首页 500强 活动 榜单 商业 科技 商潮 专题 品牌中心
杂志订阅

一名海军退伍老兵讲述被马斯克“优化”内幕

Grace Jones
2025-03-29

他表示,马斯克的所作所为令人感到无助

文本设置
小号
默认
大号
Plus(0条)

2025年3月,埃隆·马斯克参加特朗普政府的内阁会议。图片来源:Win McNamee/Getty Images

我加入海军部,是出于对公共服务、使命和同僚的信念。历经九年现役生涯(包括多次海外部署),我却在转任文职六个月后遭到解雇,我被解雇的原因并非工作失职,而是因为我用一首五行打油诗回应马斯克的新规。

自2月24日起,政府效率部要求联邦文职人员用五个要点,说明“上周工作内容”。3月17日“圣帕特里克节”当天,我以一首五行打油诗回复了第四轮邮件。当管理层将我们的工作简化成未加密、毫无意义的要点清单时,他们得到的自然是与任务分量相称的回应。随后我被以“行为失当”为由解雇,解聘函将这首打油诗作为唯一证据。

我的直属上司(我发给政府效率部的所有周报邮件都会抄送给上司)也对我被解雇措手不及。我被解雇前既没有谈话,我也没有收到负面绩效评估。整个指挥链曾多次肯定我的出色表现,称赞我是团队的宝贵资产。

被解雇次日的上午,我翻开祖父的《1935年值更官指南》,这是他1942年任海军军官时用过的书,他在书内着重划出了一段话:“申诉处理——需耐心倾听投诉;决定采取行动前应充分听取双方陈述。”

祖父与我曾怀抱报国之心加入海军,如今海军却正为迎合马斯克而屈膝,为了政治上的妥协而牺牲了其长期坚持的原则。这个标榜领导力与坚毅不拔精神的军事部门,目前的领导者因为屈从于马斯克而获得奖赏,却无视下属付出的代价或者忘了自己的使命。

我将人生与职业生涯奉献给海军。从斯坦福大学(Stanford)政治学专业毕业后,我加入海军成为一名情报官,九年现役后转入预备役。后来我赴哈佛肯尼迪学院(Harvard Kennedy School)深造,2024年5月获公共政策硕士学位,同年8月,我被海军部聘为文职人员。

履职六个月后,我仍处于试用期。试用期员工的身份让我既无工作保障,又无申诉权利。我的简历与服役经历不应该让我免予处分,但我之所以提及我的资质,只是为了说明联邦政府正在因为政府效率部失去人才与热忱。

马斯克在特朗普政府的非民选职位上的所作所为,令人目不暇接。通过华盛顿的大量新闻轰炸,我政府外的朋友们发现我们被要求提交工作要点的说法竟然是真实的,这令他们感到震惊。但这就是事实。这就是马斯克的目的——在美国民众中制造混乱,以便在无监督的环境下为所欲为。

关于这些周报要点,我的上司曾直言:“我们未收到任何反馈表明有人会阅读这些内容。”此外,我们被告知提交的要点必须简短,我们甚至收到了只有五个单词的回复示例。

近百万封国防文职人员的电子邮件发送到一个电子邮箱,存在极其严重的安全威胁。将看似未加密的信息汇总后,可能形成被加密的信息合集,因此我不会公开前两周的完整工作要点。

以下是导致我被解雇的邮件。(“复制者”是美国国防部部署数千自主系统的计划。)

致OSD公关主宰者们:

• 我统筹全局协调四方

• 确保计划周密周详

• 联动团队协作无间

• 力推“复制者”计划开展

• 疑惑要点何以无价值

此致

格雷斯

情报界(IC)文职人员可通过更高密级渠道提交工作总结。然而,我们这些处理机密信息却不属于情报机构的雇员,并未获得这种选择权。

海军部没有就如何提交五条非加密要点的要求提供书面指导,而是任由雇员在马斯克风暴中自生自灭。在被解雇的当天上午,我仍通过绝密渠道汇总发送团队本周行动,这是早在政府效率部的邮件令实施前便形成的惯例。我始终对问责制充满信心,并且我相信上级有必要了解下属的行动。

士气与团队精神是军队成功的核心。去问问任何一位老兵的服役经历,军旅生涯固然离不开牺牲,但更承载着故事、恶作剧与欢笑,让这段艰苦的生活可以忍受。曾有军人在陆海军对抗时偷山羊和骡子,在高层简报幻灯片中加入梗图,将身份证藏于天花板中。没错,我确实在这至暗时刻写了一首打油诗,但对于国防部官员而言,这并不算失格之举。

马斯克削减开支的做法荒诞不经。别误会,美国确实需要削减国防开支。向过时的系统与臃肿的项目投入大量资金,只会削弱而非增强国家安全。但政府效率部在海军部的“节流”举措,既无系统性也不够彻底。他们只是在解雇缺乏保障的雇员。甘愿为国牺牲一切的人,反而成了权宜之计的牺牲品。

我被解雇,只是因为我以最温和的方式表达了异议。但异议终究是异议。在这个奥威尔式时代,真相仍在暴政下窒息。

致联邦雇员:我懂你们。勿惧前行。永远无畏。

致马斯克与政府效率部:历史是无情的。为残存的荣誉弃船,为时未晚。非为己,乃为国。(财富中文网)

本文作者格雷斯·琼斯是一名美国海军退伍老兵、海军预备役少校,毕业于斯坦福大学和哈佛大学。

本文中表达的立场和观点仅代表作者本人的观点,不代表美国国防部或海军部的立场和观点。

Fortune.com上发表的评论文章中表达的观点,仅代表作者本人的观点,不代表《财富》杂志的观点和立场。

译者:刘进龙

审校:汪皓

我加入海军部,是出于对公共服务、使命和同僚的信念。历经九年现役生涯(包括多次海外部署),我却在转任文职六个月后遭到解雇,我被解雇的原因并非工作失职,而是因为我用一首五行打油诗回应马斯克的新规。

自2月24日起,政府效率部要求联邦文职人员用五个要点,说明“上周工作内容”。3月17日“圣帕特里克节”当天,我以一首五行打油诗回复了第四轮邮件。当管理层将我们的工作简化成未加密、毫无意义的要点清单时,他们得到的自然是与任务分量相称的回应。随后我被以“行为失当”为由解雇,解聘函将这首打油诗作为唯一证据。

我的直属上司(我发给政府效率部的所有周报邮件都会抄送给上司)也对我被解雇措手不及。我被解雇前既没有谈话,我也没有收到负面绩效评估。整个指挥链曾多次肯定我的出色表现,称赞我是团队的宝贵资产。

被解雇次日的上午,我翻开祖父的《1935年值更官指南》,这是他1942年任海军军官时用过的书,他在书内着重划出了一段话:“申诉处理——需耐心倾听投诉;决定采取行动前应充分听取双方陈述。”

祖父与我曾怀抱报国之心加入海军,如今海军却正为迎合马斯克而屈膝,为了政治上的妥协而牺牲了其长期坚持的原则。这个标榜领导力与坚毅不拔精神的军事部门,目前的领导者因为屈从于马斯克而获得奖赏,却无视下属付出的代价或者忘了自己的使命。

我将人生与职业生涯奉献给海军。从斯坦福大学(Stanford)政治学专业毕业后,我加入海军成为一名情报官,九年现役后转入预备役。后来我赴哈佛肯尼迪学院(Harvard Kennedy School)深造,2024年5月获公共政策硕士学位,同年8月,我被海军部聘为文职人员。

履职六个月后,我仍处于试用期。试用期员工的身份让我既无工作保障,又无申诉权利。我的简历与服役经历不应该让我免予处分,但我之所以提及我的资质,只是为了说明联邦政府正在因为政府效率部失去人才与热忱。

马斯克在特朗普政府的非民选职位上的所作所为,令人目不暇接。通过华盛顿的大量新闻轰炸,我政府外的朋友们发现我们被要求提交工作要点的说法竟然是真实的,这令他们感到震惊。但这就是事实。这就是马斯克的目的——在美国民众中制造混乱,以便在无监督的环境下为所欲为。

关于这些周报要点,我的上司曾直言:“我们未收到任何反馈表明有人会阅读这些内容。”此外,我们被告知提交的要点必须简短,我们甚至收到了只有五个单词的回复示例。

近百万封国防文职人员的电子邮件发送到一个电子邮箱,存在极其严重的安全威胁。将看似未加密的信息汇总后,可能形成被加密的信息合集,因此我不会公开前两周的完整工作要点。

以下是导致我被解雇的邮件。(“复制者”是美国国防部部署数千自主系统的计划。)

致OSD公关主宰者们:

• 我统筹全局协调四方

• 确保计划周密周详

• 联动团队协作无间

• 力推“复制者”计划开展

• 疑惑要点何以无价值

此致

格雷斯

情报界(IC)文职人员可通过更高密级渠道提交工作总结。然而,我们这些处理机密信息却不属于情报机构的雇员,并未获得这种选择权。

海军部没有就如何提交五条非加密要点的要求提供书面指导,而是任由雇员在马斯克风暴中自生自灭。在被解雇的当天上午,我仍通过绝密渠道汇总发送团队本周行动,这是早在政府效率部的邮件令实施前便形成的惯例。我始终对问责制充满信心,并且我相信上级有必要了解下属的行动。

士气与团队精神是军队成功的核心。去问问任何一位老兵的服役经历,军旅生涯固然离不开牺牲,但更承载着故事、恶作剧与欢笑,让这段艰苦的生活可以忍受。曾有军人在陆海军对抗时偷山羊和骡子,在高层简报幻灯片中加入梗图,将身份证藏于天花板中。没错,我确实在这至暗时刻写了一首打油诗,但对于国防部官员而言,这并不算失格之举。

马斯克削减开支的做法荒诞不经。别误会,美国确实需要削减国防开支。向过时的系统与臃肿的项目投入大量资金,只会削弱而非增强国家安全。但政府效率部在海军部的“节流”举措,既无系统性也不够彻底。他们只是在解雇缺乏保障的雇员。甘愿为国牺牲一切的人,反而成了权宜之计的牺牲品。

我被解雇,只是因为我以最温和的方式表达了异议。但异议终究是异议。在这个奥威尔式时代,真相仍在暴政下窒息。

致联邦雇员:我懂你们。勿惧前行。永远无畏。

致马斯克与政府效率部:历史是无情的。为残存的荣誉弃船,为时未晚。非为己,乃为国。(财富中文网)

本文作者格雷斯·琼斯是一名美国海军退伍老兵、海军预备役少校,毕业于斯坦福大学和哈佛大学。

本文中表达的立场和观点仅代表作者本人的观点,不代表美国国防部或海军部的立场和观点。

Fortune.com上发表的评论文章中表达的观点,仅代表作者本人的观点,不代表《财富》杂志的观点和立场。

译者:刘进龙

审校:汪皓

I joined the Department of the Navy because I believed in public service, in the mission, and in the people. After serving nine years on Active Duty — including multiple deployments — I was fired six months into my civilian career, not for failing at my job, but for sending a limerick in response to Elon Musk’s new requirements.

Beginning on February 24, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has directed federal civilians to provide five bullets responding to the prompt, “What did you do last week?”. On March 17, I answered the fourth round of emails with five lines of rhyme – a limerick sent on St. Patrick’s Day. When leadership reduced our work to unclassified and meaningless bullet points, they got a response commensurate with the assignment. I was subsequently terminated for poor conduct; my termination letter cited the limerick as the only evidence.

My supervisor, who was cc’d on all of my weekly emails to DOGE, was blindsided by my termination too. I was fired without counseling. I had not received a negative performance review. My entire chain of command had stated repeatedly I was doing a great job and that I was an asset to the team.

The morning after I was fired, I opened my grandfather’s 1935 Watch Officer’s Guide which he had when he was a young Naval Officer in 1942, and in which he had underlined, “Complaints – In hearing complaints exercise patience; hear both sides of the story fully before deciding on action.”

The Navy that my grandfather and I joined in the spirit of service is currently buckling to Musk, sacrificing its long-held principles for the sake of political deference. A military department that ostensibly values leadership and fortitude is currently led by men rewarded for falling in line with Musk, heedless of the cost to their staff, or their mission.

I have given my life and career to the Navy. I graduated from Stanford with a degree in Political Science. I then joined the Navy as an intelligence officer. After my nine years on active duty, I transitioned to the Reserves. I went to Harvard Kennedy School, and graduated with my Master of Public Policy in May 2024. I was hired as a civilian by the Department of the Navy in August 2024.

Six months into the role, I still was a probationary employee. With this status I lacked job protection and the right to appeal, should I be fired. My resume and prior service shouldn’t make me immune to disciplinary action, I offer my qualifications simply as additional context to illustrate the talent and commitment that the federal government is losing because of DOGE.

It’s hard to keep track of everything Musk has done in his unelected role as part of the Trump administration. With the endless barrage of news coming from Washington, my friends outside of the government were shocked to learn that the request that we provide bullets was real. It was real. This is what Musk wants – to sow confusion amongst the American people so he can operate without oversight.

For those weekly bullets, I was told directly by my leadership: “We have not received any indication that these are being read.” Furthermore, we were told to keep the bullets short, and were given an example of one response that was only five words long.

The security threat posed by nearly 1 million DoD civilian emails going to a single email address is immense. Aggregating seemingly unclassified information can result in collected information that is classified – which is why I won’t publish my full bullets from the preceding two weeks.

Here’s the email I sent which led to my termination. (Replicator is the DoD initiative to field thousands of autonomous systems.)

OSD PR Overlords,

• I coordinated across the field,

• Ensured that our plans were well-heeled.

• I synced with the teams,

• Pushed Replicator schemes,

• And pondered why bullets won’t yield.

V/R,

Grace

Civilians in the intelligence community (IC) are allowed to submit their bullets via a higher classification. Those of us who work on classified information but outside of an IC organization, however, were not given that option.

The Department of the Navy provided no written guidance for fulfilling the requirement to provide five unclassified bullets. Instead, it left its employees to fend for themselves against Elon Musk. The morning I was fired, I compiled and sent my entire team’s actions for the week via top secret channels, a practice I had established long before the DOGE-mandated emails. I believe wholeheartedly in accountability and the need for a supervisor to be aware of an employee’s actions.

Morale and esprit de corps are core to the success of our military. Ask any veteran about their service, and–sure–it will be about sacrifice. But it will also be about the stories, the pranks, and the laughter that made it bearable. Service members have stolen goats and mules for the Army-Navy rivalry, snuck little memes into slides for senior briefings, and routinely hidden ID cards in the ceiling. Yes, I wrote a rhyme for levity during these dark times, but it was hardly conduct unbecoming of a defense official.

Musk’s approach to attempted spending cuts is preposterous. Don’t get me wrong, there does need to be a cut in defense spending. Pouring millions into outdated systems and bloated programs weakens—rather than strengthens—our national security. DOGE’s cost-cutting efforts in the department, however, have been neither systematic nor thorough. Rather, they are firing workers who lack protections. Workers willing to sacrifice everything for their country are instead being sacrificed for expediency.

I was fired because I dissented in the most minor of ways. It was dissent nonetheless. In these Orwellian times, the truth continues to be extinguished by tyranny.

To federal employees: I see you. Do not live in fear. Semper Fortis.

To Musk and DOGE: History will not be kind. There’s still time to jump ship in favor of whatever honor remains. Non sibi sed patriae.

Grace Jones is a U.S. Navy veteran, Lieutenant Commander in the U.S. Navy Reserves and a graduate of Stanford and Harvard.

The opinions and views expressed here belong solely to the author and do not reflect those of the Department of Defense (DoD) or the Department of the Navy.

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.

财富中文网所刊载内容之知识产权为财富媒体知识产权有限公司及/或相关权利人专属所有或持有。未经许可,禁止进行转载、摘编、复制及建立镜像等任何使用。
0条Plus
精彩评论
评论

撰写或查看更多评论

请打开财富Plus APP

前往打开