如果你旁听任何企业的在线会议,无论是零售、电信还是金融行业,你都很有可能听到:“我们要成为一家科技公司。”但这意味着什么?
首先,你要清楚这不意味着以下这些事情:正如金钱买不到幸福一样,这并不能把一家公司变成精通技术的明星企业。投资是必要的,但远远不够:并非所有的技术项目都有回报。成为技术的早期采用者也没有多大意义;事实上,如果投资仅限于科技领域,这可能会成为一个资金坑。
成为一家真正的科技公司意味着以提高利润和绩效的方式部署技术。为了实现这一点,组织通常需要搭建自己的技术,而不只是做出正确的购买决策。在竞争优势受到威胁的领域,技术的最大好处在于能够帮你打造独特的能力。这可能意味着从头开始构建某些东西,或者意味着把不同的组成部分整合起来,形成真正能帮助到公司的特别的解决方案。这是麦肯锡近十年来研究了数百家真正的数字领袖企业后得出的结论。以下这个统计数据很有说服力:70%的数字领袖企业推出了自己特有的软件来推动运营。
要想真正成为一家科技公司,还有四大原则尤为重要。
科技公司的四大配方
首先,也是最重要的,业务和技术团队需要很好地合作,将技术嵌入公司运营和文化中。现代数字/人工智能文化与20世纪的信息技术(IT)文化之间存在很大差异。这种差异可以用一个词来概括:“需求”。
在IT文化中,业务团队将需求提交给技术团队;业务和技术都很重要,但各自独立运作,技术人员被视为支持者。而在成功的数字/人工智能公司中,业务和技术团队被视为同等重要。大家不会为了一次性的项目来回传递需求文档,而是持续地共同解决问题。在我们2023年出版的《重新布线:麦肯锡在数字和人工智能时代的竞争指南》(Rewired: The McKinsey guide to outcompeting in the age of digital and AI)一书中,我和我的合著者发现,在我们基准测试的50家银行中,只有25%的银行将数字投资转化为重大价值。让这些银行与众不同的不是他们花了多少钱,也不在于他们选择了何种技术架构,而在于业务和技术团队之间的紧密合作。
第二,速度很重要。正在成为科技公司的企业迭代速度越来越快。他们在几周内完成产品发布和更新周期,而不是花费几个月。他们以敏捷的短冲刺周期工作。为了实现这个目标,他们不只从硅谷招聘了很酷的年轻人和改变着装要求,还非常重新培训和提高员工技能,以创造持久的影响力,通过为数字人才铺设技术职业阶梯,使技术人员可以向其他技术人员学习。至关重要的是,他们对外包的依赖程度较低。他们的技术主管是实干家,而不是供应商经理。
第三,科技公司积极率先采用、并规模化应用新技术。他们深入研究了如何转变业务领域。认真思考哪些激励措施能鼓励业务团队共同开展技术项目。如果公司以正确的心态对待,他们可以在最传统的行业和一些最不显眼的地方打造出优异的技术团队。
最后,从高层至下的领导力至关重要。首席执行官们不仅需要了解技术能如何重塑他们的业务,还要了解如何改变公司,以便更好地利用技术。他们要抵制“一次结束所有任务”的诱惑,专注于最重要的领域。要想像一家真正的科技公司那样运作,领导者就要去提出难以回答的问题:哪些业务领域最适合技术转型?公司如何吸引所需的人才?技术人才路线图是否与技术扩展路线图一样详细?有多少高层领导自认为有技术能力?公司如何利用其数据创造竞争优势?
Gen AI带来新的压力
随着生成式人工智能(gen-AI)出现,成为一家科技公司变得更加紧迫和复杂。生成式人工智能之所以如此困难,是因为它看起来如此简单。几乎任何人都能借助人工智能成为一个优秀飞行员,但把这件事变成一个强大的、可重复的、安全的和可扩展的业务要困难得多。
大多数公司都明白这一点。超过半数的人表示,他们计划通过提高技能、重新培训和重新部署人才,在内部打造新一代人工智能能力。2023年,尽管科技投资整体下降,但对人工智能的支出增长了七倍。然而在今年早些时候针对近900家公司的一项调查中,只有不到5%的公司表示,人工智能对其组织息税前利润的贡献超过10%。
虽然第二代人工智能是全新而且令人兴奋的,但我们不能忘掉早期的转型教训:采用新技术这件事本身并不能创造价值。竞争优势来自于建立独特的组织能力,使公司能够大规模创新、部署和改进技术解决方案。仅仅采用现成的人工智能工具可能还不够,因为毕竟竞争对手也可以这样做。
简而言之,真正的技术领袖打造自己的专业知识,并在这个过程中确保公司会进行技术投资。
这篇评论文章来自财富全球论坛知识合作伙伴之一——麦肯锡公司。罗德尼·泽梅尔(Rodney Zemmel)是麦肯锡高级合伙人。(财富中文网)
译者:乐云起
如果你旁听任何企业的在线会议,无论是零售、电信还是金融行业,你都很有可能听到:“我们要成为一家科技公司。”但这意味着什么?
首先,你要清楚这不意味着以下这些事情:正如金钱买不到幸福一样,这并不能把一家公司变成精通技术的明星企业。投资是必要的,但远远不够:并非所有的技术项目都有回报。成为技术的早期采用者也没有多大意义;事实上,如果投资仅限于科技领域,这可能会成为一个资金坑。
成为一家真正的科技公司意味着以提高利润和绩效的方式部署技术。为了实现这一点,组织通常需要搭建自己的技术,而不只是做出正确的购买决策。在竞争优势受到威胁的领域,技术的最大好处在于能够帮你打造独特的能力。这可能意味着从头开始构建某些东西,或者意味着把不同的组成部分整合起来,形成真正能帮助到公司的特别的解决方案。这是麦肯锡近十年来研究了数百家真正的数字领袖企业后得出的结论。以下这个统计数据很有说服力:70%的数字领袖企业推出了自己特有的软件来推动运营。
要想真正成为一家科技公司,还有四大原则尤为重要。
科技公司的四大配方
首先,也是最重要的,业务和技术团队需要很好地合作,将技术嵌入公司运营和文化中。现代数字/人工智能文化与20世纪的信息技术(IT)文化之间存在很大差异。这种差异可以用一个词来概括:“需求”。
在IT文化中,业务团队将需求提交给技术团队;业务和技术都很重要,但各自独立运作,技术人员被视为支持者。而在成功的数字/人工智能公司中,业务和技术团队被视为同等重要。大家不会为了一次性的项目来回传递需求文档,而是持续地共同解决问题。在我们2023年出版的《重新布线:麦肯锡在数字和人工智能时代的竞争指南》(Rewired: The McKinsey guide to outcompeting in the age of digital and AI)一书中,我和我的合著者发现,在我们基准测试的50家银行中,只有25%的银行将数字投资转化为重大价值。让这些银行与众不同的不是他们花了多少钱,也不在于他们选择了何种技术架构,而在于业务和技术团队之间的紧密合作。
第二,速度很重要。正在成为科技公司的企业迭代速度越来越快。他们在几周内完成产品发布和更新周期,而不是花费几个月。他们以敏捷的短冲刺周期工作。为了实现这个目标,他们不只从硅谷招聘了很酷的年轻人和改变着装要求,还非常重新培训和提高员工技能,以创造持久的影响力,通过为数字人才铺设技术职业阶梯,使技术人员可以向其他技术人员学习。至关重要的是,他们对外包的依赖程度较低。他们的技术主管是实干家,而不是供应商经理。
第三,科技公司积极率先采用、并规模化应用新技术。他们深入研究了如何转变业务领域。认真思考哪些激励措施能鼓励业务团队共同开展技术项目。如果公司以正确的心态对待,他们可以在最传统的行业和一些最不显眼的地方打造出优异的技术团队。
最后,从高层至下的领导力至关重要。首席执行官们不仅需要了解技术能如何重塑他们的业务,还要了解如何改变公司,以便更好地利用技术。他们要抵制“一次结束所有任务”的诱惑,专注于最重要的领域。要想像一家真正的科技公司那样运作,领导者就要去提出难以回答的问题:哪些业务领域最适合技术转型?公司如何吸引所需的人才?技术人才路线图是否与技术扩展路线图一样详细?有多少高层领导自认为有技术能力?公司如何利用其数据创造竞争优势?
Gen AI带来新的压力
随着生成式人工智能(gen-AI)出现,成为一家科技公司变得更加紧迫和复杂。生成式人工智能之所以如此困难,是因为它看起来如此简单。几乎任何人都能借助人工智能成为一个优秀飞行员,但把这件事变成一个强大的、可重复的、安全的和可扩展的业务要困难得多。
大多数公司都明白这一点。超过半数的人表示,他们计划通过提高技能、重新培训和重新部署人才,在内部打造新一代人工智能能力。2023年,尽管科技投资整体下降,但对人工智能的支出增长了七倍。然而在今年早些时候针对近900家公司的一项调查中,只有不到5%的公司表示,人工智能对其组织息税前利润的贡献超过10%。
虽然第二代人工智能是全新而且令人兴奋的,但我们不能忘掉早期的转型教训:采用新技术这件事本身并不能创造价值。竞争优势来自于建立独特的组织能力,使公司能够大规模创新、部署和改进技术解决方案。仅仅采用现成的人工智能工具可能还不够,因为毕竟竞争对手也可以这样做。
简而言之,真正的技术领袖打造自己的专业知识,并在这个过程中确保公司会进行技术投资。
这篇评论文章来自财富全球论坛知识合作伙伴之一——麦肯锡公司。罗德尼·泽梅尔(Rodney Zemmel)是麦肯锡高级合伙人。(财富中文网)
译者:乐云起
Listen in to any corporate conference call, whether the company is in retail or telecoms or finance, and there’s a good chance you will hear: “We need to be a tech company.” But what does that mean?
For a start, here is what it does not mean. Just as money cannot buy happiness, it cannot turn a company into a tech-savvy star. Investment is necessary but far from sufficient: Not all tech initiatives pay off. Nor does being an early adopter mean much; indeed, that can become a money pit if the investments are in tech alone.
Here is what becoming a true tech company does mean: deploying tech in a way that boosts profits and performance. For that to happen, organizations often need to build their own technology, not just make good choices about what to buy. In domains where competitive advantage is at stake, the greatest benefit comes from building unique capabilities. This can mean creating something from scratch or assembling something new from components that work specifically for the company. That is the conclusion of nearly a decade of McKinsey research into hundreds of companies that are true digital leaders. Here is one telling statistic: 70% of the digital leaders created their own software to drive operations.
What else matters in terms of truly becoming a tech company? Four principles stand out.
The 4 ingredients to a tech company
First, and most important, business and technology teams need to work well together, with technology embedded in company operations and culture. There is a big difference between a modern digital/AI culture versus the 20th century information technology (IT) culture. That difference can be summed up in one word: “requirements.”
In an IT culture, the business team hands off requirements to the technology team; both are important but operate separately, and the technologists are seen as support. At successful digital/AI companies, on the other hand, business and technology teams are seen as equal in importance. Rather than passing requirements documents back and forth for one-off projects, they own problems together and on an ongoing basis. In our 2023 book, Rewired: The McKinsey guide to outcompeting in the age of digital and AI, my co-authors and I found that of the 50 banks we benchmarked, only 25% had turned their digital investments into significant value. What set these banks apart was not how much they spent or what technology architecture they chose, but how well business and technology teams worked together.
Second, speed counts. Companies that are on the way to becoming tech companies iterate faster and faster. They complete the product release and update cycle in weeks, rather than months. They work in agile, short-sprint cycles. To make this happen, they don’t just hire cool kids from Silicon Valley and change the dress code. Instead, they reskill and upskill their workforces to create lasting impact, creating technology career ladders for their digital talent, so that technologists can learn from other technologists. Critically, they are less dependent on outsourcing. Their technology executives are doers, not vendor managers.
Third, tech companies adopt and scale well. They dig into how a business domain can be transformed. They think hard about what incentives can encourage business teams to co-own tech initiatives. Companies can build amazing technology teams in the most traditional industries and some of the least obvious locations if they approach it with the right mindset.
Finally, leadership is critical and starts from the top. CEOs need to understand not only how technology could reinvent their business, but how to change their company to harness technology. They resist the “everything all at once” temptation to focus on the most important domains. Determining whether their organization is functioning as a true tech company requires leaders to ask difficult questions. Which business domains are best positioned for technological transformation? How can the company attract the talent it needs? Is the tech talent road map as detailed as the road map for scaling technology? How many senior leaders would self-identify as tech capable? How can the company use its data to create competitive advantage?
Gen AI adds new pressure
With the advent of generative artificial intelligence (gen AI), becoming a tech company is even more urgent—and complicated. What makes gen AI so hard is that it can look so easy. Almost anyone can fire up an impressive looking pilot, but turning that into a robust, repeatable, safe, and scaled business impact is much more difficult.
Most companies understand that. More than half say they plan to build their gen AI capabilities internally, through upskilling, reskilling, and redeploying talent. And spending on gen AI rose sevenfold in 2023, even though tech investment as a whole fell. Nevertheless, in a survey of almost 900 companies done earlier this year, fewer than 5% said that gen AI was contributing more than 10% of their organizations’ EBIT.
While gen AI is new and exciting, the lesson from earlier transformations remains relevant: technology adoption for its own sake doesn’t create value. Competitive advantage comes from building unique organizational capabilities that enable companies to innovate, deploy, and improve technological solutions at scale. Simply adopting off-the-shelf gen AI tools will likely not be enough: after all, the competition can do the same.
In short, true tech leaders build their own expertise, and in doing so, ensure that their tech investments show up on the bottom line.
This commentary is from McKinsey & Company, a Fortune Global Forum Knowledge Partner. Rodney Zemmel is a senior partner.