首页 500强 活动 榜单 商业 科技 领导力 专题 品牌中心
杂志订阅

“男神经济”爆火:有人带货发财,有人拿大锤砸骨

“男神养成”系视频在欧美火了,专门教男人如何修炼完美下颌线、如何增肌和护肤。

文本设置
小号
默认
大号
Plus(0条)

图片来源:GETTY IMAGES

高三那年,17岁的迪伦·莱瑟姆被女朋友甩了。此后他愤然决定对自己的外表进行投资。从此,他每天都要泡在健身房里几个小时,在脸上敷自制的护肤面膜,还给自己烫了一个时兴的发型。现在他觉得自己帅气多了,也自信多了。

不久后,莱瑟姆开始在TikTok上发布自己的型男心得,以激励有过同样遭遇的男孩们。他的视频经常以“这会让你变丑”、“不要毁了你的皮肤”、“如何让鼻子显小”这种话术为题。他发布的这些“型男心得”在网上火得一塌糊涂,而且热度一直维持到现在。到目前为止,他在TikTok上发步的短视频已经获得了近9800万个赞和10亿次浏览。莱瑟姆现在已经在带货自己的发胶品牌了。他表示,他每个月可以从平台上获得6位数的视频播放和带货收入。因此他决定放弃大学学业,转而做一名全职网红。

莱瑟姆的爆火,与欧美国家时下流行的一种“男神养成”(looksmaxxing)潮流有关。它大概是一种男版的容貌焦虑,要求男生们要通过严格的健身、护肤和护发程序,来让自己显得阳刚和有魅力。这类主播最底限的要求,是男生起码把脸洗干净。而有些极端的博主会让男生定期捶打自己的下巴,以诱发轻微骨折,还有的甚至会建议男生整容或者服用类固醇。而在算法的推荐下,这些内容很容易在网上得到大范围传播。

《财富》采访的一些心理学家对这种现象表示了担忧。他们认为,这些网络上的建议和批评会给青少年带来很大的不良影响,使青少年对自己的容貌和吸引力产生负面评价。

纽约西奈山伊坎医学院希尔德布兰特实验室的创始人和负责人汤姆·希尔德布兰特研究厌食症已有20年了。他认为:“从心理上看,这种负面评价会损害人的自我感。比如,我得到的负反馈越多,我就会越焦虑,然后我就会用更多的时间、精力甚至是金钱和资源,来放弃我当前的身份,去追求另外一个身份'”。

莱瑟姆也表示,他发布的负面内容的浏览量和讨论热度远远超过正面内容。所以这位19岁的网红现在依然会继续贬低观众的长相,这样才能在TikTok的网店里卖出更多产品。

不过他并不认可批评者的意见,并表示人们应该多听听他的建议。他表示,他视频里的负面内容与正面内容是混杂在一起的。“人们会被负面的东西所吸引,因为很多人都缺乏安全感,所以你首先得用这种方式去吸引他们,然后才能帮助他们。”

这种负反馈循环也刺激了“男神经济”的繁荣。现在很多跟男颜养成相关的产品都卖得很火,比如有助于锻炼下颌线条的口香糖,男性护理用品以及男装等等。

还有一些移动APP称,他们可以给用户的长相打分,或者评估他们符不符合“男神”的标准。其中最火的一款APP叫做UMAX,它采用了来自OpenAI 的技术,可以根据男性的气质、下颌轮廓和颧骨等参数给付费用户的颜值打分。该APP的创始人、CEO布莱克·安德森今年只有23岁。他表示,尽管这款APP去年12月份才上线,但它的每月订阅收入已经达到了50万美元。不过这个数字目前还无法单独核实。

用户需要在UMAX上自行上传脸部照片,它的收费是每周3.99美元。它每周都会用户的颜值打分,满分是100分。而且它还会向用户提供“开始日常护肤”等小贴士来帮助用户提高颜值分数。虽然该APP称,只要用户推荐三位朋友注册,就可以免首周费用,但在《财富》的测试中,推荐好友注册并未获得它声称的免费权益。

据安德森称,UMAX的总下载量已超过700万次,在苹果应用商店的生活方式排行榜上排在第36位,排名甚至高于Zillow Rentals和TaskRabbit等生活服务应用。安德森还表示,该应用90%的用户是 16至45岁之间的男性。

他认为,UMAX之所以受到欢迎,主要归功于它在社交媒体上的影响力。很多短视频用户发视频谈自己的“男神养成”之旅时,经常把UMAX的截图放在视频里。他表示,UMAX已经在所有社交媒体平台上获得了超过10亿次的展示。UMAX的竞争对手LooksMax AI颜值评分器也已跻身生活方式类应用的前100名之列。(但其开发者并未回应《财富》的采访请求)。

安德森说表示:“总的来看,社交媒体是最伟大的广告渠道。”他希望打造一个“体现男性自我提升”的品牌。“最热门的短视频就是养成系的短视频。‘我以前长这样,可有痤疮,可能长得也不好看,或者也没有打理自己。这是我现在的样子!’而UMAX评分有助于量化这种变化。”

至有批评者认为,UMAX可能会使用户产生消极的自我认知,安德森表示:“我们永远不希望容貌焦虑影响大家的心理健康……如果我们只是告诉大家百分百地爱自己,你没有任何需要努力的地方,这也是一种危险的心态……自我完善是极其重要的,它会在人的一生中给你带来红利。”

“男神经济”火爆的另一个原因,是TikTok网店的崛起。

“男神养成系”网红莱瑟姆表示,对于他的护发品牌来说,TikTok网店是一个让他“钱赚疯了”的平台。“因为你现在可以一边看视频,一边直接购买产品。”他的品牌在TikTok网店上的成功,是让他决定放弃大学学业,走专业网红路线的一个重要原因。

TikTok并未回应《财富》的置评请求。

由于TikTok的算法推送机制,希尔德布兰特对这些负面内容的影响深感忧虑。他认为,这可能会导致人们对男性的外表产生畸形审美。这种现象在上世纪80年代施瓦辛格刚刚走红的时候就出现了。随着社交媒体的兴起,这种畸形审美变得更加隐蔽化。人们可能会花大量时间在网上观看或者消费与美容和健身有关的内容。当然从表面看来,现在所有人每天都会刷上几个小时的手机。

对于UMAX以及莱瑟姆的护发产品的火爆,希尔德布兰特并未感到意外。因为“男神经济”利用了男性的容貌焦虑,而资本已经靠刺激女性的容貌焦虑赚了几万亿美元的化妆品和保健品了。“这些主播和产品的生产厂家发现,男性和女性一样容易受到负反馈的影响……只要你能让人对自己的身份产生不安全感,他们就愿意为此一掷千金,来寻求解决方案。”

虽然TikTok已经对网上商城里的减肥药问题进行了打击,但心理学家表示,TikTok的网上商城里仍然有一些有问题的内容存在。如果你在TikTok网上商城里搜索“looksmax”,就会出现一条信息写着“你比你的体重更重要”。这条信息还配有一幅画面,画中是一个卡通小人抱着一颗爱心,以及一个点击选项,上面写着:“如果你或你认识的人有关于身材、包含或者运动方面的问题,请注意,你是可以获得帮助的,你不是一个人在战斗。”然后,用户就可以通过链接,进入TikTok自己的进食障碍资源中心和一个域名为“nationaleatingdisorders.org”的网站。但如果你不点击,而是滚动页面的话,这条信息就会消失。

但是Meta旗下的Instagram和Facebook、谷歌旗下的YouTube,以及Snapchat等热门社交应用则无此类推广消息。

CNN和参议员理查德·布卢门撒尔都曾于2021年指出,Instagram存在向青少年宣传与厌食症有关的内容的问题,它专门有一个页面告诉用户,出现这种问题后应该找朋友寻求帮助。Meta公司的发言人拒绝就此事发表评论,不过他向《财富》强调了Meta在自杀、自残和厌食等问题上的政策。

Meta表示,该公司表示会删除平台上“任何有关鼓励自杀、自残或厌食的内容”,但它“允许人们讨论这些话题,因为我们希望我们的服务成为人们交流经验、提高对这些问题的认识并且相互帮助的空间。”

Meta表示,它已经在自杀、自残、厌食以及身体形象相关的搜索结果页中添加了弹出窗口,为用户提供与相关组织联系的建议和方法,但在与“男神养成”“男颜”相关的搜索中却没有这样的警告。《财富》在Instagram上搜索关键词“looksmax”,发现一段视频,视频博主拥有好看的下巴,但他声称,他是通过用锤子敲打自己的脸部,才把下巴弄成这个样子的(这种做法被称为 “砸骨”)。这个博主还在视频中向用户做了示范,不过同时他也警告了这么做的危险性。

Snapchat也不向用户提供有关厌食症的信息。Snapchat的发言人拒绝围绕本文内容发表评论。他建议《财富》查阅关于其算法推荐机制的的帖子。他还指出,Snapcha禁止宣传鼓吹自残、自杀和厌食的内容。尽管有这样的规定,《财富》还是在Snapchat的#looksmax 标签下发现了一些宣传自残和暴力的帖子。其中一段视频以男神范儿的自拍开头,后面出现“当她说,我要跟我的新朋友开派对”时,画面突然变成了一连串的人拿着突击步枪开火的镜头。该视频的标题是“我要去参加派对”。

针对YouTube上的“男神养成”相关内容,YouTube的一位发言人告诉《财富》:“YouTube针对面向低龄和青少年观众制定了额外的保障机制,而且这些措施是在咨询儿童发展专家后制定的”。该发言人还向我们分享了相关保障措施的链接,并表示YouTube会“限制重复推荐关于攀比身体特征、描述理想化的健身水平或者理想体重等相关内容”,并指出,YouTube有相关政策来删除“易被模仿的”厌食内容。

上面提到的这几家社交媒体公司,因其推荐算法和功能容易让人上瘾,进而引发青少年心理健康危机,而已经受到了联邦和州两级政府的严格审查。这些平台最被诟病的原因之一,就是它们容易导致用户产生畸形审美,尤其是对年轻女性的身体产生畸形审美。

但是随着“男神养成”的走红,年轻男性用户也很有可能受到畸形审美的负面影响。

塞拉·列维利是纽约市一位治疗饮食失调和饮食紊乱问题的临床心理学家。在她2007年刚开始执业时,她的患者大多是女性,包括年轻女孩。但是在过去10年里,随着社交媒体的兴起,她的病人已经是男女各占一半。她表示:“对于男性来说,现在的社会变得越来越可怕了,就像长期以来的女性一样。”

而一些全国性的报告也表明,随着社交媒体的兴起,美国男性患饮食失调症的比例有所增加。

纽约心理学家莎拉·戴维斯长期研究儿童饮食失调问题。她注意到,一些患者在治疗过程中,会进行用舌头舔上牙关的练习,据他们说,这样可以练出完美的下颌线。戴维斯把这个问题归咎于社交媒体,因为她的病人“越来越年轻了”,甚至最小的病人只有9岁。

戴维斯表示:“我们都想被爱、被接受。所以人们会想,如果我长成某种样子就能被爱、被接受,那么我就应该砸钱干这件事。”(财富中文网)

译者:朴成奎

高三那年,17岁的迪伦·莱瑟姆被女朋友甩了。此后他愤然决定对自己的外表进行投资。从此,他每天都要泡在健身房里几个小时,在脸上敷自制的护肤面膜,还给自己烫了一个时兴的发型。现在他觉得自己帅气多了,也自信多了。

不久后,莱瑟姆开始在TikTok上发布自己的型男心得,以激励有过同样遭遇的男孩们。他的视频经常以“这会让你变丑”、“不要毁了你的皮肤”、“如何让鼻子显小”这种话术为题。他发布的这些“型男心得”在网上火得一塌糊涂,而且热度一直维持到现在。到目前为止,他在TikTok上发步的短视频已经获得了近9800万个赞和10亿次浏览。莱瑟姆现在已经在带货自己的发胶品牌了。他表示,他每个月可以从平台上获得6位数的视频播放和带货收入。因此他决定放弃大学学业,转而做一名全职网红。

莱瑟姆的爆火,与欧美国家时下流行的一种“男神养成”(looksmaxxing)潮流有关。它大概是一种男版的容貌焦虑,要求男生们要通过严格的健身、护肤和护发程序,来让自己显得阳刚和有魅力。这类主播最底限的要求,是男生起码把脸洗干净。而有些极端的博主会让男生定期捶打自己的下巴,以诱发轻微骨折,还有的甚至会建议男生整容或者服用类固醇。而在算法的推荐下,这些内容很容易在网上得到大范围传播。

《财富》采访的一些心理学家对这种现象表示了担忧。他们认为,这些网络上的建议和批评会给青少年带来很大的不良影响,使青少年对自己的容貌和吸引力产生负面评价。

纽约西奈山伊坎医学院希尔德布兰特实验室的创始人和负责人汤姆·希尔德布兰特研究厌食症已有20年了。他认为:“从心理上看,这种负面评价会损害人的自我感。比如,我得到的负反馈越多,我就会越焦虑,然后我就会用更多的时间、精力甚至是金钱和资源,来放弃我当前的身份,去追求另外一个身份'”。

莱瑟姆也表示,他发布的负面内容的浏览量和讨论热度远远超过正面内容。所以这位19岁的网红现在依然会继续贬低观众的长相,这样才能在TikTok的网店里卖出更多产品。

不过他并不认可批评者的意见,并表示人们应该多听听他的建议。他表示,他视频里的负面内容与正面内容是混杂在一起的。“人们会被负面的东西所吸引,因为很多人都缺乏安全感,所以你首先得用这种方式去吸引他们,然后才能帮助他们。”

这种负反馈循环也刺激了“男神经济”的繁荣。现在很多跟男颜养成相关的产品都卖得很火,比如有助于锻炼下颌线条的口香糖,男性护理用品以及男装等等。

还有一些移动APP称,他们可以给用户的长相打分,或者评估他们符不符合“男神”的标准。其中最火的一款APP叫做UMAX,它采用了来自OpenAI 的技术,可以根据男性的气质、下颌轮廓和颧骨等参数给付费用户的颜值打分。该APP的创始人、CEO布莱克·安德森今年只有23岁。他表示,尽管这款APP去年12月份才上线,但它的每月订阅收入已经达到了50万美元。不过这个数字目前还无法单独核实。

用户需要在UMAX上自行上传脸部照片,它的收费是每周3.99美元。它每周都会用户的颜值打分,满分是100分。而且它还会向用户提供“开始日常护肤”等小贴士来帮助用户提高颜值分数。虽然该APP称,只要用户推荐三位朋友注册,就可以免首周费用,但在《财富》的测试中,推荐好友注册并未获得它声称的免费权益。

据安德森称,UMAX的总下载量已超过700万次,在苹果应用商店的生活方式排行榜上排在第36位,排名甚至高于Zillow Rentals和TaskRabbit等生活服务应用。安德森还表示,该应用90%的用户是 16至45岁之间的男性。

他认为,UMAX之所以受到欢迎,主要归功于它在社交媒体上的影响力。很多短视频用户发视频谈自己的“男神养成”之旅时,经常把UMAX的截图放在视频里。他表示,UMAX已经在所有社交媒体平台上获得了超过10亿次的展示。UMAX的竞争对手LooksMax AI颜值评分器也已跻身生活方式类应用的前100名之列。(但其开发者并未回应《财富》的采访请求)。

安德森说表示:“总的来看,社交媒体是最伟大的广告渠道。”他希望打造一个“体现男性自我提升”的品牌。“最热门的短视频就是养成系的短视频。‘我以前长这样,可有痤疮,可能长得也不好看,或者也没有打理自己。这是我现在的样子!’而UMAX评分有助于量化这种变化。”

至有批评者认为,UMAX可能会使用户产生消极的自我认知,安德森表示:“我们永远不希望容貌焦虑影响大家的心理健康……如果我们只是告诉大家百分百地爱自己,你没有任何需要努力的地方,这也是一种危险的心态……自我完善是极其重要的,它会在人的一生中给你带来红利。”

“男神经济”火爆的另一个原因,是TikTok网店的崛起。

“男神养成系”网红莱瑟姆表示,对于他的护发品牌来说,TikTok网店是一个让他“钱赚疯了”的平台。“因为你现在可以一边看视频,一边直接购买产品。”他的品牌在TikTok网店上的成功,是让他决定放弃大学学业,走专业网红路线的一个重要原因。

TikTok并未回应《财富》的置评请求。

由于TikTok的算法推送机制,希尔德布兰特对这些负面内容的影响深感忧虑。他认为,这可能会导致人们对男性的外表产生畸形审美。这种现象在上世纪80年代施瓦辛格刚刚走红的时候就出现了。随着社交媒体的兴起,这种畸形审美变得更加隐蔽化。人们可能会花大量时间在网上观看或者消费与美容和健身有关的内容。当然从表面看来,现在所有人每天都会刷上几个小时的手机。

对于UMAX以及莱瑟姆的护发产品的火爆,希尔德布兰特并未感到意外。因为“男神经济”利用了男性的容貌焦虑,而资本已经靠刺激女性的容貌焦虑赚了几万亿美元的化妆品和保健品了。“这些主播和产品的生产厂家发现,男性和女性一样容易受到负反馈的影响……只要你能让人对自己的身份产生不安全感,他们就愿意为此一掷千金,来寻求解决方案。”

虽然TikTok已经对网上商城里的减肥药问题进行了打击,但心理学家表示,TikTok的网上商城里仍然有一些有问题的内容存在。如果你在TikTok网上商城里搜索“looksmax”,就会出现一条信息写着“你比你的体重更重要”。这条信息还配有一幅画面,画中是一个卡通小人抱着一颗爱心,以及一个点击选项,上面写着:“如果你或你认识的人有关于身材、包含或者运动方面的问题,请注意,你是可以获得帮助的,你不是一个人在战斗。”然后,用户就可以通过链接,进入TikTok自己的进食障碍资源中心和一个域名为“nationaleatingdisorders.org”的网站。但如果你不点击,而是滚动页面的话,这条信息就会消失。

但是Meta旗下的Instagram和Facebook、谷歌旗下的YouTube,以及Snapchat等热门社交应用则无此类推广消息。

CNN和参议员理查德·布卢门撒尔都曾于2021年指出,Instagram存在向青少年宣传与厌食症有关的内容的问题,它专门有一个页面告诉用户,出现这种问题后应该找朋友寻求帮助。Meta公司的发言人拒绝就此事发表评论,不过他向《财富》强调了Meta在自杀、自残和厌食等问题上的政策。

Meta表示,该公司表示会删除平台上“任何有关鼓励自杀、自残或厌食的内容”,但它“允许人们讨论这些话题,因为我们希望我们的服务成为人们交流经验、提高对这些问题的认识并且相互帮助的空间。”

Meta表示,它已经在自杀、自残、厌食以及身体形象相关的搜索结果页中添加了弹出窗口,为用户提供与相关组织联系的建议和方法,但在与“男神养成”“男颜”相关的搜索中却没有这样的警告。《财富》在Instagram上搜索关键词“looksmax”,发现一段视频,视频博主拥有好看的下巴,但他声称,他是通过用锤子敲打自己的脸部,才把下巴弄成这个样子的(这种做法被称为 “砸骨”)。这个博主还在视频中向用户做了示范,不过同时他也警告了这么做的危险性。

Snapchat也不向用户提供有关厌食症的信息。Snapchat的发言人拒绝围绕本文内容发表评论。他建议《财富》查阅关于其算法推荐机制的的帖子。他还指出,Snapcha禁止宣传鼓吹自残、自杀和厌食的内容。尽管有这样的规定,《财富》还是在Snapchat的#looksmax 标签下发现了一些宣传自残和暴力的帖子。其中一段视频以男神范儿的自拍开头,后面出现“当她说,我要跟我的新朋友开派对”时,画面突然变成了一连串的人拿着突击步枪开火的镜头。该视频的标题是“我要去参加派对”。

针对YouTube上的“男神养成”相关内容,YouTube的一位发言人告诉《财富》:“YouTube针对面向低龄和青少年观众制定了额外的保障机制,而且这些措施是在咨询儿童发展专家后制定的”。该发言人还向我们分享了相关保障措施的链接,并表示YouTube会“限制重复推荐关于攀比身体特征、描述理想化的健身水平或者理想体重等相关内容”,并指出,YouTube有相关政策来删除“易被模仿的”厌食内容。

上面提到的这几家社交媒体公司,因其推荐算法和功能容易让人上瘾,进而引发青少年心理健康危机,而已经受到了联邦和州两级政府的严格审查。这些平台最被诟病的原因之一,就是它们容易导致用户产生畸形审美,尤其是对年轻女性的身体产生畸形审美。

但是随着“男神养成”的走红,年轻男性用户也很有可能受到畸形审美的负面影响。

塞拉·列维利是纽约市一位治疗饮食失调和饮食紊乱问题的临床心理学家。在她2007年刚开始执业时,她的患者大多是女性,包括年轻女孩。但是在过去10年里,随着社交媒体的兴起,她的病人已经是男女各占一半。她表示:“对于男性来说,现在的社会变得越来越可怕了,就像长期以来的女性一样。”

而一些全国性的报告也表明,随着社交媒体的兴起,美国男性患饮食失调症的比例有所增加。

纽约心理学家莎拉·戴维斯长期研究儿童饮食失调问题。她注意到,一些患者在治疗过程中,会进行用舌头舔上牙关的练习,据他们说,这样可以练出完美的下颌线。戴维斯把这个问题归咎于社交媒体,因为她的病人“越来越年轻了”,甚至最小的病人只有9岁。

戴维斯表示:“我们都想被爱、被接受。所以人们会想,如果我长成某种样子就能被爱、被接受,那么我就应该砸钱干这件事。”(财富中文网)

译者:朴成奎

After Dillon Latham’s girlfriend dumped him during their junior year of high school, the then-17-year-old decided to invest in his appearance. He began spending hours daily in the gym, applying homemade skincare concoctions to his face like beef tallow moisturizer, and permed his hair to give it a tousled mop look. He says he felt and looked better.

Soon, Latham started posting tips on TikTok to inspire teen boys in similar situations. His videos are captioned with language like “this is making you ugly,” “stop ruining your skin,” and “get a smaller nose.” The makeover advice went, and continues to go, viral. To date, his TikTok clips have nearly 98 million likes and 1 billion views across social media. Latham, who is now selling his own brand of hairspray, says he’s making six-figures in revenue monthly from sales and social media, leading him to skip college and be a full-time influencer.

Latham’s videos are part of a trend called “looksmaxxing” that capitalizes on mostly boys’ insecurities, and tells them they can become attractive and masculine by toning their faces and bodies via rigid fitness, skincare, and hair care routines. In its mildest form, looksmax social media creators tell teen boys to wash their faces; in its most extreme, they tell boys to regularly pummel their jaws to induce micro fractures, get surgery, and take steroids. Social media algorithms tend to amplify this content.

Psychologists interviewed by Fortune expressed concern about the trend. They assailed the potentially devastating effects of the online advice and criticism that makes those seeking it feel inadequate and unattractive.

“Psychologically, it’s essentially an erosion of the sense of self,” says Tom Hildebrandt, a clinical psychologist who has studied eating disorders for 20 years as the chief and founder of the Hildebrandt Laboratory at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, in New York City. “It’s like, ‘The more I get feedback that I’m not good enough, the more I consume it. And then, I trade my attention, my time and sometimes my money and resources to give up my current identity in pursuit of this other one.’”

Latham, too, says the negative content he posts attracts far more views and engagement than positive stuff. So the now 19-year-old continues to insult the appearances of his viewers, and in turn, sell more products, mostly via TikTok Shop.

He dismisses the critics, saying they should listen more closely to his advice. The negativity in his videos is mixed with positive messages, he argues. “People are really attracted to negative things because so many guys are insecure—so you pull them in with that in a way, and then try to help them.”

This negative feedback loop has also spurred a burgeoning looksmaxxing economy, including chewing gum meant to help with jaw exercises, personal care products, and clothing.

Meanwhile, a number of apps claim to evaluate the looks of users and their success in following the looksmaxxing message. The most popular app is UMAX – Become Hot. Powered partly by OpenAI’s technology, UMAX rates paying users’ faces on masculinity, their jawlines, and cheekbones, among other attributes. Though it launched in December, the app is already raking in about $500,000 in subscription revenue monthly, according to Blake Anderson, the app’s 23-year-old founder and CEO. The amount could not be independently verified.

UMAX, which relies on users uploading headshot photos, costs $3.99 weekly. It scores users’ faces each week on a scale up to 100, and gives tips like “start a skincare routine” to increase their scores. Though the app says users can forgo the first weekly fee if they refer three friends, this feature didn’t work in Fortune’s test of the app.

UMAX has over 7 million total downloads, according to Anderson, and climbed to number 36 in the Apple App Store’s Lifestyle chart, which ranks apps by downloads, app usage and velocity of downloads. It ranked higher than the apps of Zillow Rentals and handyman service TaskRabbit. Anderson says 90% of users are males aged 16 to 45.

He credits UMAX’s popularity to its social media presence, helped by users who often show screenshots of UMAX’s app as a backdrop in their own social media videos in which they discuss their looksmaxxing journeys. He says UMAX has garnered over 1 billion impressions across all social media platforms. A UMAX competitor, LooksMax AI – Face Style Rater, is also among the top 100 lifestyle apps. (Its developer did not respond to Fortune’s interview request.)

“Social media, as a whole, is the greatest advertising channel to exist,” says Anderson, who wants to build a brand that “embodies male self improvement.” “The videos that tend to do really well are glow up videos: ‘This is me before—maybe I had acne or wasn’t as good looking, wasn’t taking care of myself—and now, this is me after.’ UMAX scores help to quantify that change.’”

In response to critics who say that UMAX may contribute to users’ negative self-perception, Anderson says: “We never want somebody to feel insecure to the point that it causes anxiety or significantly impacts their mental health…If we just tell everyone to just love who you are 100% and there’s never anything that needs any work—I think that’s a dangerous mindset…self-improvement is extremely important and pays dividends over the course of one’s life.”

Another reason for the growth of the looksmaxxing economy is TikTok Shop.

Looksmax influencer Latham calls it an “insanely profitable” platform for his haircare brand because “you can literally just buy a product on the same screen that you watch the video.” He says the success of his brand on TikTok Shop is a reason he decided to forgo college to focus on his social media creator career.

TikTok did not respond to Fortune’s request for comment.

Mount Sinai’s Hildebrandt is deeply worried about the potentially devastating effects of negative content delivered through an algorithm, as he believes this could cause widespread and often-undetected male body dysmorphia. This phenomenon, he says, gained traction during Arnold Schwarzenegger’s muscular rise to fame in the 1980s. With the rise of social media, the problem has been supercharged and harder to detect. Now, the disorder is often characterized by people spending excessive time consuming and thinking about online beauty and wellness content. On the surface, it’s largely indistinguishable from today’s norm of people scrolling on their phones for hours on end.

Hildebrandt is unsurprised that UMAX’s app and Latham’s hair care products have caught on. He believes the looksmaxxing economy takes advantage of men’s insecurities using methods that have minted female-focused cosmetics and wellness brands trillions of dollars. “The producers of [looksmaxxing] content and products are figuring out that men are just as vulnerable as women to that negative feedback…if you make anyone feel insecure about their identities, they are willing to throw money after a solution for that.”

TikTok has cracked down on weight loss content, though psychologists say problematic content very much still exists. A search for “looksmax” on the platform returns a banner saying “you are more than your weight.” The message is accompanied by a cartoon character hugging a heart and an option to click on a message that says: “If you or someone you know has questions about body image, food, or exercise — it is important to know that help is out there and you are not alone.” Users can follow links to TikTok’s own eating disorder resource center and nationaleatingdisorders.org. But once users begin to scroll, the banner disappears.

Meta-owned Instagram and Facebook, Google’s YouTube, and Snapchat have no such warnings on looksmaxxing content.

Instagram, which CNN and Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) said in 2021 promoted eating disorder content to teens, has a page about eating disorders that focuses on how users should approach friends about the problem. Facebook has a similar page. A Meta spokesperson declined to comment for this story, but pointed Fortune to its policy on suicide, self-injury and eating disorders.

Though the company says it removes “any content that encourages suicide, self-injury or eating disorders,” it allows “people to discuss these topics because we want our services to be a space where people can share their experiences, raise awareness about these issues, and seek support from one another.”

Meta says that it has added popup on searches related to suicide, self-harm, eating disorders or body image issues that gives users tips and ways to connect with relevant organizations, but it has no such warning on looksmax-related searches. When Fortune searched for “looksmax” on Instagram, it found a video of a user with a chiseled jaw who claimed to have obtained it by hitting his face with a hammer (a practice known as “bone smashing”). The video shows users how to do it, while warning of its dangers.

Snapchat provides users with no information about eating disorders. A spokesperson for the platform declined to comment for this article, directing Fortune to its guidelines about the kinds of posts its algorithm recommends, noting the company prohibits the promotion of self-injury, suicide and disordered eating content. Despite the rules, under the #looksmax hashtag on Snapchat, Fortune found a number of posts that promote self-harm and violence. One video that begins with a selfie video of looksmaxxer is captioned “when she says I’m going to party with my new friends,” followed by a sequence of people firing assault rifles. A caption on the clip then said “me after pulling up to that party.”

In response to looksmaxxing content on YouTube, a spokesperson for the platform told Fortune: “YouTube has extra safeguards in place for videos recommended to teens and younger viewers, developed in consultation with child development experts.” The spokesperson, who share a link to the safeguards, says the company “limits repeated recommendations of content that compares physical features and idealizes specific fitness levels or body weights over others,” noting it has policies to remove content about disordered eating behaviors that “can be easily imitated.”

Social media companies are already facing scrutiny from federal and state officials for allegedly causing a youth mental health crisis with their addictive algorithms and features. A key accusation in these lawsuits and initiatives is that social media platforms incite body dysmorphia in users, especially young females.

But looksmaxxing may be evidence that young male users are just as affected by body dysmorphia.

Sera Levelle, a clinical psychologist who treats eating disorders and disordered eating in New York City, says she now has an even split of male and female patients. When she started her practice in 2007, it was mostly women and girls. Levelle says that over the last 10 years—concurrent with the rise of social media—the gender makeup of her patients has reached parity. “Society is now getting equally horrible for men as it has been for women for a long time,” says Levelle.

Levelle’s anecdote is consistent with national reports that show that diagnosed male eating disorders have increased with social media’s rise.

Sarah Davis, also a psychologist in New York who is focused on children’s eating disorders, notes that a few patients have engaged in a looksmaxxing exercise during therapy sessions called mewing, a belief that touching one’s tongue to top of mouth through clenched teeth can spur a defined jawline. She blames social media as her patients get “younger and younger,” with the youngest being nine years old.

“We all want to be loved and accepted,” says Davis. “People think, ‘If I look a certain way, and I can throw money at that [to be loved and accepted,] then I’ll do it.”

财富中文网所刊载内容之知识产权为财富媒体知识产权有限公司及/或相关权利人专属所有或持有。未经许可,禁止进行转载、摘编、复制及建立镜像等任何使用。
0条Plus
精彩评论
评论

撰写或查看更多评论

请打开财富Plus APP

前往打开