从旁观者的角度来看,在每个工作日的高峰时段,从站台和停车场里走出来的拥挤的人群,似乎都有类似的故事。
但仔细观察你会发现,有人正在睡眼惺忪地揉着眼睛,有人在匆匆忙忙地收拾化妆包,还有许多人可能刚解开围在脖子上的旅行枕。
这些人都是长途通勤者,他们在天还没有亮的时候起床,把自己的车或火车视为第二个家。
通勤过程如同旅行一样。
在新冠疫情期间,平均通勤时间不出意料地缩短。
2019年,约10%上班族的通勤时间长达一个小时,有3%的上班族通勤时间超过90%。但据美国人口普查局(U.S. Census Bureau)统计,2021年通勤时间超过一小时的上班族的比例下降到7.7%,平均通勤时间从2019年的27.6分钟缩短到25.6分钟。
新冠疫情爆发后,一些全球大公司承诺彻底采取远程办公或混合办公。
2020年至2022年,美国约有200万人搬离了大城市,指望着全世界重启后通勤频率能够下降。
但一年多后,公司纷纷要求员工现场办公,强制通勤报复性恢复。
但经验丰富的超级通勤者表示,通勤有一些好处,而且他们厌倦了职场新人的抱怨。
“通勤给我带来优势”
乔纳森·沃尔特斯的职业生涯的大部分时间都在长途通勤。
在新冠疫情之前,他从芝加哥到小城市内珀维尔上班,根据交通状况开车需要45分钟至75分钟。2021年,他搬到了内珀维尔,距离上班地点更近。唯一的问题是,他换了工作,结果又要前往芝加哥上班。
对有些人而言,这种貌似不可避免的通勤可能令人讨厌,但作为一家运输公司的助理副总裁,沃尔特斯却对通勤持接受的态度。
沃尔特斯对《财富》杂志表示,他把早上5点开始的通勤称为“挡风玻璃时间”,让他有机会理清自己的思路。
他解释道:“在通勤途中,我有超过一个小时高度专注的时间,我可以确定每天的优先事项,考虑工作清单上的前两件或前三件事情。尤其是需要见客户或参加内部会议时,我能够保证会议过程简洁明了,因为我已经有时间进行思考和计划。”
以前,沃尔特斯与成百上千万的其他人一样,都认为通勤是“不得已而为之的事情”。
他决定努力改变自己的心态,以积极的视角看待通勤时间。他表示,人们应该“充分利用通勤时间,而不是只会抱怨。”
沃尔特斯说:“抱怨不会带来任何改变。你不如将通勤变成一件至少是积极的事情,甚至让通勤时间变得富有成效。”
在大西洋彼岸,25岁的梅利莎·霍华德每天同样从早上5点开始。她要每周两次从位于英格兰剑桥郡乡村的家中,前往位于伦敦的办公室,中途要换乘一次火车,还要穿过伦敦市区。
到上午8点,这位公关主管已经开始工作,比大部分同事签到的时间早了一个小时。而且,她已经制定了当天的行动计划:她说这给她带来了一个“优势”。
霍华德表示:“我对每天的工作充满激情,尤其是我比别人早到公司的时候。这让我有额外一个小时的时间可以安定下来,在没有其他人干扰的情况下完成更多的工作。”
财务优势
霍华德每周的通勤成本为180英镑(约219美元),但其中一半由雇主报销。
她是少数幸运儿之一。与新冠疫情之前相比,大多数员工承担的出行成本增长了31%。房地产中介匹配服务Clever Real Estate对多份政府数据的计算结果显示,普通美国人每年的通勤成本为8,466美元。
英国的情况类似,普通英国人每天的通勤成本约为17.23英镑(约21美元),而前往伦敦、曼彻斯特和伯明翰等主要中心城市的通勤成本更高。
然而,尽管霍华德有时候会怀念生活在伦敦的便利和社交生活,但她并没有搬到大都市的计划。
霍华德说:“看看物价与收益的对比,我并不认为在大都市生活有足够的优势。不只是房租。从食品、饮料等各个方面都是如此。”
同样,虽然沃尔特斯每年的通勤费用约为6,000美元,但内珀维尔比芝加哥更低的生活成本,“总是”能够给他带来惊喜,从精神上抵消了通勤费用的影响。
他说:“在同一家连锁餐厅里用餐时,在内珀维尔一瓶红酒的价格,只有芝加哥的三分之一或三分之二。”他说道,目前芝加哥市在各个方面都变得斤斤计较:无论是停车、过路费、路边停车还是城市违章,拥有一辆车会产生大量额外支出。”
他的两层四居室住宅为八岁和四岁的两个孩子提供了更多的空间,而且他感觉孩子们在美国第三大城市以外生活更安全、更独立。
你的职业生涯可能离不开通勤
《财富》杂志采访的所有长途通勤者都认同,通勤必不可少,无论是为了与老板面对面会面的重要时刻,还是与同事进行思想碰撞的机会。
迈卡·谢泼德是舍弗勒集团(Schaeffler)亚洲业务的总裁兼区域首席执行官,负责管理在10个办事处和工厂的1,600名员工。
虽然谢泼德住在泰国东部的芭堤雅,但他每年有一半工作时间不仅需要通勤,还需要长途出差:仅下个月,他就需要前往德国、澳大利亚、越南、中国和菲律宾。
谢泼德有两个儿子。他表示,如果不做出这些牺牲,他的事业“绝对”无法取得现在的成就。
他对《财富》杂志表示:“无论通勤还是到不同地点出差所带来的曝光度,可以让你成为少数优秀员工之一。我还建议年轻员工,要向正常去办公室办公的老员工学习。”
作为管理者,谢泼德称,有时候完全远程办公者变成了“眼不见,心不烦”的人,但他承认,如果远程办公或混合办公的员工表现出色,灵活办公并不会妨碍他们的发展。
但在恢复通勤之后,他从公司的成功中看到了一些不同之处。
谢泼德说:“我研究了我的团队去年的业绩,结合我坚持出差和重新回到市场这个事实,我发现与同行相比,我们调整的速度最快,中期增长速度加快,产品发布、客户参与度和营销活动都显著增加。”(财富中文网)
译者:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
从旁观者的角度来看,在每个工作日的高峰时段,从站台和停车场里走出来的拥挤的人群,似乎都有类似的故事。
但仔细观察你会发现,有人正在睡眼惺忪地揉着眼睛,有人在匆匆忙忙地收拾化妆包,还有许多人可能刚解开围在脖子上的旅行枕。
这些人都是长途通勤者,他们在天还没有亮的时候起床,把自己的车或火车视为第二个家。
通勤过程如同旅行一样。
在新冠疫情期间,平均通勤时间不出意料地缩短。
2019年,约10%上班族的通勤时间长达一个小时,有3%的上班族通勤时间超过90%。但据美国人口普查局(U.S. Census Bureau)统计,2021年通勤时间超过一小时的上班族的比例下降到7.7%,平均通勤时间从2019年的27.6分钟缩短到25.6分钟。
新冠疫情爆发后,一些全球大公司承诺彻底采取远程办公或混合办公。
2020年至2022年,美国约有200万人搬离了大城市,指望着全世界重启后通勤频率能够下降。
但一年多后,公司纷纷要求员工现场办公,强制通勤报复性恢复。
但经验丰富的超级通勤者表示,通勤有一些好处,而且他们厌倦了职场新人的抱怨。
“通勤给我带来优势”
乔纳森·沃尔特斯的职业生涯的大部分时间都在长途通勤。
在新冠疫情之前,他从芝加哥到小城市内珀维尔上班,根据交通状况开车需要45分钟至75分钟。2021年,他搬到了内珀维尔,距离上班地点更近。唯一的问题是,他换了工作,结果又要前往芝加哥上班。
对有些人而言,这种貌似不可避免的通勤可能令人讨厌,但作为一家运输公司的助理副总裁,沃尔特斯却对通勤持接受的态度。
沃尔特斯对《财富》杂志表示,他把早上5点开始的通勤称为“挡风玻璃时间”,让他有机会理清自己的思路。
他解释道:“在通勤途中,我有超过一个小时高度专注的时间,我可以确定每天的优先事项,考虑工作清单上的前两件或前三件事情。尤其是需要见客户或参加内部会议时,我能够保证会议过程简洁明了,因为我已经有时间进行思考和计划。”
以前,沃尔特斯与成百上千万的其他人一样,都认为通勤是“不得已而为之的事情”。
他决定努力改变自己的心态,以积极的视角看待通勤时间。他表示,人们应该“充分利用通勤时间,而不是只会抱怨。”
沃尔特斯说:“抱怨不会带来任何改变。你不如将通勤变成一件至少是积极的事情,甚至让通勤时间变得富有成效。”
在大西洋彼岸,25岁的梅利莎·霍华德每天同样从早上5点开始。她要每周两次从位于英格兰剑桥郡乡村的家中,前往位于伦敦的办公室,中途要换乘一次火车,还要穿过伦敦市区。
到上午8点,这位公关主管已经开始工作,比大部分同事签到的时间早了一个小时。而且,她已经制定了当天的行动计划:她说这给她带来了一个“优势”。
霍华德表示:“我对每天的工作充满激情,尤其是我比别人早到公司的时候。这让我有额外一个小时的时间可以安定下来,在没有其他人干扰的情况下完成更多的工作。”
财务优势
霍华德每周的通勤成本为180英镑(约219美元),但其中一半由雇主报销。
她是少数幸运儿之一。与新冠疫情之前相比,大多数员工承担的出行成本增长了31%。房地产中介匹配服务Clever Real Estate对多份政府数据的计算结果显示,普通美国人每年的通勤成本为8,466美元。
英国的情况类似,普通英国人每天的通勤成本约为17.23英镑(约21美元),而前往伦敦、曼彻斯特和伯明翰等主要中心城市的通勤成本更高。
然而,尽管霍华德有时候会怀念生活在伦敦的便利和社交生活,但她并没有搬到大都市的计划。
霍华德说:“看看物价与收益的对比,我并不认为在大都市生活有足够的优势。不只是房租。从食品、饮料等各个方面都是如此。”
同样,虽然沃尔特斯每年的通勤费用约为6,000美元,但内珀维尔比芝加哥更低的生活成本,“总是”能够给他带来惊喜,从精神上抵消了通勤费用的影响。
他说:“在同一家连锁餐厅里用餐时,在内珀维尔一瓶红酒的价格,只有芝加哥的三分之一或三分之二。”他说道,目前芝加哥市在各个方面都变得斤斤计较:无论是停车、过路费、路边停车还是城市违章,拥有一辆车会产生大量额外支出。”
他的两层四居室住宅为八岁和四岁的两个孩子提供了更多的空间,而且他感觉孩子们在美国第三大城市以外生活更安全、更独立。
你的职业生涯可能离不开通勤
《财富》杂志采访的所有长途通勤者都认同,通勤必不可少,无论是为了与老板面对面会面的重要时刻,还是与同事进行思想碰撞的机会。
迈卡·谢泼德是舍弗勒集团(Schaeffler)亚洲业务的总裁兼区域首席执行官,负责管理在10个办事处和工厂的1,600名员工。
虽然谢泼德住在泰国东部的芭堤雅,但他每年有一半工作时间不仅需要通勤,还需要长途出差:仅下个月,他就需要前往德国、澳大利亚、越南、中国和菲律宾。
谢泼德有两个儿子。他表示,如果不做出这些牺牲,他的事业“绝对”无法取得现在的成就。
他对《财富》杂志表示:“无论通勤还是到不同地点出差所带来的曝光度,可以让你成为少数优秀员工之一。我还建议年轻员工,要向正常去办公室办公的老员工学习。”
作为管理者,谢泼德称,有时候完全远程办公者变成了“眼不见,心不烦”的人,但他承认,如果远程办公或混合办公的员工表现出色,灵活办公并不会妨碍他们的发展。
但在恢复通勤之后,他从公司的成功中看到了一些不同之处。
谢泼德说:“我研究了我的团队去年的业绩,结合我坚持出差和重新回到市场这个事实,我发现与同行相比,我们调整的速度最快,中期增长速度加快,产品发布、客户参与度和营销活动都显著增加。”(财富中文网)
译者:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
To an onlooker, the throngs of people spilling off platforms and out of car parks during rush hour on a weekday may all appear to have a similar story.
But look closer—some wipe sleep from their eyes, others hastily pack away make up bags, and a few may unwind a travel pillow from around their neck.
These are the long-distance commuters—those who wake up in the dark, and view their cars or a train as their second home.
And like the trip.
During the pandemic, average commuting times unsurprisingly fell.
In 2019, one in 10 workers had an hour-long commute, while just 3% had a journey of more than 90 minutes. But according to the U.S. Census Bureau, the number of people traveling for more than an hour fell to 7.7% in 2021, with average commutes down to 25.6 minutes from 27.6 minutes in 2019.
When COVID hit, some of the biggest businesses in the world promised to go remote—or hybrid—for good.
Some two million people moved away from America’s major cities between 2020 and 2022, banking that their commutes would be less frequent when the world reopened.
A year or so later, however, businesses are calling staff back, and the mandatory commute has returned with a vengeance.
Yet veterans of the ultra-commute say there are silver linings to be found, and they’re tired of the griping from newcomers.
“Commuting gives me an edge”
Jonathan Walters has been a long-distance commuter for the majority of his working life.
Prior to COVID he travelled from Chicago to work in Naperville—a 45-minute to 75-minute drive, depending on traffic—and in 2021 moved out to the smaller city to be closer to work. The only problem was, his job changed and he ended up with a commute back into Chicago.
For some people this seemingly unavoidable commute might be a bugbear—but for the associate vice president at a transportation company, it’s become welcome.
Walters told Fortune he refers to his 5 a.m. starts as “windshield time”—a chance to get his thoughts in order.
“When I get in I’ve had over an hour where I’m pretty focused, I’ve had time to prioritize my day and to think about the first two or three things that are going to be on my list,” he explained. “Especially when it comes to customer or internal meetings, I can make sure they’re more succinct because I’ve had time to think and plan already.”
Previously Walters, like millions of other people, saw his commute as a “necessary evil.”
He decided to try and shift his mindset to view the travel time as a positive thing, saying people should “take advantage of that rather than whining about it.”
“It’s not going to change anything by complaining about it,” he said. “You might as well make it something that—if not productive—is at least positive.”
Across the Atlantic, 25-year-old Melissa Howard’s day also starts at 5 a.m. Twice a week she makes her way from home in rural Cambridgeshire, England, to the office, taking two trains to get into—and across—London.
By 8 a.m., the PR executive is working—an hour before most of her colleagues in the industry log on—and she’s already set up a plan of action for her day: she says it gives her an “edge.”
“I feel pumped for the day, especially when I’m getting in before everyone else,” Howard said. “It gives me an extra hour to get settled, I get more things done without being distracted by anyone.”
The financial upsides
Howard’s commute costs her £180 (approximately $219) a week—though half the amount is covered by her employer.
She’s one of the lucky few—most employees are footing the bill of a 31% increase in their journey costs compared to pre-COVID. The average American shells out $8,466 on commuting annually, according to calculations of various government data from real estate agent matching service Clever Real Estate.
In the U.K. it’s a similar story—the average person reportedly spends around £17.23 ($21) getting to work every day, though that increases when commuting to major hubs like London, Manchester and Birmingham.
But despite Howard sometimes missing the easy convenience and social aspect of living in London, she has no plans to move to the metropolis.
“Looking at the prices versus the benefits, I just don’t think there’s enough,” Howard said. “It’s not even just the rent as well. It’s almost everything that comes with it—food, drink.”
Similarly, while Walters’s journey costs him around $6,000 a year, he mentally offsets this with the “constant” pleasant surprise of how much more affordable life is in Naperville is compared to Chicago.
“For a bottle of wine we’re paying a third, or two-thirds, of what we would pay in Chicago—even at the same restaurant chain. The city nowadays is nickel-and-diming everything: whether it’s parking, tolls, street parking, city stickers—just having the luxury of having a car comes with a lot of additional expenses,” he said.
His two-story, four-bed home also has more space for his eight and four-year-old children—and he feels they’re safer and more independent outside America’s third-largest city.
Commutes might be necessary for your career
Every long-distance commuter Fortune spoke to agreed that regular trips to the office are necessary—whether it’s to get in that all-important face time with the boss, or to bounce ideas around with colleagues.
Micah Shepard is the president and regional CEO for Schaeffler’s Asia operations, overseeing 1,600 staff across 10 offices, as well as factory sites.
Although Shephard lives in Pattaya in Eastern Thailand, he spends half his working year not just commuting but traveling long-distance: in the next month alone he’ll visit Germany, Australia, Vietnam, China and the Philippines.
Without this sacrifice—Shepard is a father to two sons—the CEO said he “definitely” wouldn’t have achieved the same level of career success.
“The visibility that comes with either traveling or commuting to different locations puts you in a narrow bracket of employees,” he told Fortune. “I also recommend to younger employees that they need to learn from the senior people who normally come to the office.”
As a manager himself Shepard said sometimes those who work completely remotely are “out of sight, out of mind,” but acknowledged flexibility doesn’t hold back staff if they perform well in a remote or hybrid role.
As soon as he got back on the road, however, Shepard saw a difference in the company’s success.
“If I look at the performance of my team over the last year and the fact that I have travelled and got back out into the market—compared to my peer companies—we’ve changed the quickest, medium term growth has been faster and product releases, customer engagement, and marketing activities have all significantly increased,” he said.