琼•万生病请假时,她就拿不到工资。
这位在东圣路易斯工作的餐厅服务员和三个孩子的单亲妈妈表示,如果她或她的某个孩子生病了,她会打两份工来赚回请假失去的工资。
她说:“我不能让孩子看到我因为疲惫而崩溃,我必须奋力前行。我必须这么做,不然我能依靠谁呢?”
可能过不了太久,她就不用这样了。伊利诺伊州民主党州长J.B.普利兹克表示他将签署所有劳工带薪休假法案。该法案要求伊利诺伊州雇主根据工作时间为雇员提供带薪休假,雇员可以基于任何理由使用。
美国罕见
尽管在其他工业化国家规定带薪休假的法律很常见,但在美国却很少,只有缅因州和内华达州有类似法律。
14个州和华盛顿特区通过类似法律要求雇主提供带薪病假,但雇员只能出于健康相关原因使用。伊利诺伊州新法案的不同之处在于,只要雇员按照合理的雇主规范发出通知,他们就不必解释请假原因。
缅因州和内华达州也允许雇员自己决定如何使用他们的带薪假期,但有很多企业不在带薪休假法律适用范围内。缅因州的带薪休假法只适用于员工超过10人的雇主,内华达州的带薪休假法只适用于员工不少于50人的企业。而伊利诺伊州的法案将覆盖几乎所有雇员,并且没有企业规模方面的限制。
救生员等季节性员工、联邦雇员或在大学从事非全职临时工作的大学生不在法案适用范围内。
‘生活就是这样’
该法案将于2024年1月1日生效。雇员每工作满40个小时便可获得一小时的带薪假期,每年最多可累计40小时,但雇主可以提供比法定40小时更长的带薪休假时间。雇员只要工作满90天就可以开始使用这些假期。
1月11日,该法案在州参众两院通过时,普利兹克表示:“工薪家庭需要面对的挑战已经够多了,现在他们不用再担心生活出现问题时会失去一天的工资。”
库克县和芝加哥的法令已经要求雇主提供带薪病假,新法案在这两个地区不适用,这里的雇员将继续受现行法律的保护。
芝加哥一家小型媒体公司的行政人员约翰娜•斯特朗表示,带薪病假使她能够照顾两个孩子,一个10岁,另一个6岁。但是,不用解释任何原因就可以使用带薪假期还是有好处的。
她说:“生活就是这样,”并补充道,她希望芝加哥能更新法律,像州法案一样更加灵活。
非营利组织Women Employed的宣传和政策主管萨拉•拉巴迪表示,芝加哥和库克县的法令是全州法案的试点项目,并宽慰了那些预测大量企业会倒闭的批评人士。实际上大量企业倒闭的情况并未出现。Women Employed自2008年以来一直在争取带薪休假,并推动了法案的通过。
“很显然,疫情期间发生了一些奇怪的事情,但疫情之前并非如此。芝加哥是一个蓬勃发展的经济引擎,” 萨拉说道。
这项法案由来自皮奥里亚的民主党众议员吉安•戈登-布斯提出,她说该法案将“有助于鼓舞工薪家庭”,并“使人们直接受益”。
新任众议院共和党领袖托尼•麦科比表示,“在已经不友好的营商环境下”,强制性福利可能对小企业和非营利组织产生“不良影响”。
她在一份电子邮件声明中表示:“我们都期待一个良好的工作环境,能合理平衡工作和生活。然而,参议院208号法案未能解决提供这种工作环境的主体的担忧。”
小企业‘有些担心’
莱斯利•艾莉森-塞伊和丈夫在杜佩奇郡经营着一家推广和抽奖活动管理公司。对她来说,照顾好三名全职员工是头等大事,但却“很难”满足企业带薪休假政策的规定。
艾莉森-塞伊表示,“这项法案获得通过并将签署,我们都很兴奋。但我们也有些担心,因为你知道,一周的带薪假期,我不知道这会对我们的生意造成什么影响。我认为,许多企业当前只是在尽最大努力生存下去。”
小企业倡导组织全国独立企业联合会(National Federation of Independent Business)对这项法案持反对态度,称它“强行对所有雇主实行一刀切”。
法案通过后,全国独立企业联合会州主管克里斯•戴维斯在一份声明中表示,小企业主面临通胀高企、燃料和能源成本上升以及合格员工短缺等问题,这一要求将成为“额外的负担”。“伊利诺伊州议员们传达的信息响亮而清晰——‘小企业并非必不可少’”。
然而,小企业的潜在负担与其员工的需求存在冲突,特别是有孩子的员工。
万是社区组织和家庭问题机构(Community Organizing and Family Issues)的一名家长领袖,她表示她在工作一年之后才享有带薪休假。如果她或她的某个孩子生病,她清楚将失去一天的工资,这对这位伊利诺伊州贝尔维尔的妈妈来说是一个持续的压力,但有保障的带薪休假“非常好”,能让她安下心来,并减轻一些经济上的负担。
带薪休假政策专家、美国进步中心(Center for American Progress)智库的高级研究员莫莉•韦斯顿•威廉姆森称伊利诺伊州的法案“朝着正确方向迈出了一大步”。
威廉姆森表示,除了确立员工享有带薪休假的权利外,该法案还禁止雇主对使用带薪休假的员工进行报复。这是确保“低收入员工或其他更弱势的群体真正、切实享受带薪休假”的关键。
威廉姆森表示,带薪休假既是一个劳动权利问题,也涉及到公共健康。像万这样没有带薪假期的餐饮行业服务人员更有可能带病上班,并把孩子带病送到日托所,“这样他们也会导致其他人生病。”
威廉姆森还表示:“特别是既然我们已经经历了三年多的全球新冠疫情,我认为大家都对‘所有人的健康都是联结在一起的’有了更深刻的理解。”(财富中文网)
翻译:郝秀
审校:汪皓
琼•万生病请假时,她就拿不到工资。
这位在东圣路易斯工作的餐厅服务员和三个孩子的单亲妈妈表示,如果她或她的某个孩子生病了,她会打两份工来赚回请假失去的工资。
她说:“我不能让孩子看到我因为疲惫而崩溃,我必须奋力前行。我必须这么做,不然我能依靠谁呢?”
可能过不了太久,她就不用这样了。伊利诺伊州民主党州长J.B.普利兹克表示他将签署所有劳工带薪休假法案。该法案要求伊利诺伊州雇主根据工作时间为雇员提供带薪休假,雇员可以基于任何理由使用。
美国罕见
尽管在其他工业化国家规定带薪休假的法律很常见,但在美国却很少,只有缅因州和内华达州有类似法律。
14个州和华盛顿特区通过类似法律要求雇主提供带薪病假,但雇员只能出于健康相关原因使用。伊利诺伊州新法案的不同之处在于,只要雇员按照合理的雇主规范发出通知,他们就不必解释请假原因。
缅因州和内华达州也允许雇员自己决定如何使用他们的带薪假期,但有很多企业不在带薪休假法律适用范围内。缅因州的带薪休假法只适用于员工超过10人的雇主,内华达州的带薪休假法只适用于员工不少于50人的企业。而伊利诺伊州的法案将覆盖几乎所有雇员,并且没有企业规模方面的限制。
救生员等季节性员工、联邦雇员或在大学从事非全职临时工作的大学生不在法案适用范围内。
‘生活就是这样’
该法案将于2024年1月1日生效。雇员每工作满40个小时便可获得一小时的带薪假期,每年最多可累计40小时,但雇主可以提供比法定40小时更长的带薪休假时间。雇员只要工作满90天就可以开始使用这些假期。
1月11日,该法案在州参众两院通过时,普利兹克表示:“工薪家庭需要面对的挑战已经够多了,现在他们不用再担心生活出现问题时会失去一天的工资。”
库克县和芝加哥的法令已经要求雇主提供带薪病假,新法案在这两个地区不适用,这里的雇员将继续受现行法律的保护。
芝加哥一家小型媒体公司的行政人员约翰娜•斯特朗表示,带薪病假使她能够照顾两个孩子,一个10岁,另一个6岁。但是,不用解释任何原因就可以使用带薪假期还是有好处的。
她说:“生活就是这样,”并补充道,她希望芝加哥能更新法律,像州法案一样更加灵活。
非营利组织Women Employed的宣传和政策主管萨拉•拉巴迪表示,芝加哥和库克县的法令是全州法案的试点项目,并宽慰了那些预测大量企业会倒闭的批评人士。实际上大量企业倒闭的情况并未出现。Women Employed自2008年以来一直在争取带薪休假,并推动了法案的通过。
“很显然,疫情期间发生了一些奇怪的事情,但疫情之前并非如此。芝加哥是一个蓬勃发展的经济引擎,” 萨拉说道。
这项法案由来自皮奥里亚的民主党众议员吉安•戈登-布斯提出,她说该法案将“有助于鼓舞工薪家庭”,并“使人们直接受益”。
新任众议院共和党领袖托尼•麦科比表示,“在已经不友好的营商环境下”,强制性福利可能对小企业和非营利组织产生“不良影响”。
她在一份电子邮件声明中表示:“我们都期待一个良好的工作环境,能合理平衡工作和生活。然而,参议院208号法案未能解决提供这种工作环境的主体的担忧。”
小企业‘有些担心’
莱斯利•艾莉森-塞伊和丈夫在杜佩奇郡经营着一家推广和抽奖活动管理公司。对她来说,照顾好三名全职员工是头等大事,但却“很难”满足企业带薪休假政策的规定。
艾莉森-塞伊表示,“这项法案获得通过并将签署,我们都很兴奋。但我们也有些担心,因为你知道,一周的带薪假期,我不知道这会对我们的生意造成什么影响。我认为,许多企业当前只是在尽最大努力生存下去。”
小企业倡导组织全国独立企业联合会(National Federation of Independent Business)对这项法案持反对态度,称它“强行对所有雇主实行一刀切”。
法案通过后,全国独立企业联合会州主管克里斯•戴维斯在一份声明中表示,小企业主面临通胀高企、燃料和能源成本上升以及合格员工短缺等问题,这一要求将成为“额外的负担”。“伊利诺伊州议员们传达的信息响亮而清晰——‘小企业并非必不可少’”。
然而,小企业的潜在负担与其员工的需求存在冲突,特别是有孩子的员工。
万是社区组织和家庭问题机构(Community Organizing and Family Issues)的一名家长领袖,她表示她在工作一年之后才享有带薪休假。如果她或她的某个孩子生病,她清楚将失去一天的工资,这对这位伊利诺伊州贝尔维尔的妈妈来说是一个持续的压力,但有保障的带薪休假“非常好”,能让她安下心来,并减轻一些经济上的负担。
带薪休假政策专家、美国进步中心(Center for American Progress)智库的高级研究员莫莉•韦斯顿•威廉姆森称伊利诺伊州的法案“朝着正确方向迈出了一大步”。
威廉姆森表示,除了确立员工享有带薪休假的权利外,该法案还禁止雇主对使用带薪休假的员工进行报复。这是确保“低收入员工或其他更弱势的群体真正、切实享受带薪休假”的关键。
威廉姆森表示,带薪休假既是一个劳动权利问题,也涉及到公共健康。像万这样没有带薪假期的餐饮行业服务人员更有可能带病上班,并把孩子带病送到日托所,“这样他们也会导致其他人生病。”
威廉姆森还表示:“特别是既然我们已经经历了三年多的全球新冠疫情,我认为大家都对‘所有人的健康都是联结在一起的’有了更深刻的理解。”(财富中文网)
翻译:郝秀
审校:汪皓
When Joan Van is sick, she doesn’t get paid.
The East St. Louis-area restaurant server and single mother of three said she works doubles to make up the money when she or one of her children gets sick.
“You can’t let your kids see you break down because you’re tired and exhausted, ’cause you gotta keep pushing. You got to. And if you don’t, then who’s gonna do it?” she said.
She may not have to for much longer. Expansive paid leave legislation requiring Illinois employers to give workers time off based on hours worked, to be used for any reason, is ready for action by Democratic Gov. J.B. Pritzker, who said he will sign it.
Rare in the U.S.
Requiring paid vacation is rare in the U.S. — just Maine and Nevada have similar laws — although common in other industrialized nations.
Fourteen states and Washington, D.C., require employers offer paid sick leave via similar laws, although employees may only use it for health-related issues. What sets Illinois’ new legislation apart is workers won’t have to explain the reason for their absence as long as they provide notice in accordance with reasonable employer standards.
Maine and Nevada also allow workers to decide how to use their time, but substantial exemptions apply. Maine’s Earned Paid Leave law only applies to employers with more than 10 employees, and Nevada’s exempts businesses with less than 50. Illinois’ will reach nearly all employees and has no limit based on the business size.
Seasonal workers such as lifeguards will be exempt, as will federal employees or college students who work non-full-time, temporary jobs for their university.
‘Life happens’
The legislation would take effect on Jan. 1, 2024. Employees will accrue one hour of paid leave for every 40 hours worked up to 40 hours total, although the employer may offer more. Employees can start using the time once they have worked for 90 days.
“Working families face enough challenges without the concern of losing a day’s pay when life gets in the way,” Pritzker said on Jan. 11, when the bill passed both chambers.
Ordinances in Cook County and Chicago already require employers to offer paid sick leave, and workers in those locations will continue to be covered by the existing laws rather than the new bill.
Johnae Strong, an administrative worker at a small media company in Chicago, said paid sick time helps her take care of her two children, a 10-year-old and a 6-year-old. But expanding the time to be used for any reason would be helpful.
“Life happens,” she said, adding that she hopes Chicago will update its law to be more flexible, like the state bill.
The Chicago and Cook County ordinances served as pilot programs for the statewide legislation, and assuaged critics who predicted mass business closures that didn’t come to fruition, said Sarah Labadie, director of advocacy and policy at Women Employed, a nonprofit that has fought for paid leave since 2008 and helped push through the legislation.
“Obviously we had some strange things happen during the pandemic, but pre-pandemic that was not the case. Chicago was a thriving economic engine,” she said.
Peoria Democratic Rep. Jehan Gordon-Booth sponsored the bill, which she said will “help to uplift working families” and “immediately help people.”
Newly-elected House Republican Leader Tony McCombie said the mandated benefits could have a “detrimental effect” on small businesses and nonprofits “in an already unfriendly business climate.”
“We all want a great working environment with an equitable work/life balance,” she said in an emailed statement. “However, Senate Bill 208 failed to address the concerns of those providing that work environment.”
‘A little bit frightening’ for small businesses
For Leslie Allison-Seei, who runs a promotion and sweepstakes management company with her husband in DuPage county, taking care of their three full-time employees is a priority, but it is “difficult” to compete with corporate paid time off policies.
“We’re thrilled that this is getting passed and that it’s going to be signed. But it’s also a little bit frightening because, you know, a week’s worth of time — I don’t know what that would do to our business,” Allison-Seei said. “I think a lot of businesses are just doing the very best that they can to stay afloat.”
Small business advocacy organization National Federation of Independent Business opposes the bill, saying that it “imposes a one-size fits all mandate on all employers.”
Small business owners face steep inflation, increased fuel and energy costs and an absence of qualified workers, and the requirement will be an “additional burden,” NFIB state director Chris Davis said in a statement following the bill’s passage. “The message from Illinois lawmakers is loud and clear, ‘Your small business isn’t essential.’”
However, the potential burden on small businesses clashes with the needs of their workers, particularly those with children.
Van, a parent leader with Community Organizing and Family Issues said she has no paid leave until she has worked for one year. Knowing she will miss a day of pay when she or one of her kids gets sick is a constant stress for the Belleville mom, but guaranteed PTO “would be awesome,” offering her peace of mind and alleviating some financial worries.
Molly Weston Williamson, paid leave policy expert and senior fellow at think tank Center for American Progress, called the Illinois legislation “a huge step in the right direction.”
In addition to establishing workers’ right to paid time off, the bill forbids employers from retaliating against employees for using it. This is key to making sure “low-income workers or other folks who are more vulnerable are really, practically able to take the time,” Williamson said.
Paid leave is both a labor rights issue and a public health issue, Williamson said. Service workers like Van who handle food and beverage without paid time off are more likely to go to work sick and to send their children to day care sick, “at which point they get everyone else sick,” she said.
“Especially now that we are three-plus years into a global pandemic, I think all of us have a much more visceral understanding of the ways that all of our health is tied together,” Williamson said.