周内,拜登政府还恢复了一项针对中美洲未成年人的计划,即允许21岁以下的未成年人与他们合法生活在美国的父母团聚。
辛卡佩说:“我们知道拜登政府需要时间,还需要采取行政和立法手段,才可以消除过去四年特朗普的移民政策所造成的伤害。拜登已经向世界传达了一个信息,即美国将再次成为一个向全球公民敞开怀抱的国家。”(财富中文网)
编译:陈聪聪
3月11日,美国总统乔·拜登正式签署了1.9万亿美元的新冠疫情纾困法案——该法案的资金规模之大、覆盖范围之广,以及其中一些略显激进的内容,都注定会载入史册。其中还涉及向有子女的家庭提供低保的具体形式。这项法案是拜登上台后的第一个重大政绩,而它出台的背景则是美国疫苗接种率提高、疫情大流行也似乎终于迎来了曙光。
当拜登正带领美国度过这场致命公共卫生危机的最后阶段,他自然会受到人们的交口称赞。但一波未平,一波又起——当疫情的危机得到缓解之后,他又难免会在其他一些重大问题上面临更多的挑战,其中最重要的一个便是移民问题。
上周,有消息称,美国边境地区又涌现了许多儿童移民,白宫新闻秘书珍·普萨基对此向记者回应道:“鉴于许多国会议员对移民问题、边境局势都有着深切的忧虑,现在将这项工作提上议程,不失为一个合适的时机。”
有人表示,拜登的确拟定了许多移民政策,但在落实过程中困难重重,仅仅是取消前总统唐纳德·特朗普的政策——这在移民权利倡导者看来是最起码的——都可能需要他付出一整个任期的努力。而民主党的长期目标一直是要对现有移民制度进行真正的改革,这将需要更长的时间。
“拜登政府触及的是政治改革中最复杂的环节之一。”美国国家移民法律中心(National Immigration Law Center)的执行主任玛丽莱娜·辛卡佩说——她也是拜登和桑德斯共同领导的一个移民专项工作组的联合主席。“我们原先已经为移民政策改革打好了许多基础,而特朗普政府推翻了一切,我认为拜登政府的目标正是要出台合适的法案,让移民们在美国更加安全、受到更加人道的对待。”
为解决移民问题,拜登制定了一项总体性的规划,正式名称是《2021年美国公民法案》(U.S. Citizenship Act of 2021)——该法案可谓多管齐下,旨在为无证件公民提供取得合法身份的途径,让家庭成员不再天各一方,加强对美国国土安全部(Department of Homeland Security)和边境巡逻队(Border Patrol)的监督,并有意加大对中美洲国家的援助力度,想要通过这一方式,从根源上解决移民的问题。
然而尽管民主党人在国会占多数,即便是拜登计划中那些备受欢迎的部分也可能遇到阻力。预计众议院将在本周通过关于“儿童入境暂缓遣返”计划(DACA)和农民绿卡身份的两项法案,但立法者表示,如果通过有望,则必须由参议院修订。
据《华盛顿邮报》(Washington Post)报道,一些民主党众议员表示,他们希望拜登在争取共和党人的支持时,能够采取更多强硬的措施——尽管他们也知道,这会引起党内进步派人士的强烈反对。但政府似乎愿意做出一些让步。一位和白宫有密切接触的移民权利倡导者告诉了《华盛顿邮报》一些有关拜登改革计划的消息:“他们并不拘泥于那个计划。他们愿意为无证件人士提供一切有可能的救济。”
对许多移民权利倡导者来说,“一切有可能的救济”或许还不够,他们希望看到新政府可以做出实质性的改变。他们正准备给拜登施压,希望政府能够进一步控制住疫情。
美国难民及移民教育与法律服务中心(RAICES)的诉讼事务主任曼诺吉·戈文达亚说:“我觉得我们已经向拜登做出了一些让步,积极配合他的政策,因为我们也不是不知道疫情的实际情况。但只要疫情下的封禁措施取消,社会再次‘回归常态’,我们就不会再浪费时间,会立即要求他对这一问题进行更彻底的改革。”
但是,尽管这些民权组织可能并不会那么咄咄逼人地喊话拜登,但他们也没有在移民问题上全然放过他。上个月,美国难民及移民教育与法律服务中心发表公告称,称该组织感到“既震惊又悲伤”,因为他们看到政府重新开放了卡里索斯普林斯的儿童移民收留中心,并要求他们立即关闭。此外,还有报道称,拜登准备在佛罗里达州霍姆斯特德市重新开放另一个“集中营”,而该中心还面临着性虐待指控——这也引起了民权人士的猛烈抨击。
圣安东尼奥市一名维护无人监护儿童权益的移民律师琳达·布兰德米勒说:“我对本届政府非常失望——这种强行将儿童交给政府照料的方式在财政上是不负责任的,在道德上是应该受到谴责的,而且也是违法的。”
让布兰德米勒等人担忧的还有煽动性的媒体报道——例如把移民的增加称为“危机”放在头版头条,而有关移民的右翼言论也可能会让拜登步入歧途。拜登想要左右逢源,和两党都搞好关系,避免左派把他和特朗普相提并论,右派又抨击他对移民问题处理不当。
戈文达亚说:“我们当然不会幻想自己的愿望——在边境地区去军事化和放弃强制遣返手段等可以在一夜之间实现。但令人担忧的是,散布‘难民危机’或‘移民涌入’的言论,或者用和特朗普一样的方式来解决问题,这些都很容易——因为除非我们能够把这些问题解释清楚,否则[他会认为]自己其实别无选择。”
尽管如此,在特朗普时代就积极为移民争取权益的人们虽然心怀忧虑,但依旧保持乐观。在拜登的“新官上任三把火”中,就废除了特朗普的一些移民政策:上任后,他就立即叫停了针对穆斯林的入境禁令,中止了美墨边界墙的建设,并指示国土安全部要加强对暂缓遣返的儿童移民的法律保护。此后的几周内,拜登政府还恢复了一项针对中美洲未成年人的计划,即允许21岁以下的未成年人与他们合法生活在美国的父母团聚。
辛卡佩说:“我们知道拜登政府需要时间,还需要采取行政和立法手段,才可以消除过去四年特朗普的移民政策所造成的伤害。拜登已经向世界传达了一个信息,即美国将再次成为一个向全球公民敞开怀抱的国家。”(财富中文网)
编译:陈聪聪
On March 11, President Joe Biden signed a $1.9 trillion COVID relief bill, historic for its scope, size, and some of its radical content, including a form of guaranteed basic income for families with children. The legislation is Biden’s first big win in the White House, and it arrives at a time as vaccination rates increase and the pandemic appears to be on the verge of receding.
When it does, Biden will undoubtedly be praised for leading the country through the hopefully final phase of a deadly public health crisis. But with one crisis addressed, he will inevitably face more scrutiny on his handling of other major issues, the foremost of which is shaping up to be immigration.
“Given all of the concern by many in Congress about immigration and what’s happening at the border, this sure seems like a good time to move that initiative forward,” White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki told reporters last week, referring to recent news of an increase in migrant children at the border.
Biden faces an uphill battle to realizing many of his proposed immigration policies, and merely undoing President Donald Trump’s—the bare minimum, according to immigrant rights advocates—may take all of his first term, some say. Truly transforming the immigration system, a longtime much-deferred goal of Democrats’, will take even longer.
“The Biden administration has inherited one of the most complicated areas of policy changes,” said Marielena Hincapié, the executive director of the National Immigration Law Center and a co-chair of the Biden-Sanders unity task force on immigration. “The Trump administration decimated the infrastructure and the staffing our country needs to have proper legal channels to treat immigrants safely and humanely, which I believe is the goal of the Biden administration.”
Biden’s comprehensive plan for tackling the issue is formally known as the U.S. Citizenship Act of 2021, a multi-pronged proposal that aims to provide a pathway to citizenship for the undocumented, end family separation, increase oversight of Department of Homeland Security and Border Patrol, and address a root cause of immigration by increasing federal assistance to Central American countries.
But while Democrats are in the majority, even the more popular aspects of Biden’s plan may be difficult to pass. While two upcoming bills related to DACA and green card status for farmers are expected to sail through the House this week, lawmakers say it will have to be reworked in the Senate if there’s any hope of it passing.
According to the Washington Post, some House Democrats are looking to include more enforcement measures in Biden’s plan to win over more Republican support, though they know it would trigger backlash from the progressive wing of the party. For the administration’s part, however, it seems they’re willing to make compromises. “They’re not wedded to that plan,” an advocate close to the White House told the Post of Biden’s sweeping proposal. “They’re willing to make any relief for the undocumented.”
“Any relief” may not be good enough for many immigrant rights advocates, who want to see substantial change from the new administration. They’re preparing to dial up the pressure on Biden, as they look forward to having the virus under control.
“I think we are giving him a little bit of a pass because we have some sense of the realities of COVID,” said Manoj Govindaiah, the director of litigation services at RAICES. “But once the restrictions are gone, and we return to quote unquote ‘normal,’ we’re not going to be wasting any time in pushing him to be bold in how he moves forward.”
But while advocacy groups may have allowed Biden a kind of amnesty period, they haven’t completely let him off the hook. Last month, RAICES published a press release stating that the group was “shocked and saddened” to see that the administration had reopened the Carrizo Springs center and called for it to be closed immediately. Advocates have also railed against the Biden administration for reportedly preparing to reopen another emergency detention center in Homestead, Florida, which has faced allegations of sexual abuse.
“It’s fiscally irresponsible, morally reprehensible, and it doesn’t legally comply with the way children are supposed to be detained under government care,” said Linda Brandmiller, an immigration lawyer in San Antonio who represents unaccompanied minors. “I’m bitterly disappointed in this administration.”
Brandmiller and others also worry that what some would term inflammatory media coverage—headlines describing an increase of incoming migrants as a “crisis,” for example—and right-wing talking points on immigration can have the effect of prodding Biden in the wrong direction. Committed to bipartisanship, Biden will want to appease both sides of the aisle, avoiding any comparisons to Trump on the left as well as any criticism of mishandling immigration on the right.
“The things we want—a demilitarization of the border and getting rid of the law enforcement approach—I don’t think they’re going to happen over night,” Govindaiah said. “The worry is that it might be easy to say there’s this ‘crisis’ or ‘influx’ and use some of the same tools Trump used to address it because [he thinks] there’s no choice until we figure something else out.”
Nonetheless, a feeling of cautious optimism prevails among those who helped migrants through the Trump years. Many of Biden’s day one executive orders included rollbacks to Trump-era immigration policies: Upon taking office, Biden immediately ended the Muslim ban, halted construction of the U.S.-Mexico border wall, and directed the Department of Homeland Security to strengthen legal protections for DACA recipients. In the weeks since, the Biden administration has also reinstated the Central American Minors program, which allows children under 21 to be reunited with parents living lawfully in the U.S.
“We know that it’s going to take time and require both administrative and legislative action for the Biden administration to undo the harm of the last four years,” Hincapie said. “Biden is already sending a message to the world that the U.S. is once again a welcoming nation.”