订阅

多平台阅读

微信订阅

杂志

申请纸刊赠阅

订阅每日电邮

移动应用

专栏 - 向Anne提问

办公室恋情到底关不关老板的事

Anne Fisher 2013年06月13日

Anne Fisher为《财富》杂志《向Anne提问》的专栏作者,这个职场专栏始于1996年,帮助读者适应经济的兴衰起落、行业转换,以及工作中面临的各种困惑。
公司要求彼此约会的同事签署“丘比特协议”,并不是因为公司要多管闲事,而是为了避免吃官司。因为自从千禧一代进入职场之后,办公室里的感情状态已经变得前所未有的开放与混乱,由此给管理层带来的挑战也层出不穷。

    在有些企业文化中,办公室恋情或许能有积极的影响。但坎贝尔认为:“公司与公司之间差别很大。在有些公司文化中,有一半员工正在与另外一半员工约会,或已经结成夫妻,所以办公室恋情不是问题——至少现在还不是问题。”但在其他许多公司当中,办公室恋情遭到强烈反对,甚至被严令禁止。

    整个千禧一代中,认为与上司约会不是什么问题的人所占的比例是其他所有年龄段的三倍以上,而且Workplace Options的研究发现:40%的千禧一代愿意与老板发生关系,而更年长的员工中,这一比例仅有12%。这对于雇主(和他们的律师)来说可绝对不是好兆头。

    坎贝尔说:“如果关系中的一方与另一方是上下级,它会产生许多潜在的责任。其中的一个担忧是,两人关系之外的其他人该怎么办?雇主必须确保,不会出现任何被感知的或实际发生的偏袒,”比如老板的情人能得到比其他人更好的差事。

    这也是许多公司不得不棒打鸳鸯散的主要原因。许多公司会将其中一人调往不同的部门,如果这种办法行不通,则会要求其中一人辞职。坎贝尔称:“这是最好的做法,虽然不是法律规定。这样确实能够将公司的法律责任降到最低。”

    她补充道,如果是上司和下属发生关系,丘比特协议中声明这种关系是自愿的条款就变得尤为重要,因为从法律角度:“这个条款从一开始就明确了没有发生存在补偿条件的性骚扰。”所谓的补偿条件,比如有上司对下属说:“跟我上床,我就给你涨工资。”

    当然,这并不适合你和你男朋友——但我敢打赌,这个话题比你想象的更加复杂。考虑到美好的办公室恋情最后可能变得异常丑陋,昔日恋人甚至可能对簿公堂,签署一份丘比特协议也就没什么大惊小怪的了。

    反馈:你是否曾与同事或上司发生过关系?如果有,这种关系对你的工作或职业造成了什么影响(如果有影响的话)?欢迎评论。(财富中文网)

    译者:刘进龙/汪皓

    In some corporate cultures, that may be true. "It really varies a lot from one company to another," Campbell observes. "In some cultures, half the employees are dating, or married to, the other half and it's not a problem -- at least not yet." In many other companies, though, office romances are strongly discouraged, or even prohibited.

    Especially ominous for employers (and their lawyers) is that, as a group, the millennial generation is more than three times more likely to see no problem with dating their supervisors than all other age groups combined, the Workplace Options study notes: 40% of millennials would get involved with a boss, versus just 12% of older employees.

    "There is a lot of potential liability if one party in a relationship reports to the other," Campbell says. "One concern is, what about the people who are not in the relationship? Employers are responsible for making sure there is no perceived, or actual, favoritism" -- where, for example, the boss' sweetie gets better assignments than everybody else.

    It's a big reason why some companies have a policy of separating the lovebirds, either by moving one of them to a different part of the firm or, if that's not possible, asking one or the other to resign. "That's a best practice, not a legal requirement," Campbell notes. "But it does minimize the company's legal liability."

    When a supervisor and a subordinate are involved with each other, she adds, the part of the cupid contract that says the romance is voluntary is especially important, from a legal point of view: "It establishes from the outset that there is no quid pro quo sexual harassment taking place." That's the kind where a boss tells an underling, for example, "You can have a raise if you sleep with me."

    Of course, that doesn't apply to you and your boyfriend -- but I bet this whole subject is a bigger can of worms than you suspected. Considering all the various ways that office romances can turn ugly and litigious, having to sign a cupid contract might not seem so strange.

    Talkback: Have you ever been involved with a coworker, or a boss? If so, what effect (if any) did it have on your job, or your career? Leave a comment below.

上一页 1 2

我来点评

  最新文章

最新文章:

中国煤业大迁徙

500强情报中心

财富专栏