首页 500强 活动 榜单 商业 科技 领导力 专题 品牌中心
杂志订阅

迪士尼CEO解雇公司高管,员工士气低落

SOPHIE MELLOR
2022-06-15

许多高管对赖斯被解雇的方式感到震惊。

文本设置
小号
默认
大号
Plus(0条)

上周四,迪士尼公司(Walt Disney Company)突然解雇了其电视部门负责人彼得·赖斯,理由是他与公司的企业文化格格不入。虽然迪士尼董事会对首席执行官鲍勃•查佩克本人及其罢免赖斯一事表示支持,但业界其他人大多表示不认同。

解雇事件发生后,迪士尼股票当天下跌了3.7%,一群业内高管在好莱坞媒体上齐声(匿名)抨击迪士尼管理层。

“查佩克又犯了一个大错,”一位业内高管向《好莱坞报道》(Hollywood Reporter)说,而一位迪士尼内部人士称,“这一步对公司很不利。士气低得可怕。”

许多高管对赖斯被解雇的方式感到震惊。迪士尼某竞争对手公司的一位高管说:“在迪士尼,做到了那个级别,你不应该这样对待(一位高管)。你可以给他一份制作合同,给他一期封面故事,给他举办一个派对,送他走出公司大门。如果你一定要处决一个人,可以有很多种方式。问题在于缺少沟通。感觉这哥们(查佩克)好像不知道我们这是怎么做事的。”

这是鲍勃·查佩克最近最头疼的事,也是他接替备受尊重和爱戴的鲍勃·伊格尔出任迪士尼首席执行官以来一连串麻烦事里的其中一件。按照美国全国广播公司财经频道(CNBC)的说法,查佩克“外表强硬,但听同事们说,有时情商很低”。

自上任以来,查佩克先是为了用上佛罗里达州诱人的税收减免政策,决定将2000名迪士尼主题乐园工程师(也称“幻想工程师”)的岗位从南加州迁到该州;随即就因为公司未对“不许讨论同性恋”(“Don’t Say Gay”)法案(佛罗里达州即将禁止在该州小学课堂上讨论性取向或性别认同的法案)充分发声导致员工罢工抗议。

查佩克还重组了公司的媒体和娱乐业务,将预算权力集中到他的得力助手卡里姆·丹尼尔手中,因此剥夺了迪士尼各位资深的部门负责人的盈亏管理权,引起了众怒。查佩克还因《黑寡妇》(Black Widow)在院线上映期间就在迪士尼+上线一事与斯嘉丽·约翰逊产生了公开争执,斯嘉丽认为这种做法削减了她的潜在收入。

不一致的报道

关于赖斯被解职是否在预料之中,不同报道的说法不一。

赖斯负责包括ABC、迪士尼频道(Disney Channel)、迪士尼+、Hulu和fx在内的多个迪士尼平台的节目,一些报道对赖斯的离职感到震惊,并将他对团队的投入与恰佩克据说更加高高在上的领导风格进行了对比。迪士尼的一名高管向《好莱坞报道》表示:“我怀疑查佩克到底有没有意识到,赖斯在疫情期间召集线上员工大会、进行员工问答,种种做法让他在我们这些普通员工的生活中拥有很强的存在感。”

但也有其他报道称,赖斯确实不是最适合迪士尼的人选。据《纽约邮报》(New York Post)报道,赖斯习惯了福克斯宽松的文化环境,无法适应迪士尼“内敛的风格”,疏远了迪士尼管理层。报道称赖斯出局是“姗姗来迟”。

赖斯此前是21世纪福克斯(21st Century Fox)公司的总裁。在福克斯探照灯公司(Fox Searchlight)任职期间,赖斯把公司打造成奥斯卡奖项和票房宠儿,制作了《阳光小美女》(Little Miss Sunshine)、《杯酒人生》(Sideways)和《贫民窟的百万富翁》(Slumdog Millionaire)等大热电影。

电影制作人纷纷出来表达对赖斯的赞赏。《贫民窟的百万富翁》导演丹尼·博伊尔说:“彼得是我合作过的最棒的高管,我知道其他很多艺术家也会同意这一点。”据《纽约时报》(New York Times)报道,他还说,没有了赖斯的迪士尼会“更弱”,“更商业化”。

“问题出在这是两种非常不同的文化。(彼得)在福克斯非常成功。”一位前迪士尼高管向《野兽日报》(Daily Beast)表示,“我很崇拜他。你现在看到的是一场文化冲突。”

但有一点似乎很清楚,查佩克的位子坐得没那么稳。最近迪士尼董事长苏珊•阿诺德罕见地发表公开评论,说查佩克得到了董事会的“支持和信任”,这让许多业内人士颇感吃惊。

一些人猜测,查佩克要在2月续约,但董事会尚未续约的事实表明,董事会对他的领导缺乏信心。

“公司首席执行官的合同还有不到一年就要到期。”一位资深业内人士向《好莱坞报道》表示,“这本身就是一种不支持的表态。投信任票根本就是胡说八道。米老鼠公司真是最没劲的公司。各种运转失常。”

赖斯的职位将由他的副手达娜·瓦尔登接替,瓦尔登是在2019年迪士尼收购福克斯后与赖斯一起进的公司。赖斯上次续约是在去年8月,合同签到2024年底。据《纽约时报》报道,迪士尼会进行赔付。(财富中文网)

译者:Agatha

上周四,迪士尼公司(Walt Disney Company)突然解雇了其电视部门负责人彼得·赖斯,理由是他与公司的企业文化格格不入。虽然迪士尼董事会对首席执行官鲍勃•查佩克本人及其罢免赖斯一事表示支持,但业界其他人大多表示不认同。

解雇事件发生后,迪士尼股票当天下跌了3.7%,一群业内高管在好莱坞媒体上齐声(匿名)抨击迪士尼管理层。

“查佩克又犯了一个大错,”一位业内高管向《好莱坞报道》(Hollywood Reporter)说,而一位迪士尼内部人士称,“这一步对公司很不利。士气低得可怕。”

许多高管对赖斯被解雇的方式感到震惊。迪士尼某竞争对手公司的一位高管说:“在迪士尼,做到了那个级别,你不应该这样对待(一位高管)。你可以给他一份制作合同,给他一期封面故事,给他举办一个派对,送他走出公司大门。如果你一定要处决一个人,可以有很多种方式。问题在于缺少沟通。感觉这哥们(查佩克)好像不知道我们这是怎么做事的。”

这是鲍勃·查佩克最近最头疼的事,也是他接替备受尊重和爱戴的鲍勃·伊格尔出任迪士尼首席执行官以来一连串麻烦事里的其中一件。按照美国全国广播公司财经频道(CNBC)的说法,查佩克“外表强硬,但听同事们说,有时情商很低”。

自上任以来,查佩克先是为了用上佛罗里达州诱人的税收减免政策,决定将2000名迪士尼主题乐园工程师(也称“幻想工程师”)的岗位从南加州迁到该州;随即就因为公司未对“不许讨论同性恋”(“Don’t Say Gay”)法案(佛罗里达州即将禁止在该州小学课堂上讨论性取向或性别认同的法案)充分发声导致员工罢工抗议。

查佩克还重组了公司的媒体和娱乐业务,将预算权力集中到他的得力助手卡里姆·丹尼尔手中,因此剥夺了迪士尼各位资深的部门负责人的盈亏管理权,引起了众怒。查佩克还因《黑寡妇》(Black Widow)在院线上映期间就在迪士尼+上线一事与斯嘉丽·约翰逊产生了公开争执,斯嘉丽认为这种做法削减了她的潜在收入。

不一致的报道

关于赖斯被解职是否在预料之中,不同报道的说法不一。

赖斯负责包括ABC、迪士尼频道(Disney Channel)、迪士尼+、Hulu和fx在内的多个迪士尼平台的节目,一些报道对赖斯的离职感到震惊,并将他对团队的投入与恰佩克据说更加高高在上的领导风格进行了对比。迪士尼的一名高管向《好莱坞报道》表示:“我怀疑查佩克到底有没有意识到,赖斯在疫情期间召集线上员工大会、进行员工问答,种种做法让他在我们这些普通员工的生活中拥有很强的存在感。”

但也有其他报道称,赖斯确实不是最适合迪士尼的人选。据《纽约邮报》(New York Post)报道,赖斯习惯了福克斯宽松的文化环境,无法适应迪士尼“内敛的风格”,疏远了迪士尼管理层。报道称赖斯出局是“姗姗来迟”。

赖斯此前是21世纪福克斯(21st Century Fox)公司的总裁。在福克斯探照灯公司(Fox Searchlight)任职期间,赖斯把公司打造成奥斯卡奖项和票房宠儿,制作了《阳光小美女》(Little Miss Sunshine)、《杯酒人生》(Sideways)和《贫民窟的百万富翁》(Slumdog Millionaire)等大热电影。

电影制作人纷纷出来表达对赖斯的赞赏。《贫民窟的百万富翁》导演丹尼·博伊尔说:“彼得是我合作过的最棒的高管,我知道其他很多艺术家也会同意这一点。”据《纽约时报》(New York Times)报道,他还说,没有了赖斯的迪士尼会“更弱”,“更商业化”。

“问题出在这是两种非常不同的文化。(彼得)在福克斯非常成功。”一位前迪士尼高管向《野兽日报》(Daily Beast)表示,“我很崇拜他。你现在看到的是一场文化冲突。”

但有一点似乎很清楚,查佩克的位子坐得没那么稳。最近迪士尼董事长苏珊•阿诺德罕见地发表公开评论,说查佩克得到了董事会的“支持和信任”,这让许多业内人士颇感吃惊。

一些人猜测,查佩克要在2月续约,但董事会尚未续约的事实表明,董事会对他的领导缺乏信心。

“公司首席执行官的合同还有不到一年就要到期。”一位资深业内人士向《好莱坞报道》表示,“这本身就是一种不支持的表态。投信任票根本就是胡说八道。米老鼠公司真是最没劲的公司。各种运转失常。”

赖斯的职位将由他的副手达娜·瓦尔登接替,瓦尔登是在2019年迪士尼收购福克斯后与赖斯一起进的公司。赖斯上次续约是在去年8月,合同签到2024年底。据《纽约时报》报道,迪士尼会进行赔付。(财富中文网)

译者:Agatha

The Walt Disney Company on Thursday abruptly fired Peter Rice—the head of the company’s TV division—for being an ill fit with its corporate culture. But while Disney’s board threw its support behind CEO Bob Chapek and his ousting of Rice, much of the rest of the world was less impressed.

Following the dismissal, Disney’s shares dropped 3.7% on the day, and a chorus of industry executives slammed Disney management—anonymously—in the Hollywood press.

“Chapek just made another massive mistake,” one industry executive told The Hollywood Reporter, while a Disney insider claimed, “It’s not good for the company. Morale is terrible.”

Many executives are shocked at the way Rice was fired. According to one high-level executive at a Disney competitor, “At Disney, at that level, you don’t treat [an executive] that way. You give him a production deal, you give him a cover story, you give him a party, you walk them out the door. If you have to execute someone, there are ways to do it. It’s the lack of touch. It’s like this guy [Chapek] doesn’t know how things are done in our town.”

This is the latest headache for Bob Chapek, whom CNBC described as having “a harder exterior and at times, according to colleagues, struggles with emotional intelligence,” and another in a string of difficulties he has faced in following his much-loved and respected predecessor, Bob Iger.

Since beginning his tenure, Chapek has faced staff walkouts over an insufficient response to the “Don’t Say Gay” bill—incoming legislation that will prohibit classroom discussion of sexual orientation or gender identity in Florida’s primary schools—right after deciding to move 2,000 of Disney’s theme park engineers, or “Imagineers,” from Southern California to Florida to take advantage of lucrative state tax credits.

Chapek also reorganized the company’s media and entertainment businesses, and centralized budget power under his right-hand man Kareem Daniel, prompting anger from Disney’s veteran division leaders for taking away their profit-and-loss power. And Chapek publicly feuded with Scarlett Johansson over Disney’s release of Black Widow on Disney+ while the movie was still in theaters, which she claimed deprived her of potential earnings.

Conflicting reports

Reports diverge on whether Rice’s firing was expected or not.

Some were shocked at the ousting of Rice—who was in charge of shows across Disney platforms including ABC, the Disney Channel, Disney+, Hulu, and FX—and compared his commitment to his team with Chapek’s supposedly more distant leadership. “I wonder if Chapek has even been aware that Rice held Zoom town halls and Q&As throughout the pandemic that really made him a presence in the lives of us rank-and-file schlubs,” a Disney executive told The Hollywood Reporter.

But other reports claim that Rice was indeed not the best fit for Disney. Rice alienated Disney executives after coming from Fox’s looser culture and failing to adapt to the “buttoned-up style” at Disney, the New York Post reported. They called his exit a “long time coming.”

Rice joined the company from his previous role as president of 21st Century Fox. During his tenure at Fox Searchlight, Rice turned the company into an Oscar and box office superpower, producing hit movies like Little Miss Sunshine, Sideways, and Slumdog Millionaire.

Filmmakers came out to praise Rice. “Peter’s the best executive I’ve ever worked with, and I know many other artists would agree,” said Danny Boyle, the director of Slumdog Millionaire. He added that Disney would be “weaker” and “more corporate without him,” according to the New York Times.

“This is about two very different cultures. [Peter] was wildly successful at Fox,”a former Disney exec told the Daily Beast.“I have a lot of admiration for him. What you are seeing is a culture clash playing out.”

What seems clear is that Chapek’s position is not as secure as it could be. Many in the industry have raised eyebrows at the rare public comment made by Disney chairwoman Susan Arnold, saying Chapek has “support and confidence” from the board.

Some speculate that while Chapek will get his contract renewed in February, the fact that the board hasn’t renewed it already is an indicator of the lack of confidence in his leadership.

“You let the CEO get within a year of his contract being up,” one longtime industry player said to The Hollywood Reporter. “That by itself is a statement of nonsupport. A vote of confidence is nonsense. It is the most Mickey Mouse company. It’s so dysfunctional.”

Rice will be replaced by his second-in-command, Dana Walden, who came over with Rice after Disney acquired Fox in 2019. Rice most recently renewed his contract at Disney in August, and it runs until the end of 2024. Disney will pay him out, the New York Times reported.

财富中文网所刊载内容之知识产权为财富媒体知识产权有限公司及/或相关权利人专属所有或持有。未经许可,禁止进行转载、摘编、复制及建立镜像等任何使用。
0条Plus
精彩评论
评论

撰写或查看更多评论

请打开财富Plus APP

前往打开