新兴国家通常受制于美元。现在,新兴国家希望减少美元储备,转而增加黄金储备,以避免因为美联储变化莫测的政策而受到影响。
各国调整外汇储备给美国人带来了风险。其他国家愿意用他们的商品交换美国法定货币,这让美国受益匪浅。如果更多国家选择用其他货币进行贸易结算,例如人民币,这种“去美元化”的趋势将迫使美国财政部向外国债权人借款时支付更高利息。
世界黄金协会(World Gold Council)近日发布的对各国央行的年度调查结果显示,发展中国家如今确实在努力减少对美元的依赖。
该行业协会代表了部分业内最大的黄金开采企业,如巴里克黄金(Barrick Gold)、纽蒙特矿业(Newmont)和安格鲁阿散蒂黄金(AngloGold Ashanti)等。该协会发现发达国家和发展中国家的货币政策制定者之间存在“思想上的鸿沟”。调查结果对于美国有重要的意义,美国能否维持巨大的、持续的贸易赤字以及美国人的生活标准,都将受到影响。
世界黄金协会的年度报告称:“各国对于美元和黄金前景的看法,分歧最为明显。”该协会表示,从2008年全球金融危机以来,发展中经济体一直是购买黄金的主力,他们“对美元的未来更加悲观,更看好黄金的未来前景”。
出现这种分歧的部分原因是美国利率大幅波动在新兴市场造成的动荡。当美联储利率接近零时,外国投资者通常会将资金投入新兴市场,促进新兴市场的经济增长,同时也会助长通胀。
当美联储加息时,比如去年的连续加息,这些投资者会迅速将资金转回美国,这通常会在更脆弱的经济体引发经济衰退,更糟糕的是导致货币危机。
正如理查德·尼克松政府的一句名言所说:“美元是我们的货币,却是你们的麻烦。”
溢出效应
当美国人都在关注最近的区域银行挤兑和债务上限谈判时,人们通常会忘记其他国家同样因为美联储主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔的决策受到了严重影响。
经济学家们六年前针对美联储的决策写道:“美国加息对其他国家有巨大的溢出效应,平均影响几乎与加息对美国的影响不相上下。三年后,货币政策引发的美国利率上浮100个基点,使发达经济体和新兴经济体的GDP分别减少了0.5%和0.8%。”
对于这些新兴国家而言,唯一可持续的解决方案是通过减少对美元的依赖,不再将美元作为与邻国开展贸易的货币,从而减少美联储政策的影响。从不断减少的美元储备中可以明显看出这种趋势。
世界黄金协会调查了未来五年全球储备份额的变化,有58%的新兴市场央行表示,以美元计价的资产将减少,有68%的央行预测将增加黄金储备。只有五分之一的央行认为将维持当前水平。
相比之下,绝大多数发达经济体的央行预计将维持现状。
美联储应对通胀的举措对新兴经济体的附带损害令各国不满,而七国集团对俄罗斯发起俄乌冲突的制裁进一步加剧了这种不满情绪。一些新兴国家担心,一旦他们与西方工业化国家出现分歧,同样的手段可能会施加在他们身上。
制裁和去美元化这两个因素使各国在选择持有黄金储备最重要的原因上出现了最明显的分歧。25%的新兴市场央行提到了对制裁的担忧,这是今年的调查中新增加的一个问题。有11%的央行表示这是其去美元化政策的一部分。但没有任何一个发达经济体认为这两个因素与持有黄金储备有关。
去年,20%的受访者表示,去美元化是持有黄金储备略微相关或在一定程度上相关的因素。但今年这个比例提高到38%,其中甚至有4%的受访者首次表示这是“高度相关”的因素。
总体上有71%的受访者认为,全球央行未来12个月将增加黄金储备,相比之下去年只有61%,而2021年只有52%。
央行是黄金市场的主要参与者,他们帮助维持黄金价格。最近金价上涨至超过每盎司2,000美元的历史最高价,但央行并不会为了投机买入黄金。相反,央行主要将黄金用于对冲通货膨胀和作为一种价值储备。
世界黄金协会调查显示,2022年,央行净买入黄金总计达到1,136公吨。这不仅是各国连续13年净买入黄金,也代表了自1950年以来的最高年度需求。其中,土耳其央行是去年黄金的最大买家,其官方黄金储备增长了148吨。(财富中文网)
翻译:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
新兴国家通常受制于美元。现在,新兴国家希望减少美元储备,转而增加黄金储备,以避免因为美联储变化莫测的政策而受到影响。
各国调整外汇储备给美国人带来了风险。其他国家愿意用他们的商品交换美国法定货币,这让美国受益匪浅。如果更多国家选择用其他货币进行贸易结算,例如人民币,这种“去美元化”的趋势将迫使美国财政部向外国债权人借款时支付更高利息。
世界黄金协会(World Gold Council)近日发布的对各国央行的年度调查结果显示,发展中国家如今确实在努力减少对美元的依赖。
该行业协会代表了部分业内最大的黄金开采企业,如巴里克黄金(Barrick Gold)、纽蒙特矿业(Newmont)和安格鲁阿散蒂黄金(AngloGold Ashanti)等。该协会发现发达国家和发展中国家的货币政策制定者之间存在“思想上的鸿沟”。调查结果对于美国有重要的意义,美国能否维持巨大的、持续的贸易赤字以及美国人的生活标准,都将受到影响。
世界黄金协会的年度报告称:“各国对于美元和黄金前景的看法,分歧最为明显。”该协会表示,从2008年全球金融危机以来,发展中经济体一直是购买黄金的主力,他们“对美元的未来更加悲观,更看好黄金的未来前景”。
出现这种分歧的部分原因是美国利率大幅波动在新兴市场造成的动荡。当美联储利率接近零时,外国投资者通常会将资金投入新兴市场,促进新兴市场的经济增长,同时也会助长通胀。
当美联储加息时,比如去年的连续加息,这些投资者会迅速将资金转回美国,这通常会在更脆弱的经济体引发经济衰退,更糟糕的是导致货币危机。
正如理查德·尼克松政府的一句名言所说:“美元是我们的货币,却是你们的麻烦。”
溢出效应
当美国人都在关注最近的区域银行挤兑和债务上限谈判时,人们通常会忘记其他国家同样因为美联储主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔的决策受到了严重影响。
经济学家们六年前针对美联储的决策写道:“美国加息对其他国家有巨大的溢出效应,平均影响几乎与加息对美国的影响不相上下。三年后,货币政策引发的美国利率上浮100个基点,使发达经济体和新兴经济体的GDP分别减少了0.5%和0.8%。”
对于这些新兴国家而言,唯一可持续的解决方案是通过减少对美元的依赖,不再将美元作为与邻国开展贸易的货币,从而减少美联储政策的影响。从不断减少的美元储备中可以明显看出这种趋势。
世界黄金协会调查了未来五年全球储备份额的变化,有58%的新兴市场央行表示,以美元计价的资产将减少,有68%的央行预测将增加黄金储备。只有五分之一的央行认为将维持当前水平。
相比之下,绝大多数发达经济体的央行预计将维持现状。
美联储应对通胀的举措对新兴经济体的附带损害令各国不满,而七国集团对俄罗斯发起俄乌冲突的制裁进一步加剧了这种不满情绪。一些新兴国家担心,一旦他们与西方工业化国家出现分歧,同样的手段可能会施加在他们身上。
制裁和去美元化这两个因素使各国在选择持有黄金储备最重要的原因上出现了最明显的分歧。25%的新兴市场央行提到了对制裁的担忧,这是今年的调查中新增加的一个问题。有11%的央行表示这是其去美元化政策的一部分。但没有任何一个发达经济体认为这两个因素与持有黄金储备有关。
去年,20%的受访者表示,去美元化是持有黄金储备略微相关或在一定程度上相关的因素。但今年这个比例提高到38%,其中甚至有4%的受访者首次表示这是“高度相关”的因素。
总体上有71%的受访者认为,全球央行未来12个月将增加黄金储备,相比之下去年只有61%,而2021年只有52%。
央行是黄金市场的主要参与者,他们帮助维持黄金价格。最近金价上涨至超过每盎司2,000美元的历史最高价,但央行并不会为了投机买入黄金。相反,央行主要将黄金用于对冲通货膨胀和作为一种价值储备。
世界黄金协会调查显示,2022年,央行净买入黄金总计达到1,136公吨。这不仅是各国连续13年净买入黄金,也代表了自1950年以来的最高年度需求。其中,土耳其央行是去年黄金的最大买家,其官方黄金储备增长了148吨。(财富中文网)
翻译:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
Often at the mercy of the dollar, emerging countries are looking to insulate themselves from the vagaries of U.S. Federal Reserve policy by shifting to gold—and away from the greenback.
This shift in their currency reserves poses a distinct risk to Americans, who benefit from the willingness of other countries to swap their goods in exchange for U.S. legal tender. If more nations trade among themselves using other currencies such as the Chinese yuan, the U.S. Treasury will be forced by this “de-dollarization” to pay higher interest when borrowing from foreign creditors.
Now, it appears developing countries are indeed looking to lower their dependence on the dollar, according to the results of an annual survey of central banks conducted by the World Gold Council and published on Tuesday.
The industry association, which represents some of the largest miners of the metal including Barrick Gold, Newmont, and AngloGold Ashanti, discovered a “gulf in thinking” between the monetary policymakers in advanced economies and those in developing markets. The outcome has major implications for the United States and its ability to fund large and persistent trade deficits—and therefore American living standards.
“This divergence of views is perhaps most striking in terms of the outlook for the U.S. dollar and gold,” the World Gold Council’s annual report said. Developing economies, which the group says have been the primary driver of gold buying since the 2008 global financial crisis, “appear to be more pessimistic about the U.S. dollar’s future and more optimistic about gold’s.”
Part of the reason for this gulf in thinking is the instability large swings in U.S. interest rates can have on emerging economies. When the Fed’s rates are near zero, foreign investors tend to shower emerging markets with money, fueling growth but also inflation.
When the Fed then reverses course, as it did last year with a series of interest rate hikes, these same investors swiftly divert their flow of funds back to U.S. shores, often sparking a recession, or worse a currency crisis in these more fragile economies.
As the Richard Nixon administration’s famous adage goes, “The dollar is our currency, but it’s your problem.”
Spillover effects
While Americans’ attention has been diverted to the recent run on regional banks and the debt ceiling negotiations, it’s often forgotten that the rest of the world is just as heavily affected by the decisions of Fed Chair Jerome Powell.
“The foreign spillovers of higher U.S. interest rates are large, and on average nearly as large as the U.S. effects,” economists writing for the Federal Reserve determined six years ago. “A monetary-policy-induced rise in U.S. rates of 100 basis points reduces GDP in advanced economies and in emerging economies by 0.5% and 0.8%, respectively, after three years.”
The only sustainable solution for these emerging countries is to reduce their exposure to Fed policy by reducing their reliance on the dollar as a means to conduct trade with their neighbors. This would then become evident in shrinking share of U.S. dollar reserves.
When asked by the World Gold Council how the share of global reserves will change over the next five years, 58% of emerging market central banks responded by saying those denominated in dollars will fall, while 68% forecast those in gold will rise. Only a fifth believed they would remain unchanged from current levels.
By comparison a solid majority of central banks representing advanced economies expect the status quo for both will continue.
The underlying frustration of being the collateral damage in the Fed’s fight against inflation has been further exacerbated by the G7’s economic sanctions imposed on Russia for its war in Ukraine. Some emerging countries fear this tool could be wielded against them as well should they ever fall out of line with the industrialized West.
These two factors—sanctions and de-dollarization—offered the most glaring differences in opinion about the most relevant reasons to own gold reserves. A full 25% of emerging market central banks cited concerns about sanctions—a new question that was added to the survey this year—while 11% said it was part of a dedicated de-dollarization policy. Not a single advanced economy saw either as relevant.
Last year, 20% of overall respondents cited de-dollarization as playing either a marginally relevant or somewhat relevant role. This year that surged to 38%, of which 4% now said for the first time it was even “highly relevant.”
Overall, 71% of all survey respondents believed global central bank gold holdings will rise in the next 12 months compared with 61% last year and just 52% in 2021.
While central banks are major players in the gold market, helping provide support to the price of gold that surged recently to a record high above $2,000 an ounce, central banks do not buy for the purpose of speculation. Instead they keep it primarily as an inflation hedge and a store of value.
According to the World Gold Council, net purchases by central banks totaled 1,136 metric tons in 2022. This marked not only the 13th consecutive year of net purchases, but also the highest level of annual demand on record back to 1950. The Central Bank of Turkey reported the largest buying, with its official gold reserves swelling by 148 tons.