有报道称,十年前,BuzzFeed总裁乔恩·斯坦伯格曾经跪求公司创始人乔纳·佩雷蒂接受迪士尼(Disney)开出的6.5亿美元收购要约。
佩雷蒂拒绝了。
迪士尼首席执行官罗伯特·艾格当时表示,这家新兴的媒体公司“永远不会企及一旦加入我们后有可能获得的价值。”他或许说得没错。BuzzFeed上周宣布,将关闭曾经斩获普利策新闻奖(Pulitzer Prize)的新闻部门,并裁员约180人——占员工总数的15%。
据《卫报》(The Guardian)报道,佩雷蒂为自己的决定向员工道歉。
“我当初决定大举投资BuzzFeed News,是因为我非常喜欢他们的工作和使命。这使我迟迟不能接受这样的事实,即大平台不会提供一家专为社交媒体打造的优质免费新闻机构所需的分销和资金支持。”佩雷蒂写道。
在这家公司经历了最近的灾难后,前BuzzFeed News总编辑本·史密斯透露了佩雷蒂在2013年拒绝那张令人瞠目的收购支票的种种细节,并对他缘何做出这项决定发表了看法。
史密斯日前在《名利场》杂志(Vanity Fair)分享了他即将出版的新书《交通》(Traffic)的一段摘录。根据这段文字,迪士尼当时正在疯狂地寻找一种方式,以期进入越来越倾向于社交媒体受众的媒体世界。与此同时,BuzzFeed的读者数量正在蓬勃增长。史密斯详尽描述了佩雷蒂是如何开始与迪士尼谈判的——除了高达6亿美元的要价,他还列出了一份交易必须满足的要求清单。
根据史密斯的说法,向“大师”艾格学习,是吸引佩雷蒂参与这笔交易的原因。“对佩雷蒂来说,有机会成为直接向现代媒体领域最成功的CEO汇报工作的13位高管之一,是迪士尼最吸引人的地方。”他写道。
在迪斯尼和BuzzFeed高管首次会面后,史密斯、佩雷蒂和斯坦伯格讨论了这笔收购要约。斯坦伯格极力敦促佩雷蒂接受这一提议,并最终出现了跪在地上恳求创始人那一幕。
史密斯称,迪士尼后来给出了官方报价:4.5亿美元,可能还会再追加2亿美元。
“很明显,这是一个佩雷蒂几乎无法拒绝的报价。”史密斯写道。
迪士尼和BuzzFeed都没有回应《财富》的置评请求。
出现嫌隙
史密斯透露称,几个月后,也就是11月,迪士尼信心满满地认为,这笔“完全不用多想”的交易将顺利达成。
彼时,佩雷蒂已经受邀在这家影业公司的管理务虚会上向250位员工发表演讲,并要求在演讲结束后与艾格私下交谈。
史密斯写道,“艾格将佩雷蒂的演讲安排在一个大帐篷中,意在欢迎他加入这个大家庭。”而这位互联网企业家“像惯常那样发表了一段颇为前卫的独白。”
史密斯写道,这场演讲的反响不太好。佩雷蒂讲的许多笑话都是他在以前的演讲中“循环使用过的”。迪士尼的一位人力资源主管认为,佩雷蒂对摩门教徒和犹太人的评论让他成为一个“问题”。
“佩雷蒂这辈子得到的笑声从来没有这么少过。”史密斯写道。“他想象着自己在接下来的职业生涯中,不得不向这些西装革履的家伙解释互联网,而他们则茫然地盯着他,完全听不懂他的笑话。”
佩雷蒂走下舞台,告诉艾格他不能接受这笔交易。史密斯推测称,他的前老板想要吹嘘自己拒绝了业内最具权势的人之一。他补充说,佩雷蒂很可能想重现一个类似马克·扎克伯格在2006年拒绝雅虎(Yahoo)以10亿美元收购Facebook的故事。
艾格不相信BuzzFeed会走上一条与Facebook相同的发展轨迹。据说他当时告诉一位高管同事:“他输了。那家公司永远不会企及一旦加入我们后有可能获得的价值。”
“最愚蠢的决定”
BuzzFeed在2021年成功上市,但这并不是高管们所希望的。从那时起,与许多在线同行一样,随着广告资金流入视频和影响力等新市场,该公司受到了沉重打击。2022年,BuzzFeed录得4.36亿美元的总收入,净收入损失约为2.01亿美元。
与此同时,在收购BuzzFeed交易告吹后的10年里,迪士尼的总收入几乎翻了一番。2013年,华特迪士尼公司的收入刚刚超过450亿美元——到2022年,这一数字跃升至近830亿美元。
佩雷蒂见证了BuzzFeed的轰然倒塌。另一方面,在经历了几年的动荡之后,迪士尼在2022年力邀艾格重掌帅位,稳定大局。
“根据风险投资圈的冷酷算计,佩雷蒂不接受迪士尼的收购要约,将作为数字媒体历史上最愚蠢的决定而载入史册。”史密斯写道。 (财富中文网)
译者:任文科
有报道称,十年前,BuzzFeed总裁乔恩·斯坦伯格曾经跪求公司创始人乔纳·佩雷蒂接受迪士尼(Disney)开出的6.5亿美元收购要约。
佩雷蒂拒绝了。
迪士尼首席执行官罗伯特·艾格当时表示,这家新兴的媒体公司“永远不会企及一旦加入我们后有可能获得的价值。”他或许说得没错。BuzzFeed上周宣布,将关闭曾经斩获普利策新闻奖(Pulitzer Prize)的新闻部门,并裁员约180人——占员工总数的15%。
据《卫报》(The Guardian)报道,佩雷蒂为自己的决定向员工道歉。
“我当初决定大举投资BuzzFeed News,是因为我非常喜欢他们的工作和使命。这使我迟迟不能接受这样的事实,即大平台不会提供一家专为社交媒体打造的优质免费新闻机构所需的分销和资金支持。”佩雷蒂写道。
在这家公司经历了最近的灾难后,前BuzzFeed News总编辑本·史密斯透露了佩雷蒂在2013年拒绝那张令人瞠目的收购支票的种种细节,并对他缘何做出这项决定发表了看法。
史密斯日前在《名利场》杂志(Vanity Fair)分享了他即将出版的新书《交通》(Traffic)的一段摘录。根据这段文字,迪士尼当时正在疯狂地寻找一种方式,以期进入越来越倾向于社交媒体受众的媒体世界。与此同时,BuzzFeed的读者数量正在蓬勃增长。史密斯详尽描述了佩雷蒂是如何开始与迪士尼谈判的——除了高达6亿美元的要价,他还列出了一份交易必须满足的要求清单。
根据史密斯的说法,向“大师”艾格学习,是吸引佩雷蒂参与这笔交易的原因。“对佩雷蒂来说,有机会成为直接向现代媒体领域最成功的CEO汇报工作的13位高管之一,是迪士尼最吸引人的地方。”他写道。
在迪斯尼和BuzzFeed高管首次会面后,史密斯、佩雷蒂和斯坦伯格讨论了这笔收购要约。斯坦伯格极力敦促佩雷蒂接受这一提议,并最终出现了跪在地上恳求创始人那一幕。
史密斯称,迪士尼后来给出了官方报价:4.5亿美元,可能还会再追加2亿美元。
“很明显,这是一个佩雷蒂几乎无法拒绝的报价。”史密斯写道。
迪士尼和BuzzFeed都没有回应《财富》的置评请求。
出现嫌隙
史密斯透露称,几个月后,也就是11月,迪士尼信心满满地认为,这笔“完全不用多想”的交易将顺利达成。
彼时,佩雷蒂已经受邀在这家影业公司的管理务虚会上向250位员工发表演讲,并要求在演讲结束后与艾格私下交谈。
史密斯写道,“艾格将佩雷蒂的演讲安排在一个大帐篷中,意在欢迎他加入这个大家庭。”而这位互联网企业家“像惯常那样发表了一段颇为前卫的独白。”
史密斯写道,这场演讲的反响不太好。佩雷蒂讲的许多笑话都是他在以前的演讲中“循环使用过的”。迪士尼的一位人力资源主管认为,佩雷蒂对摩门教徒和犹太人的评论让他成为一个“问题”。
“佩雷蒂这辈子得到的笑声从来没有这么少过。”史密斯写道。“他想象着自己在接下来的职业生涯中,不得不向这些西装革履的家伙解释互联网,而他们则茫然地盯着他,完全听不懂他的笑话。”
佩雷蒂走下舞台,告诉艾格他不能接受这笔交易。史密斯推测称,他的前老板想要吹嘘自己拒绝了业内最具权势的人之一。他补充说,佩雷蒂很可能想重现一个类似马克·扎克伯格在2006年拒绝雅虎(Yahoo)以10亿美元收购Facebook的故事。
艾格不相信BuzzFeed会走上一条与Facebook相同的发展轨迹。据说他当时告诉一位高管同事:“他输了。那家公司永远不会企及一旦加入我们后有可能获得的价值。”
“最愚蠢的决定”
BuzzFeed在2021年成功上市,但这并不是高管们所希望的。从那时起,与许多在线同行一样,随着广告资金流入视频和影响力等新市场,该公司受到了沉重打击。2022年,BuzzFeed录得4.36亿美元的总收入,净收入损失约为2.01亿美元。
与此同时,在收购BuzzFeed交易告吹后的10年里,迪士尼的总收入几乎翻了一番。2013年,华特迪士尼公司的收入刚刚超过450亿美元——到2022年,这一数字跃升至近830亿美元。
佩雷蒂见证了BuzzFeed的轰然倒塌。另一方面,在经历了几年的动荡之后,迪士尼在2022年力邀艾格重掌帅位,稳定大局。
“根据风险投资圈的冷酷算计,佩雷蒂不接受迪士尼的收购要约,将作为数字媒体历史上最愚蠢的决定而载入史册。”史密斯写道。 (财富中文网)
译者:任文科
A decade ago, BuzzFeed president Jon Steinberg reportedly got on his knees to beg its founder, Jonah Peretti, to accept a $650 million buyout deal from Disney.
Peretti refused.
At the time, Disney CEO Bob Iger said the up-and-coming media company would “never be worth what it would have been worth with us,” and he may have been proved right. BuzzFeed announced last week it is closing its Pulitzer Prize–winning news division and laying off around 180 members of staff—15% of its workforce.
Peretti apologized to staff for his decisions, the Guardian reported.
“I made the decision to overinvest in BuzzFeed News because I love their work and mission so much. This made me slow to accept that the big platforms wouldn’t provide the distribution or financial support required to support premium, free journalism purpose-built for social media,” Peretti wrote.
On the heels of the company’s latest catastrophe, former BuzzFeed News editor-in-chief Ben Smith revealed details of Peretti’s decision to turn down an eye-watering amount of money in 2013, and insights into why he made the decision.
In an excerpt shared with Vanity Fair from his upcoming book Traffic, Smith suggests that Disney was frantically searching for a way to break into a media landscape increasingly angled toward social media engagement. Meanwhile, BuzzFeed was enjoying flourishing reader figures. Smith details how Peretti began negotiations with Disney by setting out a list of requests that he would want for the deal to go through, as well as an asking price of $600 million.
Learning from the “master” Iger was what attracted Peretti to the deal, according to Smith. “To Peretti, this was Disney’s most compelling aspect…to be one of 13 people reporting directly to the most successful CEO in modern media,” he writes.
Following the initial meeting between top Disney and BuzzFeed executives, Smith writes that he, Peretti, and Steinberg discussed the offer, with the latter pushing hard for Peretti to take it, eventually culminating with a scene in which Steinberg got down on his knees pleading for the founder to make the sale.
Disney’s official offer later came through, Smith claims, to buy the business for $450 million with the potential for an additional $200 million.
“It became clear that this was an offer that Peretti, almost, couldn’t refuse,” Smith writes.
Neither Disney nor BuzzFeed responded to Fortune’s request for comment.
Turning sour
Months later, in November, Smith suggests that Disney was fairly certain that the “no-brainer” of a deal would go through.
Peretti had been invited to speak at the moviemaker’s management retreat in front of 250 members of staff, and had asked to speak to Iger privately after his appearance.
Smith writes that “Iger had staged Peretti’s speech in a marquee slot to welcome him to the family,” and the internet entrepreneur “delivered one of his standard, edgy monologues.”
The speech, Smith writes, didn’t go down very well. Many of the jokes Peretti shared had been “recycled” from speaking engagements he’d done previously, while an HR executive for Disney observed that comments about Mormons and Jews made him a “problem,” according to Smith.
“Peretti had never gotten fewer laughs in his life,” Smith wrote. “He had a vision of himself having to explain the internet to these suits for the rest of his career while they stared blankly back at him and missed his jokes.”
Peretti came offstage and told Iger he couldn’t take the deal, Smith writes, theorizing that his old boss would want to brag about turning down one of the most powerful men in the industry. He added that Peretti would want to tout a story similar to Mark Zuckerberg’s decision to turn down Yahoo’s $1 billion offering for Facebook in 2006.
Iger wasn’t convinced BuzzFeed would have the same trajectory as Facebook, with Iger reportedly telling a fellow executive: “F–k him, he loses. That company will never be worth what it would have been worth with us.”
“Dumbest decision”
BuzzFeed managed to push through to a public offering in 2021, but it wasn’t what executives hoped for. And since then, like many of its online counterparts, the company has been hit hard by advertising money moving into new markets like video and influencing. BuzzFeed’s gross revenue in 2022 was around $436 million, with a net income loss of around $201 million.
Disney, meanwhile, has nearly doubled its gross revenue in the 10 years since the BuzzFeed deal went cold. The Walt Disney Company brought in just over $45 billion in 2013—by 2022 it had jumped to nearly $83 billion.
While Peretti has presided over BuzzFeed’s collapse, Iger was asked to return to Disney in 2022 to steady the ship after a tumultuous few years.
“In the cold terms of venture capital, Peretti’s—our—decision not to sell to Disney will go down as one of the dumbest in the history of digital media,” Smith writes.