数据显示,奥密克戎变异株的感染症状更轻而且潜伏期更短。这一结果让亚洲旅游胜地备受鼓舞,它们纷纷加速了重启接纳外国游客的计划,希望从德尔塔病毒对其旅游行业的毁灭性打击中恢复过来。
当奥密克戎种首次于去年11月现世之时,各国政府暂停了其重新向外国开放的计划,叫停了免隔离的旅行方案,并再次实施了旅行禁令。
然而有鉴于更多的证据显示奥密克戎感染者的住院率和死亡率更低——可能也意识到更加严格的策略也未能抑制奥密克戎病例的增长——亚洲各国政府如今才有底气考虑对其策略进行调整。
在过去几周中,尽管泰国、马来西亚、印尼和菲律宾还没有面向国际游客重新开放其国界,但他们均承诺在未来几个月实现这一点。这些国家的政府认为,闭关锁国的经济成本已经超过了重新开放后的公共卫生风险。他们寄希望于通过取消旅游限制来重振其重要的旅游行业,但该行业的完全恢复无法得到保证,尤其是考虑到游客资源大国中国仍未开放。
重开国界计划
泰国在2月1日重新推出了其免隔离旅游方案,该方案此前因奥密克戎而暂停了五周的时间。最初,重启方案仅限于67个国家和地区。然而如今,限制甚至变得更加宽松。任何国家全部完成疫苗接种的游客均可前往泰国旅游,无需进行隔离。该国政府预计,仅2月份就将有30万名游客前往泰国旅游,而且后续几个月甚至会迎来更多的游客。
1月24日,印尼同意为全部完成疫苗接种的新加坡公民设立免隔离通道,以便于其访问巴淡岛和民丹岛。同时,直达巴厘岛的国际航班已从2月4日开始正常起降。访问巴厘岛的游客必须完成全部的疫苗接种,并在酒店或海上船只进行5-7天的隔离。
菲律宾于2月10日面向完成全部接种的外国游客开放,允许157个国家的公民入境旅游且无需隔离。
2月8日,马来西亚负责帮助该国从疫情中恢复的国家复苏理事会(National Recovery Council)承诺,在3月之前面向所有外国公民开放国界,不过该机构并未提供相关具体信息。
国界重开计划幕后的推手似乎是经济考量,因为其中多个国家出现了新一轮的病患激增现象。旅游是这些国家经济的重要组成部分。泰国银行(Bank of Thailand)称,2019年到访泰国的游客量达到了4000万,贡献了该国约11%的GDP。旅游业对于马来西亚来说甚至更为重要,2019年,其贡献的GDP比例占到了该国的16%,也让旅游业成为了自制造业和大宗商品之后的第三大产业。在巴厘岛,旅游业占到了其经济的60%。
开放国界增加了新冠病例激增的风险,然而,各国政府认为,旅游业的枯竭导致的经济成本会带来更大的威胁。
香港城市大学(City University of Hong Kong)卫生治理教授尼古拉斯·托马斯表示:“任何公共卫生威胁都需要在受影响人口的医疗必要性与社会经济需求之间进行平衡。”这些国家都在“接纳必然会逃脱最初筛查的新引入感染病例”,他们可能会认定,“失去的游客以及由此导致的经济效益的缺失,会对民众带来更大的伤害。”
在宣布马来西亚重开国界之时,该国前副首相、国家复苏理事会主席慕尤丁称,重新开启国境将意味着“游客和(投资者)都可以来了。”
放弃新冠归零政策
澳大利亚和新西兰因其异常严格的疫情入境管控政策遭到了诟病,甚至其公民都不得不排队等候有限的航班座位以及隔离设施。这两个国家也宣布了国界重开计划,只不过其国门的开放尺度并没有一些亚洲国家的大。
从2月21日开始,澳大利亚将允许至少接种过两针疫苗的外国游客进入国境。在此之前,也就是去年12月15日,澳大利亚曾公布了一项初期举措,允许外国学生和高技能工人回归该国。
重新开放国界是澳大利亚废除其此前新冠归零政策的最后举措,但这里也有一个重要的限制性条件:澳大利亚各州仍可自行制定入境要求,包括某些人是否需要进行隔离。各州在新冠疫情应对举措方面也存在着很大的差异:西澳大利亚州依然在严格限制入境人数,包括从澳大利亚本土入境的人数。该州此前曾成功地抵御了奥密克戎,当时,其他各州的新增病例不断创历史新高。
邻国新西兰在重开国界方面亦十分缓慢,其首相杰辛达·阿德恩制定的目标是,允许所有外国游客于今年10月份入境访问。国际游客无需在该国的隔离设施中隔离,但他们依然需要居家隔离10天。
重开国界的反弹?
即便各个国家开始取消限令,但预测者对于游客的大量回流并不感到乐观。香港理工大学(Hong Kong Polytechnic University)开展的一项调查显示,亚太旅游协会(Pacific Asia Travel Association,PATA)预测,抵达亚太地区的国际游客到2024年才会恢复至疫情前水平,部分原因在于亚洲以及世界各国参差不齐的新冠疫情恢复情况。亚太旅游协会首席执行官丽兹·奥蒂葛拉在一份声明中表示,旅游业需求“在接下来的几年中可能依然会呈现出跌宕起伏的趋势。”
此前鼓励旅游的举措并未奏效,部分原因在于繁冗的防疫要求。巴厘岛自去年11月便基本上对外国游客开放了,但游客必须为其签证寻找一名当地的担保人,然后在雅加达隔离10天,然后才能前往该岛。申请签证的人并不多:10月15-1月28日期间,印尼仅为巴厘岛和廖内群岛签发了273个签证。
即便按照当前的旅行方案,游客也不能像过去一样想飞就飞。例如,那些希望前往泰国旅游而且不愿隔离的游客需要提交一份申请,预支两次新冠检测的费用,并购买保额5万美元的旅游保险。Minor International酒店创始人比尔·海内克告诉彭博社(Bloomberg),泰国的旅游业恢复“在一段时间内将充满艰难和挑战,除非政府能改变其立场。”菲律宾的要求要简单一些,他们强制要求游客提供阴性离境检测证明以及保额3.5万美元的旅游保险。
坚持
并非所有新冠归零的国家制定了重开国境的计划。尽管奥密克戎更短的潜伏期正在鼓励中国香港、中国台湾和日本等地减少对国际游客的隔离,但这一待遇依然仅限于长住居民,而外国商人和国际学生则对此感到不知所措。
中国是对防疫政策坚持最长久的国家。中国疾控中心首席流行病学家吴尊友对《环球时报》说,即便是中国和全球的高接种率也不足以让中国改变其做法。他称,在控制新冠疫情方面“不存在简单的做法”。
中国的新冠疫情归零政策可能会影响希望重振其旅游行业的国家。即便中国游客无需隔离便可进入其他国家,他们依然需要在回归中国之后在一家酒店中隔离两周的时间。这对于中国民众来说是一个巨大的问题,而疫情前中国游客是诸多东南亚国家旅游行业的主力军。2019年,泰国超过四分之一的游客都来自于中国。疫情前,中国是印尼第二大、马来西亚第三大游客来源国。
香港理工大学酒店与旅游管理学院副主任宋海岩表示,这意味着中国游客“是这些旅游目的地维持长远发展的关键因素。”然而,中国游客并不希望在回国后进行数周的隔离,因此会阻碍旅游行业的复苏,直到中国开始放开其国界,但这一天可能至少要等到2022年年中,宋海岩说道。
泰国上周一宣布,希望围绕“旅游相互开放”与中国进行协商,以便让中国游客无需在两国进行隔离。
托马斯说,这种协议可能无法奏效,因为它“开启了让病例回流至中国的新通道”。因此,“从中国方面来看……此举依然存在风险。”他说,即便这种协议得以实施,也将受制于“持续的干扰”。(财富中文网)
译者:冯丰
审校:夏林
数据显示,奥密克戎变异株的感染症状更轻而且潜伏期更短。这一结果让亚洲旅游胜地备受鼓舞,它们纷纷加速了重启接纳外国游客的计划,希望从德尔塔病毒对其旅游行业的毁灭性打击中恢复过来。
当奥密克戎种首次于去年11月现世之时,各国政府暂停了其重新向外国开放的计划,叫停了免隔离的旅行方案,并再次实施了旅行禁令。
然而有鉴于更多的证据显示奥密克戎感染者的住院率和死亡率更低——可能也意识到更加严格的策略也未能抑制奥密克戎病例的增长——亚洲各国政府如今才有底气考虑对其策略进行调整。
在过去几周中,尽管泰国、马来西亚、印尼和菲律宾还没有面向国际游客重新开放其国界,但他们均承诺在未来几个月实现这一点。这些国家的政府认为,闭关锁国的经济成本已经超过了重新开放后的公共卫生风险。他们寄希望于通过取消旅游限制来重振其重要的旅游行业,但该行业的完全恢复无法得到保证,尤其是考虑到游客资源大国中国仍未开放。
重开国界计划
泰国在2月1日重新推出了其免隔离旅游方案,该方案此前因奥密克戎而暂停了五周的时间。最初,重启方案仅限于67个国家和地区。然而如今,限制甚至变得更加宽松。任何国家全部完成疫苗接种的游客均可前往泰国旅游,无需进行隔离。该国政府预计,仅2月份就将有30万名游客前往泰国旅游,而且后续几个月甚至会迎来更多的游客。
1月24日,印尼同意为全部完成疫苗接种的新加坡公民设立免隔离通道,以便于其访问巴淡岛和民丹岛。同时,直达巴厘岛的国际航班已从2月4日开始正常起降。访问巴厘岛的游客必须完成全部的疫苗接种,并在酒店或海上船只进行5-7天的隔离。
菲律宾于2月10日面向完成全部接种的外国游客开放,允许157个国家的公民入境旅游且无需隔离。
2月8日,马来西亚负责帮助该国从疫情中恢复的国家复苏理事会(National Recovery Council)承诺,在3月之前面向所有外国公民开放国界,不过该机构并未提供相关具体信息。
国界重开计划幕后的推手似乎是经济考量,因为其中多个国家出现了新一轮的病患激增现象。旅游是这些国家经济的重要组成部分。泰国银行(Bank of Thailand)称,2019年到访泰国的游客量达到了4000万,贡献了该国约11%的GDP。旅游业对于马来西亚来说甚至更为重要,2019年,其贡献的GDP比例占到了该国的16%,也让旅游业成为了自制造业和大宗商品之后的第三大产业。在巴厘岛,旅游业占到了其经济的60%。
开放国界增加了新冠病例激增的风险,然而,各国政府认为,旅游业的枯竭导致的经济成本会带来更大的威胁。
香港城市大学(City University of Hong Kong)卫生治理教授尼古拉斯·托马斯表示:“任何公共卫生威胁都需要在受影响人口的医疗必要性与社会经济需求之间进行平衡。”这些国家都在“接纳必然会逃脱最初筛查的新引入感染病例”,他们可能会认定,“失去的游客以及由此导致的经济效益的缺失,会对民众带来更大的伤害。”
在宣布马来西亚重开国界之时,该国前副首相、国家复苏理事会主席慕尤丁称,重新开启国境将意味着“游客和(投资者)都可以来了。”
放弃新冠归零政策
澳大利亚和新西兰因其异常严格的疫情入境管控政策遭到了诟病,甚至其公民都不得不排队等候有限的航班座位以及隔离设施。这两个国家也宣布了国界重开计划,只不过其国门的开放尺度并没有一些亚洲国家的大。
从2月21日开始,澳大利亚将允许至少接种过两针疫苗的外国游客进入国境。在此之前,也就是去年12月15日,澳大利亚曾公布了一项初期举措,允许外国学生和高技能工人回归该国。
重新开放国界是澳大利亚废除其此前新冠归零政策的最后举措,但这里也有一个重要的限制性条件:澳大利亚各州仍可自行制定入境要求,包括某些人是否需要进行隔离。各州在新冠疫情应对举措方面也存在着很大的差异:西澳大利亚州依然在严格限制入境人数,包括从澳大利亚本土入境的人数。该州此前曾成功地抵御了奥密克戎,当时,其他各州的新增病例不断创历史新高。
邻国新西兰在重开国界方面亦十分缓慢,其首相杰辛达·阿德恩制定的目标是,允许所有外国游客于今年10月份入境访问。国际游客无需在该国的隔离设施中隔离,但他们依然需要居家隔离10天。
重开国界的反弹?
即便各个国家开始取消限令,但预测者对于游客的大量回流并不感到乐观。香港理工大学(Hong Kong Polytechnic University)开展的一项调查显示,亚太旅游协会(Pacific Asia Travel Association,PATA)预测,抵达亚太地区的国际游客到2024年才会恢复至疫情前水平,部分原因在于亚洲以及世界各国参差不齐的新冠疫情恢复情况。亚太旅游协会首席执行官丽兹·奥蒂葛拉在一份声明中表示,旅游业需求“在接下来的几年中可能依然会呈现出跌宕起伏的趋势。”
此前鼓励旅游的举措并未奏效,部分原因在于繁冗的防疫要求。巴厘岛自去年11月便基本上对外国游客开放了,但游客必须为其签证寻找一名当地的担保人,然后在雅加达隔离10天,然后才能前往该岛。申请签证的人并不多:10月15-1月28日期间,印尼仅为巴厘岛和廖内群岛签发了273个签证。
即便按照当前的旅行方案,游客也不能像过去一样想飞就飞。例如,那些希望前往泰国旅游而且不愿隔离的游客需要提交一份申请,预支两次新冠检测的费用,并购买保额5万美元的旅游保险。Minor International酒店创始人比尔·海内克告诉彭博社(Bloomberg),泰国的旅游业恢复“在一段时间内将充满艰难和挑战,除非政府能改变其立场。”菲律宾的要求要简单一些,他们强制要求游客提供阴性离境检测证明以及保额3.5万美元的旅游保险。
坚持
并非所有新冠归零的国家制定了重开国境的计划。尽管奥密克戎更短的潜伏期正在鼓励中国香港、中国台湾和日本等地减少对国际游客的隔离,但这一待遇依然仅限于长住居民,而外国商人和国际学生则对此感到不知所措。
中国是对防疫政策坚持最长久的国家。中国疾控中心首席流行病学家吴尊友对《环球时报》说,即便是中国和全球的高接种率也不足以让中国改变其做法。他称,在控制新冠疫情方面“不存在简单的做法”。
中国的新冠疫情归零政策可能会影响希望重振其旅游行业的国家。即便中国游客无需隔离便可进入其他国家,他们依然需要在回归中国之后在一家酒店中隔离两周的时间。这对于中国民众来说是一个巨大的问题,而疫情前中国游客是诸多东南亚国家旅游行业的主力军。2019年,泰国超过四分之一的游客都来自于中国。疫情前,中国是印尼第二大、马来西亚第三大游客来源国。
香港理工大学酒店与旅游管理学院副主任宋海岩表示,这意味着中国游客“是这些旅游目的地维持长远发展的关键因素。”然而,中国游客并不希望在回国后进行数周的隔离,因此会阻碍旅游行业的复苏,直到中国开始放开其国界,但这一天可能至少要等到2022年年中,宋海岩说道。
泰国上周一宣布,希望围绕“旅游相互开放”与中国进行协商,以便让中国游客无需在两国进行隔离。
托马斯说,这种协议可能无法奏效,因为它“开启了让病例回流至中国的新通道”。因此,“从中国方面来看……此举依然存在风险。”他说,即便这种协议得以实施,也将受制于“持续的干扰”。(财富中文网)
译者:冯丰
审校:夏林
Data showing that the Omicron variant has more mild symptoms and a shorter incubation period is encouraging tourism hotspots in Asia to accelerate plans to restart foreign travel in hopes of recovering from the devastating blow COVID-19 dealt to their business.
When the Omicron variant first emerged last November, governments paused their plans to reopen to the rest of the world, freezing quarantine-free travel schemes and reimposing travel restrictions.
But with greater evidence that the Omicron variant has lower rates of hospitalization and death—and perhaps recognizing that its increased transmissibility makes a stricter strategy untenable—Asian governments now have the confidence to consider a change in strategy.
Over the past few weeks, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, and the Philippines have all pledged to reopen their borders—if they haven’t already—to international visitors in the next several months. The governments are concluding that the economic costs of staying closed outweigh the public health risks of reopening. They are hopeful that dropping restrictions will resuscitate their vital tourism sectors, but a full rebound isn’t guaranteed, especially when a large source of tourists—mainland China—remains sealed.
Plans to reopen
Thailand relaunched its quarantine-free travel scheme on Feb. 1 after a five-week pause owing to Omicron. Originally, the reopening scheme was limited to just 67 countries and territories. But now, restrictions are even looser. Fully vaccinated visitors from any country can to travel to Thailand without quarantine. The government expects nearly 300,000 tourists to travel to Thailand in February alone, and even more to arrive in following months.
Indonesia agreed to establish a quarantine-free lane for fully vaccinated Singaporeans to visit the islands of Batam and Bintan on Jan. 24, and direct international flights started landing on the resort island of Bali on Feb. 4. Tourists visiting Bali must be fully vaccinated, and spend five to seven days in quarantine in hotels or offshore vessels.
The Philippines opened to fully vaccinated foreign tourists on Feb. 10, with nationals from 157 countries allowed to travel without needing to quarantine.
And on Feb. 8, the Malaysia National Recovery Council—the body charged with helping the country recover from the pandemic—pledged to open borders to all foreign nationals by March, though it didn’t provide full details.
Economic concerns appear to be driving reopening plans, given that several of the countries are in the midst of new COVID surges. Tourism is a significant part of the countries’ economies. In 2019, 40 million tourists visited Thailand, generating approximately 11% of its GDP, according to the Bank of Thailand. Tourism is even more important to Malaysia, where the sector generated almost 16% of the country’s GDP in 2019, making it the third largest sector after manufacturing and commodities. In Bali, tourism drives 60% of the economy.
Opening up to the outside world increases the likelihood of ballooning COVID case counts, but governments have determined that the economic costs of tourism droughts pose a greater threat.
“Any public health threat requires a balance to be struck between medical necessity and the socioeconomic needs of the affected population,” says Nicholas Thomas, a health governance professor at the City University of Hong Kong. Countries are opening “themselves up to new imported infections that will, inevitably, escape the initial screening,” yet may decide that “a greater harm is being inflicted on their populations by the withdrawal of the tourists and the economic benefits that they bring in.”
In announcing Malaysia’s reopening, former Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin, who chairs the National Recovery Council, said that reopening the borders would mean that “tourists can visit [and] investors can come in.”
Moving away from COVID-zero
Australia and New Zealand—infamous for pandemic border policies so strict that even citizens had to queue for limited space on flights and in quarantine facilities—have also announced plans to reopen, though they are not throwing their doors open as widely as some of their Asian peers.
Australia will allow foreign visitors with at least two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine to enter the country from Feb. 21, following an earlier measure to allow foreign students and skilled workers back into the country on Dec. 15.
Reopening the border is the final step in Australia’s repeal of its previous COVID-zero policy, but there’s a major caveat: The country’s individual states can still set their own entry requirements—including whether or not someone needs to quarantine. Different states have had wildly different approaches to COVID-19: Western Australia—which warded off Omicron even as the rest of the country suffered record waves of COVID—still strictly limits how many people enter the state, including from elsewhere in Australia.
Neighboring New Zealand is also slowly reopening, with Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern setting an October target to allow all foreign visitors into the country. International arrivals would not have to stay in the country’s quarantine facilities, but they would still need to isolate at home for 10 days.
Reopening rebound?
Even as countries drop restrictions, forecasters are not optimistic that tourists will come flooding back. In a study conducted with Hong Kong Polytechnic University, the Pacific Asia Travel Association predicts that international arrivals into Asia-Pacific will only reach pre-pandemic levels by 2024, in part owing to an uneven recovery from the COVID pandemic across Asia and the rest of the world. Tourism demand “will most likely still remain volatile over the next few years,” PATA CEO Liz Ortiguera said in a statement.
Previous efforts to encourage travel stumbled in part because of burdensome requirements. Bali has technically been open to foreign tourists since last November, but visitors had to find a local sponsor for their visa, and then quarantine for 10 days in Jakarta before continuing on to the resort island. There were few takers: Indonesia only issued 273 visas for Bali and the Riau Islands between Oct. 15 and Jan. 28.
Even under current travel schemes, tourists can’t hop on planes as freely as they used to. For example, those wishing to travel to Thailand without quarantine need to submit an application, prepay for two COVID tests, and hold $50,000 in travel insurance. Bill Heinecke, founder of hotel group Minor International, told Bloomberg that Thailand’s tourism recovery is “going to be tough and challenging for a while until the government changes its position.” The Philippines’ requirements are less onerous; they mandate a negative predeparture test and travel insurance covering $35,000.
The holdouts
Not every COVID-zero country has a path to reopen. While Omicron’s shorter incubation period is encouraging places like Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Japan to reduce quarantine for international arrivals, entry is still restricted to long-term residents, leaving foreign businesspeople and international students in limbo.
The biggest holdout is China, which has firmly rejected efforts to shift away from the COVID-zero strategy. Wu Zunyou, chief epidemiologist with the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, told the Global Times that even a high vaccination rate in China and the rest of the world may not be enough for China to change course, saying, “There’s no simple method to control” COVID.
China’s COVID-zero policy may hamper countries hoping to revive their tourism sectors. Even if Chinese tourists can enter other countries without needing to quarantine, they would still need to quarantine for two weeks in a hotel upon their return to China. It’s a significant deterrent for a population that was the foundation for the tourism sectors of several Southeast Asian countries before the pandemic. Over a quarter of tourists visiting Thailand in 2019 came from China. China was Indonesia’s second-largest and Malaysia’s third-largest source of visitors before the pandemic.
That means Chinese tourists are “key for these destinations to be sustainable in the long run,” says Haiyan Song, associate dean of Hong Kong Polytechnic University’s School of Hotel and Tourism Management. But China’s tourists are unlikely to want to suffer through weeks of quarantine upon their return. That will dampen the recovery of the tourism industry until China starts to open its border, which may not happen until at least “the middle of 2022,” says Song.
Thailand announced on Monday it was hoping to start negotiations with China on a travel bubble that would allow Chinese visitors to avoid quarantine in both countries.
Such an agreement may be unworkable because it “opens up a new route for the infections to flow back into China” says Thomas, which “from a Chinese perspective…still presents a risk.” Even if the bubble got off the ground, he says, it would be subject to “constant disruption.”