2020年9月,随着贝努瓦·达吉维尔(玛丽丈夫)旗下的数据云公司Snowflake成功上市,达吉维尔夫妇一夜之间成为亿万富翁。在经历了这一人生改变时刻后,作为曾经的临终关怀护士,玛丽开始学习相关知识,了解如何尽快捐出这笔刚得到的财富。
她在硅谷家中接受美联社(The Associated Press)采访时说:“我们需要把过多的财富重新分配出去”。
虽然很多人认为捐出巨额财富并非易事,但达吉维尔并不这么想。她的建议是,别想那么多,先捐再说。
1889年,安德鲁·卡内基发表了一篇题为 《财富的福音》(The Gospel of Wealth)的文章,至少从那一年开始,美国的顶级富豪就开始不断敦促彼此捐出更多财富。卡内基在文章中写道,顶级富豪应在有生之年捐出自己的财富,而之所以要这么做,部分是为了减轻不平等问题日益严重所带来的痛苦。
一个由顾问、慈善项目和慈善捐赠工具组成的完整产业已经冉冉升起,在推动富豪们进行捐赠方面发挥着积极作用,从某种程度上说,比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会发起的“捐赠承诺”(Giving Pledge)对此功不可没。2010年,沃伦·巴菲特、比尔·盖茨和梅琳达·弗伦奇·盖茨邀请其他亿万富翁共同承诺,在有生之年或通过遗嘱捐出自己的一半财产。到目前为止,已有244位亿万富翁签署了该承诺书。
那么,是什么阻碍了顶级富豪们更快捐出更多财富呢?
阻碍富豪捐赠的因素有哪些?
慈善顾问表示,有些属于结构性因素,比如寻找合适的工具和顾问,有些则与情感或心理因素有关,比如要与家人协商或希望在同辈面前留下良好形象。
ideas42公司的首席创新官皮尤什·坦蒂亚说:“这就像一场巨大且完美的行为障碍风暴。”最近其为盖茨基金会资助完成的一份报告贡献了自己的力量,该报告对那些让富豪捐赠者打退堂鼓的因素进行了探讨。
皮尤什指出,普通捐赠者进行捐赠可能是为了回应朋友或家人的请求,而富豪捐赠者则不同,他们在选择捐赠对象方面花的心思要比普通人多得多。
他说:“我们可能会想,‘他可是个亿万富翁,怎么会在乎这区区十万块呢?只要15分钟他们就能把这笔钱赚回来’,但事实并非如此”。
他的建议是,富豪们可以把慈善事业看作投资组合,利用各种策略将不同风险水平的慈善项目以一众合理的方式组合在一起。这样就可以不那么看重单笔捐赠的结果,而更看重累积的效果了。
玛丽·达吉维尔说,通过与其他签署了“捐赠承诺”的人士交流,她受益匪浅,特别是那个敦促她捐赠了一笔一般运营赠款(意味着组织可以自己选择如何使用资金)的人。她相信,贴近社区的非营利组织最了解如何才能最大发挥这些资金的价值,并表示自己不担心这些组织会滥用善款。
她说:“当你身处这个位置上,有能力对财富进行重新分配时,要么你自己承担风险,要么让别人来承担。那你(在做慈善时)为什么不能承担一些风险呢?”
达吉维尔还认为,大家对捐赠者的愿望过于关注,对受助者的需求则关心不足。
麦肯齐·斯科特证明,捐赠也可以干净利落
相关顾问发现,捐赠者间私下开诚布公的谈话也能推进他们在慈善事业上更进一步。宾夕法尼亚大学“高影响力慈善事业中心”(Center for High Impact Philanthropy)还开办了一个学院,专门供富豪捐赠者、相关顾问和基金会负责人分批共同学习。
该中心的执行主任凯特·罗斯奎塔说,像麦肯齐·斯科特(MacKenzie Scott,作家,亚马逊创始人杰夫·贝索斯前妻,同时也是亿万富翁)这样的捐赠者用实际行动表明,做慈善也能干净利落,快速行动。
她说:“难道只有麦肯齐•斯科特能快速行动,其他所有的超高净值捐赠者都赶不上她吗?答案当然是否定的。”
但她也说,由于与政府支出或商业部门的投入相比,慈善捐款显得微不足道,捐赠者有时不知道如何才能让这些钱真正发挥作用。
盖茨基金会负责慈善伙伴关系的副主任卡拉•布拉德利说,从亿万富翁对慈善项目进行的严格审查可以看出,他们感觉自己肩负着沉重责任,必须尽可能用好自己的财富。
她说:“他们签承诺书时是真心实意地想要捐出自己的巨额财富。然后,由于忙于工作生活,这件事就搁置了。做慈善不是件容易的事,必须得有无限热情才能做好。”
推进捐赠事业发展的关键在于保持透明
耶鲁大学管理学院(Yale School of Management)市场营销教授德博拉·斯莫尔说,对亿万富翁进行实证研究也不是件容易的事。但她说,总的来说,当下的社会更看重匿名捐赠,认为匿名捐赠更为高尚,因为这么做可以证明捐赠者慷慨解囊并非为了得到社会的认可。
她说:“如果每个人都能公开做慈善,那么就能形成一种社会风气,让大家知道社会期望自己投身到慈善事业中来,这样无论是对慈善项目还是慈善事业整体来说都有好处。”
地产开发商Related Group创始人兼首席执行官豪尔赫·佩雷斯和他的妻子达琳早在2012年就加入了“捐赠承诺”。在接受美联社采访时,佩雷斯说,他经常与圈中好友谈论如何更快捐出更多财富。
他开玩笑说:“我觉得他们现在已经不想接我电话了。”
他还让自己的成年子女参与到了慈善事业之中,后者参与的大部分慈善工作通过迈阿密基金会开展。他说,为提高对潜在受助者的评估速度,其子女决定借助基金会的专业力量,而非自行成立慈善机构来推进相关工作。
早在加入“捐赠承诺”之前,佩雷斯夫妇已是迈阿密艺术界和奖学金的主要赞助者。2011年,这对夫妇将自己的艺术收藏捐给了当地的艺术博物馆,同时还捐赠了不少现金,总价值高达4000万美元。
佩雷斯说,他之所以要捐款,一是因为他认为当前非常不平等的社会不可持续,二是以为他想留下一笔遗产。
他说:“我一直在宣扬这样一种观点,即捐赠的目的其实非常自私。其一是会让你感觉很快乐。其二,尤其是在你将要生活的城市、州或国家进行捐赠,从长远来看,会使社会变得更加公平、美好和进步,还可能带来更多财富。”
美联社在非洲的新闻报道工作得到了比尔及梅林达·盖茨基金会的财务支持。(财富中文网)
译者:冯丰
审校:夏林
2020年9月,随着贝努瓦·达吉维尔(玛丽丈夫)旗下的数据云公司Snowflake成功上市,达吉维尔夫妇一夜之间成为亿万富翁。在经历了这一人生改变时刻后,作为曾经的临终关怀护士,玛丽开始学习相关知识,了解如何尽快捐出这笔刚得到的财富。
她在硅谷家中接受美联社(The Associated Press)采访时说:“我们需要把过多的财富重新分配出去”。
虽然很多人认为捐出巨额财富并非易事,但达吉维尔并不这么想。她的建议是,别想那么多,先捐再说。
1889年,安德鲁·卡内基发表了一篇题为 《财富的福音》(The Gospel of Wealth)的文章,至少从那一年开始,美国的顶级富豪就开始不断敦促彼此捐出更多财富。卡内基在文章中写道,顶级富豪应在有生之年捐出自己的财富,而之所以要这么做,部分是为了减轻不平等问题日益严重所带来的痛苦。
一个由顾问、慈善项目和慈善捐赠工具组成的完整产业已经冉冉升起,在推动富豪们进行捐赠方面发挥着积极作用,从某种程度上说,比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会发起的“捐赠承诺”(Giving Pledge)对此功不可没。2010年,沃伦·巴菲特、比尔·盖茨和梅琳达·弗伦奇·盖茨邀请其他亿万富翁共同承诺,在有生之年或通过遗嘱捐出自己的一半财产。到目前为止,已有244位亿万富翁签署了该承诺书。
那么,是什么阻碍了顶级富豪们更快捐出更多财富呢?
阻碍富豪捐赠的因素有哪些?
慈善顾问表示,有些属于结构性因素,比如寻找合适的工具和顾问,有些则与情感或心理因素有关,比如要与家人协商或希望在同辈面前留下良好形象。
ideas42公司的首席创新官皮尤什·坦蒂亚说:“这就像一场巨大且完美的行为障碍风暴。”最近其为盖茨基金会资助完成的一份报告贡献了自己的力量,该报告对那些让富豪捐赠者打退堂鼓的因素进行了探讨。
皮尤什指出,普通捐赠者进行捐赠可能是为了回应朋友或家人的请求,而富豪捐赠者则不同,他们在选择捐赠对象方面花的心思要比普通人多得多。
他说:“我们可能会想,‘他可是个亿万富翁,怎么会在乎这区区十万块呢?只要15分钟他们就能把这笔钱赚回来’,但事实并非如此”。
他的建议是,富豪们可以把慈善事业看作投资组合,利用各种策略将不同风险水平的慈善项目以一众合理的方式组合在一起。这样就可以不那么看重单笔捐赠的结果,而更看重累积的效果了。
玛丽·达吉维尔说,通过与其他签署了“捐赠承诺”的人士交流,她受益匪浅,特别是那个敦促她捐赠了一笔一般运营赠款(意味着组织可以自己选择如何使用资金)的人。她相信,贴近社区的非营利组织最了解如何才能最大发挥这些资金的价值,并表示自己不担心这些组织会滥用善款。
她说:“当你身处这个位置上,有能力对财富进行重新分配时,要么你自己承担风险,要么让别人来承担。那你(在做慈善时)为什么不能承担一些风险呢?”
达吉维尔还认为,大家对捐赠者的愿望过于关注,对受助者的需求则关心不足。
麦肯齐·斯科特证明,捐赠也可以干净利落
相关顾问发现,捐赠者间私下开诚布公的谈话也能推进他们在慈善事业上更进一步。宾夕法尼亚大学“高影响力慈善事业中心”(Center for High Impact Philanthropy)还开办了一个学院,专门供富豪捐赠者、相关顾问和基金会负责人分批共同学习。
该中心的执行主任凯特·罗斯奎塔说,像麦肯齐·斯科特(MacKenzie Scott,作家,亚马逊创始人杰夫·贝索斯前妻,同时也是亿万富翁)这样的捐赠者用实际行动表明,做慈善也能干净利落,快速行动。
她说:“难道只有麦肯齐•斯科特能快速行动,其他所有的超高净值捐赠者都赶不上她吗?答案当然是否定的。”
但她也说,由于与政府支出或商业部门的投入相比,慈善捐款显得微不足道,捐赠者有时不知道如何才能让这些钱真正发挥作用。
盖茨基金会负责慈善伙伴关系的副主任卡拉•布拉德利说,从亿万富翁对慈善项目进行的严格审查可以看出,他们感觉自己肩负着沉重责任,必须尽可能用好自己的财富。
她说:“他们签承诺书时是真心实意地想要捐出自己的巨额财富。然后,由于忙于工作生活,这件事就搁置了。做慈善不是件容易的事,必须得有无限热情才能做好。”
推进捐赠事业发展的关键在于保持透明
耶鲁大学管理学院(Yale School of Management)市场营销教授德博拉·斯莫尔说,对亿万富翁进行实证研究也不是件容易的事。但她说,总的来说,当下的社会更看重匿名捐赠,认为匿名捐赠更为高尚,因为这么做可以证明捐赠者慷慨解囊并非为了得到社会的认可。
她说:“如果每个人都能公开做慈善,那么就能形成一种社会风气,让大家知道社会期望自己投身到慈善事业中来,这样无论是对慈善项目还是慈善事业整体来说都有好处。”
地产开发商Related Group创始人兼首席执行官豪尔赫·佩雷斯和他的妻子达琳早在2012年就加入了“捐赠承诺”。在接受美联社采访时,佩雷斯说,他经常与圈中好友谈论如何更快捐出更多财富。
他开玩笑说:“我觉得他们现在已经不想接我电话了。”
他还让自己的成年子女参与到了慈善事业之中,后者参与的大部分慈善工作通过迈阿密基金会开展。他说,为提高对潜在受助者的评估速度,其子女决定借助基金会的专业力量,而非自行成立慈善机构来推进相关工作。
早在加入“捐赠承诺”之前,佩雷斯夫妇已是迈阿密艺术界和奖学金的主要赞助者。2011年,这对夫妇将自己的艺术收藏捐给了当地的艺术博物馆,同时还捐赠了不少现金,总价值高达4000万美元。
佩雷斯说,他之所以要捐款,一是因为他认为当前非常不平等的社会不可持续,二是以为他想留下一笔遗产。
他说:“我一直在宣扬这样一种观点,即捐赠的目的其实非常自私。其一是会让你感觉很快乐。其二,尤其是在你将要生活的城市、州或国家进行捐赠,从长远来看,会使社会变得更加公平、美好和进步,还可能带来更多财富。”
美联社在非洲的新闻报道工作得到了比尔及梅林达·盖茨基金会的财务支持。(财富中文网)
译者:冯丰
审校:夏林
Marie Dageville and her husband Benoit Dageville became billionaires overnight when his data cloud company, Snowflake, went public in September 2020. After that life changing moment, Marie, a former hospice nurse, then set out to learn how to urgently give away that new fortune.
“We need to redistribute what we have that is too much,” she said in an interview with The Associated Press from her home in Silicon Valley.
While many say giving away a lot of money is hard, that is not Dageville’s perspective. Her advice is to just get started.
America’s wealthiest people have urged each other to give away more of their money since at least 1889, the year Andrew Carnegie published an essay entitled, “The Gospel of Wealth.” He argued that the richest should give away their fortunes within their lifetimes, in part to lessen the sting of growing inequality.
A whole industry of advisers, courses and charitable giving vehicles has grown to help facilitate donations from the wealthy, to some extent prompted by the Giving Pledge, an initiative housed at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. In 2010, Warren Buffett, Bill Gates and Melinda French Gates invited other billionaires to promise to give away half of their fortunes in their lifetimes or in their wills. So far, 244 have signed on.
So, what stands in the way of the wealthiest people giving more and giving faster?
What stops billionaires from giving?
Philanthropy advisers say some answers are structural, like finding the right vehicles and advisers, and some have to do with emotional and psychological factors, like negotiating with family members or wanting to look good in the eyes of their peers.
“It’s like a massive, perfect storm of behavioral barriers,” said Piyush Tantia, chief innovation officer at ideas42, who recently contributed to a report funded by the Gates Foundation looking at what holds the wealthiest donors back.
He points out that unlike everyday donors, who may give in response to an ask from a friend or family member, the wealthiest donors end up deliberating much more about where to give.
“We might think, ‘It’s a billionaire. Who cares about a hundred grand? They make that back in the next 15 minutes’,” he said. “But it doesn’t feel like that.”
His advice is to think about philanthropy as a portfolio, with different risk levels and strategies ideally working in concert. That way it’s less about the outcome of any single grant and more about the cumulative impact.
Marie Dageville said she benefited from speaking with other people who had signed the Giving Pledge, especially one person who urged her to make general operating grants, meaning the organization can choose how to spend the funds themselves. She trusts nonprofits close to the communities they serve to know best how to spend the money and said she is not held back by a worry that they will misuse it.
“If you are in the position where you are at now — able to redistribute this fortune — either you took risks or someone took risks on you,” she said, adding. “So why can’t you take some risk (in your philanthropy)?”
Dageville also thinks there is too much focus on the wants of the donors, rather than the needs of the recipients.
MacKenzie Scott is proof funders can move fast
Private and open conversations between donors also help them move forward, advisers have found. The Center for High Impact Philanthropy at University of Pennsylvania runs an academy that convenes very wealthy donors, their advisers and the heads of foundations to learn together in cohorts.
Kat Rosqueta, the center’s executive director, said donors like MacKenzie Scott, the author and now billionaire ex-wife of Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, show it’s possible to move quickly.
“Do all the ultra high net worth funders have to go slower than MacKenzie Scott? No,” she said.
But she said, sometimes donors struggle with seeing how to make a difference, given that philanthropic funding is tiny compared to government spending or the business sector.
Cara Bradley, deputy director of philanthropic partnerships at the Gates Foundation, said the scrutiny of billionaire philanthropy also means they feel a huge responsibility to use their funds as best as possible.
“They’ve signed a pledge genuinely committed to trying to give away this tremendous amount of wealth. And then, people can get stuck because life gets busy. This is hard. Philanthropy is a real endeavor,” she said.
Transparency is key to encouraging giving
It is also not easy to conduct empirical research on billionaires, said Deborah Small, a marketing professor at Yale School of Management. But she said, in general, current social norms value anonymity in giving, which is seen as being more virtuous because the donor isn’t recognized for their generosity.
“It would be better for causes, and for philanthropy as a whole, if everybody was open about it because that would create the social norm that this is an expectation in society,” she said.
Jorge Pérez, founder and CEO of the real estate developer Related Group, along with his wife, Darlene, was early to join the Giving Pledge in 2012. In an interview with The Associated Press, Pérez said he frequently speaks with his peers about giving more and faster.
“I think people have stopped taking my calls,” he joked.
He also has engaged his adult children in their philanthropy, much of which they conduct through The Miami Foundation. He said they decided to draw on the expertise of the foundation, rather than starting their own organizations, to speed along the evaluation of potential grantees.
Even before the Pérezes joined the Giving Pledge, they were major supporters of the arts and of scholarships in Miami, where they are based. In 2011, the couple donated their art collection along with cash, together worth $40 million, to the art museum, which was renamed the Pérez Art Museum Miami after the gift.
Pérez said he gives because he thinks very unequal societies are not sustainable and because he wants to leave behind a legacy.
“I keep on selling the idea that you’re giving because of very selfish reasons,” he said. “One is it makes you feel good. But two, particularly in the city or the state or the country that you’re going to live in, in the long run, this is going to make a huge difference in making our society fairer, better and more progressive and probably lead to greater economic wealth.”
The Associated Press receives financial support for news coverage in Africa from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.