当经济陷入困境时,向创业者灌输设立新公司的最佳时机已到的建议并不罕见。
《福布斯》(Forbes)刊登的一篇文章称之为:“几十年来最大的机会。”《Entrepreneur》杂志认为:“创业就是采纳一个点子并有所行动。今天就行动。”
诸如此类的论调给流行的自给自足神话增色不少,那就是任何勤奋工作的人,只要有好点子,就能够轻而易举地把握住这个时机并获得成功。持有此类观点的人对贫困者的生活一无所知,特别是已经或者正在摆脱贫困的创业者的经历。
我们钦佩的那些创业者品质和精神在贫困群体中随处可见。聪明才智、创造力和奔忙是生存的关键,无论是由于房东不作为而修葺房屋,是把一分钱掰成八瓣儿花以便家里不断电,桌上有吃的,还是打零工来补贴家用。如果仅凭坚毅和好点子就可以摆脱贫困,今天的世界就完全是另外一番景象了。
但我们基本上都没有看到欠缺资源的社区居民的潜力,也没有对他们的才能投资。同时,我们为个别“成功者”欢呼,并将其作为“所有人都能够成功”的证据。这样的恶性循环巩固了现状,并让我们忽略了一个现实,那就是贫困人群普遍得不到所有成功创业者都需要的社会和经济资本。
非营利组织Small Business Majority的网络囊括了85,000多位小企业主,该机构的首席策略官马克·赫伯特说:“我们需要诚实面对我们做出的决策以及这些决策对投身于创业的人们的能力意味着什么。社区确实有他们成功所需的所有人才。问题只是找不到机会。”
在欠缺资源的社区推动就业和机会的主要力量是社区发展金融机构(Community Development Financial Institutions)。此前在斯托克顿市担任市长时我一直盼望当地可以有一家这样的机构。
社区发展金融机构由美国财政部(U.S. Treasury)提供支持。它们和社区需求的契合度通常都远高于传统银行。AmPac Business Capital是一家总部设在美国加利福尼亚州安大略市的社区发展金融机构,它已经发放了近10亿美元贷款,为1,000多家小公司提供服务,并且创造和保留了超过4,000个工作岗位,其中大多数都服务于非传统客户。该机构的创始人及总裁希尔达·肯尼迪在洛杉矶中南部度过了贫困的童年。创建AmPac Business Capital前,她在当地政府和社区贷款部门工作了12年。简而言之,她成功了。
肯尼迪告诉我,收入较低的创业者无法获得资金的一个主要原因是大多数金融机构根本不给他们介绍自身想法和情况的机会。
肯尼迪指出:“传统的贷款决策5C原则——信贷记录(credit history)、偿债能力(capacity)、抵押品(collateral)、资金(capital)和个人情况(conditions)天然地把一些人拒之门外。人们需要向社区发展金融机构这样的合作伙伴真正讲故事的机会,这样才能够得到公平对待。”
甚至不是所有创业者都知道有社区发展金融机构这样的机构。我们必须做的工作之一就是强化这方面的意识。此外,各州可以通过自行建立的社区发展金融机构基金(CDFI Fund)来提供数以百万计的杠杆资金,以便社区发展金融机构扩大覆盖面。
有抱负的创业者遇到的另一障碍是他们要通过官僚体系来获得资源。亚斯明·穆克塔西德和丈夫迈切尔·达尔文共同经营着时尚设计咨询公司Omnific Global Marketing,她认为本次新冠疫情带来的积极经验就是我们发现能够缩减繁琐的手续。
她说:“拨款、微型贷款等资源的申请得到了简化,我们还发现我们可以向最需要的人直接提供资金。”
穆克塔西德相信我们应当运用这些经验,从而为此前申请资源遭拒的创业者设立扶持项目。她指出,人为形成的种族贫富差距,比如奴隶制剥夺了几代人的财富,禁止享受社保和军人福利,歧视和定向次级抵押贷款等,给黑人和棕色人种创业者制造了特有的门槛。
赫伯特称:“我们做出的决策构成了一个框架,它让人们无法获得机会。我们能够通过决策来改变这种情况。”
对于这个问题,Small Business Majority已经呼吁加州政府尝试通过州银行向无法获得传统银行贷款的小企业主投资,同时增加技术支持、微型拨款并为欠缺服务的社区提供创业资金,包括移民和英语熟练度有限(Limited English Proficient)的社区成员。
加州的州长加文·纽森(我是他的无偿顾问)和加州的立法机构已经取得了重大进展,他们修订了《加州零售食品法案》(California Retail Food Code),以便街头摊贩可以获得食品销售许可。
许多这样的小微创业者都很难遵守过时的规章制度,他们大多是低收入移民和其他有色人种。在圣贝纳迪诺市创立Ortiz Ice Cream的玛丽亚·奥尔蒂斯告诉我,现实情况是许多人都不可能获得拿到许可所需的昂贵设备。实际上,据拉丁裔创业者扶持机构Asociacion de Emprendedores的总裁莫妮卡·罗布尔斯介绍,由此产生的结果是圣贝纳迪诺市的许多创业者都被捕入狱,设备也被没收。现在,加州所有58个县的此类创业者都能够合法地做生意而不必担惊受怕了。
肯尼迪和几位同事还致力于联邦层面的结构性改革,目的是让人们更容易获得贷款产品。举例来说,美国小企业管理局(Small Business Administration)的一个贷款项目允许为商业地产首付10%,而非商业银行要求25%。
不过,肯尼迪指出,加州商业地产的最低价可能达到100万美元,而拿出10万美元的首付有困难,特别是对有色人种创业者来说。
她说:“过去10年,美国小企业管理局的这些贷款中有不到10%发放给了拉丁裔拥有的企业,非洲裔美国人办的公司得到的贷款不足2%,而在本次新冠疫情爆发前,它们的增速超过30%。”
最后,肯尼迪觉得联邦、州和地方政府采购对小企业竞标的开放程度并未达到创业者生存和发展所需要的水平。
Job Skills Institute的首席执行官西莉亚·加西亚是一位拥有30多年工作经验的劳动力开发专家,她表示:“我们是自己社区的专家。我们年复一年地追寻合同,而他们却聘用我们社区以外的人。”提供食品服务的家庭企业Burgess Brothers的联合创始人乔恩·伯吉斯称:“小公司不像大企业那样有能力承接大型合同。大公司手握10年至15年的合同却无所成就,而小公司永远也拿不到可以和大公司公平竞争的合同,我们需要给小公司找到出路。”
美国所有资源不足的社区都有大量人才,那里的人创业意愿强烈、工作勤奋。但系统性资金和机遇障碍同样一直存在,必须予以消除。做到了这一点,机会就会变得真正平等,有抱负的创业者就能够公平地开展竞争。(财富中文网)
迈克尔·塔布斯(Michael Tubbs)创立了消除贫困组织End Poverty in California,并在Rosenberg Foundation担任高级研究员。他是美国加州州长加文·纽森在经济流动性和机遇方面的特别顾问,并曾经担任斯托克顿市的市长。
Fortune.com上发表的评论文章中表达的观点,仅代表作者本人的观点,不代表《财富》杂志的观点和立场。
译者:Charlie
当经济陷入困境时,向创业者灌输设立新公司的最佳时机已到的建议并不罕见。
《福布斯》(Forbes)刊登的一篇文章称之为:“几十年来最大的机会。”《Entrepreneur》杂志认为:“创业就是采纳一个点子并有所行动。今天就行动。”
诸如此类的论调给流行的自给自足神话增色不少,那就是任何勤奋工作的人,只要有好点子,就能够轻而易举地把握住这个时机并获得成功。持有此类观点的人对贫困者的生活一无所知,特别是已经或者正在摆脱贫困的创业者的经历。
我们钦佩的那些创业者品质和精神在贫困群体中随处可见。聪明才智、创造力和奔忙是生存的关键,无论是由于房东不作为而修葺房屋,是把一分钱掰成八瓣儿花以便家里不断电,桌上有吃的,还是打零工来补贴家用。如果仅凭坚毅和好点子就可以摆脱贫困,今天的世界就完全是另外一番景象了。
但我们基本上都没有看到欠缺资源的社区居民的潜力,也没有对他们的才能投资。同时,我们为个别“成功者”欢呼,并将其作为“所有人都能够成功”的证据。这样的恶性循环巩固了现状,并让我们忽略了一个现实,那就是贫困人群普遍得不到所有成功创业者都需要的社会和经济资本。
非营利组织Small Business Majority的网络囊括了85,000多位小企业主,该机构的首席策略官马克·赫伯特说:“我们需要诚实面对我们做出的决策以及这些决策对投身于创业的人们的能力意味着什么。社区确实有他们成功所需的所有人才。问题只是找不到机会。”
在欠缺资源的社区推动就业和机会的主要力量是社区发展金融机构(Community Development Financial Institutions)。此前在斯托克顿市担任市长时我一直盼望当地可以有一家这样的机构。
社区发展金融机构由美国财政部(U.S. Treasury)提供支持。它们和社区需求的契合度通常都远高于传统银行。AmPac Business Capital是一家总部设在美国加利福尼亚州安大略市的社区发展金融机构,它已经发放了近10亿美元贷款,为1,000多家小公司提供服务,并且创造和保留了超过4,000个工作岗位,其中大多数都服务于非传统客户。该机构的创始人及总裁希尔达·肯尼迪在洛杉矶中南部度过了贫困的童年。创建AmPac Business Capital前,她在当地政府和社区贷款部门工作了12年。简而言之,她成功了。
肯尼迪告诉我,收入较低的创业者无法获得资金的一个主要原因是大多数金融机构根本不给他们介绍自身想法和情况的机会。
肯尼迪指出:“传统的贷款决策5C原则——信贷记录(credit history)、偿债能力(capacity)、抵押品(collateral)、资金(capital)和个人情况(conditions)天然地把一些人拒之门外。人们需要向社区发展金融机构这样的合作伙伴真正讲故事的机会,这样才能够得到公平对待。”
甚至不是所有创业者都知道有社区发展金融机构这样的机构。我们必须做的工作之一就是强化这方面的意识。此外,各州可以通过自行建立的社区发展金融机构基金(CDFI Fund)来提供数以百万计的杠杆资金,以便社区发展金融机构扩大覆盖面。
有抱负的创业者遇到的另一障碍是他们要通过官僚体系来获得资源。亚斯明·穆克塔西德和丈夫迈切尔·达尔文共同经营着时尚设计咨询公司Omnific Global Marketing,她认为本次新冠疫情带来的积极经验就是我们发现能够缩减繁琐的手续。
她说:“拨款、微型贷款等资源的申请得到了简化,我们还发现我们可以向最需要的人直接提供资金。”
穆克塔西德相信我们应当运用这些经验,从而为此前申请资源遭拒的创业者设立扶持项目。她指出,人为形成的种族贫富差距,比如奴隶制剥夺了几代人的财富,禁止享受社保和军人福利,歧视和定向次级抵押贷款等,给黑人和棕色人种创业者制造了特有的门槛。
赫伯特称:“我们做出的决策构成了一个框架,它让人们无法获得机会。我们能够通过决策来改变这种情况。”
对于这个问题,Small Business Majority已经呼吁加州政府尝试通过州银行向无法获得传统银行贷款的小企业主投资,同时增加技术支持、微型拨款并为欠缺服务的社区提供创业资金,包括移民和英语熟练度有限(Limited English Proficient)的社区成员。
加州的州长加文·纽森(我是他的无偿顾问)和加州的立法机构已经取得了重大进展,他们修订了《加州零售食品法案》(California Retail Food Code),以便街头摊贩可以获得食品销售许可。
许多这样的小微创业者都很难遵守过时的规章制度,他们大多是低收入移民和其他有色人种。在圣贝纳迪诺市创立Ortiz Ice Cream的玛丽亚·奥尔蒂斯告诉我,现实情况是许多人都不可能获得拿到许可所需的昂贵设备。实际上,据拉丁裔创业者扶持机构Asociacion de Emprendedores的总裁莫妮卡·罗布尔斯介绍,由此产生的结果是圣贝纳迪诺市的许多创业者都被捕入狱,设备也被没收。现在,加州所有58个县的此类创业者都能够合法地做生意而不必担惊受怕了。
肯尼迪和几位同事还致力于联邦层面的结构性改革,目的是让人们更容易获得贷款产品。举例来说,美国小企业管理局(Small Business Administration)的一个贷款项目允许为商业地产首付10%,而非商业银行要求25%。
不过,肯尼迪指出,加州商业地产的最低价可能达到100万美元,而拿出10万美元的首付有困难,特别是对有色人种创业者来说。
她说:“过去10年,美国小企业管理局的这些贷款中有不到10%发放给了拉丁裔拥有的企业,非洲裔美国人办的公司得到的贷款不足2%,而在本次新冠疫情爆发前,它们的增速超过30%。”
最后,肯尼迪觉得联邦、州和地方政府采购对小企业竞标的开放程度并未达到创业者生存和发展所需要的水平。
Job Skills Institute的首席执行官西莉亚·加西亚是一位拥有30多年工作经验的劳动力开发专家,她表示:“我们是自己社区的专家。我们年复一年地追寻合同,而他们却聘用我们社区以外的人。”提供食品服务的家庭企业Burgess Brothers的联合创始人乔恩·伯吉斯称:“小公司不像大企业那样有能力承接大型合同。大公司手握10年至15年的合同却无所成就,而小公司永远也拿不到可以和大公司公平竞争的合同,我们需要给小公司找到出路。”
美国所有资源不足的社区都有大量人才,那里的人创业意愿强烈、工作勤奋。但系统性资金和机遇障碍同样一直存在,必须予以消除。做到了这一点,机会就会变得真正平等,有抱负的创业者就能够公平地开展竞争。(财富中文网)
迈克尔·塔布斯(Michael Tubbs)创立了消除贫困组织End Poverty in California,并在Rosenberg Foundation担任高级研究员。他是美国加州州长加文·纽森在经济流动性和机遇方面的特别顾问,并曾经担任斯托克顿市的市长。
Fortune.com上发表的评论文章中表达的观点,仅代表作者本人的观点,不代表《财富》杂志的观点和立场。
译者:Charlie
As we face a tough economy, it’s not uncommon to read advice to entrepreneurs that now is the perfect moment to launch a new business.
“The greatest opportunity in a generation,” according to an article in Forbes. And according to Entrepreneur, “entrepreneurship is about taking that idea and doing something with it. Today.”
Assertions such as these reinforce the popular bootstrapping myth: Any hard worker with a good idea can simply seize the moment and become successful. It’s a perspective that demonstrates a complete ignorance of the experiences of people in poverty, and particularly entrepreneurs who have worked–or are working–their way out of poverty.
The very qualities and spirit we admire in entrepreneurs are ubiquitous among people in poverty. Ingenuity, creativity, and hustle are key to survival–from making home repairs because a landlord isn’t responsive, to stretching the dollar so the lights stay on and food is on the table, to doing odd jobs that help make ends meet. If grit and good ideas were all it took to get out of poverty, the world would look entirely different today.
Yet we largely fail to recognize the potential of people in under-resourced communities and invest in their talent. At the same time, we celebrate the exceptions who “make it out” as proof that “anyone can do it.” It’s a vicious cycle that reinforces the status quo and enables us to ignore the fact that people in poverty generally do not have access to the social and financial capital that all successful entrepreneurs require.
“We need to be honest about the policy decisions that we made and about what that means for the ability of folks to take the entrepreneurial plunge,” said Mark Herbert, Chief Strategy Officer for Small Business Majority, which includes a network of more than 85,000 small business owners. “Neighborhoods literally have all the talent they need to be successful. It’s just a lack of access to opportunity.”
A key driver of jobs and opportunities in under-resourced communities is Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs), and I always wished we’d had one in Stockton when I was mayor.
CDFIs are backed by the U.S. Treasury and are typically far more attuned to community needs than traditional banks. AmPac Business Capital, a CDFI based in Ontario, California, has made nearly $1 billion in loans, served more than 1,000 businesses, and created or retained more than 4,000 jobs mostly serving non-traditional clients. The organization’s founder and president, Hilda Kennedy, experienced poverty during her childhood in South Central Los Angeles and worked for 12 years in local government and community lending prior to starting AmPac. In short, she gets it.
Kennedy told me that a major reason why lower-income entrepreneurs are unable to access capital is that most financial institutions simply won’t give them an opportunity to talk about their ideas and circumstances.
“The 5 c’s that traditionally guide lending decisions–credit history, capacity, collateral, capital, and conditions–were written to keep some people out,” said Kennedy. “People need the opportunity to really tell their stories to partners like CDFIs in order to get a fair shot.”
Entrepreneurs are not always even aware that CDFIs exist. Raising awareness is part of the work we must do. Moreover, states can establish their own CDFI Funds to provide millions of dollars in leveraged capital so these institutions can expand their reach.
Another obstacle aspiring entrepreneurs face is navigating bureaucracies to obtain resources. According to Yasmeen Muqtasid, co-owner with her husband, Mychael Darwin, of Omnific Global Marketing, a fashion and design consulting firm, a positive lesson from the pandemic was that we saw we can reduce red tape.
“Applications for grants, microloans, and other resources were simplified,” she said,” and we also learned that we can give money directly to people who need it the most.”
Muqtasid believes we should apply these same lessons towards creating programs for entrepreneurs who historically have been denied resources, noting that the man-made racial wealth gap–generational denial of wealth due to slavery, barring of Social Security and GI benefits, redlining, subprime mortgage targeting, and more–has resulted in a unique barrier to entry for Black and Brown entrepreneurs.
“We made policy decisions that created a framework that prevents opportunity from being accessed,” said Herbert. “We can make policy decisions to change it.”
To that end, Small Business Majority has called on California to explore a state bank that could invest in small business owners who are unable to receive a traditional bank loan, as well as increased technical assistance, microgrants, and startup funding for underserved communities, including for immigrants and Limited English Proficient (LEP) individuals.
Gov. Gavin Newsom (for whom I am an unpaid advisor) and the California legislature made critical progress by updating the California Retail Food Code so that street vendors are able to obtain food vending permits.
Many of these micro-entrepreneurs, most of whom are low-income immigrants and other people of color, had struggled to comply with outdated rules and regulations. Maria Ortiz, owner of Ortiz Ice Cream in San Bernardino, told me the expensive equipment required to obtain a permit had been virtually impossible for many to obtain. In fact, according to Monica Robles, President of the Asociacion de Emprendedores, the result was that many entrepreneurs in the San Bernardino area were arrested, jailed, and their equipment was confiscated. Now, these entrepreneurs in 58 counties across our state will be able to run their businesses legally and free from fear.
Kennedy and some of her colleagues are also working on structural reform at the federal level to make loan products more accessible. For example, an SBA loan program allows a 10% down payment for commercial real estate, instead of the 25% required by commercial banks.
However, Kennedy notes that in California a commercial property will likely sell for a minimum of $1 million, and coming up with a $100,000 down payment is a challenge, particularly for entrepreneurs of color.
“Over the last 10 years, less than 10% of these SBA loans have gone to Latino-owned businesses,” she said. “For African American-owned businesses, it’s less than 2%, and yet pre-pandemic they were growing at rates of more than 30%.”
Finally, there is a sense that federal, state, and local procurement are not as open to competitive bidding from small businesses as they need to be if entrepreneurs are to survive and thrive.
“We are experts in our communities. And yet year after year we go after contracts, and they go to people outside of our communities,” said Celia Garcia, a workforce development specialist with more than 30 years of experience and the CEO of Job Skills Institute. Jon Burgess, a co-founder of Burgess Brothers, a family food service provider, said, “Small employers don’t have the same capacity as big businesses to do large-scale contracting work. We need to make a way for small businesses that never had a contract to compete fairly with large businesses that sit on contracts for 10-15 years and produce no successes.”
In every under-resourced community across the nation, there is an abundance of talent, desire, and hard work. But there are also constant, systemic barriers to capital and opportunity that must be addressed. When we do that, opportunity will be truly equal, and aspiring entrepreneurs will compete on a level playing field.
Michael Tubbs is the founder of End Poverty in California and the senior fellow at the Rosenberg Foundation. He is the special advisor to Gov. Gavin Newsom for economic mobility and opportunity and former mayor of Stockton.
The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.