上周二,美国领先的加密货币交易所Coinbase在与证券交易委员会(SEC)的最新法律战中获胜,美国地方法官凯瑟琳·费拉裁定,该公司可以将一起备受关注的案件——涉及哪些加密货币属于证券——直接提交给美国第二巡回上诉法院。
这一裁决并不一定意味着Coinbase将在核心证券问题上获胜,但它确实让公司可能更快拿到最终裁决。正如费拉在其23页的裁决书中所述,此举反映了法官们在如何在加密货币领域执行现有证券法方面存在分歧,希望随着案件在司法系统中的推进,这一问题能够得到解决,尽管上诉法院仍需同意审理此案。
Coinbase首席法务官保罗·格利瓦尔在X上表示:“我们感谢法院的审慎考虑。我们将前往第二巡回法院。”
美国证券交易委员会的发言人拒绝对这一裁决置评。目前正值该机构的新主席即将上任,他可能会完全撤销诉讼。
证券争议
多年来,证券交易委员会一直试图解决一个与区块链这个颠覆性行业相关的关键问题:加密货币是否应该像股票和债券一样,视为传统证券?证券交易委员会已同意将比特币视为像黄金或石油一样的大宗商品,除此之外,它一直认为几乎所有其他数字资产都属于证券,因此在其管辖范围之内。这也意味着,由于绝大多数加密货币的发行机构、交易所和托管人没有在证券交易委员会注册登记,因此他们违反了证券法。
证券交易委员会已经对顶级发行机构和交易所提起了多起诉讼,引起广泛关注,首先是2020年对备受欢迎的加密货币XRP背后的公司Ripple提起的投诉,当时证券交易委员会的主席是杰伊·鲍威尔。随后在鲍威尔备受争议的继任者加里·盖斯勒领导下,该机构执行了一系列执法行动。在这些案件中,证券交易委员会认为,Coinbase等公司在其平台上向投资者发行未注册的证券(如Solana),违反了关键法律。
由于这些案件由不同法官和联邦法院审理,导致法律裁决各不相同,一些法官(包括费拉)似乎支持证券交易委员会的主张,但有些法官(如负责Ripple诉讼的法官)却质疑该机构的立场,认为出售加密货币并不总是构成投资合同。
去年3月,费拉否决了Coinbase主张驳回证券交易委员会诉讼的动议的关键方面——这是预料之中的举动,但表明她在最终裁定中可能会支持证券交易委员会。Coinbase认为加密货币应被视为具有重大经济意义的问题,从而应该限制证券交易委员会对证券监管的解释,且Coinbase认为他们没有收到证券交易委员会关于监管方法的公平通知,费拉在裁决中否决了这些主张。她还认为,在Coinbase平台上提供和销售加密货币似乎是投资合同,因此应视为证券。然而,费拉同意驳回证券交易委员会关于自托管钱包的部分案件。
尽管费拉法官的裁决为Coinbase的未来道路带来了不确定性,但由于她与其他法官的裁决存在冲突,该案件最终几乎肯定会由上诉法院作出裁定,甚至可能会提交到最高法院。如果Coinbase败诉,其可以提供的产品类型将受到限制,这会显著影响其运营能力。在上周二的裁决中,费拉同意“在重要法律问题上的裁定存在冲突,需要第二巡回法院的指导。”Ripple诉讼也可能会提交至第二巡回法院。
费拉作出裁定时,正值证券交易委员会的关键时期。在唐纳德·特朗普当选总统后,盖斯勒宣布他将于今年1月辞去主席职务。特朗普曾表示,他将在第二个总统任期内采取对加密货币更有利的立场。一些法律专家认为,证券交易委员会在其新任主席、前委员保罗·阿特金斯的领导下,甚至可能会撤销对加密货币公司的诉讼。(财富中文网)
译者:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
上周二,美国领先的加密货币交易所Coinbase在与证券交易委员会(SEC)的最新法律战中获胜,美国地方法官凯瑟琳·费拉裁定,该公司可以将一起备受关注的案件——涉及哪些加密货币属于证券——直接提交给美国第二巡回上诉法院。
这一裁决并不一定意味着Coinbase将在核心证券问题上获胜,但它确实让公司可能更快拿到最终裁决。正如费拉在其23页的裁决书中所述,此举反映了法官们在如何在加密货币领域执行现有证券法方面存在分歧,希望随着案件在司法系统中的推进,这一问题能够得到解决,尽管上诉法院仍需同意审理此案。
Coinbase首席法务官保罗·格利瓦尔在X上表示:“我们感谢法院的审慎考虑。我们将前往第二巡回法院。”
美国证券交易委员会的发言人拒绝对这一裁决置评。目前正值该机构的新主席即将上任,他可能会完全撤销诉讼。
证券争议
多年来,证券交易委员会一直试图解决一个与区块链这个颠覆性行业相关的关键问题:加密货币是否应该像股票和债券一样,视为传统证券?证券交易委员会已同意将比特币视为像黄金或石油一样的大宗商品,除此之外,它一直认为几乎所有其他数字资产都属于证券,因此在其管辖范围之内。这也意味着,由于绝大多数加密货币的发行机构、交易所和托管人没有在证券交易委员会注册登记,因此他们违反了证券法。
证券交易委员会已经对顶级发行机构和交易所提起了多起诉讼,引起广泛关注,首先是2020年对备受欢迎的加密货币XRP背后的公司Ripple提起的投诉,当时证券交易委员会的主席是杰伊·鲍威尔。随后在鲍威尔备受争议的继任者加里·盖斯勒领导下,该机构执行了一系列执法行动。在这些案件中,证券交易委员会认为,Coinbase等公司在其平台上向投资者发行未注册的证券(如Solana),违反了关键法律。
由于这些案件由不同法官和联邦法院审理,导致法律裁决各不相同,一些法官(包括费拉)似乎支持证券交易委员会的主张,但有些法官(如负责Ripple诉讼的法官)却质疑该机构的立场,认为出售加密货币并不总是构成投资合同。
去年3月,费拉否决了Coinbase主张驳回证券交易委员会诉讼的动议的关键方面——这是预料之中的举动,但表明她在最终裁定中可能会支持证券交易委员会。Coinbase认为加密货币应被视为具有重大经济意义的问题,从而应该限制证券交易委员会对证券监管的解释,且Coinbase认为他们没有收到证券交易委员会关于监管方法的公平通知,费拉在裁决中否决了这些主张。她还认为,在Coinbase平台上提供和销售加密货币似乎是投资合同,因此应视为证券。然而,费拉同意驳回证券交易委员会关于自托管钱包的部分案件。
尽管费拉法官的裁决为Coinbase的未来道路带来了不确定性,但由于她与其他法官的裁决存在冲突,该案件最终几乎肯定会由上诉法院作出裁定,甚至可能会提交到最高法院。如果Coinbase败诉,其可以提供的产品类型将受到限制,这会显著影响其运营能力。在上周二的裁决中,费拉同意“在重要法律问题上的裁定存在冲突,需要第二巡回法院的指导。”Ripple诉讼也可能会提交至第二巡回法院。
费拉作出裁定时,正值证券交易委员会的关键时期。在唐纳德·特朗普当选总统后,盖斯勒宣布他将于今年1月辞去主席职务。特朗普曾表示,他将在第二个总统任期内采取对加密货币更有利的立场。一些法律专家认为,证券交易委员会在其新任主席、前委员保罗·阿特金斯的领导下,甚至可能会撤销对加密货币公司的诉讼。(财富中文网)
译者:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
On Tuesday, the leading U.S. crypto exchange Coinbase won its latest legal battle against the Securities and Exchange Commission, as U.S District Judge Katherine Failla ruled the company can take a closely watched case—which turns on which cryptocurrencies are securities—directly to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
The ruling does not necessarily mean Coinbase will prevail on the core securities question, but it does accelerate the timeline by which the company can expect a definitive ruling. As laid out in Failla’s 23-page ruling, the move reflects the disagreement among judges about how to enforce existing securities laws for the crypto sector, with the hope that the matter can be settled as it moves up the judicial food chain, though the appeals court still has to agree to hear the case.
“We appreciate the Court’s careful consideration,” said Coinbase chief legal officer Paul Grewal on X. “On to the Second Circuit we go.”
A spokesperson for the SEC declined to comment on the ruling, which comes as a new chairman is poised to take over the agency, and could drop the case altogether.
Securities dispute
For years, the SEC has been trying to settle a key question with the disruptive blockchain sector: Should cryptocurrencies be treated as traditional securities, such as stocks and bonds? With the exception of Bitcoin, which the agency has agreed should be treated as a commodity like gold or oil, the SEC has maintained that nearly every other digital asset is a security, and therefore under its purview. That also means that because the vast majority of issuers, exchanges, and custodians for cryptocurrencies do not register with the SEC, they are violating securities laws.
The SEC has brought a number of high-profile lawsuits against both top issuers and exchanges, beginning with with a 2020 complaint against Ripple, the company behind the popular XRP cryptocurrency, under Chair Jay Powell. This was followed by a string of enforcement actions led by Powell’s controversial successor, Chair Gary Gensler. In these cases, the SEC has argued that companies like Coinbase are breaking key laws by offering unregistered securities like Solana to investors on its platform.
Because the cases have appeared before different judges and federal courts, the resulting legal rulings have been mixed, with some judges (including Failla) appearing to side with the SEC’s arguments, and others, such as the judge overseeing the Ripple suit, taking issue with the agency’s stances and arguing that the sale of cryptocurrencies do not always constitute investment contracts.
In March, Failla denied the key aspects of Coinbase’s motion to dismiss the SEC’s lawsuit—an expected move, but one that suggested that she would side with the SEC in her final decision. In her ruling, Failla rejected Coinbase’s argument that crypto should count as a “major question” of economic significance, and therefore limit the SEC’s interpretation of securities oversight, as well as that the exchange had not received fair notice of the agency’s approach to supervision. She also argued that the offer and sale of cryptocurrencies on Coinbase’s platform appeared to be investment contracts, and therefore should be treated as securities. Failla did, however, agree to throw out a portion of the SEC’s case concerning self-custodied wallets.
While the decision created a murky path forward for Coinbase, contrasting rulings by other judges meant the final decision at the case would almost certainly occur at the appellate level, and possibly even to the Supreme Court. A loss would significantly impact Coinbase’s ability to operate by limiting the types of assets it could offer. With her ruling on Tuesday, Failla agreed that “conflicting decisions on an important legal issue necessitate the Second Circuit’s guidance.” The Ripple lawsuit will also likely move to the Second Circuit.
Failla’s decision comes at a crossroads for the SEC, with Gensler announcing that he would step down as chair in January following the election of Donald Trump, who has signaled he would take a more favorable approach toward crypto during his second term as president. Some legal experts have suggested that the SEC under its new chair, former commissioner Paul Atkins, might even drop its lawsuits against crypto companies.