虽然严重倒挂的收益率曲线令投资者对经济衰退的前景感到焦虑,但高盛集团(Goldman Sachs)却传达了不同信息:不要再担心这个指标。
高盛集团的首席经济学家简·哈祖斯在7月17日的报告中写道:“我们并不认同普遍存在的对收益率曲线倒挂的担忧。”低于预期的美国通胀报告在上周发布后,他将对美国经济衰退概率的预测从25%下调到20%。
哈祖斯的观点与大多数投资者截然不同。大多数人认为收益率曲线倒挂几乎一定预示着经济下行。在过去7次美国经济衰退发生之前,都出现了三个月期国债的收益率超过10年期国债的情况。目前,短期债券收益率比长期债券收益率高150多个基点,接近于四十年来最大的收益率曲线倒挂。
正常情况下,收益率曲线呈上升趋势,因为投资者要求持有长期债券的报酬或期限溢价高于短期债券。哈祖斯解释称,当收益率曲线倒挂时,这意味着投资者认为美国降息的幅度,足以对期限溢价产生严重影响,只有当经济衰退风险变得“显而易见”时才会出现这种现象。
但这位经济学家表示,这一次情况有所不同。这是因为期限溢价“远低于”其长期平均水平,因此只要更小的预期降息幅度就能够逆转收益率曲线。此外,哈祖斯认为,随着通胀降温,这为美联储(Federal Reserve)在避免引发经济衰退的情况下放宽利率提供了一条“可行的道路”。
哈祖斯还指出,当经济预测变得过度悲观时,就会给长期利率带来超出合理范围的下行压力。
他写道:“因此,退一步来讲,认为收益率曲线倒挂确认了经济衰退主流预测的观点,至少是循环论证。”(财富中文网)
译者:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
虽然严重倒挂的收益率曲线令投资者对经济衰退的前景感到焦虑,但高盛集团(Goldman Sachs)却传达了不同信息:不要再担心这个指标。
高盛集团的首席经济学家简·哈祖斯在7月17日的报告中写道:“我们并不认同普遍存在的对收益率曲线倒挂的担忧。”低于预期的美国通胀报告在上周发布后,他将对美国经济衰退概率的预测从25%下调到20%。
哈祖斯的观点与大多数投资者截然不同。大多数人认为收益率曲线倒挂几乎一定预示着经济下行。在过去7次美国经济衰退发生之前,都出现了三个月期国债的收益率超过10年期国债的情况。目前,短期债券收益率比长期债券收益率高150多个基点,接近于四十年来最大的收益率曲线倒挂。
正常情况下,收益率曲线呈上升趋势,因为投资者要求持有长期债券的报酬或期限溢价高于短期债券。哈祖斯解释称,当收益率曲线倒挂时,这意味着投资者认为美国降息的幅度,足以对期限溢价产生严重影响,只有当经济衰退风险变得“显而易见”时才会出现这种现象。
但这位经济学家表示,这一次情况有所不同。这是因为期限溢价“远低于”其长期平均水平,因此只要更小的预期降息幅度就能够逆转收益率曲线。此外,哈祖斯认为,随着通胀降温,这为美联储(Federal Reserve)在避免引发经济衰退的情况下放宽利率提供了一条“可行的道路”。
哈祖斯还指出,当经济预测变得过度悲观时,就会给长期利率带来超出合理范围的下行压力。
他写道:“因此,退一步来讲,认为收益率曲线倒挂确认了经济衰退主流预测的观点,至少是循环论证。”(财富中文网)
译者:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
While the deeply inverted yield curve has stoked anxiety among investors about the prospect of a recession, Goldman Sachs has a different message: stop worrying about it.
“We don’t share the widespread concern about yield curve inversion,” Jan Hatzius, the bank’s chief economist wrote in a note on July 17, cutting his assessment of the probability of a recession to 20% from 25%, following a lower-than-expected inflation report last week.
Hatzius stands in opposition to most investors who point out that the curve inversion has an almost impeccable track record of foretelling economic downturns. The three-month T-bills yielded more than 10-year notes before each of the past seven US recessions. Currently, the short-term yields are more than 150 basis points above the longer-maturity notes, close to the biggest inversion in four decades.
Normally, the curve is upward sloped because investors demand higher compensation — or term premium — for holding longer-maturity bonds than short-term ones. When the curve turns upside down, it means investors are pricing in rate cuts large enough to overwhelm the term premium, such a phenomenon only occurs when recession risk becomes “clearly visible,” Hatzius explained.
This time, though, things are different, the economist said. That’s because term premium is “well below” its long-term average, so it takes fewer expected rate cuts to invert the curve. In addition, as inflation cools, it opens “a plausible path” to the Federal Reserve easing up on interest rates without triggering a recession, according to Hatzius.
When economic forecasts became overly pessimistic, Hatzius added, they put downward more pressure on longer-term rates than justified.
“So the argument that the inverted curve validates the consensus forecast of a recession is circular, to say the least,” he wrote.