内燃机照常轰鸣
另一个方法是涡轮增压。根据霍尼韦尔交通系统部门(Honeywell Transportation Systems)的调查显示,全球销售的新车中有约25%配有涡轮增压,而且到2017年这个比例最终可能会达到40%。这种技术本身已有近100年的历史了,但汽车制造商正越来越多地采用这项技术。目前市场上有几款涡轮增压发动机就包括:福特的EcoBoost、马自达的Skyactiv、宝马的EfficientDynamics。涡轮增压利用汽车自身产生的废气来驱动泵轮,迫使更多空气进入气缸。压缩后的空气可以和更多压缩后的燃油(这里可以采用直喷技术)相混合,从而加大发动机的输出动力。 机械增压是一个成本更加昂贵、但与涡轮增压相类似的技术选择。机械增压器的作用基本上与涡轮增压器相同,但它不是借助汽车废气来驱动泵轮,而通常是由发动机的风扇皮带来带动。机械增压器的优势是,不必等待汽车排出废气来开始增压。机械增压更常用于提高汽车性能,而不是提高燃油经济性。 很大程度上,包括福特(除了一款高性能的野马汽车)在内的美国汽车制造商认为,机械增压技术过于昂贵,相对于在发动机输出功率方面实现的提高而言并不合算。这些公司大多转而选择涡轮增压技术。然而,一些汽车——比如大众1.4升TSI Twincharger 四缸发动机既有机械增压器,也有涡轮增压器。大众及其海外合资企业是在发动机里结合包括柴油动力在内的诸多节能技术的早期倡导者,以此来节能意识格外强烈的欧洲客户的需求。 其他越来越常见的做法包括(但不限于):在有任何移动部件的地方减少摩擦。十年前还非常罕见的可变气门正时技术现在几乎是普遍存在。本田(Honda)在推出VTEC系统时首创了这项技术,VTEC系统甚至形成了自己的技术基因。而宝马在这方面也取得了很大的进展,推出了Valvetronic系统。在配有Valvetronic系统的汽车里,一台电脑智能地精确校准进气孔与排气阀的开关时间,以此与车辆的速度和负载相匹配。 思迈汽车咨询公司(IHS Automotive)全球汽车动力总成系统与部件预测部门负责人埃里克•费德瓦表示,预计未来可变气门正时系统所带来的巨大收益会变得越来越精确。而且,预计还将会出现更多的混合动力电动发动机,支持传统内燃机。同时,汽车变速器将获得更多速度设置,以便发动机在最高效的情况下运作。费德瓦说,10年后:“发动机尺寸必须会大幅缩小,而同时输出功率很可能与目前相同、甚至更大。”过去,发动机技术改进的收益一直集中在输出功率方面。费德瓦在提到如今的汽车时说:“基本上等于是让消费者驾驶赛车发动机。”未来,发动机技术改进的重点将集中在提高燃油经济性方面。 所有这些创新所造成的影响是巨大的。根据密歇根大学交通研究所(the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute)进行的分析显示,自2007年以来,轻型车辆的燃油经济性已提高了18%,达到23.8英里/加仑。燃油经济性的改善部分归功于发动机更加智能化,以及在汽车节能方面的一系列其他增量型改善。这个增长的实质幅度并不巨大,但与1923年至2007年期间所有汽车的燃油经济性仅提高区区23%相比,这可谓是一个巨大的飞跃。 当然,世界各国在打破依赖汽油的习惯方面还有很长的一段路要走,而内燃机并不会改变这一点。《国际汽车工程》杂志(Automotive Engineering International)高级编辑林赛•布鲁克称,汽车制造商在研制仍能给汽车提供强大动力的小型发动机方面面临一个物理极限,而我们在大中型汽车方面已经达到这种极限,在其他类型汽车方面也非常接近这个极限了。在此之后,要想减少燃料消耗,美国将需要建造更多面向电动汽车的公共充电站,开发性能更加优良的电池,甚至或许要对内燃机产生一个新的看法(几家初创公司目前正在这方面努力。)但现在,似乎老式的内燃发动机还将会伴随我们很长一段时间——而这件事也许并不是那么糟糕。 译者:iDo98 |
Another method is turbocharging. According to Honeywell Transportation Systems, turbochargers were in about 25% of new cars sold globally, and could end up in 40% of cars as soon as 2017. The technology itself is nearly a century old, but automakers are increasingly embracing it. A few turbocharged engines: Ford's EcoBoost, Mazda's Skyactiv, BMW's EfficientDynamics. Turbocharging uses a car's own exhaust to power a pump that forces more air into the cylinders. That compressed air can mix with more compressed fuel (hello, direct injection), resulting in more power. Supercharging is a more expensive, but similar option. Superchargers do essentially the same thing as turbochargers, but instead of being powered by a vehicle's exhaust, they're mechanically driven, usually by the engine's fan belt. The supercharger's advantage is that there's no need to wait for exhaust to come out for the boost to kick in. The supercharger is more commonly used for performance rather than fuel economy. This has been largely deemed too pricey to justify the extra power by U.S. automakers, Ford included (except for one high-performance Mustang variant). These firms have largely opted for turbochargers instead. However, some vehicles -- like the Volkswagen 1.4-liter TSI Twincharger four-cylinder engine -- have both. Volkswagen and its overseas counterparts were early pioneers of combining efficiency technologies, including diesel power, in engines for hyper-fuel conscious European customers. Other increasingly common tactics include, but aren't limited to, reducing friction wherever there are moving parts. And variable valve timing, which was rare a decade ago and is now almost ubiquitous. Honda (HMC) pioneered the technology, with its VTEC system, which even got its own meme. And BMW has also made strides with its Valvetronic system. In cars equipped with the system, a computer intelligently times the opening and closing of air intake and exhaust valves to match a vehicle's speed and load. In the future, expect big gains from variable valve timing systems becoming more precise, says Eric Fedewa, director of IHS Inc.'s global powertrain and component forecasting. Also expect more hybrid electric engines to work as a support to traditional engines. At the same time, transmissions will get more speeds, in an effort to make engines operate at their most efficient. In 10 years: "engines will necessarily be a lot smaller and probably as powerful or more powerful than they are now," Fedewa says. In the past, gains have focused on power. "You've essentially got consumers driving race car engines," Fedewa says of today's cars. In the future, gains will focus on efficiency. The impact of all these innovations is substantial. According to analysis by the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, fuel economy for light-duty vehicles has improved 18% since 2007, to 23.8 miles per gallon. Part of the credit for those gains goes to smarter engines, along with a host of other incremental improvements in vehicle efficiency. The increase isn't huge in real terms, but it's a giant leap compared with the scant 23% gain in the fuel economy of all vehicles between 1923 and 2007. Of course, the world is still a long way from breaking its gasoline habit, and internal combustion won't change that. There's a physical limit to how small an automaker can make an engine and have it still power a car, and we've already hit it in large and midrange vehicles, says Automotive Engineering International senior editor Lindsay Brooke, and we're close in other classes. After that, to reduce fuel consumption the country will need more public chargers for electric cars, better batteries, and maybe even a new take on internal combustion. (Several startups are working on it.) But for now, it looks like the old-fashioned engine will be with us for a long time still -- and that might not be so bad. |