雇主和员工普遍达成共识的一点是:初级员工并不适合这份工作。
技术教育提供商General Assembly的一份最新报告显示,不足半数的员工(48%)和仅有12%的中层管理人员认为,如今的入门级员工已经为职场做好了充分准备。
导致对新员工信心不足的主要原因何在?根据受访经理们的看法,关键在于新员工未能掌握实现职场成功所需的软技能,例如沟通、协作和适应能力。
General Assembly首席商务官乔丹·海瑟薇(Jourdan Hathaway)在一份声明中写道:“入门级员工的渠道已经出现了断裂。企业必须重新审视其招聘、培训和聘用员工的策略。”
海瑟薇补充称,对于那些致力于解决这一问题的雇主来说,确实存在许多基于证据的方法来加强员工的准备工作。“例如,技术学徒和技能培训项目为员工提供了模拟真实工作环境的经验,使他们能够在掌握技术技能的同时培养沟通和协作能力。”
为撰写这份报告,General Assembly对美国和英国的1180名员工以及393名副总裁或总监级别管理人员进行了调查。
近四分之一的高管表示,他们不会雇佣目前的入门级员工。各级员工中约有23%的人持相同观点,其中包括三分之一的婴儿潮一代。
错过真正的价值
即使是初级员工也能意识到,他们在某些关键领域存在缺失。
五分之二(40%)的Z世代受访者(其中许多是新入职的员工)表示,缺乏软技能是他们职业发展的主要短板。高管和员工都认为,技术技能以及正确的工作态度同样是他们职业成长中需要加强的关键领域。
不过,这并非完全是年轻员工的责任。许多人在疫情封锁期间度过了大学时光,由于实习机会的取消或受完全远程的工作的束缚,他们错过了建立人脉和获得面对面专业指导的机会。
三分之一的高管和相似比例的员工认为,公司未能为新员工提供充分的培训支持,这种做法实际上为他们的失败或至少是表现不佳埋下伏笔。
在那些确实为培训津贴或基金预留预算的公司中,近一半的公司表示,员工“有时、很少或从不”使用这些预算。这很可能是由于缺乏参与的动力或时间,甚至可能是因为他们觉得自己不是问题所在。
耐人寻味的是,美国和英国的员工在这个问题上存在分歧;英国员工认为政府在帮助员工为工作做好准备方面承担一定责任的可能性是美国员工的两倍多。英国雇主持相同观点的可能性是美国雇主的7倍。
尽管有人工智能,软技能仍然占据主导地位
General Assembly的报告发现,即使未来变得越来越数字化,人情味仍然至关重要。最近的其他一些报告也印证了这一点。
今年1月,哈里斯民意调查公司(Harris Poll)专门为《财富》杂志进行的一项调查发现,82%的管理者表示,Z世代新员工的软技能需要更多指导,也需要花费更多时间培训。他们还认为,Z世代往往对职场抱有不切实际的期望——比如快速晋升的时间表、充足的灵活性空间,或者始终保持工作与生活的平衡——而且他们在软技能方面的培训比技术技能方面的培训更具挑战性。
职场教育平台培生(Pearson)在2024年9月进行的一项研究发现,1.1亿份招聘信息提到了沟通这一最受欢迎的软技能,而数据分析这一人工智能相关技能仅在900万份招聘信息中被提及。
此外,在德勤(Deloitte)最近的一项研究中,员工们将团队合作列为他们最看重的技能,其次是沟通和领导能力。只有编码这一技术性较强的技能排在第四位,其次是数据分析。
许多《财富》世界500强企业已经开始响应这一号召。比如,微软(Microsoft)就与虚拟教育平台Coursera合作,为员工提供包括数据分析在内的硬技能和沟通在内的软技能培训和认证。埃森哲(Accenture)首席执行官朱莉·斯威特(Julie Sweet)自上任首日起就把持续学习放在首位。今年,她的公司收购了与Coursera类似的人工智能学习平台Udacity,以持续推进这一使命,并将技能提升作为优先事项。
德勤首席学习官安东尼·斯蒂芬(Anthony Stephan)写道,如果企业过于重视技术培训,而忽略“人类长期所需的能力,如发散性思维、情感敏捷性和韧性,最终可能会阻碍创新,导致员工在领导团队、把握市场机遇和充分利用技术潜力方面能力不足”。
General Assembly也持同样的看法。
General Assembly校友参与和雇主合作主管卢佩·科朗吉洛(Lupe Colangelo)在报告中写道:“当我们观察到一种趋势对如此多人产生影响时,我们必须后退一步,深思熟虑这个系统需要做出哪些改变。人们显然需要更多的支持才能顺利进入职场并取得成功。我们不能仅仅指望个别员工凭一己之力来弥合当前的技能差距。”(财富中文网)
译者:中慧言-王芳
雇主和员工普遍达成共识的一点是:初级员工并不适合这份工作。
技术教育提供商General Assembly的一份最新报告显示,不足半数的员工(48%)和仅有12%的中层管理人员认为,如今的入门级员工已经为职场做好了充分准备。
导致对新员工信心不足的主要原因何在?根据受访经理们的看法,关键在于新员工未能掌握实现职场成功所需的软技能,例如沟通、协作和适应能力。
General Assembly首席商务官乔丹·海瑟薇(Jourdan Hathaway)在一份声明中写道:“入门级员工的渠道已经出现了断裂。企业必须重新审视其招聘、培训和聘用员工的策略。”
海瑟薇补充称,对于那些致力于解决这一问题的雇主来说,确实存在许多基于证据的方法来加强员工的准备工作。“例如,技术学徒和技能培训项目为员工提供了模拟真实工作环境的经验,使他们能够在掌握技术技能的同时培养沟通和协作能力。”
为撰写这份报告,General Assembly对美国和英国的1180名员工以及393名副总裁或总监级别管理人员进行了调查。
近四分之一的高管表示,他们不会雇佣目前的入门级员工。各级员工中约有23%的人持相同观点,其中包括三分之一的婴儿潮一代。
错过真正的价值
即使是初级员工也能意识到,他们在某些关键领域存在缺失。
五分之二(40%)的Z世代受访者(其中许多是新入职的员工)表示,缺乏软技能是他们职业发展的主要短板。高管和员工都认为,技术技能以及正确的工作态度同样是他们职业成长中需要加强的关键领域。
不过,这并非完全是年轻员工的责任。许多人在疫情封锁期间度过了大学时光,由于实习机会的取消或受完全远程的工作的束缚,他们错过了建立人脉和获得面对面专业指导的机会。
三分之一的高管和相似比例的员工认为,公司未能为新员工提供充分的培训支持,这种做法实际上为他们的失败或至少是表现不佳埋下伏笔。
在那些确实为培训津贴或基金预留预算的公司中,近一半的公司表示,员工“有时、很少或从不”使用这些预算。这很可能是由于缺乏参与的动力或时间,甚至可能是因为他们觉得自己不是问题所在。
耐人寻味的是,美国和英国的员工在这个问题上存在分歧;英国员工认为政府在帮助员工为工作做好准备方面承担一定责任的可能性是美国员工的两倍多。英国雇主持相同观点的可能性是美国雇主的7倍。
尽管有人工智能,软技能仍然占据主导地位
General Assembly的报告发现,即使未来变得越来越数字化,人情味仍然至关重要。最近的其他一些报告也印证了这一点。
今年1月,哈里斯民意调查公司(Harris Poll)专门为《财富》杂志进行的一项调查发现,82%的管理者表示,Z世代新员工的软技能需要更多指导,也需要花费更多时间培训。他们还认为,Z世代往往对职场抱有不切实际的期望——比如快速晋升的时间表、充足的灵活性空间,或者始终保持工作与生活的平衡——而且他们在软技能方面的培训比技术技能方面的培训更具挑战性。
职场教育平台培生(Pearson)在2024年9月进行的一项研究发现,1.1亿份招聘信息提到了沟通这一最受欢迎的软技能,而数据分析这一人工智能相关技能仅在900万份招聘信息中被提及。
此外,在德勤(Deloitte)最近的一项研究中,员工们将团队合作列为他们最看重的技能,其次是沟通和领导能力。只有编码这一技术性较强的技能排在第四位,其次是数据分析。
许多《财富》世界500强企业已经开始响应这一号召。比如,微软(Microsoft)就与虚拟教育平台Coursera合作,为员工提供包括数据分析在内的硬技能和沟通在内的软技能培训和认证。埃森哲(Accenture)首席执行官朱莉·斯威特(Julie Sweet)自上任首日起就把持续学习放在首位。今年,她的公司收购了与Coursera类似的人工智能学习平台Udacity,以持续推进这一使命,并将技能提升作为优先事项。
德勤首席学习官安东尼·斯蒂芬(Anthony Stephan)写道,如果企业过于重视技术培训,而忽略“人类长期所需的能力,如发散性思维、情感敏捷性和韧性,最终可能会阻碍创新,导致员工在领导团队、把握市场机遇和充分利用技术潜力方面能力不足”。
General Assembly也持同样的看法。
General Assembly校友参与和雇主合作主管卢佩·科朗吉洛(Lupe Colangelo)在报告中写道:“当我们观察到一种趋势对如此多人产生影响时,我们必须后退一步,深思熟虑这个系统需要做出哪些改变。人们显然需要更多的支持才能顺利进入职场并取得成功。我们不能仅仅指望个别员工凭一己之力来弥合当前的技能差距。”(财富中文网)
译者:中慧言-王芳
One thing both bosses and workers can agree on: Entry-level workers aren’t cut out for the job.
Fewer than half of workers (48%) and just 12% of mid-level executives think today’s entry-level workers are adequately prepared for the workforce, according to a new report from General Assembly, a technology education provider.
The biggest factors driving this lack of confidence? Managers polled feel new workforce entrants don’t have the requisite soft skills—like communication, collaboration, and adaptability—needed to thrive at work.
“The entry-level employee pipeline is broken,” Jourdan Hathaway, General Assembly’s chief business officer, wrote in a statement. “Companies must rethink how they source, train, and onboard employees.”
For bosses committed to tackling the issue, there’s no shortage of evidence-based approaches to beefing up workforce readiness, Hathaway added. “Technology apprenticeships and skill training programs, for example, provide employees with experience that mimics a real work environment, allowing them to build communication and collaboration skills alongside technical skills.”
For the report, General Assembly surveyed 1,180 workers across the U.S. and U.K., as well as 393 VPs or director-level managers.
Nearly one in four of those executives said they wouldn’t hire today’s entry-level employees. About 23% of all employees, at all levels, said the same—including one in three baby boomers.
Missing the real value
Even the entry-level workers can tell they’re missing something crucial.
Two in five (40%) of Gen Z respondents—many of whom are the new hires in question—say that lacking soft skills is a major shortcoming in their career advancement. Also high on the list, according to both executives and workers, are technical skills—and coming into work with the right attitude.
Then again, it’s not entirely younger workers’ fault. Many spent their college years in pandemic lockdowns, hamstrung by canceled internships or fully remote roles, and thus missed opportunities for networking and in-person professional mentoring.
One in three executives—and a similar share of employees—agreed that companies don’t provide adequate training for new hires, effectively setting them up for failure, or at least underperformance.
Among the companies that actually do set aside a budget for training stipends or funds, nearly half said employees “sometimes, rarely, or never” use them. That’s likely due to a lack of motivation or time—or maybe even the sense that they’re not the problem.
Interestingly, U.S. and U.K. employees diverge somewhat on the issue; U.K. employees were more than twice as likely to believe the government bears some responsibility for job preparedness than American workers. U.K. bosses were seven times more likely than U.S. bosses to say the same.
Despite AI, soft skills still reign supreme
Even as the future becomes increasingly digitized, the human touch remains vital, General Assembly’s report finds. That’s been echoed by a smattering of other recent reports.
A Harris Poll carried out exclusively for Fortune in January found that 82% of managers said their new Gen Z hires’ soft skills require more guidance, time, and training. They also think Gen Zers often have unrealistic workplace expectations—like speedy promotion timelines, ample room for flexibility, or consistent work-life balance—and they’re harder to train in soft skills than in technical skills.
A September 2024 study by workplace education platform Pearson found that communication—the most in-demand soft skill—was mentioned in 110 million job listings, while data analysis—an AI skill—appeared in only 9 million.
Plus, in a recent Deloitte study, workers put teamwork as their number-one valued skill, followed by communication and leadership. Only in fourth place did a more technical skill—coding—make the list, followed by data analysis.
Many Fortune 500 companies are already heeding the call. Microsoft, for one, has partnered with virtual education platform Coursera to offer workers courses and certificates in hard (data analysis) and soft (communication) skills alike. Accenture CEO Julie Sweet has prioritized continual learning from her first day on the job, and this year her company bought Udacity, an AI learning platform akin to Coursera, to build on that mission and prioritize upskilling.
Companies that put too much stock in technical training at the expense of “enduring human capabilities—like divergent thinking, emotional agility, [and] resilience—could end up impeding innovation and leaving employees ill-equipped to lead teams, adapt to market opportunities, and fully harness the potential of technology,” Anthony Stephan, Deloitte’s chief learning officer, wrote.
General Assembly said much the same.
“When we see a trend impacting so many people, we have to take a step back and consider that the system needs to change,” Lupe Colangelo, director of alumni engagement and employer partnerships at General Assembly, wrote in the report. “People clearly need more support to enter the workforce and succeed. We can’t expect individual employees to close today’s skills gaps on their own.”