如果说6月10日欧洲央行(European Central Bank)货币政策会议的哪一项内容最值得投资者关注,那么必然是欧洲央行是否会对其2023年通胀预测做出任何调整。
尽管听起来似乎是很遥远的未来,但它与当前的市场息息相关。这是因为克里斯蒂娜·拉加德领导的欧洲央行不断重申,只有在潜在价格压力不仅会“有力”地推动通胀迈向其2%的中期目标(当下已经是这种情形),而且会“形成一种常态”的情况下,央行才会开始收紧控制。
如果有任何迹象表明,价格压力在欧洲央行整个预测范围中将大幅提升,那么便会危及鹰派与鸽派当前的休战协议,这两派基本都按照欧洲南北界限分而治之。
经济学家乌尔夫·克劳斯对《财富》杂志说:“我们正在走出通货紧缩压力时期,因此也导致了银行超级随和的立场。然而,这也是欧洲央行所担心的事情:不管是存款的负利率,资产购买或流动性招标,欧洲央行已经部署了一系列工具,而且无法在不付出任何代价的情况下简单撤回。”
经济学家在去年12月给出的最初年度预测为1.4%,而且在今年3月维持了这一预测,他们预计,有鉴于大宗商品市场导致的价格压力的增加,欧洲央行将不得不调高2023年的预测数字。关键问题在于,会调高多少?
货币洪水
自欧洲央行于2011年7月提升其基准利率以来,它就从未想过要实施真正的紧缩。拉加德的前任、意大利技术统治型政府当前的负责人马里奥·德拉吉成功地完成了其整个8年的任期,从未调高过利率。
意大利人抛弃了教条并选择了灵活性,它对其央行进行了重塑,将其从德国中央银行(Germany's Bundesbank)式的通胀抵御者变革为了一个更加现代化的美联储式央行。
德拉吉有意利用欧洲央行自身的资产负债来购买债务,并压低收益率,也就是知名的量化宽松(QE),此举激怒了其北方同僚,后者批评这一决策每月将为市场注入数百亿欧元的新发货币。
这也是6月10日新鲜出炉的季度专家预测规划应该发挥的作用。这些经济预测在测量其主要量化宽松工具的火力方面扮演着重要角色。
由于削减利率这类常规政策已经被用尽,疫情紧急购债项目(PEPP)旨在确保债务市场和商业出借方依然拥有欧洲央行所认为的“有利融资条件”。
5月,通过疫情紧急购债项目购买的债务数额达到了8070亿欧元,是自去年7月以来主权债务市场最大的一次干预。拉加德与其治理委员会特意扩张了规模,以防止投资者不成熟地押注欧洲央行将被迫缩减量化宽松计划。。
购债行为帮助抵御了意大利、希腊、西班牙和葡萄牙这些羸弱国家的紧缩风险。北欧鹰派希望能够看到月息的减少或减轻,至少回到3月之前600亿欧元的水平。
只要欧洲央行没有对中期通胀预测做出重大调整,那么意大利联合信贷银行(UniCredit)便认定这个货币扩张的月幅度将延续至第三季度。
公司于上周在给客户的研究纪要中写道:“我们认为鹰派将放弃,并开始关注9月的会议,届时,会议或将讨论在疫情紧急购债项目可能于2022年3月终止之前进行资产缩减。”
经济学家广泛认为,在短期内,低估了通胀压力的欧洲央行将不得不对当前处于较低水平的今、明年季度专家预测规划进行修订。欧元区的消费价格协调指数(HICP)在5月已经升至2%的预估年增速,创两年半以来的新高,去年12月曾经下滑0.3%。
欧洲央行向市场表示,它对该指数的近期上升并不是很在意,原因有三点:第一,价格在疫情期间处于不正常的低位,部分原因在于德国削减了其增值税来刺激消费。这些为价格带来压力的基线效应将在2022年逐渐消退。
第二,决策者将把当前的指数增长看作是经济重启的功能。受抑需求的释放可能会让经销商不堪重负,并造成短缺。然而,令供应端感到持续震惊的价格也会在短期内收敛。
最后,商品和服务之所以会带来上行压力,其主要推手到目前为止是能源成本。尽管油价的抬升会影响消费者,但考虑到其波动性,央行高管并不愿意过分强调其重要性。
瑞士银行(UBS)经济学家在6月10日会议的预览中写道:“2022年受抑制的通胀会允许欧洲央行对临时的攀升进行‘审视’,并认为政策支持应该持续更长的时间。”
警告信号
4月欧洲央行货币政策会议的纪要显示,令决策者感到欣慰的是,家庭并没有过多地在意资本市场给出的通胀警告信号。他们还提到,劳动力市场的异常不景气破坏了员工获取更高薪资的能力,并有助于稳定预期。
6月季度专家预测规划所提到的新因素将是美国总统拜登的1.9万亿美元财政刺激法案,其对建材需求的影响可能会加剧依然紧张的大宗商品市场。
届时,一个值得关注的重要因素在于欧洲央行中期预测所依赖的假设,尤其是与原油价格和欧元/美元交叉汇率的假设,这两者会对欧元区的消费者物价调和指数(HICP)带来重大影响。欧洲央行上次对这两者的预期分别为53.70美元/桶和1.21美元。
欧洲央行新闻发布会与6月10日新鲜出炉的美国通胀数据,将提前为本周关键的美联储会议定下基调,后者将参照1200亿美元的量化宽松计划,更新其自有的预测和指引。
美联储的主席杰罗米·鲍威尔在4月曾经表示,只有在恢复充分就业之后,他才会开始讨论对政策进行修改。重要的是,欧洲央行称其紧缩计划将在美联储之后推出,因为其疫苗计划从一开始就处于落后状态。
即便拉加德的专家预测2023年通胀将达到2%的临界值,但经济学家怀疑,拉加德理事会的诸多鸽派将以不能操之过急的理由成功说服对方。这是因为央行在过去总是会高估价格在中期所面临的上行压力。
Helaba的克劳斯说:“目前,股市正在经历某种温和增长期,也就是通胀处于不高不低的水平。”
最近的消费者物价调和指数数据看似已经消除了通货紧缩的恐惧,而且对紧缺商品的过剩需求意味着各大公司能够通过将更高的成本转嫁给客户来保护其利润。与此同时他还认为,高企的消费价格还不足以迫使央行管理者过早地收紧政策。
这意味着欧洲央行内部的休战协议依然可以维持,暂时不会有问题。
克劳斯说:“欧洲央行最重要的目标并非是实现经济产出的最大化,甚至不是其使命中所宣称的维持价格稳定,而是维护单一货币。”(财富中文网)
译者:梁宇
审校:夏林
如果说6月10日欧洲央行(European Central Bank)货币政策会议的哪一项内容最值得投资者关注,那么必然是欧洲央行是否会对其2023年通胀预测做出任何调整。
尽管听起来似乎是很遥远的未来,但它与当前的市场息息相关。这是因为克里斯蒂娜·拉加德领导的欧洲央行不断重申,只有在潜在价格压力不仅会“有力”地推动通胀迈向其2%的中期目标(当下已经是这种情形),而且会“形成一种常态”的情况下,央行才会开始收紧控制。
如果有任何迹象表明,价格压力在欧洲央行整个预测范围中将大幅提升,那么便会危及鹰派与鸽派当前的休战协议,这两派基本都按照欧洲南北界限分而治之。
经济学家乌尔夫·克劳斯对《财富》杂志说:“我们正在走出通货紧缩压力时期,因此也导致了银行超级随和的立场。然而,这也是欧洲央行所担心的事情:不管是存款的负利率,资产购买或流动性招标,欧洲央行已经部署了一系列工具,而且无法在不付出任何代价的情况下简单撤回。”
经济学家在去年12月给出的最初年度预测为1.4%,而且在今年3月维持了这一预测,他们预计,有鉴于大宗商品市场导致的价格压力的增加,欧洲央行将不得不调高2023年的预测数字。关键问题在于,会调高多少?
货币洪水
自欧洲央行于2011年7月提升其基准利率以来,它就从未想过要实施真正的紧缩。拉加德的前任、意大利技术统治型政府当前的负责人马里奥·德拉吉成功地完成了其整个8年的任期,从未调高过利率。
意大利人抛弃了教条并选择了灵活性,它对其央行进行了重塑,将其从德国中央银行(Germany's Bundesbank)式的通胀抵御者变革为了一个更加现代化的美联储式央行。
德拉吉有意利用欧洲央行自身的资产负债来购买债务,并压低收益率,也就是知名的量化宽松(QE),此举激怒了其北方同僚,后者批评这一决策每月将为市场注入数百亿欧元的新发货币。
这也是6月10日新鲜出炉的季度专家预测规划应该发挥的作用。这些经济预测在测量其主要量化宽松工具的火力方面扮演着重要角色。
由于削减利率这类常规政策已经被用尽,疫情紧急购债项目(PEPP)旨在确保债务市场和商业出借方依然拥有欧洲央行所认为的“有利融资条件”。
5月,通过疫情紧急购债项目购买的债务数额达到了8070亿欧元,是自去年7月以来主权债务市场最大的一次干预。拉加德与其治理委员会特意扩张了规模,以防止投资者不成熟地押注欧洲央行将被迫缩减量化宽松计划。。
购债行为帮助抵御了意大利、希腊、西班牙和葡萄牙这些羸弱国家的紧缩风险。北欧鹰派希望能够看到月息的减少或减轻,至少回到3月之前600亿欧元的水平。
只要欧洲央行没有对中期通胀预测做出重大调整,那么意大利联合信贷银行(UniCredit)便认定这个货币扩张的月幅度将延续至第三季度。
公司于上周在给客户的研究纪要中写道:“我们认为鹰派将放弃,并开始关注9月的会议,届时,会议或将讨论在疫情紧急购债项目可能于2022年3月终止之前进行资产缩减。”
经济学家广泛认为,在短期内,低估了通胀压力的欧洲央行将不得不对当前处于较低水平的今、明年季度专家预测规划进行修订。欧元区的消费价格协调指数(HICP)在5月已经升至2%的预估年增速,创两年半以来的新高,去年12月曾经下滑0.3%。
欧洲央行向市场表示,它对该指数的近期上升并不是很在意,原因有三点:第一,价格在疫情期间处于不正常的低位,部分原因在于德国削减了其增值税来刺激消费。这些为价格带来压力的基线效应将在2022年逐渐消退。
第二,决策者将把当前的指数增长看作是经济重启的功能。受抑需求的释放可能会让经销商不堪重负,并造成短缺。然而,令供应端感到持续震惊的价格也会在短期内收敛。
最后,商品和服务之所以会带来上行压力,其主要推手到目前为止是能源成本。尽管油价的抬升会影响消费者,但考虑到其波动性,央行高管并不愿意过分强调其重要性。
瑞士银行(UBS)经济学家在6月10日会议的预览中写道:“2022年受抑制的通胀会允许欧洲央行对临时的攀升进行‘审视’,并认为政策支持应该持续更长的时间。”
警告信号
4月欧洲央行货币政策会议的纪要显示,令决策者感到欣慰的是,家庭并没有过多地在意资本市场给出的通胀警告信号。他们还提到,劳动力市场的异常不景气破坏了员工获取更高薪资的能力,并有助于稳定预期。
6月季度专家预测规划所提到的新因素将是美国总统拜登的1.9万亿美元财政刺激法案,其对建材需求的影响可能会加剧依然紧张的大宗商品市场。
届时,一个值得关注的重要因素在于欧洲央行中期预测所依赖的假设,尤其是与原油价格和欧元/美元交叉汇率的假设,这两者会对欧元区的消费者物价调和指数(HICP)带来重大影响。欧洲央行上次对这两者的预期分别为53.70美元/桶和1.21美元。
欧洲央行新闻发布会与6月10日新鲜出炉的美国通胀数据,将提前为本周关键的美联储会议定下基调,后者将参照1200亿美元的量化宽松计划,更新其自有的预测和指引。
美联储的主席杰罗米·鲍威尔在4月曾经表示,只有在恢复充分就业之后,他才会开始讨论对政策进行修改。重要的是,欧洲央行称其紧缩计划将在美联储之后推出,因为其疫苗计划从一开始就处于落后状态。
即便拉加德的专家预测2023年通胀将达到2%的临界值,但经济学家怀疑,拉加德理事会的诸多鸽派将以不能操之过急的理由成功说服对方。这是因为央行在过去总是会高估价格在中期所面临的上行压力。
Helaba的克劳斯说:“目前,股市正在经历某种温和增长期,也就是通胀处于不高不低的水平。”
最近的消费者物价调和指数数据看似已经消除了通货紧缩的恐惧,而且对紧缺商品的过剩需求意味着各大公司能够通过将更高的成本转嫁给客户来保护其利润。与此同时他还认为,高企的消费价格还不足以迫使央行管理者过早地收紧政策。
这意味着欧洲央行内部的休战协议依然可以维持,暂时不会有问题。
克劳斯说:“欧洲央行最重要的目标并非是实现经济产出的最大化,甚至不是其使命中所宣称的维持价格稳定,而是维护单一货币。”(财富中文网)
译者:梁宇
审校:夏林
If there is just one takeaway investors should zero in on during June 10's European Central Bank monetary policy meeting, it should be any change made to its 2023 inflation forecast.
While this may seem far off into the future, it has immediate relevance to markets today. That’s because the bank, led by Christine Lagarde as its president, has repeatedly emphasized it will begin tightening the reins only after underlying price pressures not just “robustly” move inflation toward its midterm target of 2%, as is already the case, but “consistently” as well.
Any sign pricing pressure is set to rise markedly higher throughout the bank's entire forecast horizon would endanger the current truce between hawks and doves at the bank, largely grouped along the continent’s north-south divide.
“We’re emerging from a period of deflationary pressures that justified the bank’s ultra-accommodative stance,” Helaba economist Ulf Krauss tells Fortune. “Yet this is also what the ECB fears: Whether it’s the negative interest charged on deposits, the asset purchases, or the liquidity tenders, it has deployed a number of instruments that cannot simply be rolled back without consequences.”
First pegged in December at an annual 1.4% and maintained in March, economists expect the ECB will be unable to escape revising the 2023 figure higher, due to price pressures bubbling up from commodity markets. The key question now will be by how much.
Monetary flood
Actual tightening has not been in the ECB’s vocabulary since it raised its benchmark rates in July 2011. Lagarde’s predecessor and Italy’s current head of a technocratic government, Mario Draghi, managed to complete his entire eight-year term without once hiking rates.
Abandoning dogma in favor of flexibility, the Italian refashioned the institution from an inflation fighter in the style of Germany's Bundesbank to a more modern central bank that resembles the U.S. Federal Reserve.
His willingness to employ the ECB's own balance sheet to purchase debt and drive down yields, known as quantitative easing (QE), raised the ire of his northern colleagues, who criticized the decision to flood markets with tens of billions of newly minted euros every month.
This is where June 10's batch of fresh quarterly staff projections come into play. These economic forecasts play a key role in calibrating the firepower of its main QE instrument.
With conventional policies like cutting interest rates already exhausted, the pandemic emergency purchase program (PEPP) is tasked to ensure what the ECB deems to be “favorable financing conditions” among debt markets and commercial lenders.
In May the amount of debt bought under PEPP hit €80.7 billion, the largest intervention in sovereign bond markets since last July. Lagarde and her Governing Council deliberately expanded the scale to discourage investors prematurely betting the bank will be forced to taper back the program.
These purchases help ward off deflationary risks among ailing economies in Italy, Greece, Spain, and Portugal. Hawks in Northern Europe would like to see a reduction, or tapering, of the monthly rate, at least back to the €60 billion levels from before March.
As long as there is no significant revision to the ECB’s medium-term inflation forecast, UniCredit wagers this monthly pace of monetary expansion will continue for the third quarter.
“We suspect that the hawks will fold and start focusing on the September meeting, when tapering ahead of a possible termination of PEPP in March 2022 will likely be on the table,” it wrote in a research note to clients last week.
Economists broadly agree that in the short term, the ECB underestimated inflationary pressures and will have to revise staff projections for this year and next from their current low levels. The harmonized index for consumer prices (HICP) in the euro area already increased at an estimated annual rate of 2% in May, the highest in two and a half years, having declined by 0.3% in December.
The bank has telegraphed to markets it has taken a relaxed view of the recent rise for three reasons. First, prices were abnormally low during the pandemic, in part due to Germany’s cut in its value-added tax to spur consumption. These baseline effects putting pressure on prices will wash out over the course of 2022.
Second, policymakers will view much of the current rise as a function of the economy reopening. The release of pent-up demand threatens to overwhelm vendors, creating shortages. Yet this ongoing supply-side shock to prices should also subside in the near term.
Finally, the key driver in the basket of goods and services exerting upwards pressure thus far is energy costs. And while higher oil prices affect consumers, central bankers tend to assign them less significance owing to their volatility.
“Subdued inflation in 2022 should allow the ECB to ‘look through’ the temporary spike and argue that policy support remains warranted for longer,” economists at UBS wrote in its preview of June 10’s meeting.
Flashing signals
Minutes from the last ECB monetary policy discussion in April indicated policymakers were assuaged by indications that households have taken little notice of the flashing inflation signals priced in by capital markets. They also point to significant slack in labor markets that undermines workers’ ability to demand higher wages and helps anchor expectations.
One new factor modeled in the June staff projections will be U.S. President Joe Biden’s $1.9 trillion fiscal stimulus bill, the effect of which on demand for construction materials could exacerbate an already tense commodities market.
A key element to watch out for then is the assumptions underlying the ECB’s midterm forecasts, particularly with respect to the oil price and euro/dollar cross rate, which both pose material implications for euro-area HICP. These were last estimated at $53.70 for a barrel and $1.21, respectively.
The ECB press briefing, along with fresh U.S. inflation figures expected later on June 10, sets the tone ahead of this week’s key Federal Reserve meeting, which will update its own forecasts and guidance on the pace of its $120 billion QE program.
In April, Fed Chair Jerome Powell said further substantial progress toward restoring full employment would need to be made before he would begin discussing any changes to policy. Importantly, the ECB has indicated its tightening plans will lag that of the Fed’s since its vaccination program was slower off the block.
Even if Lagarde’s staff forecasts inflation in 2023 will hit the 2% threshold, economists suspect numerous doves on her Governing Council will successfully argue not to jump the gun. That’s because the bank has in the past consistently overestimated upward pressures on prices over the medium term.
“For the moment equity markets are enjoying a kind of Goldilocks period, where inflation is not too hot and not too cold,” Helaba’s Krauss says.
Recent HICP data looks to have put any fears of deflation to bed, and a surplus of demand chasing a dearth of goods means companies can protect margins by passing on higher costs to the customer. At the same time, he argues, consumer prices are not running high enough to force central bankers into tightening prematurely.
That means the truce within the ECB tower can be maintained. For now.
“The most important goal of the ECB is not maximizing economic output, or even maintaining the price stability cited in its mandate, it’s the preservation of the single currency,” says Krauss.