如果你是苹果公司(Apple)的忠实股东,尽管该iPhone手机制造商规模庞大并且已经成熟,但你仍然相信苹果的股价会继续表现出色,那么苹果的股价自新冠疫情爆发以来300%的现象级涨幅,肯定就给你带来了巨大的回报。但如果你现在开始考虑买入苹果的股票,希望它能够继续以类似的速度上涨,就还是打消这个念头吧。事实上,狂欢极有可能已经结束,即将到来的是“宿醉”的折磨。苹果的股价被高估,其未来可能被证明只能带来极低的回报,它可以作为这类股票的典型案例。
这个结论可能令人难以接受,因为在7月4日的一周内,商业媒体和华尔街分析师纷纷在为苹果最新的表现高唱赞歌。6月30日星期五,苹果收盘后的总市值超过3万亿美元,这是美国企业首次达到这个里程碑。“库比蒂诺的巨无霸”在2022年1月的盘中交易中曾经短暂突破“3万亿美元”大关,但收盘时未能守住,之后在过去一年持续下跌。但2023年,苹果的股价暴涨49%,市值几乎增长了1万亿美元,相当于微软(Microsoft)当前2.5万亿美元市值的40%。
苹果股价预测
简而言之,苹果的股价未来大幅增长面临两大障碍。这两大障碍都源于到目前为止令投资者们收益颇丰的一个趋势:苹果市值大涨,远超过资本市场历史上最强劲的收益增长幅度。结果就是:苹果现在股价过高,难以持久,而且其利润方面的表现可能也无法重复。从2015财年年底至2020财年(截至9月30日),苹果的每股收益总计增长了42%,每年的涨幅为7.3%,达到3.28美元。随着居家办公潮流的兴起,对苹果的个人电脑、手机、服务和其他产品的需求激增,让苹果公司的每股收益暴涨,在2022年3月达到6.15美元,短短六个季度增长了88%,是截至2020年9月五年涨幅的两倍。
从2009年年底到新冠疫情爆发,苹果公司的中位数市盈率倍数约为16倍。但6月30日苹果估值突破3万亿美元时,其市盈率倍数达到32.9,这意味着与新冠疫情之前市场表现正常的九年相比,股东为苹果的股票每投入100美元所获得的利润减少了一半以上。市场为苹果的公认会计准则收益支付了额外溢价。苹果的公认会计准则收益从2010年代中期到后期的550亿美元左右,到2022财年增长到1,000亿美元。换言之,是投资者导致了超高的市盈率,因为他们预计苹果的利润尽管在几个季度内几乎翻了一番,但依旧会快速增长。这就是问题所在。
两个问题:股息发放和回购对股价的影响较小,而且市盈率可能下降
目前,苹果官方的股息收益率只有0.58%。与此同时,过去两个财年,苹果将超过90%的公认会计准则利润用于回购;事实上,苹果的回购总额和股息已经略高于总收益。在本分析中,我们假设苹果会将其报告的利润全部用于这两个领域。问题是:按照33的市盈率倍数计算,以股息和回购的方式将收益100%返还给股东,总回报率也只有3%。这与2017年和2018年苹果的平均市盈率倍数为16时形成了鲜明对比。当时,将所有收益用于发放股息和回购的回报率为6.25%,是目前数字的两倍(即苹果的“股息加回购收益率”,或16倍市盈率的倒数)。
假设投资者希望在未来十年获得10%的年收益,作为持有这些超高定价、超高风险股票的补偿。如果苹果的市盈率倍数始终维持在33,它就需要每年将利润提高7%,这极具挑战性,并且需要考虑到通货膨胀,即3%的合并股息与回购收益率和7%的年度收益增长。然而,市盈率倍数维持在这个极其罕见的水平的概率为零。我们为苹果假设一个可以持久的市盈率倍数。一个有用的公式预测,苹果的市盈率倍数可能恢复到新冠疫情之前的历史水平16倍。16倍和目前的33倍两者的中间值约为24倍。24倍依旧是一个惊人的数字,其中包含了在2033年买入股票的投资者对其收益强劲增长的预期。因此,我们假设一个最佳情景。
市盈率倍数下降凸显出史诗级的收益增长难以实现
从现在到2033年年中,苹果的市盈率倍数从33下降到24,需要每年下降3%。苹果的市盈率倍数每年只有上一年的97%,在我们预测的期限结束时降至24倍。(市盈率倍数下降3%,意味着在每股收益不变的情况下,股价同样下跌3%。)市盈率倍数每年下跌3%所造成的股价下跌,将完全抵消股息发放和回购带来的3%的涨幅。因此,投资者所期待的10%的收益将来自利润增长。
根本问题在于,随着需要达到的数字越来越高,苹果能否持续达到10%的公认会计准则(GAAP)净利润增长率?根据简单的数学计算可以得出答案是“绝无可能”。苹果要实现这个利润目标,意味着在2023财年需要增加100亿美元利润,到2027年需要增加150亿美元。大数定律成为一个巨大的障碍。未来五年,苹果需要增长的利润,相当于在《财富》美国500强中收益规模排在第17位的宝洁公司(Procter & Gamble)2022年的利润总额。
事实上,苹果就连实现利润增长都面临严峻的考验,更不必说10%的年增长率。过去四个季度,苹果的净收益从2022财年的1,000亿美元下降到950亿美元,这令外界担心新冠疫情带来的几乎90%的利润增长,可能在某种程度上只是一次性现象。要知道,苹果在2022财年的收益,已经分别比新冠疫情的另外两大受益者、在《财富》美国500强中收益规模排在第二位和第三位的微软和Alphabet高28%和70%。
苹果的市值达到3万亿美元,使华尔街预测苹果会带来更大的回报,但事实可能恰恰相反。它为苹果设定了必须实现的业绩标杆,即便对苹果这样一个赚钱机器而言也很难实现:苹果依旧是一家伟大的公司。但它并不是投资股票的理想选择。(财富中文网)
译者:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
如果你是苹果公司(Apple)的忠实股东,尽管该iPhone手机制造商规模庞大并且已经成熟,但你仍然相信苹果的股价会继续表现出色,那么苹果的股价自新冠疫情爆发以来300%的现象级涨幅,肯定就给你带来了巨大的回报。但如果你现在开始考虑买入苹果的股票,希望它能够继续以类似的速度上涨,就还是打消这个念头吧。事实上,狂欢极有可能已经结束,即将到来的是“宿醉”的折磨。苹果的股价被高估,其未来可能被证明只能带来极低的回报,它可以作为这类股票的典型案例。
这个结论可能令人难以接受,因为在7月4日的一周内,商业媒体和华尔街分析师纷纷在为苹果最新的表现高唱赞歌。6月30日星期五,苹果收盘后的总市值超过3万亿美元,这是美国企业首次达到这个里程碑。“库比蒂诺的巨无霸”在2022年1月的盘中交易中曾经短暂突破“3万亿美元”大关,但收盘时未能守住,之后在过去一年持续下跌。但2023年,苹果的股价暴涨49%,市值几乎增长了1万亿美元,相当于微软(Microsoft)当前2.5万亿美元市值的40%。
苹果股价预测
简而言之,苹果的股价未来大幅增长面临两大障碍。这两大障碍都源于到目前为止令投资者们收益颇丰的一个趋势:苹果市值大涨,远超过资本市场历史上最强劲的收益增长幅度。结果就是:苹果现在股价过高,难以持久,而且其利润方面的表现可能也无法重复。从2015财年年底至2020财年(截至9月30日),苹果的每股收益总计增长了42%,每年的涨幅为7.3%,达到3.28美元。随着居家办公潮流的兴起,对苹果的个人电脑、手机、服务和其他产品的需求激增,让苹果公司的每股收益暴涨,在2022年3月达到6.15美元,短短六个季度增长了88%,是截至2020年9月五年涨幅的两倍。
从2009年年底到新冠疫情爆发,苹果公司的中位数市盈率倍数约为16倍。但6月30日苹果估值突破3万亿美元时,其市盈率倍数达到32.9,这意味着与新冠疫情之前市场表现正常的九年相比,股东为苹果的股票每投入100美元所获得的利润减少了一半以上。市场为苹果的公认会计准则收益支付了额外溢价。苹果的公认会计准则收益从2010年代中期到后期的550亿美元左右,到2022财年增长到1,000亿美元。换言之,是投资者导致了超高的市盈率,因为他们预计苹果的利润尽管在几个季度内几乎翻了一番,但依旧会快速增长。这就是问题所在。
两个问题:股息发放和回购对股价的影响较小,而且市盈率可能下降
目前,苹果官方的股息收益率只有0.58%。与此同时,过去两个财年,苹果将超过90%的公认会计准则利润用于回购;事实上,苹果的回购总额和股息已经略高于总收益。在本分析中,我们假设苹果会将其报告的利润全部用于这两个领域。问题是:按照33的市盈率倍数计算,以股息和回购的方式将收益100%返还给股东,总回报率也只有3%。这与2017年和2018年苹果的平均市盈率倍数为16时形成了鲜明对比。当时,将所有收益用于发放股息和回购的回报率为6.25%,是目前数字的两倍(即苹果的“股息加回购收益率”,或16倍市盈率的倒数)。
假设投资者希望在未来十年获得10%的年收益,作为持有这些超高定价、超高风险股票的补偿。如果苹果的市盈率倍数始终维持在33,它就需要每年将利润提高7%,这极具挑战性,并且需要考虑到通货膨胀,即3%的合并股息与回购收益率和7%的年度收益增长。然而,市盈率倍数维持在这个极其罕见的水平的概率为零。我们为苹果假设一个可以持久的市盈率倍数。一个有用的公式预测,苹果的市盈率倍数可能恢复到新冠疫情之前的历史水平16倍。16倍和目前的33倍两者的中间值约为24倍。24倍依旧是一个惊人的数字,其中包含了在2033年买入股票的投资者对其收益强劲增长的预期。因此,我们假设一个最佳情景。
市盈率倍数下降凸显出史诗级的收益增长难以实现
从现在到2033年年中,苹果的市盈率倍数从33下降到24,需要每年下降3%。苹果的市盈率倍数每年只有上一年的97%,在我们预测的期限结束时降至24倍。(市盈率倍数下降3%,意味着在每股收益不变的情况下,股价同样下跌3%。)市盈率倍数每年下跌3%所造成的股价下跌,将完全抵消股息发放和回购带来的3%的涨幅。因此,投资者所期待的10%的收益将来自利润增长。
根本问题在于,随着需要达到的数字越来越高,苹果能否持续达到10%的公认会计准则(GAAP)净利润增长率?根据简单的数学计算可以得出答案是“绝无可能”。苹果要实现这个利润目标,意味着在2023财年需要增加100亿美元利润,到2027年需要增加150亿美元。大数定律成为一个巨大的障碍。未来五年,苹果需要增长的利润,相当于在《财富》美国500强中收益规模排在第17位的宝洁公司(Procter & Gamble)2022年的利润总额。
事实上,苹果就连实现利润增长都面临严峻的考验,更不必说10%的年增长率。过去四个季度,苹果的净收益从2022财年的1,000亿美元下降到950亿美元,这令外界担心新冠疫情带来的几乎90%的利润增长,可能在某种程度上只是一次性现象。要知道,苹果在2022财年的收益,已经分别比新冠疫情的另外两大受益者、在《财富》美国500强中收益规模排在第二位和第三位的微软和Alphabet高28%和70%。
苹果的市值达到3万亿美元,使华尔街预测苹果会带来更大的回报,但事实可能恰恰相反。它为苹果设定了必须实现的业绩标杆,即便对苹果这样一个赚钱机器而言也很难实现:苹果依旧是一家伟大的公司。但它并不是投资股票的理想选择。(财富中文网)
译者:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
If you’re a loyal Apple shareholder, your faith in its stock to keep rocking—despite the iPhone-maker’s gigantic size and mature standing—has paid off big time via the phenomenal, 300% liftoff since the onset of the pandemic. But if you ponder buying Apple stock today on hopes it will keep climbing at anything resembling the same pace, forget it. In fact, the bash is most likely over, and the hangover’s ahead. Apple now towers as a textbook case of a stock so richly valued that its future returns will likely prove extremely poor.
That may be a hard conclusion to accept, on a July 4 week when business news outlets and Wall Street analysts join voices in saluting Apple’s newest coup. On Friday, June 30, Apple shares finished the trading day at a total market cap of over $3 trillion, the first time any U.S. enterprise has ever reached that milestone. The Colossus of Cupertino had hit the “Big 3” mark during intraday trading in January of 2022, only to fall short by the market close, then cratered for the remainder of last year. But in 2023, Apple’s stock has rampaged 49%, adding almost exactly $1 trillion in value, equivalent to 40% of the $2.5 trillion that Microsoft’s worth today.
Apple stock forecast
Put simply, Apple faces two major obstacles in delivering strong gains going forward. Both stem from the the trend that’s so enriched investors to this point: A giant rise in its valuation that far exceeds probably the strongest earnings takeoff in the history of capital markets. The upshot: Apple now sells at an unsustainably high multiple on top of profits that are probably unrepeatable as well. From the close of its 2015 to 2020 fiscal years (ended September 30), Apple raised its earnings-per-share by a total of 42%, or a modest 7.3% annually, to $3.28. Then, as hunger for its PCs, phones, services and other offerings that powered the work-from-home revolution exploded, its EPS staged a moonshot, climbing in to $6.15 in March of 2022, a gain 88% in just six quarters, twice the increase over the five years through September 2020.
From the end of 2009 to COVID-19 outbreak, Apple’s median price-to-earnings ratio hovered at around 16. But on June 30, the day Apple broke $3 trillion, its PE reached 32.9, meaning that shareholders are now getting less than half the dollars in profits for every $100 they pay for shares alongside the nine year norm preceding the pandemic. And the markets put that extra premium on GAAP earnings that roared from the mid-$50 billions where they’d been stuck in the mid-to-late 2010s to $100 billion in fiscal 2022. In other words, investors awarded the sumptuous PE because they expected Apple’s profits to grow rapidly even after almost doubling in a few quarters. And that’s the rub.
The two problems: Dividends and buybacks provide less bang at these prices, and the PE will probably drop
Today, Apple’s official dividend yield is a meager 0.58%. Meanwhile it’s been pumping over 90% of its GAAP profits into repurchases in the last couple of fiscal years; in fact, the total of buybacks plus dividends slightly exceeds total earnings. For this analysis, we’ll assume that Apple simply awards all of its reported profits in a combination of the two categories. The problem: At a PE of 33, returning 100% of earnings to shareholders in dividends and buybacks provides a total return of just 3%. That’s a stark contrast from the 2017 and 2018 span, when Apple’s PE averaged 16. Then, dedicating all earnings to dividends and buybacks promised a return of 6.25%, more than double today’s number (that’s Apple’s “dividends plus buybacks yield,” or the inverse of the 16 multiple).
Let’s posit that investors will want a 10% annual gains over the next decade as compensation for owning this super-high priced, and hence pretty risky, stock. If Apple’s PE stayed constant at 33, it could get there by raising profits a highly challenging 7% a year, including inflation—that’s the 3% combined dividend and buyback yield plus 7% annual advance in earnings. But the chances the multiple can remain in this rarified realm are nil. Let’s estimate a sustainable PE for Apple. One useful formula predicts that its PE will revert halfway back to the historic, pre-pandemic level of 16. The midpoint between its old 16 multiple and the current 33 is roughly 24. Keep in mind that 24 is still a formidable number that would incorporate expectations of robust earnings growth for anyone buying in 2033. So we’re taking a best case scenario.
A falling PE puts the emphasis on epic earnings growth that’s unachievable
A decline in Apple’s multiple from 33 to 24 from now until mid-2033 would require annual shrinkage of 3 percent. Every year, its PE would be 97% that of the previous year’s, finishing at 24 at the end of our window. (A multiple that’s 3% lower this year than last means the share price will fall by the same 3% if EPS stays flat.) The headwind from the 3% yearly slide in the multiple would completely offset the 3% upward push from dividends and buybacks. As a result, the entire 10% return investors expect would need to come from advancing profits.
The essential question becomes, can Apple really grow its net GAAP profits at 10% on a consistent basis, as the needed numbers become more and more gigantic? Based on the obvious math, the answer would be “not a chance.” Meeting the bogeys requires lifting profits by $10 billion in fiscal 2023, and $15 billion in 2027. The law of large numbers becomes a steep obstacle. Five years from now, Apple would need to increase its profits by the equivalent of what Procter & Gamble, the 17th largest earner on the Fortune 500 list that year, made in 2022.
In fact, Apple faces a thorny test in significantly growing its profits at all, let alone at 10% a year. Based on its last four quarters, net earnings have decreased from $100 billion in fiscal 2022 to $95 billion, leading to worries that the almost 90% surge fueled by the pandemic may be partially a one-time phenomenon. Keep in mind that Apple’s earnings in FY 2022 were already 28% and 70% higher respectively than those of the two other biggest winners from the outbreak, and the second and third highest earners on the Fortune 500 list, Microsoft and Alphabet.
The feat of reaching $3 trillion that’s led Wall Street to predict more big returns to come really bodes just the opposite. It sets the bar for what Apple must achieve well beyond even this extraordinary money spinner’s capabilities. Apple remains a great company. It’s anything but a great buy.