摩根大通巨亏60亿，业余董事会安然无恙

    但奇怪的是，虽然该行似乎承认了导致交易损失的问题，但它的董事会并没有出现任何显著变化。过去，该行曾表示，监督旗下交易头寸并非董事会的职责。但在与货币监理署达成的和解中，监管机构似乎将该行董事会列为存在问题之一，并且也同意进行整改。

    不过，维权股东普赖斯-琼斯说，若摩根大通董事会不出现新面孔，任何措施都不够。普赖斯-琼斯说：“摩根大通需要得力的董事，这些董事应该具备提出问题、化解质疑的专长。它目前显然没有这样的董事会。”（财富中文网）

    But at a time when the bank seems to be owning up to problems that led to the trading losses, it seems odd that no significant changes are being made to its board. In the past the bank has said that it wasn't the board's job to oversee the trading positions of the bank. But in the settlement with the OCC, regulators seemed to point to the board as one of the problems, and the bank agreed to make changes.

    Shareholder activist Pryce-Jones, though, says anything short of new faces on JPMorgan's board won't be enough. "JPMorgan needs a board with strong directors with the knowledge to ask questions and push back," says Pryce-Jones. "That's clearly not the case with this group."