美国施惠基金会(Giving USA Foundation)周二发布的报告显示,2022年,美国的慈善捐赠有所削减——这是40年来第四次捐款没有同比上涨。
以当前美元计算,2022年慈善捐款总额下跌3.4%至4993亿美元,经通胀调整后的跌幅达10.5%。与此同时,许多非营利机构(尤其是那些服务于困难群体的机构)称,如今寻求帮助的人比以往更多了。
不过,美国施惠基金会主席乔希•比克霍尔茨(Josh Birkholz)表示,考虑到2022年末艰难的经济环境,这个结果实际上比原本可能的情况要好得多。该基金会发布了上述报告,并分享了关于捐赠走势的数据和见解。
比克霍尔茨在接受美国联合通讯社(The Associated Press)的采访时说:“我反复思考究竟应该为这样的结果感到鼓舞还是沮丧。去年,股市下跌20%至25%,通货膨胀率高达8%,但美国人仍然捐出了近5000亿美元。”
美国印第安纳大学礼来家族慈善学院(Lilly Family School of Philanthropy at Indiana University)负责研究与国际项目的副院长、美国施惠基金会报告的首席研究员尤娜·奥斯利(Una Osili)表示,由于新冠疫情导致前所未有的救济需求,2022年前的两年慈善捐赠均创下新高。这反映出美国人有望继续慷慨解囊,不过仍有一些方面令人担忧。
奥斯利说:“21世纪初,三分之二的美国人会从事捐赠活动。而今,这一比例首次降至50%以下。因此,虽然捐赠物增多了,但参与捐赠活动的人却变少了。”
正如美国各地的许多其他慈善机构,捐赠的缩减也给公园坡社区援助中心(Community Help in Park Slope,通常称CHiPS)带来了一些问题。这家位于纽约市布鲁克林的非营利机构经营着一个施食处和一间食品储藏室,并且为单身母亲和她们的幼儿提供支持。
CHiPS的发展主管沙妮丝•布朗(Shanice Brown)表示:“通货膨胀率上升,接着,越来越多工人阶层的人接踵而至。物价的上涨导致人们需要更多的资金,能用于捐赠的钱就减少了,因而捐款缩水——捐赠的食物亦然。”
目前,CHiPS的附近住着许多寻求庇护者,使得这家布鲁克林慈善机构面临的问题变得更加复杂。去年这个时候,CHiPS每天施赠275份热餐,而现在每天却要提供超过400份餐食。有时,他们根本不够食物来派发。
为了维持CHiPS的运营,布朗一直在与其他非营利机构和食品供应商往来,她说,“当热餐派光了时,我们还会提供三明治。每个来到我们中心的人都不会空手而归。”
不仅如此,甚至连大型非营利机构也不得不想出新的方法来应对通胀对其捐赠资源的影响。
美国许愿基金会(Make-A-Wish Foundation)——致力于帮助患有重大疾病的儿童达成心愿——首席营收官贾里德•佩里(Jared Perry)表示,虽然2022年该基金会获得的捐赠略有增加,但今年一些区域的捐赠正在减少。与此同时,许愿基金会还需要应对上涨的出行成本,他们要帮助实现的心愿当中有75%涉及出行。
佩里说,“租车价格已经上涨了37%,这意味着我们要承担一笔额外的成本”,接着补充道,许愿基金会正在呼吁支持者捐赠他们的航空里程和酒店积分,以帮助我们扩大资金库。此外,该基金会还向旅游业的合作伙伴寻求更多的帮助。
佩里表示,对于许愿基金会和其他非营利机构来说,资金的短缺同时也是一个吸引个人捐赠者和请求他们提供帮助的机会。他说:“我们会继续传达这样一个信息:人们可以通过一些简单的方式参与到许愿基金会的慈善活动中来,包括提供志愿者服务,当然还有捐赠。我们每圆一个梦,就有一个新的愿望被许下。”
印第安纳大学礼来家族慈善学院负责数据合作关系的副主任、美国施惠基金会报告的首席分析师乔恩•伯格多尔(Jon Bergdoll)表示,在慈善行业“美元上涨,捐赠者减少”的长期趋势下,非营利机构如果能吸引到当前不参与捐赠活动的人,就有可能获得更多的捐赠。
伯格多尔指出,捐赠的决策者“不是小型机构,而是富有的个人。这表明现今捐款的主要来源已经不同于三四十年前了。”
美国施惠基金会的报告显示,2022年,64%的捐赠来自个人捐赠者,21%来自基金会,9%来自遗赠(一般是通过立遗嘱或制定遗产计划),还有6%来自企业。这一年,企业在美国捐赠了税前利润的0.9%,不过伯格多尔表示,该报告并未追踪跨国企业是否还在其他国家进行了捐赠活动。
至于CHiPS,他们只想寻求能获得的一切帮助。布朗称,许多基金会都对她说,由于经济原因,他们今年不会接收新的受资助者,其他在2020年和2021年曾资助过CHiPS的基金会则表示,“2024年之前不要再来找我们。”
布朗说:“人们手上的资源变少了,所以他们为自己感到担忧,这可以理解。即便捐赠缩减,社区还可以通过很多其他方法提供帮助。”(财富中文网)
译者:中慧言-刘嘉欢
美国施惠基金会(Giving USA Foundation)周二发布的报告显示,2022年,美国的慈善捐赠有所削减——这是40年来第四次捐款没有同比上涨。
以当前美元计算,2022年慈善捐款总额下跌3.4%至4993亿美元,经通胀调整后的跌幅达10.5%。与此同时,许多非营利机构(尤其是那些服务于困难群体的机构)称,如今寻求帮助的人比以往更多了。
不过,美国施惠基金会主席乔希•比克霍尔茨(Josh Birkholz)表示,考虑到2022年末艰难的经济环境,这个结果实际上比原本可能的情况要好得多。该基金会发布了上述报告,并分享了关于捐赠走势的数据和见解。
比克霍尔茨在接受美国联合通讯社(The Associated Press)的采访时说:“我反复思考究竟应该为这样的结果感到鼓舞还是沮丧。去年,股市下跌20%至25%,通货膨胀率高达8%,但美国人仍然捐出了近5000亿美元。”
美国印第安纳大学礼来家族慈善学院(Lilly Family School of Philanthropy at Indiana University)负责研究与国际项目的副院长、美国施惠基金会报告的首席研究员尤娜·奥斯利(Una Osili)表示,由于新冠疫情导致前所未有的救济需求,2022年前的两年慈善捐赠均创下新高。这反映出美国人有望继续慷慨解囊,不过仍有一些方面令人担忧。
奥斯利说:“21世纪初,三分之二的美国人会从事捐赠活动。而今,这一比例首次降至50%以下。因此,虽然捐赠物增多了,但参与捐赠活动的人却变少了。”
正如美国各地的许多其他慈善机构,捐赠的缩减也给公园坡社区援助中心(Community Help in Park Slope,通常称CHiPS)带来了一些问题。这家位于纽约市布鲁克林的非营利机构经营着一个施食处和一间食品储藏室,并且为单身母亲和她们的幼儿提供支持。
CHiPS的发展主管沙妮丝•布朗(Shanice Brown)表示:“通货膨胀率上升,接着,越来越多工人阶层的人接踵而至。物价的上涨导致人们需要更多的资金,能用于捐赠的钱就减少了,因而捐款缩水——捐赠的食物亦然。”
目前,CHiPS的附近住着许多寻求庇护者,使得这家布鲁克林慈善机构面临的问题变得更加复杂。去年这个时候,CHiPS每天施赠275份热餐,而现在每天却要提供超过400份餐食。有时,他们根本不够食物来派发。
为了维持CHiPS的运营,布朗一直在与其他非营利机构和食品供应商往来,她说,“当热餐派光了时,我们还会提供三明治。每个来到我们中心的人都不会空手而归。”
不仅如此,甚至连大型非营利机构也不得不想出新的方法来应对通胀对其捐赠资源的影响。
美国许愿基金会(Make-A-Wish Foundation)——致力于帮助患有重大疾病的儿童达成心愿——首席营收官贾里德•佩里(Jared Perry)表示,虽然2022年该基金会获得的捐赠略有增加,但今年一些区域的捐赠正在减少。与此同时,许愿基金会还需要应对上涨的出行成本,他们要帮助实现的心愿当中有75%涉及出行。
佩里说,“租车价格已经上涨了37%,这意味着我们要承担一笔额外的成本”,接着补充道,许愿基金会正在呼吁支持者捐赠他们的航空里程和酒店积分,以帮助我们扩大资金库。此外,该基金会还向旅游业的合作伙伴寻求更多的帮助。
佩里表示,对于许愿基金会和其他非营利机构来说,资金的短缺同时也是一个吸引个人捐赠者和请求他们提供帮助的机会。他说:“我们会继续传达这样一个信息:人们可以通过一些简单的方式参与到许愿基金会的慈善活动中来,包括提供志愿者服务,当然还有捐赠。我们每圆一个梦,就有一个新的愿望被许下。”
印第安纳大学礼来家族慈善学院负责数据合作关系的副主任、美国施惠基金会报告的首席分析师乔恩•伯格多尔(Jon Bergdoll)表示,在慈善行业“美元上涨,捐赠者减少”的长期趋势下,非营利机构如果能吸引到当前不参与捐赠活动的人,就有可能获得更多的捐赠。
伯格多尔指出,捐赠的决策者“不是小型机构,而是富有的个人。这表明现今捐款的主要来源已经不同于三四十年前了。”
美国施惠基金会的报告显示,2022年,64%的捐赠来自个人捐赠者,21%来自基金会,9%来自遗赠(一般是通过立遗嘱或制定遗产计划),还有6%来自企业。这一年,企业在美国捐赠了税前利润的0.9%,不过伯格多尔表示,该报告并未追踪跨国企业是否还在其他国家进行了捐赠活动。
至于CHiPS,他们只想寻求能获得的一切帮助。布朗称,许多基金会都对她说,由于经济原因,他们今年不会接收新的受资助者,其他在2020年和2021年曾资助过CHiPS的基金会则表示,“2024年之前不要再来找我们。”
布朗说:“人们手上的资源变少了,所以他们为自己感到担忧,这可以理解。即便捐赠缩减,社区还可以通过很多其他方法提供帮助。”(财富中文网)
译者:中慧言-刘嘉欢
Charitable giving in the United States declined in 2022 — only the fourth time in four decades that donations did not increase year over year — according to the Giving USA report released Tuesday.
Total giving fell 3.4% in 2022 to $499.3 billion in current dollars, a drop of 10.5% when adjusted for inflation. The decline comes at a time when many nonprofits, especially ones providing services to those in need, report an increase in requests for help.
However, Josh Birkholz, chairman of the Giving USA Foundation, which publishes the report and provides data and insights about donation trends, said the results are actually much better than they could have been considering the tough economic climate of late 2022.
“I go back and forth on whether it’s encouraging or discouraging,” Birkholz told The Associated Press in an interview. “There was a 20% to 25% decline in the stock market and an 8% inflation rate, but Americans still gave nearly a half trillion dollars.”
Those 2022 donations came after two record-setting years for charitable giving, driven by the unprecedented needs of the COVID-19 pandemic, said Una Osili, associate dean for research and international programs at the Lilly Family School of Philanthropy at Indiana University and the Giving USA report’s lead researcher. It’s a sign of continued generosity, though there are some areas of concern.
“At the beginning of the 21st century, two thirds of Americans gave,” Osili said. “Today, that is down to under 50% for the first time. So giving has grown, but fewer people are participating.”
The downturn in giving has led to issues at Community Help in Park Slope, better known as CHiPS, as it has in many charities across the country. The Brooklyn, New York, nonprofit operates a soup kitchen and food pantry, as well as supporting single mothers and their infants.
“We saw inflation rise and, with that, we saw more working class individuals on our lines,” said Shanice Brown, CHiPS development director. “Donations declined — and donated food as well — because as the price of things increase, people need more and so they donate less.”
CHiPS’ issues are compounded by the number of asylum seekers that are currently housed near the charity in Brooklyn. While CHiPS was providing 275 warm meals a day at this time last year, these days it is offering more than 400 meals daily. And sometimes, they simply run out of food.
“When we run out of hot meals, we still provide sandwiches,” said Brown, who has been collaborating with other nonprofits and food suppliers to try to make ends meet. “Anyone who comes to our door walks away with something.”
Even large-scale nonprofits have had to come up with new solutions to battle inflation’s effects on their resources.
Jared Perry, chief revenue officer at Make-A-Wish Foundation of America, said that while donations to the foundation, which grants the wishes of children fighting critical illnesses, were up slightly in 2022, they are currently declining in some areas this year. And those drops come while Make-A-Wish copes with increased costs for travel, which is involved in about 75% of the wishes they grant.
“I think we’ve seen a 37% increase in rental car prices and that translates to a cost we have to bear,” said Perry, adding that Make-A-Wish has stepped up calls for supporters to donate their airline miles and hotel points in order to help stretch its funding. The foundation has also turned to partners in the travel industry for more help.
The need, Perry said, is also an opportunity for Make-A-Wish and other nonprofits to engage individual donors and appeal to them for help. “The message we’re going to continue to send out is: There are easy ways for people to get to get involved with Make-A-Wish, whether that be through volunteering or certainly by donating,” he said. “For every wish that we’re granting, there’s another wish waiting.”
Jon Bergdoll, associate director of data partnerships at the Lilly Family School of Philanthropy at Indiana University and the lead analyst for the Giving USA report, said the long-running trend of “dollars up, donors down” in philanthropy offers potential growth for nonprofits who can engage those currently not giving.
Decision makers for donations are “not mom and pop donors, they’re wealthy individuals,” Bergdoll said. “That is indicative of where the money is coming from now versus 30 or 40 years ago.”
According to the Giving USA report, 64% of donations in 2022 came from individual donors, 21% from foundations, 9% from bequests, generally through a will or estate plan, and 6% from corporations. In 2022, corporations donated 0.9% of their pre-tax profits in the United States, though Bergdoll said the report does not track whether multi-national corporations donated more in other countries.
For CHiPS, they are simply hoping for help wherever they can find it. Brown said many foundations have told her they are not accepting new grantees this year because of the economy and other foundations that donated in 2020 and 2021 are saying, “Don’t ask us again until 2024.”
“People have less, so they’re concerned about themselves and that’s understandable,” Brown said. “But there are so many ways the community can help.”