现在堪称当中层管理者更糟糕的时机。中层管理者不仅是企业效率低下的典型代表,从《呆伯特》(Dilbert)到《办公室》(The Office)等流行文化经典中取笑的对象,在裁员时还要首当其冲。而且现在,中层管理者正面临更严峻的挑战。
在办公室发展的新趋势中,企业要优先考虑员工体验,中层管理者的任务是确保员工有参与感、获得支持,工作与生活维持良好平衡。高管制定办公室政策,中层管理者则要执行不那么受欢迎的规定和监督各式各样的工作安排。
然而,企业并未认识到很明显却经常被忽视的事实:中层管理者其实也是员工。而且是必不可少的一群。
自从O.C. Tanner开始评估敬业程度和文化情绪以来,管理者与个人贡献者相比对公司文化的情绪一直更积极。今年,情况有些变化。
反映20个国家36,000多名员工和管理者意见的《2023年全球文化报告》(2023 Global Culture Report)显示,管理者正陷于严重的困境。由于获得认可不足和责任倍增等因素,管理者的工作体验远不如报告中积极。事实上,管理者表示“为工作已经用尽全力”的几率增加了26%。
未来论坛(Future Forum)最近发布的一份报告为相关发现提供了佐证,而且揭示出情绪和经历得分最低的是中层管理者。
管理者通常会将挣扎自我消化,认为在责任不断升级的过程里保持坚强也是工作的一部分。但中层管理者的倦怠确实存在,而且会造成麻烦。
责任多多
研究中,约三分之二的管理者(61%)报告说,现在的工作责任比新冠疫情前更多,三分之一的个人(34%)认同这一说法。在责任增加的管理者里,严重焦虑的几率增加了21%。焦虑则与倦怠率增加六倍相关性。
企业重要的减震器——中层管理者处境特别困难。他们无法像高层管理者一样获得支持和资源优势,必须执行自己都不一定不认可的政策。与高层管理者相比,中、低层管理者感到被赏识的可能性分别降低了33%和47%。他们也比高层管理者更可能认同一点,即自2020年以来,指导员工、与员工有效沟通并向员工提供创新自由变得愈发困难。
为缓解中层管理者的倦怠情绪,公司不能只注重员工体验,也要延伸到架构更高层。以下是具体做法。
创建社区
当管理者觉得跟团队联系紧密时,企业文化蓬勃发展的可能性会增加18倍。管理者之间的联系也会更加紧密。
一家在50多个国家设有分支机构的欧洲零售银行推出了一项认证程序,以提高管理人员的技能并加强管理社区意识。管理者参与建立信任和协调团队等主题的研讨会后可以获得分数,也能够加强相关能力和人际关系。
让中层管理者参与决策
管理者参与制定(而不仅是实施)计划、政策和项目时,支持的可能性更高。
位于北美的一家会计和专业服务公司希望员工和管理者都感到更有价值。推出新的在线奖励计划之前,公司邀请管理者体验计划并提供反馈。这一额外举措回报明显,管理者的参与度提高了10%。
将认可与薪资分开
管理者通常不愿意承认自己需要认可,三分之一(37%)的人声称薪水满意即可,获得认可没有那么必要。但我们的研究强烈显示出相反的结果,即赞赏可以将管理者的焦虑情绪降低67%。
管理者加薪并不能够弥补缺乏赞赏的负面效果。与金钱无关的赞赏必不可少。研究表明,只要赞赏发自个人内心、足够真诚,而且与努力或成就密切相关,就可以产生持久的影响。中层管理者经常要承认团队成员的独特贡献,他们自己也理应获得真诚的认可。
为“现代管理者”赋权
自2020年以来,中、低层管理者在践行“现代领导力”方面比高层管理者更为艰难,现代领导力更强调协作和民主化,从长远来看能够大大减少管理者的工作量。
现代领导力需要新技能和新技巧。随着时间推移,定向支持可以获得巨大收益。
管理者薪水更高并不意味着要减少人性化的一面。如果说以前担任中层管理者比较轻松,现在情况已然不同。优先考虑员工体验的公司才更有机会发展壮大。毕竟,中层管理者本质上也是员工。(财富中文网)
加里·贝克斯特兰德(Gary Beckstrand)是O.C. Tanner Institute的副总裁。
Fortune.com上发表的评论文章中表达的观点,仅代表作者本人的观点,不代表《财富》杂志的观点和立场。
译者:夏林
现在堪称当中层管理者更糟糕的时机。中层管理者不仅是企业效率低下的典型代表,从《呆伯特》(Dilbert)到《办公室》(The Office)等流行文化经典中取笑的对象,在裁员时还要首当其冲。而且现在,中层管理者正面临更严峻的挑战。
在办公室发展的新趋势中,企业要优先考虑员工体验,中层管理者的任务是确保员工有参与感、获得支持,工作与生活维持良好平衡。高管制定办公室政策,中层管理者则要执行不那么受欢迎的规定和监督各式各样的工作安排。
然而,企业并未认识到很明显却经常被忽视的事实:中层管理者其实也是员工。而且是必不可少的一群。
自从O.C. Tanner开始评估敬业程度和文化情绪以来,管理者与个人贡献者相比对公司文化的情绪一直更积极。今年,情况有些变化。
反映20个国家36,000多名员工和管理者意见的《2023年全球文化报告》(2023 Global Culture Report)显示,管理者正陷于严重的困境。由于获得认可不足和责任倍增等因素,管理者的工作体验远不如报告中积极。事实上,管理者表示“为工作已经用尽全力”的几率增加了26%。
未来论坛(Future Forum)最近发布的一份报告为相关发现提供了佐证,而且揭示出情绪和经历得分最低的是中层管理者。
管理者通常会将挣扎自我消化,认为在责任不断升级的过程里保持坚强也是工作的一部分。但中层管理者的倦怠确实存在,而且会造成麻烦。
责任多多
研究中,约三分之二的管理者(61%)报告说,现在的工作责任比新冠疫情前更多,三分之一的个人(34%)认同这一说法。在责任增加的管理者里,严重焦虑的几率增加了21%。焦虑则与倦怠率增加六倍相关性。
企业重要的减震器——中层管理者处境特别困难。他们无法像高层管理者一样获得支持和资源优势,必须执行自己都不一定不认可的政策。与高层管理者相比,中、低层管理者感到被赏识的可能性分别降低了33%和47%。他们也比高层管理者更可能认同一点,即自2020年以来,指导员工、与员工有效沟通并向员工提供创新自由变得愈发困难。
为缓解中层管理者的倦怠情绪,公司不能只注重员工体验,也要延伸到架构更高层。以下是具体做法。
创建社区
当管理者觉得跟团队联系紧密时,企业文化蓬勃发展的可能性会增加18倍。管理者之间的联系也会更加紧密。
一家在50多个国家设有分支机构的欧洲零售银行推出了一项认证程序,以提高管理人员的技能并加强管理社区意识。管理者参与建立信任和协调团队等主题的研讨会后可以获得分数,也能够加强相关能力和人际关系。
让中层管理者参与决策
管理者参与制定(而不仅是实施)计划、政策和项目时,支持的可能性更高。
位于北美的一家会计和专业服务公司希望员工和管理者都感到更有价值。推出新的在线奖励计划之前,公司邀请管理者体验计划并提供反馈。这一额外举措回报明显,管理者的参与度提高了10%。
将认可与薪资分开
管理者通常不愿意承认自己需要认可,三分之一(37%)的人声称薪水满意即可,获得认可没有那么必要。但我们的研究强烈显示出相反的结果,即赞赏可以将管理者的焦虑情绪降低67%。
管理者加薪并不能够弥补缺乏赞赏的负面效果。与金钱无关的赞赏必不可少。研究表明,只要赞赏发自个人内心、足够真诚,而且与努力或成就密切相关,就可以产生持久的影响。中层管理者经常要承认团队成员的独特贡献,他们自己也理应获得真诚的认可。
为“现代管理者”赋权
自2020年以来,中、低层管理者在践行“现代领导力”方面比高层管理者更为艰难,现代领导力更强调协作和民主化,从长远来看能够大大减少管理者的工作量。
现代领导力需要新技能和新技巧。随着时间推移,定向支持可以获得巨大收益。
管理者薪水更高并不意味着要减少人性化的一面。如果说以前担任中层管理者比较轻松,现在情况已然不同。优先考虑员工体验的公司才更有机会发展壮大。毕竟,中层管理者本质上也是员工。(财富中文网)
加里·贝克斯特兰德(Gary Beckstrand)是O.C. Tanner Institute的副总裁。
Fortune.com上发表的评论文章中表达的观点,仅代表作者本人的观点,不代表《财富》杂志的观点和立场。
译者:夏林
There’s never been a tougher time to be a middle manager. Not only are they the poster children for corporate inefficiency, the butt of pop culture classics from Dilbert to The Office, and the first on the chopping block when it’s time for layoffs—these days, middle managers face even greater challenges.
As successive workplace trends spur organizations to prioritize the employee experience, middle managers are tasked with ensuring that workers feel engaged, supported, and able to maintain a healthy work-life balance. And as executives establish in-office policies, middle managers are charged with enforcing unpopular mandates and/or overseeing a dizzying patchwork of hybrid work arrangements.
However, organizations are failing to recognize an obvious yet overlooked truth: Middle managers are employees, too. And essential ones.
Since O.C. Tanner began measuring engagement and cultural sentiment, leaders’ sentiment about company culture has been more positive compared with individual contributors. This year, that changed.
Our 2023 Global Culture Report, reflecting input from more than 36,000 employees and leaders in 20 countries, indicates that leaders are in a state of severe distress. Due to factors ranging from less recognition to multiplying responsibilities, leaders’ work experiences are nowhere near as positive as those of their reports. In fact, leaders were 26% more likely to say that they had “nothing more to give in their jobs.”
A recent Future Forum report reinforces these findings, revealing that the leaders with the worst sentiment and experience scores are middle managers.
Managers often internalize their struggles, figuring that staying strong amid escalating responsibilities is just part of the job. But middle management burnout is real—and it’s leading to trouble.
A raft of responsibilities
In our research, roughly two-thirds of leaders (61%) reported having more responsibilities at work now than they did pre-pandemic, an experience shared by a third of individual contributors (34%). Among leaders with increased responsibilities, the odds of high anxiety increase by 21%. Anxiety is linked to a sixfold increase in burnout rates.
Middle managers—organizations’ invaluable shock absorbers—are in a particularly difficult spot. They lack senior leaders’ superior access to support and resources and must enforce policies they may not endorse. Mid-level and entry-level leaders were 33% and 47% less likely to feel appreciated, respectively, than senior leaders. They were also more likely than senior leaders to say that since 2020, it’s been harder to mentor employees, communicate effectively with them, and provide them with the freedom to innovate.
To relieve middle management burnout, companies must extend the focus on employee experience to the higher reaches of the org chart. Here’s how.
Create community
When managers feel connected to their teams, the odds that an organization’s culture will thrive increase 18-fold. Managers also benefit from stronger connections with one another.
A European retail bank with branches in more than 50 countries introduced an accreditation process to boost managers’ skills and forge a sense of managerial community. Managers earned credits for workshops on topics like building trust and aligning teams, which strengthened their capabilities and connections.
Bring middle managers into decision-making
When managers are involved in shaping (not merely enforcing) initiatives, policies, and programs, they’re more likely to back them.
A North American accounting and professional services firm wanted its employees and leaders to feel more valued. Before introducing a new online recognition program, it invited leaders to experience the program and provide feedback. That extra step paid off, with a 10% rise in manager engagement.
Decoupling recognition from compensation
Leaders often brush off the notion that they require recognition, with a third (37%) claiming their salary makes recognition unnecessary. But our research reveals the compelling counter-finding that appreciation reduces leaders’ anxiety by 67%.
Leaders’ higher salaries don’t compensate for lack of appreciation. Nonmonetary recognition is essential. Our research shows that it creates a lasting impact when it’s personal, sincere, and tied to one’s efforts or achievements. Middle managers are frequently called upon to recognize their team members’ unique contributions. They should also be on the receiving end of thoughtful recognition.
Empower “modern leaders”
Since 2020, entry-level and mid-level leaders have struggled more than senior leaders to practice “modern leadership”—a collaborative, democratized approach that can greatly reduce managers’ workloads in the long run.
Modern leadership requires new skills and techniques. Targeted support in this area can pay huge dividends over time.
Getting paid more doesn’t mean that a manager is less human. If there was ever an easy time to be a middle manager, now is not it. Companies prioritizing the employee experience would do well to broaden their scope upward. After all, middle managers are employees, too.
Gary Beckstrand is VP of the O.C. Tanner Institute.
The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.