埃隆·马斯克并不经常表示后悔,他发布的那些造成巨额损失的推文就是最好的证据,在最好的情况下,他的推文可以说是过时的剽窃和令人尴尬,但最糟糕的是那些反犹太主义和包含仇恨(甚至诽谤)言论的推文。作为推特(Twitter)的前首席执行官和特斯拉(Tesla)的现任首席执行官,马斯克甚至连在法庭上扮成游戏里的反派瓦里奥,都不感到羞愧。但他最近接受了美国消费者新闻与商业频道(CNBC)的采访,节目在5月17日的晚间播出后引起了媒体的关注。马斯克在采访中坦言自己犯了许多错误,有一些是他在OpenAI的创立过程里因为自己所扮演的角色而犯下的重大错误。OpenAI推出的人工智能技术ChatGPT改变了行业格局。
作为OpenAI的联合创始人,马斯克在2018年从该公司的董事会辞职,结果他只能眼睁睁地看着ChatGPT变成了采用率最快的技术,这一纪录也许永远无法被超越。马斯克关注的是自己发明的自动驾驶汽车和人形机器人,目前他所开发的机器人似乎依旧属于机器的范畴。2022年,马斯克以440亿美元收购推特,这分散了他的部分精力。事实证明,经营推特并不是一件简单有趣的工作,因为马斯克连续发布的推文承认,随着在他的管理下,推特的市值下跌,他可能为该公司多支付了超过200亿美元。
在硅谷有一句俗话:邻家芳草绿,隔岸风景好。但对马斯克而言,退出OpenAI让他损失惨重,也失去了与当今最热门的技术相关联的机会。在接受美国消费者新闻与商业频道的主持人大卫·费伯采访时,马斯克一如既往拿出了最好的表现,分享了更多自己的想法,他谈论了在OpenAI的选择,曝光了他与谷歌(Google)的拉里·佩奇之间曾经的友谊,并表示他在OpenAI的成功过程里扮演了关键角色。
主持人问道,既然马斯克在OpenAI投入了大量资金,他是否本应该持有更多股份,马斯克说:“我完全承认这是一个极其愚蠢的决定。”马斯克表示,他低估了该公司盈利的潜力,但他认为这是无法预测的。毕竟,该公司在2019年马斯克离开之后不久,才从一家非营利组织转型成为营利性企业,而这也涉及他与佩奇交恶的根本原因。
马斯克坚称:“OpenAI的存在要归功于我。”他在其中投资了接近5,000万美元,同时他哀叹道:“命运总是充满讽刺。”他说:“如果没有我,OpenAI就不可能存在。”他对费伯表示,是他想出了OpenAI的名字,并招募到关键科学家和工程师,例如OpenAI的联合创始人及首席科学家伊尔亚·苏茨克维。
马斯克讲述他与拉里·佩奇之间的真实故事
特斯拉的创始人马斯克解释称,他以前不认为而且现在依旧不认为公司应该利用人工智能来牟利(尽管特斯拉的汽车也有类似于人工智能的特性)。他说自己与拉里·佩奇交恶与此有关:“我不断提醒他警惕人工智能的危险,但他却并不放在心上。他对这个问题漫不经心。”马斯克表示,佩奇曾经指责马斯克是物种歧视主义者,或者马斯克认为人工智能无法与人类相提并论,这导致他们的关系进一步恶化。虽然马斯克称这是“最后的稻草”,但他似乎并不在意被贴上这种标签。
马斯克表示,受到佩奇的刺激,他才决定启动一个开源项目,制衡佩奇在谷歌的DeepMind项目,并确保OpenAI是一家非营利组织。“成立OpenAI的目的是,作为一家开源非营利组织,‘制衡谷歌’。因为谷歌是闭源的营利性企业。追求利润的动机可能是危险的。”
马斯克低估的一点是,他认为OpenAI不可能与谷歌交战。“最初,我的想法是:‘看,这是一场毫无希望的努力,OpenAI怎么可能与谷歌的DeepMind竞争呢?’这就像是蚂蚁与大象的对决,而不是一场竞赛。”
他依旧对OpenAI的转变耿耿于怀。他反问称,像OpenAI这样,如果一家非营利组织利用为了非营利性目的开发的知识产权,转型成为一家营利性企业,这种做法合法吗?马斯克确实认为该公司这样做“似乎有古怪”,他打了一个比方说,你资助一家宣称要拯救亚马逊雨林的机构,但后来发现它变成了一家木材公司,依靠出售雨林里的物产来牟利。
“你的感觉是:‘等等,这与我投资的意图截然相反,这是合法的吗?这似乎并不合法。’”马斯克表示,他对有人利用人工智能来牟利的做法深感担忧。他又说道:“我担心微软(Microsoft)将获得更大的控制权,可能超出OpenAI领导团队的想象。”但无论是由微软还是OpenAI的领导层主持这场有利可图的演出,有一点可以确定的是,马斯克现在只能坐在观众席上。(财富中文网)
译者:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
埃隆·马斯克并不经常表示后悔,他发布的那些造成巨额损失的推文就是最好的证据,在最好的情况下,他的推文可以说是过时的剽窃和令人尴尬,但最糟糕的是那些反犹太主义和包含仇恨(甚至诽谤)言论的推文。作为推特(Twitter)的前首席执行官和特斯拉(Tesla)的现任首席执行官,马斯克甚至连在法庭上扮成游戏里的反派瓦里奥,都不感到羞愧。但他最近接受了美国消费者新闻与商业频道(CNBC)的采访,节目在5月17日的晚间播出后引起了媒体的关注。马斯克在采访中坦言自己犯了许多错误,有一些是他在OpenAI的创立过程里因为自己所扮演的角色而犯下的重大错误。OpenAI推出的人工智能技术ChatGPT改变了行业格局。
作为OpenAI的联合创始人,马斯克在2018年从该公司的董事会辞职,结果他只能眼睁睁地看着ChatGPT变成了采用率最快的技术,这一纪录也许永远无法被超越。马斯克关注的是自己发明的自动驾驶汽车和人形机器人,目前他所开发的机器人似乎依旧属于机器的范畴。2022年,马斯克以440亿美元收购推特,这分散了他的部分精力。事实证明,经营推特并不是一件简单有趣的工作,因为马斯克连续发布的推文承认,随着在他的管理下,推特的市值下跌,他可能为该公司多支付了超过200亿美元。
在硅谷有一句俗话:邻家芳草绿,隔岸风景好。但对马斯克而言,退出OpenAI让他损失惨重,也失去了与当今最热门的技术相关联的机会。在接受美国消费者新闻与商业频道的主持人大卫·费伯采访时,马斯克一如既往拿出了最好的表现,分享了更多自己的想法,他谈论了在OpenAI的选择,曝光了他与谷歌(Google)的拉里·佩奇之间曾经的友谊,并表示他在OpenAI的成功过程里扮演了关键角色。
主持人问道,既然马斯克在OpenAI投入了大量资金,他是否本应该持有更多股份,马斯克说:“我完全承认这是一个极其愚蠢的决定。”马斯克表示,他低估了该公司盈利的潜力,但他认为这是无法预测的。毕竟,该公司在2019年马斯克离开之后不久,才从一家非营利组织转型成为营利性企业,而这也涉及他与佩奇交恶的根本原因。
马斯克坚称:“OpenAI的存在要归功于我。”他在其中投资了接近5,000万美元,同时他哀叹道:“命运总是充满讽刺。”他说:“如果没有我,OpenAI就不可能存在。”他对费伯表示,是他想出了OpenAI的名字,并招募到关键科学家和工程师,例如OpenAI的联合创始人及首席科学家伊尔亚·苏茨克维。
马斯克讲述他与拉里·佩奇之间的真实故事
特斯拉的创始人马斯克解释称,他以前不认为而且现在依旧不认为公司应该利用人工智能来牟利(尽管特斯拉的汽车也有类似于人工智能的特性)。他说自己与拉里·佩奇交恶与此有关:“我不断提醒他警惕人工智能的危险,但他却并不放在心上。他对这个问题漫不经心。”马斯克表示,佩奇曾经指责马斯克是物种歧视主义者,或者马斯克认为人工智能无法与人类相提并论,这导致他们的关系进一步恶化。虽然马斯克称这是“最后的稻草”,但他似乎并不在意被贴上这种标签。
马斯克表示,受到佩奇的刺激,他才决定启动一个开源项目,制衡佩奇在谷歌的DeepMind项目,并确保OpenAI是一家非营利组织。“成立OpenAI的目的是,作为一家开源非营利组织,‘制衡谷歌’。因为谷歌是闭源的营利性企业。追求利润的动机可能是危险的。”
马斯克低估的一点是,他认为OpenAI不可能与谷歌交战。“最初,我的想法是:‘看,这是一场毫无希望的努力,OpenAI怎么可能与谷歌的DeepMind竞争呢?’这就像是蚂蚁与大象的对决,而不是一场竞赛。”
他依旧对OpenAI的转变耿耿于怀。他反问称,像OpenAI这样,如果一家非营利组织利用为了非营利性目的开发的知识产权,转型成为一家营利性企业,这种做法合法吗?马斯克确实认为该公司这样做“似乎有古怪”,他打了一个比方说,你资助一家宣称要拯救亚马逊雨林的机构,但后来发现它变成了一家木材公司,依靠出售雨林里的物产来牟利。
“你的感觉是:‘等等,这与我投资的意图截然相反,这是合法的吗?这似乎并不合法。’”马斯克表示,他对有人利用人工智能来牟利的做法深感担忧。他又说道:“我担心微软(Microsoft)将获得更大的控制权,可能超出OpenAI领导团队的想象。”但无论是由微软还是OpenAI的领导层主持这场有利可图的演出,有一点可以确定的是,马斯克现在只能坐在观众席上。(财富中文网)
译者:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
Elon Musk doesn’t express regret a lot, publicly standing by his money-sucking tweets that have been called dated plagiarism and cringey at best and antisemitic and hateful (if not slanderous) at worst. The former CEO of Twitter and Tesla CEO hasn’t even admitted to feeling any shame about dressing up as Wario in a courtroom. But in a news-making blockbuster interview with CNBC that aired on May 17 night, Musk confessed to several mistakes, and some big ones with his role in forming the company that became OpenAI, the originator of the game-changing ChatGPT artificial intelligence technology.
A co-founder at OpenAI, Musk resigned from the board in 2018, only to see ChatGPT become the technology with the fastest adoption rate, well, maybe ever. Musk was focused on his own inventions, the self-driving car and humanoid robot thingy which still appears to be mostly robot, Musk has gotten sidetracked in the last year by Twitter, a $44 billion gift to himself. Running Twitter has proven to be more work than simply fun, as serial tweeter Musk admits he might have overpaid by more than $20 billion as the company depreciates in value under his reign.
The grass is always greener on the other side of Silicon Valley, but in Musk’s case, by backing out of OpenAI he’s lost out on quite a bit of money, along with an association with the hottest thing in tech these days. In his interview with CNBC’s David Faber, Musk did what he likes to do best and shared more of his thoughts, this time regarding his choices at OpenAI, what he revealed is a former friendship with Google’s Larry Page, and claims that his role in OpenAI’s success was pivotal.
“I fully admit to being a huge idiot here,” Musk says, when asked whether he should have a larger stake in OpenAI given that he invested so much in the project. Musk said he underestimated the potential of the company’s profitability, but he argued this was unforeseen. After all, the company transitioned from nonprofit to for-profit in 2019, not long after Musk left, and this also gets to the root of his beef with Page.
“I am the reason OpenAI exists,” Musk insisted, adding that he poured roughly $50 million into the group, while lamenting, “man, fate loves irony next level.” “It wouldn’t exist without me,” he continued, telling Faber that he came up with the name and recruited key scientists and engineers such as Ilya Sutskever, OpenAI’s co-founder and chief scientist.
Elon and Larry, the real story, according to Elon
The Tesla founder explained that he didn’t—and still doesn’t—believe that companies should profit off of A.I. (notwithstanding Tesla vehicles’ A.I.-like qualities). He describes his fallout with Larry Page as related to this: “I would be constantly urging him to be careful about the danger of A.I., and he was really not concerned about the danger of A.I. He was quite cavalier about it.” Adding to their falling out, Musk describes Page’s lobbed accusation that Musk was a speciesist, or believed that AI wasn’t as good as humans. Though musk calls it the “last straw” he also doesn’t seem to mind the label.
Musk said he was spurred to make his open source and therefore the opposite of Page’s DeepMind initiative at Google, and made sure that OpenAI would be a nonprofit. “The intent was: ‘What’s the opposite of Google,’ [it] would be an opensource nonprofit. Because Google is closed source, for-profit. And that profit motivation can be potentially dangerous.”
Part of Musk’s underestimation comes from thinking OpenAI couldn’t wage war against Google. “In the beginning I thought, ‘Look, this is probably a hopeless endeavor, how could OpenAI possibly compete with Google DeepMind?’ This seemed like an ant against an elephant, not a contest.”
He’s still sore about how it went down, asking rhetorically if it should be legal for a nonprofit to take IP developed for that purpose and transfer it to a for-profit company, as OpenAI has done. It does “seem weird” to him, likening its transformation to funding an organization that claims to save the Amazon rainforest and then finding out that it becomes a lumber company which profits off selling its materials instead.
“You’d be like ‘Oh, wait a second, that’s the exact opposite of what I gave the money for, is that legal? That doesn’t seem legal.’” Musk expresses he’s wary of anyone profiting off of A.I. “I do worry that Microsoft actually may be more in control than say the leadership team at OpenAI realizes,” he adds. Whether it be Microsoft or OpenAI leadership running the now very profitable show, one thing is certain, Musk is in the audience at this point.