首页 500强 活动 榜单 商业 科技 领导力 专题 品牌中心
杂志订阅

不顾财务风险也要离婚,老年人离婚的原因是什么?

ALICIA ADAMCZYK
2024-06-29

大多数“灰色离婚”是女性提出的。

文本设置
小号
默认
大号
Plus(0条)

69岁的玛丽(Mary)冒着巨大的财务风险与丈夫离婚。图片来源:COURTESY OF MARY

到2022年年中,玛丽知道自己必须离开结婚近20年的丈夫。

虽然她和即将成为前夫的丈夫仍然保持着融洽的关系,但玛丽表示(为了在诉讼过程中畅所欲言,要求不透露自己的姓氏),在过去的几年里,他们的政治观点开始日益两极分化,她与他在一起或在他们的社区中不再有家的感觉。她花了大约一年的时间来考虑这个决定,并巩固自己的财务状况,去年11月,这对夫妇分居了。

玛丽说:"我才意识到,我的生活毫无乐趣可言。我有一种负罪感,我遇到的每个女人都有这种负罪感。我觉得自己应该为他的幸福负责。但后来有一天我想,我还有10年,也许15年的时光,我要去办理离婚。”

做这个决定并非易事。玛丽今年69岁,由于残疾,她已经多年没有全职工作了。除了每月的社会保险金和根据离婚协议收到的任何款项外,她并没有多少收入。她也不想让自己仍然关心的伴侣措手不及,而且她担心两次离婚给自己带来污名(她在本世纪初与第一任丈夫离婚)。当许多夫妻都为无需照顾孩子而感到高兴,并在离开职场后享受新获得的自由时,玛丽却选择了不稳定和混乱。

但就像许多年过50、似乎失去一切的女人一样,玛丽还是执意要离婚。“灰色离婚”(50岁以上的人离婚)在美国急剧上升,老年夫妻的离婚率是上世纪90年代的两倍(65岁以上的离婚率是上世纪90年代的三倍)。在异性恋关系中,绝大多数离婚都是由X世代和婴儿潮时期出生的女性提出的,她们通常比男性伴侣面临更多的财务风险。事实上,一项研究发现,50岁以后离婚的女性的生活水平下降了45%,而男性的生活水平则下降了21%。根据美国人口普查局(Census Bureau)的数据,约20%的女性在离婚后一年内陷入贫困,而男性的这一比例为11%。

玛丽知道,为了自己的幸福,她将牺牲稳定的生活和带花园(亲自打理)的漂亮房屋。她现在住在第一任丈夫的一间出租屋里(他们仍然是朋友),同时她和第二任丈夫正在处理离婚的细节问题,比如退休账户的分割,以及她是否会得到配偶赡养费。分居近一年后,玛丽准备签署离婚文件,正式开始新生活。但有一个问题尤其让他们的离婚程序停滞不前:他们的房子该怎么办?

“这是我们双方取得进展的唯一途径”

玛丽和前夫如今至少讨论了四种不同的资产分割方案,其中包括他们在弗吉尼亚州拥有的房子。这套房子购于2014年,多年来与他们的其他投资一起大幅增值;比价显示,这套房子的价值略高于100万美元。

理财专家表示,在灰色离婚诉讼中,房子成为主要阻碍之一并不罕见。诚然,房子不仅仅是一个居住的地方,里面满是回忆和纪念品,除了经济上的考虑之外,还有情感上的联系。玛丽提到,虽然这并不适用于她(她并不是在现在的房子里抚养孩子长大的),但房子尤会让许多年长的女性感到一种特殊的联系,因为她们的身份与家庭住宅联系在一起,多年来(往往长达数十年),她们大部分的劳动都是在家里完成的。

约翰逊金融集团(Johnson Financial Group)的高级副总裁兼理财顾问凯莉·穆尔德(Kelly Mould)说,离婚后出售房屋通常是势在必行的。许多年长的夫妇完全拥有这些房产,或者拥有重要股权,这使它们成为夫妇最有价值的资产。即使其中一方想留在以前的房子里,他或她也可能无力支付房款、税款和维护费用等。

穆尔德说:“即使这并不是一个明智的财务选择,你经常会看到当事人不遗余力地试图保留房产。拥有一位优秀的律师和理财顾问通常会让你更容易做出决定……他们在提出这些选择时不会带有可能违背理财逻辑的感情色彩。”

穆尔德说,除非夫妻双方能自行达成协议,否则许多法院都会要求在离婚时出售房屋(不过具体情况因州而异)。尽管如此,她说,法院越来越接受“特有”的安排,比如共享计划,让双方在一年中的不同时间使用房产,就像度假屋一样。

穆尔德说:“法院可能会接受有创意的方案。但是,如果行不通,法院通常会默认能够结案的方案。”

尽管玛丽不会再住在那里,但她和即将成为前夫的人仍在研究最经济合理的方案。虽然她会怀念一些小东西——花园,自己设计的客厅壁炉,多年来熟记过道的杂货店——但她并不想留下房子。考虑到近年来房价大幅上涨,他们正在想办法减少潜在出售的税费,这也拖慢了出售进程。

她说:“在栽种植物的时候,我一直以为它们永远会在这里。”但“我们的房子,如果对半分,会给我们带来很高的资产净值。这是我们双方在经济上取得进展的唯一途径。”

也就是说,她不能长期住在第一任丈夫的房子里,她担心自己的社会保险金和离婚赔偿金是否能负担得起自己的公寓。穆尔德说,父母搬去和成年子女同住在灰色离婚人群中越来越普遍,这也是玛丽所希望的。目前,她正在与她的一个儿子和他的妻子一起找房子。他们正在寻找一个老人套间供她居住,而她将尽自己所能出钱出力。但考虑到全美房价飞涨,玛丽并不乐观。

尽管经历了各种头疼的问题和一个又一个改变人生的决定,玛丽说她并不后悔自己迎来的新方向。她有了可以依靠的群体,儿子、兄弟姐妹、最好的朋友和第一任前夫都在她身边,而且她还重新找回了自己的初恋:写作。

“人们总是说我很勇敢。”她说。但如果有一件事她可以告诉其他权衡晚年离婚的利弊的女性,那就是“你现在可以很快乐,而且轮到你享受美好时光了。这对我来说意义深远,现在已经成了我的口头禅。即使你放弃了房子和有你屁股形状的安乐椅,但离婚仍能让你感到欣慰。”(财富中文网)

译者:中慧言-王芳

到2022年年中,玛丽知道自己必须离开结婚近20年的丈夫。

虽然她和即将成为前夫的丈夫仍然保持着融洽的关系,但玛丽表示(为了在诉讼过程中畅所欲言,要求不透露自己的姓氏),在过去的几年里,他们的政治观点开始日益两极分化,她与他在一起或在他们的社区中不再有家的感觉。她花了大约一年的时间来考虑这个决定,并巩固自己的财务状况,去年11月,这对夫妇分居了。

玛丽说:"我才意识到,我的生活毫无乐趣可言。我有一种负罪感,我遇到的每个女人都有这种负罪感。我觉得自己应该为他的幸福负责。但后来有一天我想,我还有10年,也许15年的时光,我要去办理离婚。”

做这个决定并非易事。玛丽今年69岁,由于残疾,她已经多年没有全职工作了。除了每月的社会保险金和根据离婚协议收到的任何款项外,她并没有多少收入。她也不想让自己仍然关心的伴侣措手不及,而且她担心两次离婚给自己带来污名(她在本世纪初与第一任丈夫离婚)。当许多夫妻都为无需照顾孩子而感到高兴,并在离开职场后享受新获得的自由时,玛丽却选择了不稳定和混乱。

但就像许多年过50、似乎失去一切的女人一样,玛丽还是执意要离婚。“灰色离婚”(50岁以上的人离婚)在美国急剧上升,老年夫妻的离婚率是上世纪90年代的两倍(65岁以上的离婚率是上世纪90年代的三倍)。在异性恋关系中,绝大多数离婚都是由X世代和婴儿潮时期出生的女性提出的,她们通常比男性伴侣面临更多的财务风险。事实上,一项研究发现,50岁以后离婚的女性的生活水平下降了45%,而男性的生活水平则下降了21%。根据美国人口普查局(Census Bureau)的数据,约20%的女性在离婚后一年内陷入贫困,而男性的这一比例为11%。

玛丽知道,为了自己的幸福,她将牺牲稳定的生活和带花园(亲自打理)的漂亮房屋。她现在住在第一任丈夫的一间出租屋里(他们仍然是朋友),同时她和第二任丈夫正在处理离婚的细节问题,比如退休账户的分割,以及她是否会得到配偶赡养费。分居近一年后,玛丽准备签署离婚文件,正式开始新生活。但有一个问题尤其让他们的离婚程序停滞不前:他们的房子该怎么办?

‘这是我们双方取得进展的唯一途径’

玛丽和前夫如今至少讨论了四种不同的资产分割方案,其中包括他们在弗吉尼亚州拥有的房子。这套房子购于2014年,多年来与他们的其他投资一起大幅增值;比价显示,这套房子的价值略高于100万美元。

理财专家表示,在灰色离婚诉讼中,房子成为主要阻碍之一并不罕见。诚然,房子不仅仅是一个居住的地方,里面满是回忆和纪念品,除了经济上的考虑之外,还有情感上的联系。玛丽提到,虽然这并不适用于她(她并不是在现在的房子里抚养孩子长大的),但房子尤会让许多年长的女性感到一种特殊的联系,因为她们的身份与家庭住宅联系在一起,多年来(往往长达数十年),她们大部分的劳动都是在家里完成的。

约翰逊金融集团(Johnson Financial Group)的高级副总裁兼理财顾问凯莉·穆尔德(Kelly Mould)说,离婚后出售房屋通常是势在必行的。许多年长的夫妇完全拥有这些房产,或者拥有重要股权,这使它们成为夫妇最有价值的资产。即使其中一方想留在以前的房子里,他或她也可能无力支付房款、税款和维护费用等。

穆尔德说:“即使这并不是一个明智的财务选择,你经常会看到当事人不遗余力地试图保留房产。拥有一位优秀的律师和理财顾问通常会让你更容易做出决定……他们在提出这些选择时不会带有可能违背理财逻辑的感情色彩。”

穆尔德说,除非夫妻双方能自行达成协议,否则许多法院都会要求在离婚时出售房屋(不过具体情况因州而异)。尽管如此,她说,法院越来越接受“特有”的安排,比如共享计划,让双方在一年中的不同时间使用房产,就像度假屋一样。

穆尔德说:"法院可能会接受有创意的方案。但是,如果行不通,法院通常会默认能够结案的方案。"

尽管玛丽不会再住在那里,但她和即将成为前夫的人仍在研究最经济合理的方案。虽然她会怀念一些小东西——花园,自己设计的客厅壁炉,多年来熟记过道的杂货店——但她并不想留下房子。考虑到近年来房价大幅上涨,他们正在想办法减少潜在出售的税费,这也拖慢了出售进程。

她说:“在栽种植物的时候,我一直以为它们永远会在这里。”但“我们的房子,如果对半分,会给我们带来很高的资产净值。这是我们双方在经济上取得进展的唯一途径。”

也就是说,她不能长期住在第一任丈夫的房子里,她担心自己的社会保险金和离婚赔偿金是否能负担得起自己的公寓。穆尔德说,父母搬去和成年子女同住在灰色离婚人群中越来越普遍,这也是玛丽所希望的。目前,她正在与她的一个儿子和他的妻子一起找房子。他们正在寻找一个老人套间供她居住,而她将尽自己所能出钱出力。但考虑到全美房价飞涨,玛丽并不乐观。

尽管经历了各种头疼的问题和一个又一个改变人生的决定,玛丽说她并不后悔自己迎来的新方向。她有了可以依靠的群体,儿子、兄弟姐妹、最好的朋友和第一任前夫都在她身边,而且她还重新找回了自己的初恋:写作。

“人们总是说我很勇敢。”她说。但如果有一件事她可以告诉其他权衡晚年离婚的利弊的女性,那就是“你现在可以很快乐,而且轮到你享受美好时光了。这对我来说意义深远,现在已经成了我的口头禅。即使你放弃了房子和有你屁股形状的安乐椅,但离婚仍能让你感到欣慰。”(财富中文网)

译者:中慧言-王芳

By mid-2022, Mary knew she needed to leave her husband of almost 20 years.

While she and her soon-to-be-ex-husband still have a cordial relationship, Mary—who asked that her last name be withheld to talk freely about her divorce in the midst of the proceedings—says they began to have increasingly polarized political views over the past few years, and she didn’t feel at home anymore with him or among their community. She took about a year to think through the decision and shore up her finances, and last November, the couple separated.

“I just realized, I had no joy in my life,” Mary says. “I have this sense of guilt that every woman I’ve ever met has had. I feel responsible for his happiness. But then there came a day where I thought, I have 10 years, maybe 15—I’m going to do it.”

It wasn’t an easy decision. Mary is 69 and hasn’t worked full-time in years because of a disability. She would be left without much in the way of income aside from her monthly Social Security payments and whatever she receives in the settlement. She also didn’t want to blindside her partner, whom she still cares for, and she feared the stigma associated with being twice divorced (she separated from her first husband in the early 2000s). At a time when many couples are happy to be child-free and enjoying newfound freedom after leaving the workforce, Mary was opting for instability and chaos.

But like many women over 50 who seemingly have everything to lose, Mary pushed forward with the divorce anyway. “Gray divorce”—the term for separations that occur over the age of 50—is skyrocketing in the U.S., with older couples separating at twice the rate they did in the 1990s (the rate is triple for those over 65). And in heterosexual relationships, the vast majority of them are initiated by Gen X and baby boomer women, who typically have far more on the line financially than their male partners. In fact, one study found women who divorce after 50 experience a 45% decline in their standard of living, while men see theirs drop by 21%. Around 20% of women become impoverished in the year after a divorce, according to the Census Bureau, compared with 11% of men.

Mary knew she’d be sacrificing stability and a beautiful home with a hand-tended garden for her happiness. She’s now living in a rented room in her first husband’s house (they remain friends) while she and her second spouse work out the details of their split, like divvying up retirement accounts and whether she’ll receive spousal support. Almost a year after they separated, Mary is ready to sign the papers and officially move on. But one issue in particular has stalling the proceedings: What happens to their home?

‘It’s the only way either of us can move forward’

Mary and her ex have now discussed at least four different plans when it comes to splitting assets, including the house they own in Virginia. Purchased in 2014, it’s grown in value considerably over the years alongside their other investments; comps put the value at just over $1 million.

Financial experts say it’s not unusual for the house to be one of the major holdups in gray divorce proceedings. A home is, of course, more than a place to live. It’s filled with memories and mementos, and there are emotional connections in addition to financial concerns. Mary mentions that though this doesn’t apply to her (she didn’t raise her children in the current home), many older women, especially, feel a special connection because they have their identity tied up in the family home, where they performed most of their labor over the years—often for decades.

But it is usually imperative to sell the home postdivorce, says Kelly Mould, senior vice president and financial advisor at Johnson Financial Group. Many older couples own them outright or have significant equity built up, making them the couple’s most valuable assets. Even if one partner wants to stay in the home, he or she might not be able to afford the payments, taxes, upkeep, and so on.

“Often you will see parties go to great lengths to try to retain the property, even when it’s not a good financial move,” says Mould. “Having a good attorney and financial advisor can usually make this an easier decision…They present those options without the sentimentality that can run afoul of financial logic.”

Unless the couple can come to an agreement on their own, many courts will require the sale of the home in a divorce, says Mould (though this differs from situation to situation and state to state). That said, she says courts are increasingly accepting “unique” arrangements, like shared plans that give each partner access to the property—like a vacation home—at different times of the year.

“A court may entertain a creative option. However, if it doesn’t work, the court most often defaults to a plan that closes the case,” says Mould.

Mary and her soon-to-be-ex are still working out what makes the most financial sense, although she will not be living there again. While she will miss the small things—her gardens, the fireplace she designed in the living room, the grocery store whose aisles she’s memorized over the years—she doesn’t want it. Given how much home prices have appreciated in recent years, they are trying to work out a way to lessen the tax bill on a potential sale, which is slowing down the process.

“There’s not a plant I didn’t plant there thinking it would be there forever,” she says. But “our house, it would give us good equity if we just sliced it right in half. It’s the only way either of us can move forward financially.”

That said, she can’t live in her first husband’s home long term and is worried about being able to afford her own apartment with her Social Security payments and whatever she gets from the divorce settlement. Mould says parents moving in with their adult children is increasingly common among gray divorcées, and that’s what Mary hopes will happen. Right now, she is looking for a home with one of her sons and his wife. They are seeking an in-law suite for her to live in, and she would contribute what she’s able to. But given how high home prices across the country have spiraled, Mary isn’t optimistic.

Despite all of the headaches and life-changing decision after life-changing decision, Mary said she doesn’t regret her new direction. She has community to lean into—her sons, siblings, best friend, and first ex-husband have all rallied around her—and has gotten back to her first love: writing.

“People keep telling me I’m brave,” she says. But if there is one thing she could communicate to other women weighing the pros and cons of a later-in-life divorce, it is that “you can be happy now. It’s your turn. That’s pretty profound for me, that’s a bit of a mantra now. Even if you give up the house and the easy chair with the shape of your butt, it’s so comforting.”

0条Plus
精彩评论
评论

撰写或查看更多评论

请打开财富Plus APP

前往打开