
美国正面临一场威胁社区结构的住房危机。从不断扩张的都市到偏远乡镇,飙升的房价与保障性住房供给不足,正在让美国家庭失去经济机遇,让基础工作从业者不得不远离最需要他们的地方。仅以缅因州为例,该州预计到2030年需新建84,000套住房才能满足需求——这正是全国性挑战的缩影。
危机的解决之道并不神秘。答案就在于创新、效率与重构住房建造方式、选址标准和服务对象的决心。由具有前瞻性的开发商推动的私营市场解决方案,能够化解这场危机,并重塑美国房地产市场的未来。
第一,我们需要更快速、更智能的建造方式。麦肯锡(McKinsey & Company)的一项研究发现,预制模块化建筑可将施工周期缩短20%至50%,并将建房成本降低多达20%。这些技术能有效缓解疫情后困扰建筑行业的劳动力成本压力。南卡罗来纳州的Vantem与缅因州的KBS Builders等公司已证明,预制模块化建筑既具有成本效益,又极具市场吸引力。
第二,我们需要更精致、更优质的住宅设计。从微型公寓到高效住宅,经过精心设计的小户型既能满足不同人口的需求,又可减少环境影响与居住成本。通过最大程度提高空间利用率、引入可持续技术、促进社区生活的创新设计,有望改变人们的城市与郊区生活体验。
第三,我们需要在适当的地区推进高密度开发。众多社区都受到限制建筑密度的区划法规的约束。通过调整区划政策允许高密度开发,特别是围绕交通枢纽区域,可以显著提升住房供给。明尼阿波利斯与奥斯汀等城市已证明,在传统低密度区域放宽独户住宅区划限制、允许开发多户住宅,可以在不改变社区特质的前提下释放数千套新房源。康涅狄格州在这方面同样取得了巨大进步。该州在2021年通过一项具有里程碑意义的法律,要求市政当局在公交枢纽与市中心周边允许开发高密度住房。
精准投放住房供给
政策制定者必须为大规模推行这些解决方案扫清障碍。简化审批流程可将工期缩短数月,降低最终转嫁给买家和租户的持有成本。包容性区划政策虽出于善意,却往往会推高整体成本并抑制私人投资。更有效的策略是通过容积率奖励、税收抵免与快速审批等机制激励人们的负担能力。供给增加自然会带来价格下降。
过去数十年间,全美各地存在漏洞的政策持续限制了房屋供给,人为制造短缺并推高房价。严苛的区划法规、冗长的审批流程与对高密度开发的抵触情绪,在住房需求最迫切的区域形成了建设瓶颈。
以宾夕法尼亚州州长乔什·夏皮罗成功重建费城I-95垮塌大桥为例。2023年6月发生严重火灾后,州政府通过精简流程与私营承包商协作,仅用12天便修复了这条交通动脉。既然宾夕法尼亚州能在两周内重建一座重要桥梁,为何马萨诸塞州审批一个多户住宅项目动辄需要五年以上?
解决美国住房危机不仅需要政策调整与施工技术创新,更需要范式转变——坚信通过专注力、执行力与协作精神,我们终能战胜最艰巨的挑战。从曼哈顿计划(Manhattan Project)到登月工程,再到灾后重建,这个国家从未在挑战面前退缩。住房危机也不例外,而我们需要做的仅仅是清除监管壁垒,允许私营市场建造民众迫切需要的住房。
这不是非红即蓝的党派之争,而是影响每个社区的重要议题。两党领袖都有机会推动改革,释放民间资本、简化流程、破除阻碍发展的陈旧桎梏。
蓬勃发展的私营住房市场将实现多方共赢。开发商能建造符合真实市场需求的高品质社区,并且有利可图。资本将随机遇而动,而且我们可以将资本与持久社会效益相结合。最重要的是,家庭、劳动者与社区将获得可负担的、充满活力的安居之所——这将提升经济流动性,巩固国家的社会结构。
美国的住房危机是代际挑战,更是历史机遇。开发商、政策制定者与投资者有机会摆脱早已失效的旧模式,执行简单的创新解决方案。利用恰当的工具与激励机制,私营市场必将为提供可负担、理想的、可持续的住房发挥核心作用。
这将关乎美国社区的未来。
本文作者贾斯汀·斯查尔现任工薪阶层住宅投资公司Acadia Capital Group的主理合伙人。(财富中文网)
译者:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
美国正面临一场威胁社区结构的住房危机。从不断扩张的都市到偏远乡镇,飙升的房价与保障性住房供给不足,正在让美国家庭失去经济机遇,让基础工作从业者不得不远离最需要他们的地方。仅以缅因州为例,该州预计到2030年需新建84,000套住房才能满足需求——这正是全国性挑战的缩影。
危机的解决之道并不神秘。答案就在于创新、效率与重构住房建造方式、选址标准和服务对象的决心。由具有前瞻性的开发商推动的私营市场解决方案,能够化解这场危机,并重塑美国房地产市场的未来。
第一,我们需要更快速、更智能的建造方式。麦肯锡(McKinsey & Company)的一项研究发现,预制模块化建筑可将施工周期缩短20%至50%,并将建房成本降低多达20%。这些技术能有效缓解疫情后困扰建筑行业的劳动力成本压力。南卡罗来纳州的Vantem与缅因州的KBS Builders等公司已证明,预制模块化建筑既具有成本效益,又极具市场吸引力。
第二,我们需要更精致、更优质的住宅设计。从微型公寓到高效住宅,经过精心设计的小户型既能满足不同人口的需求,又可减少环境影响与居住成本。通过最大程度提高空间利用率、引入可持续技术、促进社区生活的创新设计,有望改变人们的城市与郊区生活体验。
第三,我们需要在适当的地区推进高密度开发。众多社区都受到限制建筑密度的区划法规的约束。通过调整区划政策允许高密度开发,特别是围绕交通枢纽区域,可以显著提升住房供给。明尼阿波利斯与奥斯汀等城市已证明,在传统低密度区域放宽独户住宅区划限制、允许开发多户住宅,可以在不改变社区特质的前提下释放数千套新房源。康涅狄格州在这方面同样取得了巨大进步。该州在2021年通过一项具有里程碑意义的法律,要求市政当局在公交枢纽与市中心周边允许开发高密度住房。
精准投放住房供给
政策制定者必须为大规模推行这些解决方案扫清障碍。简化审批流程可将工期缩短数月,降低最终转嫁给买家和租户的持有成本。包容性区划政策虽出于善意,却往往会推高整体成本并抑制私人投资。更有效的策略是通过容积率奖励、税收抵免与快速审批等机制激励人们的负担能力。供给增加自然会带来价格下降。
过去数十年间,全美各地存在漏洞的政策持续限制了房屋供给,人为制造短缺并推高房价。严苛的区划法规、冗长的审批流程与对高密度开发的抵触情绪,在住房需求最迫切的区域形成了建设瓶颈。
以宾夕法尼亚州州长乔什·夏皮罗成功重建费城I-95垮塌大桥为例。2023年6月发生严重火灾后,州政府通过精简流程与私营承包商协作,仅用12天便修复了这条交通动脉。既然宾夕法尼亚州能在两周内重建一座重要桥梁,为何马萨诸塞州审批一个多户住宅项目动辄需要五年以上?
解决美国住房危机不仅需要政策调整与施工技术创新,更需要范式转变——坚信通过专注力、执行力与协作精神,我们终能战胜最艰巨的挑战。从曼哈顿计划(Manhattan Project)到登月工程,再到灾后重建,这个国家从未在挑战面前退缩。住房危机也不例外,而我们需要做的仅仅是清除监管壁垒,允许私营市场建造民众迫切需要的住房。
这不是非红即蓝的党派之争,而是影响每个社区的重要议题。两党领袖都有机会推动改革,释放民间资本、简化流程、破除阻碍发展的陈旧桎梏。
蓬勃发展的私营住房市场将实现多方共赢。开发商能建造符合真实市场需求的高品质社区,并且有利可图。资本将随机遇而动,而且我们可以将资本与持久社会效益相结合。最重要的是,家庭、劳动者与社区将获得可负担的、充满活力的安居之所——这将提升经济流动性,巩固国家的社会结构。
美国的住房危机是代际挑战,更是历史机遇。开发商、政策制定者与投资者有机会摆脱早已失效的旧模式,执行简单的创新解决方案。利用恰当的工具与激励机制,私营市场必将为提供可负担、理想的、可持续的住房发挥核心作用。
这将关乎美国社区的未来。
本文作者贾斯汀·斯查尔现任工薪阶层住宅投资公司Acadia Capital Group的主理合伙人。(财富中文网)
译者:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
America is facing a housing crisis that threatens the very fabric of our communities. From sprawling cities to rural towns, skyrocketing housing costs and a lack of affordable options are driving families away from economic opportunity and pushing essential workers farther from the places where they’re needed most. In Maine alone, the state estimates it needs 84,000 new housing units by 2030 to meet demand—a microcosm of a nationwide challenge.
The solution isn’t a mystery. It’s rooted in innovation, efficiency, and a willingness to rethink how we build, where we build, and for whom we build. A private market solution, driven by forward-thinking developers, can address this crisis and reshape the future of housing in America.
First, we need to build faster and smarter. Prefabricated and modular construction can reduce construction timelines by 20% to 50% and lower costs by up to 20%, according to a McKinsey & Company study. These methods mitigate labor costs that have plagued the construction industry post-pandemic. Companies like Vantem in South Carolina and KBS Builders in Maine prove that prefab and modular homes can be both cost-effective and highly appealing.
Second, we need to build smaller and better homes. Thoughtfully designed smaller units—from micro-apartments to efficient homes—can meet diverse population needs while reducing environmental impact and lowering costs. Innovative designs that maximize space, integrate sustainable technology, and promote community living can transform how people experience urban and suburban life.
Third, we need to build more densely in the right places. Many communities are bound by restrictive zoning laws that limit density. Modifying zoning to allow for higher-density development—particularly around transit corridors—can dramatically increase the supply of housing. Cities like Minneapolis and Austin have shown that reducing single-family zoning and allowing multifamily units in traditionally low-density areas can unlock thousands of new homes without altering neighborhood character. Connecticut is also making big strides in this direction. In 2021, the state passed a landmark law requiring municipalities to allow higher-density housing near transit stations and town centers.
Housing where it’s needed most
For these solutions to scale, policymakers need to clear the path. Streamlining permitting processes can shave months off project timelines and reduce carrying costs that ultimately get passed on to buyers and renters. Inclusionary zoning policies, while well-intentioned, almost always increase overall costs and deter private investment. A more effective approach would be to incentivize affordability through density bonuses, tax credits, and expedited approvals. Higher supply means lower prices.
Across the U.S. flawed policies have constrained housing supply for decades and artificially kept supply low and prices high. Restrictive zoning laws, lengthy permitting processes, and opposition to higher-density development have created bottlenecks that prevent housing from being built where it’s needed most.
Consider Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro’s success in rebuilding the collapsed I-95 bridge in Philadelphia. After a catastrophic fire in June 2023, Shapiro’s administration restored the critical stretch of highway in just 12 days by cutting through red tape and coordinating with private contractors. If Pennsylvania can rebuild a major bridge in less than two weeks, why does it routinely take five years or more to permit a multifamily housing project in Massachusetts?
Solving America’s housing crisis requires more than policy changes and construction techniques. It demands a paradigm shift—a belief that with focus, effort, and collaboration, we can solve even the most daunting challenges. From the Manhattan Project to landing on the moon, to rebuilding after natural disasters, this country has never backed down from a challenge. The housing crisis is no different, but here all we need to do is streamline regulatory hurdles and empower the private market to build the homes Americans desperately need.
This is not a red or blue issue—it’s a purple issue affecting every community. Leaders in both parties have an opportunity to champion reforms that unlock private capital, streamline processes, and remove outdated barriers that stifle development.
A thriving private market approach to housing is a win-win for everyone. Developers can build profitable, high-quality communities that meet real market demand. Investment follows opportunity, and we can align capital with lasting social impact. Most importantly, families, workers, and communities gain access to affordable, vibrant places to live—enhancing economic mobility and strengthening the social fabric of our nation.
America’s housing crisis is a generational challenge—but it’s also an opportunity. Developers, policymakers, and investors have an opportunity to drive simple but innovative solutions that break free from outdated formulas that don’t deliver. The private market, empowered with the right tools and incentives, can lead the charge in delivering housing that is affordable, desirable, and sustainable.
The future of America’s communities depends on it.
Justin Schair is the managing partner of Acadia Capital Group, an investment firm specializing in workforce housing.