罗伯特•詹金斯(Robert Jenkins)的第一份工作是作为一名持证水管工,这曾是他的梦想。经过4年的学徒生涯(期间他在4家公司轮岗),詹金斯最终被当地一家以高薪和良好的企业文化著称的水管工公司录用。
他回忆道:“当时感觉挺好的。起初,工资不错,他们还提供卡车和工具。”那时候,詹金斯服务于俄勒冈州尤金附近的小企业和家庭,卡车和工具由公司提供,每小时赚40美元左右。入职几个月后,36岁的詹金斯看到公司给所有员工集体加薪到每小时45美元。这时,问题开始出现了。詹金斯称公司不再为员工提供工具:“他们告诉我,我们的工资足够我们额外购买工具了。”在俄勒冈州,公司让工人购买自己的工具是合法的,除非员工的报酬低于最低工资标准。但詹金斯的工作条件因此发生了变化,所以他感觉自己受骗了。他回忆道,有一单工作需要他买一个压接机来连接管道——那可是一笔大开销。他说:“反正我自己买了很多工具,其中一些最大的工具要花四五千美元。我不能让公司白捡我的便宜。”
詹金斯还与一位同事发生了冲突。据他回忆,这位同事经常轻视和粗鲁地对待资历较浅的同事,甚至还当着同事们的面大骂他们。当詹金斯向公司投诉这名问题员工时,却被告知后者收入更高,实际上就是高人一等。詹金斯告诉《财富》杂志,那时他“变得越来越不开心”,“生活质量也下降了”。
因此,尽管刚得到晋升,詹金斯还是辞职了。他说:“我意识到,我所在的这个公司薪资在业内最高,而且拥有最好的声誉,如果我想要不一样的待遇,就只能出来单干了。”
詹金斯的情况反映了一种趋势:薪资处理公司ADP最近发表的一项研究表明,得到晋升的人比没有得到晋升的人更有可能辞职。这个统计数据令人惊讶,毕竟该市场整体上来看升职机会很少:只有4.5%的员工在被雇佣后两年内得到晋升,这使得一般的员工更有可能辞职去找另一份工作,而不是从现任雇主那里获得晋升机会。
ADP首席经济学家内拉·理查森(Nela Richardson)在接受《财富》杂志采访时表示:“这个行业很少有晋升机会,也没什么发展前景。你们一定会以为,在劳动力市场紧张的背景下,情况会有所不同,但实际上并非如此。”人们(即使在得到晋升后也要)离职的原因往往有很多。ADP的数据没有具体说明晋升是否会导致员工离职。许多甚至是大多数员工可能总归都会离开,因为雄心勃勃和积极进取等能让人获得晋升的品质不利于员工形成对企业的忠诚度。
薪酬更少,问题却更多
另外,还有一些晋升只是名义上的。根据人力资源公司罗致恒富(Robert Half)2018年的一项调查,超过三分之一的晋升没有伴随着加薪,而在JobSage前不久的一项调查中,则有超过四分之三的员工称自己被要求承担更多的责任,但却没有加薪——这当然会引起不满。
即使以书面形式标明的加薪归根结底也可能比看上去少得多。通常,当员工被提升到管理职位或受薪职位时,却发现自己不再有资格获得加班费、佣金或另外一些他们在较低职位上曾享有的福利,所以他们实际上是减薪了。
撇开薪酬的问题不谈,在组织中晋升还可能让人看到更广泛的文化问题,正如詹金斯的遭遇。
詹金斯告诉《财富》杂志:“我选择这家公司的原因之一是他们的企业文化非常好。但事实已经证明这个观点有一半是错误的,因为他们要求员工承担工作所需的工具费用。”詹金斯说,而看到那位无礼的同事在会议上因那种态度而受到表扬,他便下定了决心。
他说:“那一刻,我意识到这个问题不可能得到解决。”
五个月前,詹金斯开始自立门户。他表示,虽然作为独资经营者后责任有所增加,但他现在的收入和以前差不多。
詹金斯说:“我要和顾客沟通并且支付所有账单,这对我来说是一个巨大的转变。另起炉灶,成立公司,这是我做出的改变。但这样做值得吗?当然了。”
此次经历也让詹金斯领悟到了提供良好的工作环境有多重要——考虑到他打算在未来几个月雇佣一名办公室经理和一两名水管工,这应该会对他有所帮助。
他说:“作为水管工的不体面之处在于,整个行业只是要求我们不停地工作,只看重工作,而并不重视企业文化。我很高兴这个观念正在改变,因为员工必须拥有良好的工作条件。我希望我能提供这点。”(财富中文网)
译者:中慧言-刘嘉欢
研究发现,晋升会促使许多员工更换工作,而不是留在当前的岗位上,这种情况有些反常。
罗伯特•詹金斯(Robert Jenkins)的第一份工作是作为一名持证水管工,这曾是他的梦想。经过4年的学徒生涯(期间他在4家公司轮岗),詹金斯最终被当地一家以高薪和良好的企业文化著称的水管工公司录用。
他回忆道:“当时感觉挺好的。起初,工资不错,他们还提供卡车和工具。”那时候,詹金斯服务于俄勒冈州尤金附近的小企业和家庭,卡车和工具由公司提供,每小时赚40美元左右。入职几个月后,36岁的詹金斯看到公司给所有员工集体加薪到每小时45美元。这时,问题开始出现了。詹金斯称公司不再为员工提供工具:“他们告诉我,我们的工资足够我们额外购买工具了。”在俄勒冈州,公司让工人购买自己的工具是合法的,除非员工的报酬低于最低工资标准。但詹金斯的工作条件因此发生了变化,所以他感觉自己受骗了。他回忆道,有一单工作需要他买一个压接机来连接管道——那可是一笔大开销。他说:“反正我自己买了很多工具,其中一些最大的工具要花四五千美元。我不能让公司白捡我的便宜。”
詹金斯还与一位同事发生了冲突。据他回忆,这位同事经常轻视和粗鲁地对待资历较浅的同事,甚至还当着同事们的面大骂他们。当詹金斯向公司投诉这名问题员工时,却被告知后者收入更高,实际上就是高人一等。詹金斯告诉《财富》杂志,那时他“变得越来越不开心”,“生活质量也下降了”。
因此,尽管刚得到晋升,詹金斯还是辞职了。他说:“我意识到,我所在的这个公司薪资在业内最高,而且拥有最好的声誉,如果我想要不一样的待遇,就只能出来单干了。”
詹金斯的情况反映了一种趋势:薪资处理公司ADP最近发表的一项研究表明,得到晋升的人比没有得到晋升的人更有可能辞职。这个统计数据令人惊讶,毕竟该市场整体上来看升职机会很少:只有4.5%的员工在被雇佣后两年内得到晋升,这使得一般的员工更有可能辞职去找另一份工作,而不是从现任雇主那里获得晋升机会。
ADP首席经济学家内拉·理查森(Nela Richardson)在接受《财富》杂志采访时表示:“这个行业很少有晋升机会,也没什么发展前景。你们一定会以为,在劳动力市场紧张的背景下,情况会有所不同,但实际上并非如此。”人们(即使在得到晋升后也要)离职的原因往往有很多。ADP的数据没有具体说明晋升是否会导致员工离职。许多甚至是大多数员工可能总归都会离开,因为雄心勃勃和积极进取等能让人获得晋升的品质不利于员工形成对企业的忠诚度。
薪酬更少,问题却更多
另外,还有一些晋升只是名义上的。根据人力资源公司罗致恒富(Robert Half)2018年的一项调查,超过三分之一的晋升没有伴随着加薪,而在JobSage前不久的一项调查中,则有超过四分之三的员工称自己被要求承担更多的责任,但却没有加薪——这当然会引起不满。
即使以书面形式标明的加薪归根结底也可能比看上去少得多。通常,当员工被提升到管理职位或受薪职位时,却发现自己不再有资格获得加班费、佣金或另外一些他们在较低职位上曾享有的福利,所以他们实际上是减薪了。
撇开薪酬的问题不谈,在组织中晋升还可能让人看到更广泛的文化问题,正如詹金斯的遭遇。
詹金斯告诉《财富》杂志:“我选择这家公司的原因之一是他们的企业文化非常好。但事实已经证明这个观点有一半是错误的,因为他们要求员工承担工作所需的工具费用。”詹金斯说,而看到那位无礼的同事在会议上因那种态度而受到表扬,他便下定了决心。
他说:“那一刻,我意识到这个问题不可能得到解决。”
五个月前,詹金斯开始自立门户。他表示,虽然作为独资经营者后责任有所增加,但他现在的收入和以前差不多。
詹金斯说:“我要和顾客沟通并且支付所有账单,这对我来说是一个巨大的转变。另起炉灶,成立公司,这是我做出的改变。但这样做值得吗?当然了。”
此次经历也让詹金斯领悟到了提供良好的工作环境有多重要——考虑到他打算在未来几个月雇佣一名办公室经理和一两名水管工,这应该会对他有所帮助。
他说:“作为水管工的不体面之处在于,整个行业只是要求我们不停地工作,只看重工作,而并不重视企业文化。我很高兴这个观念正在改变,因为员工必须拥有良好的工作条件。我希望我能提供这点。”(财富中文网)
译者:中慧言-刘嘉欢
Robert Jenkins’ first job as a certified plumber was a dream. After a four-year apprenticeship, during which he rotated among four companies, he was hired by a local plumber with a reputation for good pay and a great culture.
“It was great,” he recalls. “Pay was good, and they supplied trucks and tools, at first.” Jenkins made about $40 hourly servicing small businesses and homes around Eugene, Ore., with trucks and tools provided. A few months after he started, Jenkins, 36, saw the company raise everyone’s pay across the board to $45 an hour. That’s when the trouble started. Jenkins says the company stopped supplying tools for its workers: “I was told we get paid enough to buy our own tools,” he said. It’s legal in Oregon for companies to make workers buy their own tools, as long as they make over minimum wage. But this was a change to Jenkins’ working conditions, and he felt cheated. He recalled one job that would have required him to buy a press gun to join pipes together—not a cheap outlay. “I buy a lot of my own tools anyway, and some of the biggest ones are $4,000, $5,000. I’m not going to drop that just for a company to take it from me,” he said.
Jenkins also clashed with a coworker, who, in Jenkins’ recollection, was frequently rude and belittling to junior colleagues, going so far as to curse them out in front of peers. When Jenkins complained to the company about the problematic employee, he was told the colleague was a high earner and effectively untouchable. Jenkins told Fortune he was “getting less and less happy,” and his “quality of life was getting destroyed.”
So despite having just been promoted, Jenkins quit. “I realized, I’m at one of the best-paying companies in the area; they have the best reputation; and that if I want something different I have to do my own thing,” he said.
Jenkins is part of a trend: Payroll processor ADP recently published research showing that people who are promoted are more likely to quit than people who aren’t. It’s a surprising statistic in a job market in which promotions, overall, are rare: Just 4.5% of workers are promoted within two years of being hired, making it much more likely that someone will quit for a different job than advance at their current employer.
“We don’t see a lot of promotions, and we don’t see a lot of development,” ADP chief economist Nela Richardson told Fortune. “You’d think in a tight labor market, it would be different.” There are many reasons people leave their jobs, even after getting promoted. ADP’s data does not specify whether promotions cause workers to leave. It’s possible that many, if not most of them, would have left anyway, since the qualities that can make someone promotable—including being ambitious and aggressive—can be at odds with corporate loyalty.
Less money, more problems
Then there are the promotions in name only. More than a third of offered promotions came with no raise, according to a 2018 survey by staffing firm Robert Half, while more than three-quarters of workers in a recent JobSage poll reported being asked to take on more responsibility with no added pay—a sure recipe for resentment.
And even a raise on paper, when all is said and done, can turn out to be much less than it seems. Often, workers are bumped up to a management or salaried role only to learn that they’re no longer eligible for overtime, commissions, or other perks that they had in their lower role, and that they’re actually taking a pay cut.
Money issues aside, moving up in an organization can also reveal broader cultural problems, as it did for Jenkins.
“One of the reasons I was at this company is their culture was pretty good,” he told Fortune. “Fifty percent of that is already proven to be not true—they’re making people pay for the tools they need for their job.” Seeing his rude coworker commended in meetings for his attitude sealed the deal, Jenkins said.
“At that point, I realized, it’s not going to get fixed,” he said.
He struck out on his own five months ago, and, though his responsibilities have increased as a sole proprietor, he said he’s now earning roughly his previous income.
“It was a big change to be also the person who talks to customers, pays all the bills. Dealing with the name change, making the LLC, that was a change,” he said. “But was it worth it? Absolutely.”
The experience also gave Jenkins a taste of what it means to provide a good working environment—which should be useful, since he hopes to hire an office manager and one or two plumbers in the coming months.
“Being part of the trades, our stigma that we have is that we work, work, work, and [culture] doesn’t really matter, all that matters is the work. I’m glad that the idea is changing, that working conditions have to be good for the employee,” he said. “I hope I can provide that.”