华尔街最大的“空头”放弃了等待冬天到来。
摩根士丹利(Morgan Stanley)首席投资官兼首席美国股票策略师迈克·威尔逊曾预测美股将在一年多内迎来大幅回调,但他在近日的一份报告中改变了看法,称他现在预计标普500指数在未来12个月内将上涨1.5%,达到5,400点。
股市在12月内上涨1.5%听起来并不是太乐观的预测,因为标普500指数在过去100年中的年均回报率约为10%,但这表明威尔逊的立场发生了重大转变。这位资深策略师曾预测该蓝筹股指数在未来12个月内将下挫15%,跌至4,500点,而且他在一段时间以来一直看跌美股。
威尔逊对市场前景看法的转变,与摩根士丹利首席经济学家艾伦·增特纳的经济预测一致。增特纳在2月上调了对美国GDP增长的预期,并预测通胀逐渐降温,且今年会有三次降息,这应该可以缓解当前企业盈利方面所面临的压力。
2022年,威尔逊曾预测,由于“冰火两重天”(加息和经济增长放缓)的影响,当年股市将会暴跌,这个非常有先见之明的预测让他获得了华尔街顶级策略师的称号。但在过去一年半的时间里,他的悲观态度导致了一些预测失误。
2023年1月,他警告称,看涨的投资者买入股票会掉入熊市陷阱,他还指出他的盈利模型显示企业利润率受到“侵蚀”。他当时写道:“熊市的最后阶段总是最令人难以捉摸,我们一直高度警惕这种虚张声势的假动作。可以说,我们之所以没有抓住最近的这波反弹,是因为我们的工作和流程都有令人信服的理由看跌收益。”
六个月后,尽管美股持续大涨,但威尔逊认为,由于美联储加息导致经济增长放缓、财政支持减弱以及利润下滑,市场正走向灾难。他对投资者表示:“市场大幅调整的风险极高,而且如此高的风险很少见。”
即使在今年,威尔逊仍然看跌美股。这位首席投资官在1月表示,经济要大幅增长,才能让股市维持良好的势头。他说道:“这表明,在结果更加明确之前,股市将在一个交易区间内波动。”
结果证明,他的这些预测不太准确。2023年1月到2024年5月期间,标普500指数非但没有像威尔逊预测的那样下跌,反而飙升了38%以上,创下了5,300 点以上的历史新高。
现在,鉴于经济的不确定性,摩根士丹利的顶级投资者至少在一定程度上收回了他之前看跌美股的一些观点。威尔逊在周日的客户报告中写道:“简而言之,随着数据越来越不稳定,宏观结果变得越来越难以预测。我们认为这种环境将持续下去。”
自从美联储于2022年3月开始加息以对抗通胀以来,关于美国经济的前景一直存在激烈的争论。一时间,大多数经济学家和华尔街策略师都认为,借款成本上升和持续高涨的通货膨胀最终会让经济陷入停滞,导致 “硬着陆”(又称经济衰退)。但在整个2023 年,随着美国经济证明了其对更高利率和物价上涨的承受力,越来越多的专家开始相信,美国经济更有可能走向“软着陆” ——即通胀下降但不出现扼杀就业的经济衰退。强劲的消费支出、劳动力市场和企业盈利数据甚至让许多预测者在今年早些时候相信,美国经济可能会出现“不着陆 ”情景,这种情景的特征是更高的经济增长和更加持续高涨的通胀。
在上周日的客户报告中,威尔逊描述了在过去几年中,对美国经济的共识前景是如何因数据的波动而在这三种情景之间“徘徊 ”,过去几个月“跌宕起伏”的通胀数据就是这种动态的“缩影”。
由于宏观经济的不确定性,这位资深首席投资官在上周末发布了一系列美国市场的潜在结果,包括高度乐观的牛市和极度悲观的熊市。
他写道:“我们认为,提出比通常情况下更广泛的看涨和看跌价格目标是有道理的。此外,我们认为出现尾部结果的概率比正常情况下更高,而我们的基本情况则不太确定。”
威尔逊认为市场可能出现的结果范围更广,这种观点有历史为证。历史上,降息周期(例如摩根士丹利的经济学家们预测将于今年晚些时候开始的降息周期)开始时的市场回报率各不相同。有时,美联储开始降息时,市场一片繁荣;有时候却只有坏消息。
威尔逊写道:“在许多方面,这份分析很好地概括了我们对前景的展望 —— 在平均/基线情景下平衡的风险/回报系数,但有各种情景可能会发生。请再次做好准备,迎接情绪、仓位和价格方面的显著波动。”
虽然威尔逊现在对标普500指数的基准情景预测是5,400点,但如果经济衰退来临,他认为该蓝筹股指数将跌至4,200点,这意味着下挫约20%。在这种情景下,企业盈利和股市估值将大幅下挫。
但威尔逊认为,如果美国避免经济衰退,且联邦政府继续向经济注入资金,推动企业盈利增长和估值上涨,则标普500指数在未来12个月内可能会飙升约20%,达到6,350点。
他解释说:“这是我们所经历的多次扩张和盈利反弹的延续。这种情景的挑战在于,通胀可能再次失控,迫使美联储加息,但即使面对不稳定的通胀数据,美联储近期也倾向于降息而非加息。有鉴于此,美联储可能已经不再那么专注于2%的通胀目标。”
但估值终将“正常化”
威尔逊预测美国股市的基准情景现在更加乐观,他甚至认为,如果政府继续财政支出且美国避免经济衰退,美股市场可能会出现“乐观的”看涨情景。但最终,估值还是要回落到正常水平。威尔逊认为,这意味着股市投资者应保持谨慎,坚持购买优质股票。
他写道:“很难准确预测估值何时会正常化,但我们仍然相信估值最终是很重要的,我们并没有进入一个永久支持更高[市盈率]的新范式。”
威尔逊指出,标普500指数目前的市盈率约为25倍,而历史平均市盈率仅为18倍。威尔逊和他的分析师团队认为,在这种环境下,投资者应该关注优质股票,即资产负债表强劲、现金流充沛、债务水平较低和商业模式成熟的公司。因为一旦经济衰退来临,许多投资者青睐的高风险、高增长的人工智能股票很可能会陷入困境。
不过,威尔逊还是以谦逊的口吻结束了他的报告,并警告说这是一个市场充满不确定性的时代。他写道:“实话实说,在过去一年里,我们预测[标普500指数市盈率]的能力一直很差,虽然我们确信估值过高,但我们对预测市场正常化的确切时间或程度的能力信心不足。这增加了我们对股价前景预测的不确定性。”(财富中文网)
翻译:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
华尔街最大的“空头”放弃了等待冬天到来。
摩根士丹利(Morgan Stanley)首席投资官兼首席美国股票策略师迈克·威尔逊曾预测美股将在一年多内迎来大幅回调,但他在近日的一份报告中改变了看法,称他现在预计标普500指数在未来12个月内将上涨1.5%,达到5,400点。
股市在12月内上涨1.5%听起来并不是太乐观的预测,因为标普500指数在过去100年中的年均回报率约为10%,但这表明威尔逊的立场发生了重大转变。这位资深策略师曾预测该蓝筹股指数在未来12个月内将下挫15%,跌至4,500点,而且他在一段时间以来一直看跌美股。
威尔逊对市场前景看法的转变,与摩根士丹利首席经济学家艾伦·增特纳的经济预测一致。增特纳在2月上调了对美国GDP增长的预期,并预测通胀逐渐降温,且今年会有三次降息,这应该可以缓解当前企业盈利方面所面临的压力。
2022年,威尔逊曾预测,由于“冰火两重天”(加息和经济增长放缓)的影响,当年股市将会暴跌,这个非常有先见之明的预测让他获得了华尔街顶级策略师的称号。但在过去一年半的时间里,他的悲观态度导致了一些预测失误。
2023年1月,他警告称,看涨的投资者买入股票会掉入熊市陷阱,他还指出他的盈利模型显示企业利润率受到“侵蚀”。他当时写道:“熊市的最后阶段总是最令人难以捉摸,我们一直高度警惕这种虚张声势的假动作。可以说,我们之所以没有抓住最近的这波反弹,是因为我们的工作和流程都有令人信服的理由看跌收益。”
六个月后,尽管美股持续大涨,但威尔逊认为,由于美联储加息导致经济增长放缓、财政支持减弱以及利润下滑,市场正走向灾难。他对投资者表示:“市场大幅调整的风险极高,而且如此高的风险很少见。”
即使在今年,威尔逊仍然看跌美股。这位首席投资官在1月表示,经济要大幅增长,才能让股市维持良好的势头。他说道:“这表明,在结果更加明确之前,股市将在一个交易区间内波动。”
结果证明,他的这些预测不太准确。2023年1月到2024年5月期间,标普500指数非但没有像威尔逊预测的那样下跌,反而飙升了38%以上,创下了5,300 点以上的历史新高。
现在,鉴于经济的不确定性,摩根士丹利的顶级投资者至少在一定程度上收回了他之前看跌美股的一些观点。威尔逊在周日的客户报告中写道:“简而言之,随着数据越来越不稳定,宏观结果变得越来越难以预测。我们认为这种环境将持续下去。”
自从美联储于2022年3月开始加息以对抗通胀以来,关于美国经济的前景一直存在激烈的争论。一时间,大多数经济学家和华尔街策略师都认为,借款成本上升和持续高涨的通货膨胀最终会让经济陷入停滞,导致 “硬着陆”(又称经济衰退)。但在整个2023 年,随着美国经济证明了其对更高利率和物价上涨的承受力,越来越多的专家开始相信,美国经济更有可能走向“软着陆” ——即通胀下降但不出现扼杀就业的经济衰退。强劲的消费支出、劳动力市场和企业盈利数据甚至让许多预测者在今年早些时候相信,美国经济可能会出现“不着陆 ”情景,这种情景的特征是更高的经济增长和更加持续高涨的通胀。
在上周日的客户报告中,威尔逊描述了在过去几年中,对美国经济的共识前景是如何因数据的波动而在这三种情景之间“徘徊 ”,过去几个月“跌宕起伏”的通胀数据就是这种动态的“缩影”。
由于宏观经济的不确定性,这位资深首席投资官在上周末发布了一系列美国市场的潜在结果,包括高度乐观的牛市和极度悲观的熊市。
他写道:“我们认为,提出比通常情况下更广泛的看涨和看跌价格目标是有道理的。此外,我们认为出现尾部结果的概率比正常情况下更高,而我们的基本情况则不太确定。”
威尔逊认为市场可能出现的结果范围更广,这种观点有历史为证。历史上,降息周期(例如摩根士丹利的经济学家们预测将于今年晚些时候开始的降息周期)开始时的市场回报率各不相同。有时,美联储开始降息时,市场一片繁荣;有时候却只有坏消息。
威尔逊写道:“在许多方面,这份分析很好地概括了我们对前景的展望 —— 在平均/基线情景下平衡的风险/回报系数,但有各种情景可能会发生。请再次做好准备,迎接情绪、仓位和价格方面的显著波动。”
虽然威尔逊现在对标普500指数的基准情景预测是5,400点,但如果经济衰退来临,他认为该蓝筹股指数将跌至4,200点,这意味着下挫约20%。在这种情景下,企业盈利和股市估值将大幅下挫。
但威尔逊认为,如果美国避免经济衰退,且联邦政府继续向经济注入资金,推动企业盈利增长和估值上涨,则标普500指数在未来12个月内可能会飙升约20%,达到6,350点。
他解释说:“这是我们所经历的多次扩张和盈利反弹的延续。这种情景的挑战在于,通胀可能再次失控,迫使美联储加息,但即使面对不稳定的通胀数据,美联储近期也倾向于降息而非加息。有鉴于此,美联储可能已经不再那么专注于2%的通胀目标。”
但估值终将“正常化”
威尔逊预测美国股市的基准情景现在更加乐观,他甚至认为,如果政府继续财政支出且美国避免经济衰退,美股市场可能会出现“乐观的”看涨情景。但最终,估值还是要回落到正常水平。威尔逊认为,这意味着股市投资者应保持谨慎,坚持购买优质股票。
他写道:“很难准确预测估值何时会正常化,但我们仍然相信估值最终是很重要的,我们并没有进入一个永久支持更高[市盈率]的新范式。”
威尔逊指出,标普500指数目前的市盈率约为25倍,而历史平均市盈率仅为18倍。威尔逊和他的分析师团队认为,在这种环境下,投资者应该关注优质股票,即资产负债表强劲、现金流充沛、债务水平较低和商业模式成熟的公司。因为一旦经济衰退来临,许多投资者青睐的高风险、高增长的人工智能股票很可能会陷入困境。
不过,威尔逊还是以谦逊的口吻结束了他的报告,并警告说这是一个市场充满不确定性的时代。他写道:“实话实说,在过去一年里,我们预测[标普500指数市盈率]的能力一直很差,虽然我们确信估值过高,但我们对预测市场正常化的确切时间或程度的能力信心不足。这增加了我们对股价前景预测的不确定性。”(财富中文网)
翻译:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
Wall Street’s biggest bear just gave up on waiting for winter.
After predicting a serious stock market correction for over a year, Morgan Stanley’s chief investment officer and chief U.S. equity strategist Mike Wilson changed his tune in a Sunday note, saying he now expects the S&P 500 to rise 1.5% to 5,400 over the next 12 months.
A 1.5% rise in stocks over a 12-month period may not sound like a bullish take, given the roughly 10% average annual return of the S&P 500 over the past 100 years, but it’s a big change of heart for Wilson. The veteran strategist previously expected the blue-chip index to sink 15% to 4,500 over the next 12 months—and he’s been bearish for some time.
This new shift aligns Wilson’s market outlook with the economic forecasts of Morgan Stanley’s chief U.S. economist Ellen Zentner, who raised her GDP growth projections in February and is expecting fading inflation as well as three interest rate cuts this year, which should relieve some of the current pressure on corporate earnings.
As for Wilson, he earned the nod as Wall Street’s top strategist in 2022 for his prescient prediction that stocks would tumble that year due to a combination of “fire and ice” (also known as rising interest rates and fading economic growth). But his pessimistic disposition has led to some misfired forecasts over the past year and a half.
In January 2023, he warned that bullish investors were falling into a bear market trap by buying stocks, noting that his earnings models showed “erosion” in corporate profit margins. “The final stages of the bear market are always the trickiest, and we have been on high alert for such head fakes,” he wrote at the time. “Suffice it to say, we’re not biting on this recent rally because our work and process are so convincingly bearish on earnings.”
Six months later, despite an ongoing surge in U.S. stocks, Wilson argued that markets were headed for disaster due to the Fed’s economy-slowing rate hikes, fading fiscal support, and a profit slowdown. “Risks for a major correction have rarely been higher,” he told investors.
Even this year, Wilson has remained bearish on U.S. markets. Economic growth would need to surge for stocks to continue their run of good form, the CIO argued in January, saying that “this suggests a trading range until the outcome is more definitive.”
All of that turned out to be, well, a bit off base. Between Jan. 2023 and May 2024, instead of dropping like Wilson predicted, the S&P 500 surged more than 38%, hitting a record high above 5,300.
Now Morgan Stanley’s top investor is walking back some of his bearish market calls, at least partly, and it’s due to economic uncertainty. “In short, macro outcomes have become increasingly hard to predict as data have become more volatile,” Wilson wrote in his Sunday note to clients. “We see this environment persisting.”
There’s been a fierce debate over the outlook for the U.S. economy ever since the Federal Reserve began raising interest rates to fight inflation in March 2022. For a time, most economists and Wall Street strategists believed rising borrowing costs and stubborn inflation would ultimately slow the economy to a standstill, leading to a “hard landing” (a.k.a. a recession). But throughout 2023, with the economy proving its resilience to higher interest rates and rising prices, an increasing number of experts became convinced that a “soft landing”—where inflation fades without a job-killing recession—was the more likely path for the U.S. Strong consumer spending, labor market, and corporate earnings data even convinced many forecasters earlier this year that a “no landing” scenario that features higher economic growth and more stubborn inflation is now likely.
Wilson described how the consensus outlook for the U.S. economy has “bounced” between these three scenarios over the past few years due to volatile data releases in his Sunday note to clients, with the last few months of “bumpy” inflation data serving as a “microcosm” of this dynamic.
As a result of this macroeconomic uncertainty, the veteran CIO released a wide range of potential outcomes for U.S. markets over the weekend, including a seriously optimistic bull case and a direly pessimistic bear case.
“We think it makes sense to present a wider range of bull and bear case price targets than usual. Furthermore, we think the probability of the tail outcomes is higher than normal as well, while our base case is less certain,” he wrote.
Wilson’s wider range of potential outcomes for markets is backed up by history. Market returns at the start of interest rate cutting cycles—like the one Morgan Stanley’s economists are predicting will begin later this year—have been all over the place historically. Sometimes markets boom when the Fed begins to cut; other times it’s nothing but bad news.
“In many ways, this analysis encapsulates our outlook well—a balanced risk/reward profile in the average/baseline view, but the potential for a wide array of scenarios to play out,” Wilson wrote. “Once again, get ready for some notable swings in sentiment, positioning and prices.”
While Wilson’s base case outlook for the S&P 500 is now 5,400, if a recession hits, he sees the blue-chip index falling to 4,200, which represents a roughly 20% downside. Corporate earnings and stock market valuations would sink dramatically in this scenario.
However, if the U.S. avoids a recession and the federal government continues to pump money into the economy, driving corporate earnings growth and boosting valuations, then the S&P 500 could surge roughly 20% to 6,350 over the next 12 months, according to Wilson.
“It’s a continuation of the multiple expansion and earnings recovery we have been experiencing,” he explained. “The challenge with this scenario is that inflation may get out of control again and force the Fed to hike, but given its recent predisposition to cut rather than hike even in the face of bumpy inflation data, it appears the Fed may already not be as focused on its 2% target.”
But valuations will ‘normalize’—eventually
Wilson’s base case for U.S. stocks is now far more bullish, and he even argues there could be a “Goldilocks” bull-case scenario for markets if fiscal spending continues and the U.S. avoids a recession. But eventually, valuations will have to come back to Earth. And that means stock market investors should remain cautious and stick with high-quality names, according to the CIO.
“It’s very hard to predict exactly when valuations will normalize, but we remain confident that valuation matters in the end and that we are not in a new paradigm that justifies permanently higher [price-to-earnings ratios],” he wrote.
To Wilson’s point, the S&P 500 currently trades at roughly 25 times earnings, compared to the historical average of just 18 times earnings. Wilson and his team of analysts argued that investors should look to quality stocks—companies with strong balance sheets, cash flows, lower debt levels, and proven business models—in this environment. Because if a recession does hit, the risky, high-flying AI stocks that many investors have fallen for will likely struggle.
Still, Wilson capped off his note with a bit of humility—and a warning that this is an era of uncertainty for markets. “Truth be told, our ability to forecast the [S&P 500’s price-to-earnings ratio] over the last year has been poor and while we are confident valuations are too high, we have little confidence in our ability to predict the exact timing or magnitude of this normalization,” he wrote. “This adds to the higher than normal uncertainty in our outlook for equity prices.”