首页 500强 活动 榜单 商业 科技 领导力 专题 品牌中心
杂志订阅

美国房地产泡沫正在酝酿,但不会像2008年那样

Lance Lambert
2022-04-06

2007年,美国7%的个人可支配收入用于偿还抵押贷款债务。在去年的最新数据中,这一数字仅为3.8%。

文本设置
小号
默认
大号
Plus(0条)

购房者去年暂停找房,期望2022年房价更友好,但是现在他们感觉很糟糕。我们周二获悉,1月份美国房价同比增长高达19.2%,这比去年同期公布的11.3%的涨幅要高。最新的涨幅也远高于2008年房地产泡沫前的峰值年增长率(14.5%)。

持续火热的房地产市场开始引起更多关注。只要看看本周达拉斯联邦储备银行发表的一篇题为“实时市场监测发现美国房地产泡沫正在酝酿的迹象”的论文就知道了。达拉斯联邦储备银行研究人员在比较了美国房价与基础经济数据后得出了这一结论。

达拉斯联邦储备银行研究人员写道:“我们的证据表明,自21世纪初的繁荣以来,美国房地产市场行为首次出现异常。我们担忧的原因可以从某些经济指标上看出来……房价似乎越来越与基本面脱节。”

在新冠肺炎疫情期间,史上最低的抵押贷款利率和首次购房的千禧一代人口浪潮有助于促进房地产市场持续繁荣。然而,仅凭这一点并不能解释房价的暴涨。研究人员认为,另一个因素可能是“错失恐惧症”——或者购房者认为如果他们不立马涌入房地产市场,他们可能会被甩在后面。考虑到因错失恐惧症而购房是上一次房地产泡沫的关键因素,所以这一现象是令人担忧的。

好消息是什么?尽管达拉斯联邦储备银行的研究人员看到了泡沫化的房地产市场,但他们认为我们不会走向2008年式的崩盘。首先,现今的家庭状况要好得多。早在2007年,美国7%的个人可支配收入用于偿还抵押贷款债务。在去年的最新数据中,这一数字仅为3.8%。

研究人员写道:“根据目前的证据,从规模或宏观经济严重性来看,预计住房调整带来的影响不可能和2007-2009年全球金融危机相提并论。至于其他事项,家庭资产负债表状况似乎更好,过度借贷似乎并没有助长房地产市场的繁荣。”

业内人士希望,飙升的抵押贷款利率——过去12周30年期固定抵押贷款平均利率从3.11%攀升至4.42%——有助于在房价过高导致泡沫破裂之前抑制房价的失控增长。

本周早些时候,约翰·伯恩斯房地产咨询公司(John Burns Real Estate Consulting)研究副总裁德文·巴赫曼(Devyn Bachman)告诉《财富》杂志:“如果利率上升到5%以上,买家就会被挤出市场……更高的利率还可能阻碍投资者活动,而投资者活动在现今的房屋销售中占很大比例。”

早在2006年,抵押贷款利率迅速飙升。这些更高的利率——当时许多家庭的抵押贷款利率是可以调节的——最终加速了无数次级抵押贷款的消亡,并为不可避免的2008年金融危机埋下了伏笔。这一次,至少在理论上,抵押贷款利率的上升应该会带来不同的结果。虽然它肯定会阻止一些潜在买家进入市场,但对房主的影响不大。如今,约99%的抵押贷款有固定利率。(财富中文网)

译者:ZHY

购房者去年暂停找房,期望2022年房价更友好,但是现在他们感觉很糟糕。我们周二获悉,1月份美国房价同比增长高达19.2%,这比去年同期公布的11.3%的涨幅要高。最新的涨幅也远高于2008年房地产泡沫前的峰值年增长率(14.5%)。

持续火热的房地产市场开始引起更多关注。只要看看本周达拉斯联邦储备银行发表的一篇题为“实时市场监测发现美国房地产泡沫正在酝酿的迹象”的论文就知道了。达拉斯联邦储备银行研究人员在比较了美国房价与基础经济数据后得出了这一结论。

达拉斯联邦储备银行研究人员写道:“我们的证据表明,自21世纪初的繁荣以来,美国房地产市场行为首次出现异常。我们担忧的原因可以从某些经济指标上看出来……房价似乎越来越与基本面脱节。”

在新冠肺炎疫情期间,史上最低的抵押贷款利率和首次购房的千禧一代人口浪潮有助于促进房地产市场持续繁荣。然而,仅凭这一点并不能解释房价的暴涨。研究人员认为,另一个因素可能是“错失恐惧症”——或者购房者认为如果他们不立马涌入房地产市场,他们可能会被甩在后面。考虑到因错失恐惧症而购房是上一次房地产泡沫的关键因素,所以这一现象是令人担忧的。

好消息是什么?尽管达拉斯联邦储备银行的研究人员看到了泡沫化的房地产市场,但他们认为我们不会走向2008年式的崩盘。首先,现今的家庭状况要好得多。早在2007年,美国7%的个人可支配收入用于偿还抵押贷款债务。在去年的最新数据中,这一数字仅为3.8%。

研究人员写道:“根据目前的证据,从规模或宏观经济严重性来看,预计住房调整带来的影响不可能和2007-2009年全球金融危机相提并论。至于其他事项,家庭资产负债表状况似乎更好,过度借贷似乎并没有助长房地产市场的繁荣。”

业内人士希望,飙升的抵押贷款利率——过去12周30年期固定抵押贷款平均利率从3.11%攀升至4.42%——有助于在房价过高导致泡沫破裂之前抑制房价的失控增长。

本周早些时候,约翰·伯恩斯房地产咨询公司(John Burns Real Estate Consulting)研究副总裁德文·巴赫曼(Devyn Bachman)告诉《财富》杂志:“如果利率上升到5%以上,买家就会被挤出市场……更高的利率还可能阻碍投资者活动,而投资者活动在现今的房屋销售中占很大比例。”

早在2006年,抵押贷款利率迅速飙升。这些更高的利率——当时许多家庭的抵押贷款利率是可以调节的——最终加速了无数次级抵押贷款的消亡,并为不可避免的2008年金融危机埋下了伏笔。这一次,至少在理论上,抵押贷款利率的上升应该会带来不同的结果。虽然它肯定会阻止一些潜在买家进入市场,但对房主的影响不大。如今,约99%的抵押贷款有固定利率。(财富中文网)

译者:ZHY

Home shoppers who paused their search last year, in hopes that 2022 would be friendlier, aren't feeling great: We learned on Tuesday that year-over-year U.S. home price growth accelerated to 19.2% in January. That's up from the 11.3% uptick posted at the same time last year. The latest jump is also well above the peak annual rate (14.5%) posted in the lead-up to the 2008 housing bubble.

That stubbornly hot housing market is beginning to raise more eyebrows. Look no further than a paper published this week by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas titled "Real-time market monitoring finds signs of brewing U.S. housing bubble." The Dallas Fed researchers came to that conclusion after comparing U.S. home prices to underlying economic data.

"Our evidence points to abnormal U.S. housing market behavior for the first time since the boom of the early 2000s. Reasons for concern are clear in certain economic indicators...house prices appear increasingly out of step with fundamentals," wrote the Dallas Fed researchers.

Amid the pandemic, historically low mortgage rates and a demographic wave of first-time millennial homebuyers helped to spur the ongoing housing boom. However, that alone can't explain the explosion in home prices. Another factor, argues the researchers, could be "fear-of-missing-out"—or home shoppers who think they could be left behind if they don't rush into the market. That's concerning, considering that FOMO home buying was a key ingredient in the last housing bubble.

The good news? While researchers at the Dallas Fed see a bubbly housing market, they don't think we're headed for a 2008-style crash. For starters, households are in much better shape today. Back in 2007, 7% of U.S. disposable personal income was going towards mortgage debt service payments. At its latest reading last year, that figure was just 3.8%.

"Based on present evidence, there is no expectation that fallout from a housing correction would be comparable to the 2007–09 global financial crisis in terms of magnitude or macroeconomic gravity. Among other things, household balance sheets appear in better shape, and excessive borrowing doesn’t appear to be fueling the housing market boom," writes the researchers.

Industry insiders are hoping that spiking mortgage rates—with the average 30-year fixed mortgage rate climbing from 3.11% to 4.42% over the past 12 weeks—can help to tame runaway home price growth before prices get so high it leads to a bursting bubble.

"If rates rise above 5% you will price buyers out of the market... The higher rates could also discourage investor activity, which accounts for a large portion of home sales today," Devyn Bachman, vice president of research at John Burns Real Estate Consulting, told Fortune earlier this week.

Back in 2006, mortgage rates quickly shot up. Those higher rates—at a time when many households had variable mortgage rates—ultimately sped up the demise of countless subprime mortgages and set the stage for the inevitable 2008 financial crisis. This time, in theory at least, rising mortgage rates should play out differently. While it will certainly deter some would-be buyers from entering the market, it would have little impact on homeowners. These days, around 99% of mortgages have fixed rates.

财富中文网所刊载内容之知识产权为财富媒体知识产权有限公司及/或相关权利人专属所有或持有。未经许可,禁止进行转载、摘编、复制及建立镜像等任何使用。
0条Plus
精彩评论
评论

撰写或查看更多评论

请打开财富Plus APP

前往打开